Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Hu12 (talk | contribs)
91,877 edits
Adsense 4555642371987085
Line 635: Line 635:
::'''Accounts'''<br>
::'''Accounts'''<br>
{{vandal|Thedietfriend}}<br>--[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] ([[User talk:Hu12|talk]]) 21:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
{{vandal|Thedietfriend}}<br>--[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] ([[User talk:Hu12|talk]]) 21:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

==Adsense 4555642371987085==
Adsense pub-4555642371987085
*{{spamlink|myiptelephony.com}}
*{{spamlink|az-voipproviders.com}}
;Accounts
*{{userlinks|213.251.192.51}}
:Not much to this. The editor added two different links to to different articles on the same day which use the same Adsense number. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 22:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:27, 10 December 2007


Shortcut


Archive

Archives

List of archives (with sections)

ifood.tv

I've noticed links to ifood.tv popping up here and there. In most cases, by spot checking, I found the links added by IP users mapping to India. (Look for 122. IPs). I'm not entirely convinced that this is spam ... well ... it's spam, but it's borderline useful content as opposed to merely being a link aggregator or trying to push a commercial product. Maybe I'll be more dogmatic tomorrow, but I thought I would post it here first to see if anyone has a strong opinion one way or the other on removing the links. --B 02:33, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's monitor how it gets used. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:00, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dirk - did this get monitored? There doesn't seem to be a COIBot report, but a link was added on October 24 2007 ([1]). -- SiobhanHansa 16:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Curious, the bot missed that one. Maybe the bot was down at the moment...
Let's try again. --Dirk Beetstra T C 17:14, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tao-te-king.org

"tips" spam

Domains:

UserID's:

Indian poetry spam

Spam pages
Sites spammed
Spammers

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obaid Azam Azmi. MER-C 12:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Still spamming. MER-C 11:29, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Spamming and article recreation continuing soon after AfD closed and three articles deleted. ~Matticus UC 11:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If they return, it's blacklist material. Azmi was salted, so we won't be seeing vanispamcruftisement there again. MER-C 12:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed --Herby talk thyme 12:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obaid Azam Azmi was reposted again today (and got salted). Requesting blacklisting. MER-C 06:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Done--Hu12 (talk) 06:30, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.netglimse.com

netglimse.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

Returning spammer. MER-C 09:04, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At it again. MER-C 11:41, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And blocked, BL if they come back, cheers --Herby talk thyme 11:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

skin-disease-pictures.blogspot.com

Spamming from multiple IP addresses:

Articles

Herpes zoster, Athlete's foot, Mange, Candida (genus), genital wart, hemorrhoid, meningitis

Sites

Accounts

Han-Kwang (t) 07:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More IPs (4 Dec 2007):

More IPs (6 Dec 2007)

note, adsense pub-2443190406311786 --Hu12 11:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It does tend to strengthen the idea of blacklisting blogspot maybe --Herby talk thyme 13:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pre-emptive strike:
As COIBot only picks up the ones reported here, and the ones which get added with an (apparent) conflict of interest, let's monitor them all, as I expect that most are inappropriate. --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added a couple more IPs. It seems to be large /16 blocks; IP blocking is not feasible. Semiprotecting these articles is probably best. Han-Kwang (t) 12:49, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Enough I think, blacklisted & will come back & log shortly, thanks --Herby talk thyme 13:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to make a difference, but I forgot one: http://spam. wartpictures.blogspot.com/ - can you add that one too? These articles are on my watchlist, but I wonder how many other articles they spammed. If he didn't use the same IP to spam multiple articles he might stay under the radar. Han-Kwang (t) 09:14, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

famousamericans.net, Act II - Scene 3

These are all domains related to famousamericans.net, adding them here so they get monitored by lwcoibot. There have been ongoing issues concerning verbatim copying of data from this source, and the addition of links to many articles. (original report is here.


Ok, this is getting old - it's looking more and more like COI.. and there is a new sock in town: Pputter (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) --Versageek 04:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
See our article on the site's owner: Stanley L. Klos as well as the talk page discussion
Also see this list of 241 related domains. —Preceding unsigned comment added by A. B. (talk • contribs) 17:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well this is interesting: over 400 articles are internally linked to the Stanley L. Klos article. --A. B. (talk) 17:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pputter sure has been busy today..ugh--Hu12 (talk) 17:34, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, plus these are often added to references - or to completely the wrong guy [2]. I hope all these are getting zapped. Johnbod (talk) 17:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See this discussion:

--A. B. (talk) 18:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another Related Domain - selling books as well..
In addition, it has been confirmed by CheckUser, that the three named accounts (Cedarkey1, Pputter, Damslerset) on the WP:AN thread above, as well as a fourth account Solknats (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) are related. If you look at Special:Contributions/Solknats he clearly identifies himself by first & last name, although the last name has been removed from the current version of his userpage. --Versageek 21:33, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.balkantravellers.com

balkantravellers.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

MER-C 10:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


More blogspot spam

Simple paragraphs of basic information coated with google ads, spammed to multiple articles (Credit score, Credit derivative, Credit card fraud‎, Credit default swap, Credit freeze‎,Security Freeze) from rotating IP. Added to blacklist preventively. Kuru talk 13:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC) credit-free-report.blogspot.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com[reply]

Template help

Could someone with a little time and knowledge of templates work out why all the IP pages for deletion are being listed at a PR7 page here Category:Wikipedia_administration and get rid of them. There is a nasty little play here but WP:Beans --BozMo talk 10:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.intellectbooks.co.uk

intellectbooks.co.uk: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

MER-C 10:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC)\[reply]

FYI

Thought a few here would be interested in Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/A. B.. --Hu12 15:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.tetcos.com

Tetcos

See also - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tetcos
Accounts

Haffner (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Waldstein (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Pranav v (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
59.92.146.210 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
--Hu12 15:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

megadry.com

I have spotted some spamming activity on behalf of megadry.com where user Whynotthestars has been adding links to this site, as has Hyperhidrosis. Hyperhidrosis has also removed a link to a non profit organisation that works in the same field.

Accounts

Hyperhidrosis (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Whynotthestars (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
--Matt Beard 16:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Add to monitorlist of COIBot. --Dirk Beetstra T C 16:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On the verge of BL here, probably should go on if they are still at it --Herby talk thyme 16:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The link is, for as far as the bots have picked it up, only be used by the above accounts, and by an IP:
--Dirk Beetstra T C 17:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The following IP address also seems to be involved:
--Matt Beard (talk) 11:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
User Whynotthestars is still acting in a way that I believe is unhelpful. On 19:21, 4 December 2007 he returned to the Sleep_hyperhidrosis page and again removed a link to a non-profit organisation that is dedicated to this field. I think this may be a case of trying to reduce exposure of alternative sites to the one that he has been spamming. He earlier replaced the link to this non-profit with a spam-link to megadry and this action was regarded by Voyagerfan5761 as vandalism.
--Matt Beard (talk) 10:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

carmun.com

See also - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmun.com

Carmun.com

Accounts

Teeveegal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
DarbyShaw123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Aweissny (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
207.172.220.46 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Coreyj749 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
--Hu12 18:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Continued spamming and Carmun is not a reliable or useful source, BL'd--Hu12 (talk) 19:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Public-access television

This may be a bit off-topic here. The last half of the public-access television article is a large directory of external links to various stations. It ends with about a screenfull of what appears to be indiscriminate links. The page "owner" seems to want to protect things as they are (and is a founder of one or more of the stations listed), but I haven't pushed too hard. How do other editors perceive this article with respect to various linking policies? Burlywood 21:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From taking a quick look, that last half of the article seems to clearly fall under WP:NOT#REPOSITORY and WP:NOT#DIRECTORY per official policy. If the individual is connected with the stations then there may be a conflict of interest, and certainly WP:OWN, if there are claims of ownership being made. I think your concerns are quite valid. Seems there is much work to be done to make it more encyclopedic.--Hu12 (talk) 22:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have followed up on Hu12's tagging, I have removed all external links, mainly per the two cited parts of the WP:NOT policy, I removed all because all seem to fail WP:EL. Any attempt at reversion is a clear policy violation, and deserves a firm (final?) warning. --Dirk Beetstra T C 22:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A classic Spam Event Horizon--Hu12 (talk) 00:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I notice the article in its present state is unreferenced, and one or two of the deleted links might possibly be useful as references. I'm not sure about the list of stations; if we deleted that, we should at least link to a suitable external source for such a list. DGG (talk) 04:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
External links != references. If they are needed, they can be pulled from the article history. There is no need to link directly to the radio/tv stations, or they could e.g. be included in a [[list of radio stations by <your company name here>]] (or a category), where wiki-links to the articles of the radio stations are collected. We are not a directory. --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why does the wikilink not work? --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dirk, I am not disagreeing, except that a usable ref can sometimes be found in something originally presented as an external link. DGG (talk) 22:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting:

This IP added one external link to the document (using two edits; diff). The page linked to:

contains the complete list of deleted links as it was in the wikipedia article a couple of days ago. Above the page the text:

Submitted by wccatv on December 6, 2007 - 9:31am.

Please e-mail us with updates to this page. Information originally appeared at Wikipedia.

User reverted, and I left a spam4im. If this persists, maybe semi-protect the page? --Dirk Beetstra T C 14:35, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adsense SEO Spamming

Adsense pub-9758089254015021

Accounts

Shekharsuman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
121.247.90.57 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Obvious long term Self promotion for his/her Adsense sites. Excessive ads on pages. All contribution except a few are linking addditions to one or more of his sites. Cute, moving Url to the top[3] for better positioning..--Hu12 (talk) 18:18, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need additional opinions for spam/coi case

Adsense pub-7967368692755879

Accounts
This was just a simple spam/coi case. I removed the links and gave the editor a uw-coi notice along with links to to WP:EL, WP:SPAM, and WP:NOT#LINK. Then another editor got involved, reverting my link removals, questioning if they are actually spam. I started a discussion Talk:Qualitative_research#Stustu12.27s_external_links, which has only escalated, as has my initial notice User_talk:Stustu12#Conflict_of_interest. See also User_talk:Stustu12#.22Controversy.22 and Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#User:Stustu12. --Ronz (talk) 00:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Some editors wanted me to list the times I explained what I meant by spam:
--Ronz (talk) 02:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've left a comment at Qualitative research. . I consider the link to be spam. DGG (talk) 20:08, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Accounts

122.162.157.143 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
122.162.132.6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 06:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.lulu.com

Lulu (publisher)

Publish, sell, connect...Any reason for these links?--Hu12 (talk) 07:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Already for a long time on COIBot' list. Just a few users:

...

--Dirk Beetstra T C 08:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two more Sps2007 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), South pole santa (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). All the links that exist are selling product or fail WP:RS being self published..yuck--Hu12 (talk) 08:08, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

spam.videopopcorn.com

Previous incidents
Sites spammed
Spammers

MER-C 11:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Still spamming. Blacklisting requested. MER-C 08:47, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.arc.org.uk

Arthritis Research Campaign

Accounts

Arcinfo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
213.83.109.90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) →Arthritis Research Campaign IP
Registered Charity No. 207711--Hu12 (talk) 16:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I consider these links acceptable links to informative pages on the web site of a major non-profit, s an uninvolveded ed. who sometimes works on medical articles, I will reinsert them if they are removed. A good modest job of providing information appropriately to the encyclopedia. The user block is about to expire, so there is no point in contesting it. I consider it very ill-advised. DGG (talk) 06:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.pokerbot-pro.com

99.231.18.247 has added the external link pokerbot-pro.com in the Computer poker players article time and again. And argues that because similar pokerbot programs are listed in the article that he/she should be able to add the spam on my talk page [4] I'm not about to get into that type of argument or engage in a revert-war. I have informed the user of this listing.

Sites spammed
Spammer

▪◦▪≡ЅiREX≡Talk 18:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming of http://spam.artchestra.com

Artchestra LLC

Accounts

76.211.225.165 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
76.192.50.223 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
76.211.224.251 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 07:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phishing site on Gaia Online

Posting this here to have a permanent record of watching the links:

One of the pages on this site, h1.ripway.com/gaiaoline/Login.html contains a phishing site which has been added a couple of times to Gaia Online (to catch the login process).

  1. 2007-12-07 05:26:32: User en:89.114.112.124 (talk - contribs) to en:Gaia Online (diff). Links: h1.ripway.com/gaiaoline/Login.html.
  2. 2007-12-07 04:51:08: User en:75.165.126.211 (talk - contribs) to en:Gaia Online (diff). Links: h1.ripway.com/kingme/Login.html.
  3. 2007-12-07 00:32:08: User en:75.165.126.211 (talk - contribs) to en:Gaia Online (diff). Links: h1.ripway.com/kingme/Login.html.
  4. 2007-12-05 14:50:43: User en:164.116.250.39 (talk - contribs) to en:Gaia Online (diff). Links: h1.ripway.com/kingme/Login.html.
  5. 2007-12-03 15:22:10: User en:164.116.246.128 (talk - contribs) to en:Gaia Online (diff). Links: h1.ripway.com/kingme/Login.html.

--Dirk Beetstra T C 10:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gift spam

Sites spammed

http://spam.best-german-gifts.com

http://spam.best-italian-gifts.com

http://spam.successful-diet-cabbage-soup.com

http://spam.all-slovenia-holidays.com

Spammers

MER-C 11:33, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Worldwide Business Research (WBR)

See also - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldwide Business Research
See also - Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Worldwide_Business_Research

Worldwide Business Research
TradeTech

Accounts

Brittenstreet (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
208.49.200.24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
38.112.44.252 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Performance Systems International Inc.
Jobance (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Jennyzhang (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 19:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am a little confused here, as i can not see any substantial number of articles the accounts listed have tried to spam. DGG (talk) 06:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Juicy spam

Hi, all. If this isn't the right place for this... I'd be happy to take it where it belongs. I have been removing some spam (and leaving some spam that I wasn't sure about) from the external links section of Juicer. Now I have a user with one edit asking me why I deleted his links and left other spammy links in there (on my talk page). Could someone please check out the external links section of Juicer and give me an honest take on the links there? I'm not sure which (if any) are salvageable. If you go through the history, you should see pretty quick what has been going on. Thanks. -- Swerdnaneb 22:02, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the links and left a note at the talk page of the IP-address. /SvNH 06:47, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help. Nice to have a second set of eyes sometimes. -- Swerdnaneb 18:15, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indian watch online site back

Cleaned funarulez.com from a number of articles. Apparently Spambot has an old variant of this site (\bfunarule\.com) - see User talk:Fun4Guy. Other editors:

Jackollie (talk) 07:23, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.new-insurancetips.com http://spam.new-fishingtips.com

Adsense pub-3194289089925156

Spammers

6 accounts, 9 spamlink additions. There's something very fishy about this, but any attempt at an investigation comes to a dead end, which makes me think there's more spam out there. See also Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Claudia Spatar. MER-C 11:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Potential Investigative Tools

User A. B. has suggested I repeat an offer I made to him here, so I am reposting my original message:

With ref to your AN post, I have no idea if it will help but I have two possibly relevant tools I can offer.
One - wpW5 - will search article history and tell you when a piece of text (ie. a link) was added and who added it. It takes about 30 seconds in "quick" mode.
The other - lkScan - will search a user's entire contribs and compile every web link they've added to any article and put them into a sortable format.
Maybe these could help you figure out the whole scope of the problem? Let me know if you think they could help. Franamax (talk) 02:49, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The tools are described a little more fully on my user page. Franamax (talk) 02:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

where can we get these tools? βcommand 02:42, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I would have to email them at the moment, renamed from exe to xxx to get past gmail. Let me know if you want copies. Franamax (talk) 02:49, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
sure, use the e-mail listed at the top of my userpage. βcommand 02:51, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Files sent direct from my gmail account. Of course, since you're in Micronesia I assume they will take 2 weeks to get there by boat:) Franamax (talk) 03:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
where did Micronesia come from? βcommand 03:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
TLD of your email address? Ha, maybe I sent them to someone completely different! Franamax (talk) 03:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
that is just my host not where I live :) βcommand 03:36, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And that is a "straight line" in the comedic sense if I ever heard one! Must - suppress - sarcastic - rejoinder ;) Franamax (talk) 03:42, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ohh, I want this. I'll shot you an e-mail request. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 20:36, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.wapsana.com

Adsense pub-5053626743608312
Adsense pub-8326712429072318

Accounts

Wapsana (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 03:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adsense Reference spammer

Adsense pub-8371900312485223

Accounts

Amosjo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Govontario (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
spams references to related Adsense pub--Hu12 (talk) 04:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.gregrian.com

Adsense pub-2259683912738534

Accounts

Code00 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Gregrian (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
71.143.1.162 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
67.169.199.249 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
65.91.114.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
143.183.121.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
71.9.107.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
71.197.64.26 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
68.198.27.89 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 06:50, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.microstockdiaries.com

Adsense pub-4294503212334863

Accounts

Leetorrens (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
86.161.59.57 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 06:57, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.toonopedia.com

Previous incidents

toonopedia.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

Returning spam-only IP, please block. MER-C 09:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.discoverhongkong.com

discoverhongkong.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

MER-C 09:46, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thedietfriend

Adsense pub-5670141598159530
Adsense pub-8424308052810939

Accounts

Thedietfriend (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
--Hu12 (talk) 21:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adsense 4555642371987085

Adsense pub-4555642371987085

Accounts
Not much to this. The editor added two different links to to different articles on the same day which use the same Adsense number. --Ronz (talk) 22:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam&oldid=177080699"