User talk:Berby: Difference between revisions
Warning |
No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==[[Wikipedia:Sock puppet|Sockpuppetry]] case== |
|||
[[Image:Nuvola_apps_important.svg|25px]] You are in danger of violating the [[Wikipedia:three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]{{#if:Republic of Ireland| on [[:Republic of Ireland]]}}. Please cease further reverts or you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.[[User:The Thunderer|The Thunderer]] ([[User talk:The Thunderer|talk]]) 13:46, 1 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
{| align="left" |
|||
|| [[Image:Puppeter template.svg|26px]] |
|||
|} |
|||
You have been accused of [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]]. Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ovlem]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the suspect|notes for the suspect]] before editing the evidence page. [[User:Traditional unionist|Traditional unionist]] ([[User talk:Traditional unionist|talk]]) 13:52, 1 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Whats a sock? Can you explain what I'm being accussed of please?[[User:Berby|Berby]] ([[User talk:Berby#top|talk]]) 13:56, 1 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::The links above provide you with all you need to know. [[User:Traditional unionist|Traditional unionist]] ([[User talk:Traditional unionist|talk]]) 13:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::Ok. I'm still a bit confused. What deceptive work am I doing? I'm just reverting to proven fact and using Wikipedia policy to back it up.Its not as if I'm vandalising or putting in POV or something.[[User:Berby|Berby]] ([[User talk:Berby#top|talk]]) 14:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
It doesn't really matter what you're using these socks for, as there are only a few legitimate reasons for having alternative accounts. And constant reverts, baiting and generally being disruptive are definitely not included. Further, you state "proven fact", but ignore that the sentence in question needs to make it absolutely clear that NI athletes can declare for another country. And your edit confuses that fact - it doesn't help readers fully grasp the issue. So don't claim that you are doing anything based on "fact". Your little [[WP:SPA|SPA]] sockfarm is a travesty of mis-guided counter-productivity and disruption that has no place on this project. [[User:Guliolopez|Guliolopez]] ([[User talk:Guliolopez|talk]]) 14:23, 1 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::Sockfarm? I'm really confused to as what some other editor has to do with me? Really your jumping some gun here.[[User:Berby|Berby]] ([[User talk:Berby#top|talk]]) 14:28, 1 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:28, 1 September 2008
Sockpuppetry case
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ovlem for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Traditional unionist (talk) 13:52, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Whats a sock? Can you explain what I'm being accussed of please?Berby (talk) 13:56, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- The links above provide you with all you need to know. Traditional unionist (talk) 13:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Ok. I'm still a bit confused. What deceptive work am I doing? I'm just reverting to proven fact and using Wikipedia policy to back it up.Its not as if I'm vandalising or putting in POV or something.Berby (talk) 14:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- The links above provide you with all you need to know. Traditional unionist (talk) 13:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
It doesn't really matter what you're using these socks for, as there are only a few legitimate reasons for having alternative accounts. And constant reverts, baiting and generally being disruptive are definitely not included. Further, you state "proven fact", but ignore that the sentence in question needs to make it absolutely clear that NI athletes can declare for another country. And your edit confuses that fact - it doesn't help readers fully grasp the issue. So don't claim that you are doing anything based on "fact". Your little SPA sockfarm is a travesty of mis-guided counter-productivity and disruption that has no place on this project. Guliolopez (talk) 14:23, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sockfarm? I'm really confused to as what some other editor has to do with me? Really your jumping some gun here.Berby (talk) 14:28, 1 September 2008 (UTC)