Jump to content

User talk:ViperNerd: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on University of South Carolina steroid scandal. TW
Line 23: Line 23:


When using them, please [[WP:SUBST|substitute them]]. You may want to try them in the [[WP:SAND|sandbox]]. If a user vandalizes after a last warning, please report him/here [[WP:AIV|here]]. Also, please do not edit warnings left by bots. Thanks. [[User:JetLover|JetLover]] ([[User talk:JetLover|talk]]) ([[User:JetLover/False reverts|Report a mistake]]) 05:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
When using them, please [[WP:SUBST|substitute them]]. You may want to try them in the [[WP:SAND|sandbox]]. If a user vandalizes after a last warning, please report him/here [[WP:AIV|here]]. Also, please do not edit warnings left by bots. Thanks. [[User:JetLover|JetLover]] ([[User talk:JetLover|talk]]) ([[User:JetLover/False reverts|Report a mistake]]) 05:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

== January 2008 ==
{{{icon|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:University of South Carolina steroid scandal|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:University of South Carolina steroid scandal]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''/'' [[User:Edgarde|edg]]<small> [[User_talk:Edgarde|☺]] [[Special:Contributions/Edgarde|☭]]</small> 03:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:14, 21 January 2008

Welcome

Welcome!

Hi ViperNerd! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

Can you change User:ViperNerd#My Creations to User:ViperNerd#My Contributions. This would be more appropriate being you are not original author of the article. Thank you, Igor Berger (talk) 13:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, really? Then please tell me who wrote it?ViperNerd (talk) 13:41, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry I am looking at this article University_of_South_Carolina_steroid_scandal&action=history Igor Berger (talk) 13:48, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thanks for warning this user, but it is encouraged that one does not insult vandals. Also, you may want to use the following warning templates:

{{uw-v1}}

{{uw-v2}}

{{uw-v3}}

{{uw-v4}}

{{uw-v4im}}

When using them, please substitute them. You may want to try them in the sandbox. If a user vandalizes after a last warning, please report him/here here. Also, please do not edit warnings left by bots. Thanks. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 05:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on University of South Carolina steroid scandal. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. / edg 03:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]