User talk:Rafff18

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Hello! The Pro Wrestling Collaboration of the Week for October 21 - October 27 is Hulk Hogan. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, October 28. Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! | Nominate an article that could be greatly improved! You are receiving this notification because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. If you no longer wish to receive this notice, then please add your name to this list.

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Hello! The Pro Wrestling Collaboration of the Week for October 28 - November 3 is Bobby Eaton . Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, October 28. Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! | Nominate an article that could be greatly improved! You are receiving this notification because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. If you no longer wish to receive this notice, then please add your name to this list.

Delivered on 22:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC) by MiszaBot

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Hello! The Pro Wrestling Collaboration of the Week for November 4 - November 10 is Adam Copeland. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, November 11. Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! | Nominate an article that could be greatly improved! You are receiving this notification because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. If you no longer wish to receive this notice, then please add your name to this list.

Delivered on 12:12, 4 November 2007 (UTC) by MiszaBot

Blocked

I blocked you for 24 hours for a WP:3RR violation in Montreal Screwjob. Thanks This is a Secret ^account 04:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rafff18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello this is user:Rafff18 I was indefinitely blocked by administrator user:Secret for edits I made on the Montreal screwjob article. A friend of mine had re-added information in the article about Bret Hart's demands that I had originally put in almost two years ago, because the article lacked any mention of it and made it sound like the wwf decided to let him out of his contract for purely financial reasons. The information was originally removed during massive re-writes of this article by User:Rama's Arrow this past February. Yesterday I got into a small editing war with User:Bmg916 and User:Jeffrey O. Gustafsonhowever neither of them would respond to my talk page post and without warning User:Secret blocked me for 24 hours. Later my friend tried to re-add the information and he sighted more sources, he was accused of being a sock puppet and his additions with the added sources were also deleted. When I came home today I discovered that secret had, without warning, banned me indefinitely. While this might be a new account I have been an anonymous editor for almost two years at IP addresses like 71.52.210.253 and 216.162.144.26 among others and have a record of good edits please do not block me

Decline reason:

Your request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
• Click edit this page on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
• Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = Article title =)
• Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article.
• When are you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
  • If we are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. — Chris 08:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

please unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rafff18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What history of vandalism. I have never vandalized an article and have won the majority of my editing wars. It seems like I was banned because secret did not like what Jacques Rougeau said about Bret Hart. All the reasons he gave for the band were false, he never warned me or contacted me at all, I was not socking, and I have provided several useful edits. I attempted to resolve the editing war on the talk page but they refused to engage me and just reverted my edits, accused a friend of mine of being a sock puppet and blocked me without discussion. I want to know why I was blocked and hope that it was more significant then a small editing war, because there are several people who make more disruptive edits, like the person that originally told him to band me Scorpion0422. Sorry about reusing this template but because secret blocked everything including my e-mail this is the only way I can contact administrators, could you please unblock me.

Decline reason:

The request above tells you what you need to do to show you are ready to be unblocked; you don't appear to have done it. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not going to unblock you yet however I have unprotected your talk page so that you can prove to me that you will edit constructively, please follow the instructions I gave you in your first unblock template. --Chris 10:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

i did what you asked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rafff18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

thank you user:Cris G, what follows is what I originaly posted last week before User:Jeffrey O. Gustafson proved that he didn't read WP:ACM, by deleating and blocking my talk page. I did what you asked and made several improvements to the article Playpen (fictional magazine). Using research I originally did for the Tommy Westphall Multiverse I was able to add shows episodes and references. Could you please unblock me now.

Decline reason:

No. When you read up on our core guidelines did you read the ones on original research and reliable sources? This is as OR as it gets and is sourced from a blog. This is not very convincing at all. Please feel free to try again after you have put some effort into it. — Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

help me

{{helpme|I thought that episodes of tv shows were exceptable primary sources for information about theme becouse you can easily watch the show and see the magazine yourself. Also eventhou I did link to a blog i think it falls under [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published and questionable sources in articles about themselves]]. Please help me and tell me were I am wrong. I want to be allowed to edit wikipedia again.}}

First of all, there are no original research allowed. Secondly, all claims have to be verifiable. And, lastly, you musn't introduce spam links to Wikipedia. You, can however, look at where your magazine is published, visit its website, and look for the refs. -Goodshoped 03:38, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

{{helpme}}

You are free to read Wikipedia:Appealing a block but your unblock request has already been declined. Please do not add the help template anymore, as it is disruptive. - Rjd0060 (talk) 05:30, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

playpen

Playpen is a fictional pornographic magazine often depicted or mentioned in television programs, films and other media. The name is presumably a contraction of Playboy and Penthouse. The earliest know appearance of the magazine was on the early 60's sitcom That Girl. Several times the same prop magazine will be used on different shows [[1]]

Appearances in television shows

• 3rd Rock from the Sun ("Indecent Dick")
• That '70s Show("Hyde's Father")
• 8 Simple Rules
• Ally McBeal ("Body Language")
• CSI: Crime Scene Investigation ("Gentle, Gentle")
• Family Guy("Running Mates")
• In Case of Emergency("Pilot")
• Grosse Pointe("Barenaked in America")
• Homicide: Life On The Street
• Kyle XY ("Diving In")
• Lost ("Flashes Before Your Eyes")
• Magnum PI ("Faith and Begorrah")
• Malcolm in the Middle ("Bomb Shelter")
• Married... with Children("Just a Little Off the Top")
• Medium("When Push Comes to Shove (2)")
• Millennium ("Jose Chung's Doomsday Defense")
• Pacific Blue ("Seduced")
• The Partridge Family
• Renegade ("Sex, Lies and Activewear")
• Rules of Engagement("Kids")
• Salute Your Shorts ("The Radio Call-In Contest")
• Scrubs ("My Dirty Secret")
• That Girl ("I Ain't Got Nobody")
• The X-Files ("Dreamland II")

Appearances in films

• 8 Heads in a Duffel Bag
• Black Sheep
• Dinosaur Island
• Jackie's Back! (TV movie)
• Test Tube Teens from the Year 2000

references

http://toobworld.blogspot.com/2006/07/crossover-of-week.html