Kowtow: Difference between revisions
Caspian blue (talk | contribs) rvv by Manacpowers (talk) Those are properly cited inforamion and from "the same source". Besides, the user is not banned. |
Manacpowers (talk | contribs) weird. it edited by indefinited banned sock and "likey" sock |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Kowtow came into [[English language|English]] in the early 19th century to describe the bow itself, but its meaning soon shifted to describe any abject submission or grovelling. Many [[Western world|westerners]] who first encountered the practice believed it was a sign of worship, but kowtowing does not necessarily have religious overtones in traditional [[Chinese culture]]. |
Kowtow came into [[English language|English]] in the early 19th century to describe the bow itself, but its meaning soon shifted to describe any abject submission or grovelling. Many [[Western world|westerners]] who first encountered the practice believed it was a sign of worship, but kowtowing does not necessarily have religious overtones in traditional [[Chinese culture]]. |
||
| ⚫ | The kowtow was often performed in diplomatic relations as well. According to [[Annals of Joseon Dynasty]], in 1596, Japanese [[Daimyo]] [[Toyotomi Hideyoshi]] who unified Japan had to kneel 5 times on the ground and hit his head 3 times on the ground (五拜三叩头礼), to show his vassal status to the Chinese Ming Dynasty.<ref>{{cite book|url=http://sillok.history.go.kr/viewer/viewtype1.jsp?id=wna_12912007_005&grp=&aid=&sid=4183897&pos=0|title=宣祖 83卷, 29年(1596 丙申 / 명 만력(萬曆) 24年) 12月 7日(己巳) 5번째기사 중국 사신이 병부에 보낸 계첩 |publisher=[[Annals of Joseon Dynasty]]|language=Korean|quote= 朝鮮王朝實錄 宣祖 83卷, 29年( 1596 丙申 / 萬曆 24年) 12月 7日] " 倭將行長, 馳報'''秀吉''', 擇於九月初二日, 奉迎冊命於大坂〔大阪〕地方受封。 職等初一日, 持節前往, 是日卽抵大坂〔大阪〕。 次日領受欽賜圭印、'''官服''', 旋卽佩執頂被, 望闕行'''五拜三叩頭禮''', 承奉誥命。"}}</ref> |
||
| ⚫ | Kowtow was very important in the [[diplomacy]] of [[China]] with [[Europe]]an powers, since it was required to come into the presence of the [[Emperor of China]], but it meant submission before him. [[Netherlands|Dutch]] traders, such as [[Andreas Everardus van Braam Houckgeest|A. E. van Braam Houckgeest]] had no problem with kowtowing since they represented only themselves, but the [[United Kingdom|British]] embassies of [[George Macartney, 1st Earl Macartney]] (1793) and [[William Pitt Amherst, 1st Earl Amherst]] (1816) were foiled since kowtowing would mean acknowledging their King as a subject of the [[Emperor of China|Emperor]]. |
||
| ⚫ | Kowtow was very important in the [[diplomacy]] of [[China]] with [[Europe]]an powers, since it was required to come into the presence of the [[Emperor of China]], but it meant submission before him. [[Netherlands|Dutch]] traders, such as [[Andreas Everardus van Braam Houckgeest|A. E. van Braam Houckgeest]] had no problem with kowtowing since they represented only themselves, but the [[United Kingdom|British]] embassies of [[George Macartney, 1st Earl Macartney]] (1793) and [[William Pitt Amherst, 1st Earl Amherst]] (1816) were foiled since kowtowing would mean acknowledging their King as a subject of the [[Emperor of China|Emperor]]. |
||
| ⚫ | The kowtow was often performed in diplomatic relations as well. According to [[Annals of Joseon Dynasty]], in 1596, Japanese [[Daimyo]] [[Toyotomi Hideyoshi]] who unified Japan had to kneel 5 times on the ground and hit his head 3 times on the ground (五拜三叩头礼), to show his vassal status to the Chinese Ming Dynasty.<ref>{{cite book|url=http://sillok.history.go.kr/viewer/viewtype1.jsp?id=wna_12912007_005&grp=&aid=&sid=4183897&pos=0|title=宣祖 83卷, 29年(1596 丙申 / 명 만력(萬曆) 24年) 12月 7日(己巳) 5번째기사 중국 사신이 병부에 보낸 계첩 |publisher=[[Annals of Joseon Dynasty]]|language=Korean|quote= 朝鮮王朝實錄 宣祖 83卷, 29年( 1596 丙申 / 萬曆 24年) 12月 7日] " 倭將行長, 馳報'''秀吉''', 擇於九月初二日, 奉迎冊命於大坂〔大阪〕地方受封。 職等初一日, 持節前往, 是日卽抵大坂〔大阪〕。 次日領受欽賜圭印、'''官服''', 旋卽佩執頂被, 望闕行'''五拜三叩頭禮''', 承奉誥命。"}}</ref> |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Revision as of 22:35, 5 September 2008
Kowtow (simplified Chinese: 叩头; traditional Chinese: 叩頭; pinyin: Kòu tóu; Cantonese: Kau tàuh) is the act of deep respect shown by kneeling and bowing so low as to touch the head to the ground. While the phrase Kē tóu (磕頭) is often used in lieu of the former in modern Chinese, the meaning is somewhat altered: kòu originally meant "knock with reverence",[citation needed] whereas kē has the general meaning of "touch upon (a surface)".[citation needed]
In Imperial Chinese protocol, the kowtow was performed before the Emperor of China. Current Chinese etiquette does not contain any situations in which the kowtow is regularly performed in front of a living human being, although it may occur in rare and extreme cases where one is begging for forgiveness or offering an extreme apology, or showing respect in traditional funerals. Traditional Chinese martial arts schools employ the ritual in their discipleship ceremonies.
Confucius believed there was a natural harmony between the body and mind and therefore, whatever actions were expressed through the body would be transferred over to the mind. Because the body is placed in a low position in the kowtow, the idea is that you will naturally convert to your mind a feeling of respect. What you do to your body has an impact on your mind. It is important to remember that respect was needed to have a good society according to the confucian philosophy. That is why bowing was so important.
The kowtow is often performed in groups of three before Buddhist statues and images or tombs of the dead. In Buddhism it is more commonly termed either "worship with the crown (of the head)" (頂禮 ding li) or "casting the five limbs to the earth" (五體投地 wuti tou di) - referring to the two arms, two legs and forehead. For example, in certain ceremonies, a person would perform a sequence of three sets of three kowtows - stand up and kneel down again between each set - as an extreme gesture of respect; hence the term three kneelings and nine head knockings ([三跪九叩] Error: {{Lang}}: unrecognized language tag: zh-t (help)). Also, some Buddhist pilgrims would kowtow once for every three steps made during their long journeys. Often the number three referring to the Triple Gem of Buddhism, the Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha.
Kowtow came into English in the early 19th century to describe the bow itself, but its meaning soon shifted to describe any abject submission or grovelling. Many westerners who first encountered the practice believed it was a sign of worship, but kowtowing does not necessarily have religious overtones in traditional Chinese culture.
The kowtow was often performed in diplomatic relations as well. According to Annals of Joseon Dynasty, in 1596, Japanese Daimyo Toyotomi Hideyoshi who unified Japan had to kneel 5 times on the ground and hit his head 3 times on the ground (五拜三叩头礼), to show his vassal status to the Chinese Ming Dynasty.[1]
Kowtow was very important in the diplomacy of China with European powers, since it was required to come into the presence of the Emperor of China, but it meant submission before him. Dutch traders, such as A. E. van Braam Houckgeest had no problem with kowtowing since they represented only themselves, but the British embassies of George Macartney, 1st Earl Macartney (1793) and William Pitt Amherst, 1st Earl Amherst (1816) were foiled since kowtowing would mean acknowledging their King as a subject of the Emperor.
See also
- Chinese social relations
- Culture of China
- Finger kowtow: 1, 2
- Posture emoticons
- Foot washing -- another act of extreme humility
- John Moyse
- Salute
- Sifu
- Sujud
- Orz
- Dogeza
Notes
- ^ 宣祖 83卷, 29年(1596 丙申 / 명 만력(萬曆) 24年) 12月 7日(己巳) 5번째기사 중국 사신이 병부에 보낸 계첩 (in Korean). Annals of Joseon Dynasty.
朝鮮王朝實錄 宣祖 83卷, 29年( 1596 丙申 / 萬曆 24年) 12月 7日] " 倭將行長, 馳報秀吉, 擇於九月初二日, 奉迎冊命於大坂〔大阪〕地方受封。 職等初一日, 持節前往, 是日卽抵大坂〔大阪〕。 次日領受欽賜圭印、官服, 旋卽佩執頂被, 望闕行五拜三叩頭禮, 承奉誥命。"
References
- Rockhill, William Woodville. "Diplomatic Missions to the Court of China: The Kotow Question I," The American Historical Review, Vol. 2, No. 3 (Apr., 1897), pp. 427-442.
- Rockhill, William Woodville. "Diplomatic Missions to the Court of China: The Kotow Question II," The American Historical Review, Vol. 2, No. 4 (Jul., 1897), pp. 627-643.