User talk:ViperNerd: Difference between revisions
→User talk:71.12.13.137: new section |
Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on University of South Carolina steroid scandal. TW |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
When using them, please [[WP:SUBST|substitute them]]. You may want to try them in the [[WP:SAND|sandbox]]. If a user vandalizes after a last warning, please report him/here [[WP:AIV|here]]. Also, please do not edit warnings left by bots. Thanks. [[User:JetLover|JetLover]] ([[User talk:JetLover|talk]]) ([[User:JetLover/False reverts|Report a mistake]]) 05:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC) |
When using them, please [[WP:SUBST|substitute them]]. You may want to try them in the [[WP:SAND|sandbox]]. If a user vandalizes after a last warning, please report him/here [[WP:AIV|here]]. Also, please do not edit warnings left by bots. Thanks. [[User:JetLover|JetLover]] ([[User talk:JetLover|talk]]) ([[User:JetLover/False reverts|Report a mistake]]) 05:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
== January 2008 == |
|||
{{{icon|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:University of South Carolina steroid scandal|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:University of South Carolina steroid scandal]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''/'' [[User:Edgarde|edg]]<small> [[User_talk:Edgarde|☺]] [[Special:Contributions/Edgarde|☭]]</small> 03:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:14, 21 January 2008
Welcome
Welcome!
Hi ViperNerd! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
Can you change User:ViperNerd#My Creations to User:ViperNerd#My Contributions. This would be more appropriate being you are not original author of the article. Thank you, Igor Berger (talk) 13:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Oh, really? Then please tell me who wrote it?ViperNerd (talk) 13:41, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- I am sorry I am looking at this article University_of_South_Carolina_steroid_scandal&action=history Igor Berger (talk) 13:48, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Thanks for warning this user, but it is encouraged that one does not insult vandals. Also, you may want to use the following warning templates:
{{uw-v1}}
{{uw-v2}}
{{uw-v3}}
{{uw-v4}}
{{uw-v4im}}
When using them, please substitute them. You may want to try them in the sandbox. If a user vandalizes after a last warning, please report him/here here. Also, please do not edit warnings left by bots. Thanks. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 05:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on University of South Carolina steroid scandal. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. / edg ☺ ☭ 03:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)