User talk:Hiram111

Warnings From IP address 63.216.113.124 currently User:GreenEcho

Refrain from removing sourced material. My edits are exactly where they should be and should be mentioned both in the introduction and the history section.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Druze, you will be blocked from editing.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

Thats Great User:GreenEcho you are engaging in a edit war on me own Talk page thats just sad.Hiram111 (talk) 23:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:19, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Hiram111. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Rodhullandemu 02:13, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Labeling reversions as "vandalism"

Hi Hiram,

I came here because of the AN/I thread to let you know that reverting disputed content as vandalism, as you did here and here, is not an acceptable use of Twinkle or other reversion tools. It tends to inflame the situation, which is obviously not desirable in a content dispute.

In the future, please use the standard reversion method with custom edit summaries for simple reversions and save the vandalism reversions for obvious vandalism. Thank you very much, and please let me know if you have any questions. --jonny-mt 04:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

RE:Concerning the Druze page

Hello Hiram111, I am sorry but as an administrator I am not allowed to revert to a version after a have protected the article. Please see WP:The Wrong Version. I know it is difficult, but do try and communicate on the talk page and try and reach a consensus for how the article should be worded. Also, do try and keep cool when editing. Nothing ever gets done when two people just argue with each other. Good luck. Cheers, « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 18:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

I know it’s not a blog but I just read the WP:The Wrong Version article, and It’s the funniest thing I read for a while, thanks for the admin User:Gonzo fan2007 and probably "I will not threaten to leave Wikipedia", that was my “plan B” actually , anyway I took a note for the future. And I hope the dispute, over the Druze page, will be over soon. Hiram111 (talk) 00:05, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Saad Hariri

Hiram111 and GreenEcho, please explain the reasons for your edits on the article talk page, and stop reverting the article until consensus is reached. I can't know which of your edits is better if you don't explain your reasons on the talk page. Thanks. I'm also posting a message to GreenEcho. ☺ Coppertwig (talk) 18:27, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry: maybe I shouldn't have said that. If you're sure that the material you're reverting violates WP:LIVING, it might be OK to revert; or it may be better to report it at the Biographies of living persons noticeboard. But please also explain on the talk page why you think it violates WP:LIVING. Thanks. ☺ Coppertwig (talk) 21:30, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

ANI regarding GreenEcho

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ← George ^[talk] 07:15, 10 July 2008 (UTC)