Jump to content

User talk:Nancy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
wrong revert: comment
Tennis expert (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 147: Line 147:


::Hi admin, [[User:Uzhuthiran]]'s main areas of interest are to vandalize [[Labour India]] and its associates such as, [[Labour India Gurukulam Public School]], [[Santhosh George Kulangara]] etc. Please have an eye on this bad faith user (who already [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive465#User:Avineshjose_and_inappropriate_editing_behaviour claimed] to be a banned user) and his [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Uzhuthiran contributions]. I believe that probably he is a paid user by this company's business rivals which I'm not sure. Thank you. --<small><span style="color:#333399;font-size:12px;font-family:Lucida Handwriting;">[[User:Avineshjose|Avinesh Jose]] [[User_talk:Avineshjose|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#000000;font-family:Verdana;">&nbsp;T&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 09:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
::Hi admin, [[User:Uzhuthiran]]'s main areas of interest are to vandalize [[Labour India]] and its associates such as, [[Labour India Gurukulam Public School]], [[Santhosh George Kulangara]] etc. Please have an eye on this bad faith user (who already [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive465#User:Avineshjose_and_inappropriate_editing_behaviour claimed] to be a banned user) and his [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Uzhuthiran contributions]. I believe that probably he is a paid user by this company's business rivals which I'm not sure. Thank you. --<small><span style="color:#333399;font-size:12px;font-family:Lucida Handwriting;">[[User:Avineshjose|Avinesh Jose]] [[User_talk:Avineshjose|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#000000;font-family:Verdana;">&nbsp;T&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 09:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

==Nicole Vaidisova article==

Just wanted to let you know that [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nicole_Vaidi%C5%A1ov%C3%A1&diff=215002007&oldid=214983870 your move] of the Nicole Vaidisova article was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nicole_Vaidi%C5%A1ov%C3%A1&diff=232550686&oldid=231549141 reversed] by [[User:Darwinek|Darwinek]]. For more information, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nicole_Vaidi%C5%A1ov%C3%A1 this] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_moves#August_19.2C_2008 this]. Thanks. [[User:Tennis expert|Tennis expert]] ([[User talk:Tennis expert|talk]]) 20:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:29, 19 August 2008


Welcome to my talk page

  • DID I DELETE YOUR PAGE? If so please check User:Nancy/Why? for an explanation first. If you are still none the wiser then please click here to leave me a message
  • I will reply on this page as I prefer to keep conversations all in one place but may alert you on your talk page too so you get the nice orange bar.
  • If I have written something on your talk page, I will be watching it so feel free to reply there if you wish. If you prefer to reply here that's fine too.
  • Threads older than 7 days are archived automatically by MiszaBot


Contents

Thankyou

Just a little note to say thankyou for participating in my successful RFA candidacy, which passed with 96 supports, 0 opposes, and 1 neutral. I am pleasantly taken aback by the amount of support for me to contribute in an administrative role and look forward to demonstrating that such faith is well placed. Regards, WilliamH (talk) 10:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deleted page

Dear Nancy

Please could I ask for advice on whether it is better to rewrite the old copy or create a new page for BMJ Masterclasses?

Thanks Vicki —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vickin70 (talkcontribs) 15:03, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Vickin70, sorry for the delay in gettingn back to you. This may sound a bit harsh but may be you should first assess whether this topic is notable enough to have a page of its own at all? If you do decide to go for a dedicated article then there are a number of things to bear in mind - first and most obvious is that it must not simply read as an advertisement (the last one did, hence its quick removal). Secondly it must not be a copyright violation - I haven't checked but from the tone and layout of the original I would not be surprised if it was a copy and paste from another source. Finally you must show why this topic is notable, i.e. that it has been the subject of significant non-trivial coverage in reliable secondary sources - I did a quick search of news archives and it's not looking terribly hopeful. My frank opinion is that it is borderline whether this topic even merits a sentence in the BMJ article itself which incidentally doesn't even mention BMJ Learning at the moment. So maybe that's the answer - a sentence or two about BMJ Learning in the BMJ article mentioning that they run masterclasses? Good luck with whatever you decide, kind regards, nancy talk 09:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hello, i am new here so can someone help me?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by XX.mikky.Xx (talkcontribs) 06:20, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied nancy talk 07:23, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of Tomasso Squitti

Good day.

Just to clairfy.

The original deletion was based on not having a "spopource" for the listing. One was recently found.

As far as the individual having the same last name as myself, tht would be a 'red heerring'.

Thanks

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 11:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello Caesar. The article was deleted because it was substantially the same as the one whch was deleted back in September 2007 as a result of hte deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Tommaso Squitti. You mention that a source had been added to the recreated article but the problem was that it didn't actually mention the subject and so might just as well not have been there. I note your red herring comment but as I have never mentioned or implied any connection between you and the subject I am wondering if it is not your statement that is the red herring!!!. Kind regards, nancy talk 11:24, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JGHowes

That's probably it - there was a SNOW closure earlier, and it probably went when that one did. Good catch. Thanks, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 15:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

...for cleaning up after me.  Frank  |  talk  16:01, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) nancy talk 17:20, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KBKO (AM) page move

I was wondering if you could handle a, what I believe, simple page move similar to that of KBMO-FM to KVMX. I've probably butchered the pages a bit, so if you could please take care of my mess. Could you possibly move KBKO (AM) to KBKO for me? (Requested move is here.) :) Thanks. Latics 23:20, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied nancy talk 07:57, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for moving KBKO-FM to KVMX

Thanks for moving the KBKO-FM page to KVMX. I know Latics e-mailed you about KBKO (AM). Would you possibly be able to move KBKO (AM to KBKO also? KBKO (AM) is now the only station still using the KBKO call signs. All the info about KBKO (AM) Latics told you about in the previous message. We both kind of butchered the page. You know how to make the move correctly, since you're an administrator. If you could make that move for us, we'd both appriciate it. Sorry for butchering that page also. Needs to be moved by an administor. Thanks. --JoeCool950 (talk) 23:34, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied nancy talk 07:57, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I noticed you declined the speedy deletion of Fábio da Silva as there was no evidence of a previous deletion discussion. However, if you check Talk:Fábio da Silva, you will see a link to the deletion discussion that occurred at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fábio Pereira da Silva. Thanks. – PeeJay 11:58, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -I was thrown as it was not in the deletion log. Deleted now. Cheers, nancy talk 12:01, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No probs. – PeeJay 12:02, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, any chance you could have a look at Rafael da Silva. It too was deleted in that original deletion discussion, so there shouldn't be a problem with its G4 claim. – PeeJay 12:15, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. nancy talk 12:26, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duh, I guess I should have looked farther back to see what was before that user's edits...thanks for fixing it! Ctjf83Talk 16:46, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:) nancy talk 17:24, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
also, can you delete Corporate credit and Business Credit I'm tired of waiting! lol Ctjf83Talk 17:33, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User page

There is no user account named "Aloysius Schwartz," and the page was created by an anonymous IP, hence the tag. Beemer69 chitchat 17:20, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aloysius Schwartz is a mainspace article not a user page. IP was leaving a message on the article's talk page to congratulate the editors. Where's the problem? nancy talk 17:23, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK. My mistake. I've seen nonsense articles created in the past that were disguised as talk pages. Beemer69 chitchat 17:26, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

my page

Dear Nacy,

Can I not make a subpage that people can vandalize me at? HappyCat12 (talk) 17:31, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not something that I would necessarily encourage but this is a Wiki after all..... The problem was that you were creating in mainspace (i.e. where the articles are) rather than in your own userspace. That is why I moved it in to your userspace (User:HappyCat12/vandals2). Always make sure that any userpages you create are prefixed User:HappyCat12 so that they go in to your own area of Wikipedia. nancy talk 17:36, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Nancy (sorry I spelled your name wrong)HappyCat12 (talk) 17:40, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Nancy, thank you for your contribution to the discussion at my recent RfA, and for commenting on my attempts to rescue articles. If ever you have any concerns about my actions, adminly or otherwise, don't hesitate to let me know. Best wishes, Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 20:17, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy, This is the agreement on the move for KBKO (AM) to KBKO. User:RobDe68 and I agree to keep it as an disambiguate page for some time until people get used to the new call sign for KBKO-FM). Then the proper thing to do is put the pointer on the original KBKO (AM) article and tag the KBKO page for speedy delete for page move. Now for the speedy delete for page move, how do you put that in? User:RobDe68 said he could handle putting it in as a speedy delete page move. I was thinking leaving KBKO as the disambiguate page, then maybe a month from now, if that's long enough for people to get use to it, would you make that move? Do you think a month is long enough for people to get use to knowing that KBKO-FM is now KVMX? Let me know. If so, then a month from now move KBKO (AM) to KBKO putting a pointer saying that KBKO-FM is now KVMX. That's the agreement. --JoeCool950 (talk) 06:06, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like a sensible compromise . When the time comes you need to put the speedy tag {{db-move|KBKO (AM)|reason for move}} on KBKO - this will produce a template with a link for an admin to click on which will do the move for them. Cheers, nancy talk 06:54, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Where at on the KBKO page would I put the speedy tag {{db-move|KBKO (AM)|reason for move}}, so that I know, when the time comes? --JoeCool950 (talk) 05:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Right at the top. nancy talk 05:38, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Citroën C3 Pluriel, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Citroën C3 Pluriel is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Citroën C3 Pluriel, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:10, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks BOT, I think you are warning the wrong user but hey, it's not like you are sentient or anything is it? nancy talk 08:31, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was going to remove it for you, but that would just get us both in trouble. PirateArgh!!1! 08:36, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wrong revert

There are several Gurukulam Public Schools. A simple fact you can check through Google. Your revert and accusation of bad faith was improper. Please revert yourself. Uzhuthiran (talk) 18:00, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may have issues with the redirect but tagging it for deletion as "unsalvageably incoherent with no meaningful context or history" was an entirely inappropriate way to go about addressing your concerns. I will assume good faith so far as to believe that perhaps you did not read the text of the tag that you applied, but no, I will not revert. The proper place for you to pursue this is at redirects for discussion. Kind regards, nancy talk 18:17, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi admin, User:Uzhuthiran's main areas of interest are to vandalize Labour India and its associates such as, Labour India Gurukulam Public School, Santhosh George Kulangara etc. Please have an eye on this bad faith user (who already claimed to be a banned user) and his contributions. I believe that probably he is a paid user by this company's business rivals which I'm not sure. Thank you. --Avinesh Jose  T  09:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Vaidisova article

Just wanted to let you know that your move of the Nicole Vaidisova article was reversed by Darwinek. For more information, see this and this. Thanks. Tennis expert (talk) 20:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]