User talk:Khampalak

July 2007

Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles, as you did to Bactria. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Aside from whatever dispute you are having with the article, DO NOT remove or alter links to associated language wiki's. Trusilver 02:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Request for Comment: Hotaki dynasty origin and ethnicity

The RFC on the origin and ethnicity of the founder of the Hotaki dynasty are being conducted on the Hotaki dynasty talk page, as that is where a lot of the discussion of this issue has appeared. Parties include Anoshirawan and User:Mirrori1. --Bejnar 16:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Disruptive behaviour

When there are Wikipedia editors who are deliberately, albeit intelligently, attempting to establish a particular point of view and eliminate all others, the best one can do as an editor is to document there misguided efforts on the various talk pages. There is no need to revert their incorrect edits every day. Placing (new) evidence on the article talk page is a good way to establish the incorrectness of their edits. When they keep restoring problem text, RFC is a good choice. Lets see how the one above works. Remember to keep all comments objective, and to ignore personal jibs. --Bejnar 17:20, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

You have a very good point. I will definitely change my approach accordingly. Thanks. --Khampalak 17:22, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

RFC protocol

Please remove your last edit from the Hotaki RFC. The comment area is not a place for participants to place comments. Disputants are entitled to a summary, which you provided. The comment area is for others, who are not original disputants, to comment. The RFC is not a place for us to continue the dispute, it is asking other editors for there comments and wisdom. --Bejnar 17:05, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Oops. Sorry. It's more first time participtaing in an RFC. --Khampalak 18:50, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

re: Muhammad Zahir Shah

I think you could use some of your own advice and stop trying to revise history. Everyone who lived in Afghanistan knows that Zahir Shah just like his father was an ethno-fascist. Just because you are from his family doesn't mean you need to cover this up. Regardless, its sourced right there and as long as that source is there that line cannot be removed. --Behnam 19:59, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Calm down. You need to bottle up that energy and use it for something useful and decent. I'm sorry to say that isn't happening right now. --Khampalak 20:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Brother

it's not worth it to try to dispute with someone who is enemy of afghanistan. you should realize that there are many admininstrators who also view afghanistan as an enemy because of what happened after 9-11 and so on. this affects everything here, my friendly advice to you is to let these vandals write whatever they want. searching for trustful sources, reading and learning is the best fun. however, disputing with these people is the worst thing, it will create tension and make you very frustrated, and that is what they want you to be. i can see that you sound like a very intelligent person so don't force people to learn if they don't wanna learn. i say, let people remain stupid if that is what they want. i know these vandals from another place online, they are pure racist group, anti-afghanistan, anti-afghan, anti-pashtun, anti-karzai, anti-government of afghanistan. they are religiously "shias", one of them is crippled who rides in a wheel chair, his dad was killed in afghanistan in tha past and he is using that against afghanistan. since that one is crippled, he has nothing else in life but to stay home all the time and falsify afghanistan related articles as a way to take his personal revenge for his father.Mirrori1 22:29, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

No personal attacks

Khampalak, a post on WP:ANI has brought to administrative attention that you have been posting serious personal attacks (such as your talk page edits here and here. Referring to editors as dogs or people who are enemies/hate Afghanistan is not acceptable. Please comment on content not contributors. Such behavior may result in blocks of your account.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 18:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)