User talk:Soman

see: User talk:Soman/archive1, User talk:Soman/archive2, User talk:Soman/archive3, User talk:Soman/archive4

Thanks and sorry

Soman, Thanks for the help and sorry for the misunderstanding. Will post a public apology to you also in the discussion page. On.Elpeleg (talk) 11:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for creating articles about Nepal. Are you from Nepal? 202.70.64.57 (talk) 09:22, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

What the hell is wrong with you?

the title of the "Iraqi-Israeli relations" article is RELATIONS! they have had relations even though they are bad! they may not trade with each other, but is Iraq trading with Saudi Arabia?? yet you dont have a problem with that article?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Unclefester89 (talk • contribs) 16:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

please use arguments to counter wp:undue and wp:point violations

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia.

• Your test moveon the page Azad Kashmir / Pakistan occupied Kashmir has been reverted. Please take a look at the welcome page or introduction to editing to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.Cityvalyu (talk) 02:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
• Your page move edit appears to be unconstructive and you have not used to used the talk page to counter the arguments.Further the edits that you reverted were well explained in the talk page unlike your edits. Hence, it appears to be an edit war with no logical backing to counter the issues discussed at the talk page. If you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative point by point rebuttal to counter the arguments on talk page and then please state the reasons for reverting to a "per se controversial" title (Azad Kashmir) that violates wp:undue and wp:point.Cityvalyu (talk) 02:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Warning

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.Cityvalyu (talk) 02:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

• If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Thank you.Cityvalyu (talk) 02:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Please explain in which article i have violated 3RR. --Soman (talk) 11:37, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:NPsouthafrica.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:NPsouthafrica.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

The Left (Germany)

Dear Soman,

before deleting text from the article The Left (Germany) use the discussion board, please. All statements are supported by objective sources or sources of the party itself. After we discussed it we come up with a common understanding and edit the article. Please stop to be aggressive and calm down and discuss. Thank you.

Reachtests (talk) 15:30, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Kashmir related edits

Hi Soman, I sincerely apologize if I have hurt your sentiments during the course of really heated arguments on topics related to Kashmir. Shovon (talk) 20:18, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

reword

u wrote " India claims both AJK & FANA as 'PoK'"..you may have erred..first, pok is a term which came to exist from 1947..the article on northern areas and ak say that pakistan coined these terms and carved these entities out of pok (or whatever you wish to call that entity) AFTER 1970....SO, INDIA DOES NOT CLAIM ANYTHING HERE..constant name from 1947 till now-pok!! INSTEAD PAKISTAN CLAIMS THESE TWO TERMS (USED EXCLUSIVELY ONLY WITHIN PAKISTAN) AND THESE BIASED POST 1970 TERMS LACK MEANING TOO (AZADI=INDEPENDENCE)to erase pok memory and imply northern areas of pok was not under kashmir conflict(implying merger with pak state)..only fools will believe that and support its unilateral decision to betray the kashmiri cause by ceding kashmir territory to china.... SO wE HAVE TO WEED OUT PAK. PROPAGANDA AND USE OBJECTIVE TERMS UNDERSTOOD BY ALL!! i suggest a rewording "pak. claims pok is made up of two areas ajk and na after 1970.."..that should sound neutral and without any confabulation!!!Kashmircloud (talk) 21:32, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

POK will not be used if IOK is not used side by side kapish 86.151.123.126 (talk) 22:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Ooops!

I didn't realize that the ip had undone the test edit him/herself! test edit undoneme undoing the unde edit! Thanks for reverting my careless edit! --KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 13:03, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

86. nuisance: whats his problem??

since i saw that you are able to detect sock puppets, can you help detect this vandaliser who intervenes whenever i comment on pahari sahib edit ..proof:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKashmircloud&diff=236833453&oldid=236830056

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKashmircloud&diff=236833512&oldid=236830056

is he a sock puppet of pahari sahib since both belong to pakistan internet connections???Cityvalyu (talk) 10:14, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

OK.. thanks for reply...reverted his vandalismCityvalyu (talk) 10:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

How to insert stub tag in an article

Dear Soman, You inserted one BJP Politicain tag in Jeetendra Singh Bundela article. i also tried to insert same tag in another article Vinod Gontiya but unable to see this tag. Can you please guide me what mistake i m doing? or do i not have right to insert any stub tag?

Regards

Sameer Goswami

Sameergoswami (talk) 14:14, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

thanx

thanx 4 weeding out his comments. i know i not welcome there thats y i not editing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.208.206.32 (talk) 20:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

thanks

i just had a chat with hersfold who upheld my innocence..but, i must thank you for your help in the intervening period..Kashmircloud (talk) 21:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Sock saga

Have you see this? User:S3000 has been blocked as a sock of User:Nangparbat. Very very odd. Pahari Sahib 13:32, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

insulting other editors

I notice that this edit history your reinserted comment didn't contain any earthshaking new perspective comes off as an insult to other editors. I just thought I will bring it to your attention. Docku^Hi 12:26, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

look, we have to be able to separate between the edits and the editors. Criticism of an edit doesn't necessarily mean disrespect of the editor in question. My criticism of cityvalyu's edit was essentially that it didn't contain very much more than a candid repeat of his 'keep' vote. My understanding was that there was no content in the latter edits that would have caused the closing admin to withdraw his closure. --Soman (talk) 12:37, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

It may be the case. In a poinsoned environment like that, even such a candid remark could be unhelpful. There was no need for you to revert his edit (as an involved party), a non-involved admin could have done it. Docku^Hi 12:42, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Look, the AfD was already closed, with the tags "Please do not modify it." and "No further edits should be made to this page.". At that point cityvalyu should have understood that further edits in that particular AfD was futile, my revert was merely a formality. --Soman (talk) 12:47, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Well, Shouldn't I have known that you have your own reasons why you did what you did, I thought I would let u know that I noticed the incendiary and insulting remark on the edit history you made. Docku^Hi 12:54, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

i think you can agree that 'incendiary' is not the appropriate term here. Do you think cityvalyu's last comments provided any 'earthshaking new perspective'? --Soman (talk) 13:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

But you and me are not the judge on that. Docku^Hi 13:16, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:FAsouthafrica.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FAsouthafrica.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:29, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Valencian Left (1934)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Valencian Left (1934), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Valencian Left. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:29, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

• Image:Framtid-se.gif
• Image:Frenamp.PNG

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:56, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Kongunadu Makkal Katchi

A tag has been placed on Kongunadu Makkal Katchi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ravichandar_{My coffee shop} 01:51, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:CA2064-Kathmandu-7

A tag has been placed on Template:CA2064-Kathmandu-7 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:CA2064-Kathmandu-9

A tag has been placed on Template:CA2064-Kathmandu-9 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Wasakärven.jpg

I have tagged Image:Wasakärven.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Lokal_Profil 17:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Politics

Great job with your work on political articles! Your friend Eddy of the wiki^{[citation needed]} 21:17, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Forked articles (Valencian Left (1934))

Just a quick note to say that, when you take content from one article as a base for a new one, you should wikilink the original article in the edit summary of the first revision of the new article. This is to keep the GFDL attribution of the users' who edited the first article. Best, – Toon^(talk) 23:54, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

I pressed save a bit to quick, and as you know edit summaries cannot be changed retrospectively. I did however, post a notice at Talk:Valencian_Left_(1934). I did also clearly state the shifting at [1]. --Soman (talk) 06:42, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I always hit return when trying to use "]" - which can be a pain! No worries, I added a note to the bottom of the article as well, just to make it clearer. Best, – Toon^(talk) 14:46, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ldpd5G.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ldpd5G.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:28, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:LogoNCPN.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:LogoNCPN.PNG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:36, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Mayday-sacp.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mayday-sacp.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 03:27, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Wasakärven.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Wasakärven.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Lokal_Profil 13:20, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Tamil Nadu Peasants and Workers Party

A tag has been placed on Tamil Nadu Peasants and Workers Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ravichandar_{My coffee shop} 17:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

• Image:Oakke2.gif
• Image:Oipfg.png

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Left Bloc (Palestine)

Thanks for your note. I'm pressed for time right now, but I'll try to look at it tomorrow. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:24, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Like you, I've had a great deal of difficulty finding information on this. Have you tried El C? Jayjg ^(talk) 00:28, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Communist Party of Palestine

Great work in clarifying this. Maybe a disambiguation page that covers the Jewish Communist Parties, Poalei Zion parties (and i'm a little unsure why this page isn't called Workers of Zion) and the (historical and current) Palestinian parties would be useful? Paki.tv (talk) 15:47, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Skala (sports organization)

I have nominated Skala (sports organization), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skala (sports organization). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. VG ☎ 17:46, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Typhoon (sports club)

A tag has been placed on Typhoon (sports club) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TallNapoleon (talk) 21:05, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

vandalism on Bihar article

Hi Soman

Someone has restored to vandalism on Bihar page using IP - 125.63.112.149 . Please Check his edits. Manoj nav (talk) 16:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

List of terrorist organizations

Hi there, here is the link did not really get enough time to add all of them to the list, but here is the reference though.

http://www.casos.cs.cmu.edu/events/conferences/2005/2005_proceedings/Basu.pdf Will update the complete article soon though Swapnils2106 (talk) 20:50, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey, you are right, will keep looking for it and update that once I find it. You keep your eyes open as well, let me know if you find something. Swapnils2106 (talk) 06:25, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi, how come you added the complete list so soon, man you are a pro in this. Please give me some tips! Thanks again. Swapnils2106 (talk) 19:05, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

SASI

No idea, unfortunately. I ran a number of searches, but nothing came up. Biruitorul ^Talk 22:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi. Same here. I'll keep an eye out, but I don't remember any Romanian book I've read on such topics even mentioning it. Dahn (talk) 04:16, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Discrimination against the Bihari community in India=

Hi Soman The article Racism faced by Bihari community in India, has been systematically altered to change the voice of the article. A similar edit was done in the past as well. Kindly refer the discussion here - Talk:Violence_against_Hindi-speaking_migrants_in_India#cleanup .

A systematic attempt has been made to change the voice (and not the tone) of the article which I feel is equivalent to deleting the article, which was protested at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Racism_faced_by_Bihari_people_in_India and writing a new article all together. The out come of the discussion ( Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Racism_faced_by_Bihari_people_in_India )was clearly against the deletion of the article.

I would request you to protect the article to it's previous edition titled " Discrimination against Biharis in India " till a agreement is reached. Thanks Manoj nav (talk) 17:57, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

I am worried about edits like these

The sub-headings which gives eye catching view and better understanding of derogatory remarks made by people holding key positions in India like ministers, people occupying gov. offices, journalists, politicians etc. have been removes, so that the para becomes unreadable and looks lengthy.

Anyways, thank you for the message. Manoj nav (talk) 18:20, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

weird question

soman is an unusual surname if you are not from India my husband is a soman, and of Russian/Polish extraction. is it possible you are related? he's from southern california...Sara —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bozo112 (talk • contribs) 22:37, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

No, i do not think so. --Soman (talk) 22:51, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Socialist Workers Party (Palestine)

On 1 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Socialist Workers Party (Palestine), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 03:15, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

• Image:Pcpml.jpg
• Image:Pcrvsymbol.PNG

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:36, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Free Norrland

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Free Norrland, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stormbay (talk) 15:43, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

• Image:Psiup.png
• Image:Psoe003.jpg
• Image:Psuc.jpg
• Image:Psuc2.jpg
• Image:Psuclogo.JPG

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:12, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Updologo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Updologo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

CPI_national party

It is a good point. I do remember having read what I had added somewhere and I can back it up soon. I am also aware that it doesnt necessarily have to be right just because i can back it up. Whether CPI was a national party at that time is debatable. Docku:“what up?” 17:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the source. Docku:“what up?” 18:22, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

BSP and NCP are categorised here as national parties. As per the definition as seen here, they might very well be national parties, but they are not perceived as national parties in most of the India. Perception and definition can be different and guess you are right that we go by definition. Docku:“what up?” 18:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Socialist Workers' Sport International DYK

Hi. I've reviewed your DYK submission for the article Socialist Workers' Sport International, and made a comment on it at the submissions page. Please feel free to reply or comment there. Cheers, Olaf Davis | Talk 20:42, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for adding the cite: I've approved the hook for DYK. Best wishes, Olaf Davis | Talk 10:33, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Abnrmlogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Abnrmlogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kdu logga.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kdu logga.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dpsm.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dpsm.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:09, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hialogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hialogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Christianindall.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Christianindall.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mr-img0.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mr-img0.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:43, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Gillogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Gillogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Adangola.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Adangola.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:50, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Leftwing politics

Great edit Soman on the article leftwing politics, good work! You have greatly improved the article! Many thanks! C mon (talk) 13:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bundelkhand Mukti Morcha

I have nominated Bundelkhand Mukti Morcha, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bundelkhand Mukti Morcha. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Bongomatic (talk) 17:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC) Bongomatic (talk) 17:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Morgnshtern

On 3 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Morgnshtern, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 17:04, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Roy

Thanks for keeping an eye on Arundhati Roy. I appreciate your reverts of some of these all-too POV 'edits' some folks make. Drmies (talk) 19:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Socialist Workers' Sport International

On 4 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Socialist Workers' Sport International, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 05:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

please retain Bundelkhand Ekikrit Party on wiki

Bundelkhand Ekikkrit Party is a political party of India struggling for Bundelkhand state. For related evidence you can see the following also.. 1)Rashtriya Sahara (a leading hindi news paper of India)page number 9 dated 01-11-07 2)AMAR UJALA(A LEADING HINDI NEWS PAPER OF INDIA) page number 4 ,dated 01-11-07 (3)Dainik Jagran(Number one HINDI NEWS PAPER OF INDIA) page number 6 ,dated 01-11-07 (4)see www.jagran.com news of 5-12-07 page 2 the news related to Bundelkhand Ekikrit Party had been published more than 1000 times in several hindi news papers of India,you are requested to search in hindi please.So you are requested to advocate in fovour of retaining the above article on wiki please —Preceding unsigned comment added by Babligoswami (talk • contribs) 11:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Moviesz

Blocked. Thanks for the heads-up. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 18:05, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Zydokomuna

Regarding this [2]. I tend to agree that to label KPP as "anti-Jewish" is unfair, after all KPP more than often came to deffend the Polish Jewish community against state-sponsored Polish antisemitism and anti-Jewish pogroms in the Second Polish Republic. It is also true, however, that the Jewish religious community and KPP were in strong opposition. I think that the both of these aspects can and should be reflected in the article. I'm confident we can find satisfying wording for this complex historical reality with a little bit of effort, and further discussions on talk. Cheers.M0RD00R (talk) 17:16, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Warning

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.59.95.114.118 (talk) 08:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Also see this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/3RR#Soman_reported_by_User:59.95.108.209_.28Result:_.29 59.95.108.209 (talk) 09:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

I apologise for all the trouble, sorry 59.95.107.95 (talk) 15:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anti-Stalinist left. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --90.240.225.27 (talk) 18:41, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

There's actually not much meaning in posting retaliatory 3rr notices. The point of the 3rr warning is to inform other, perhaps less experienced users of the existence of the 3rr rule. Since I posted a notice on your talk page four minutes earlier, it would be fair to assume that I was aware of the rule. --Soman (talk) 18:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Zionist Socialist Workers Party

On 11 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Zionist Socialist Workers Party, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

– RyanCross (talk) 23:57, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tamil Nadu Peasants and Workers Party

I have nominated Tamil Nadu Peasants and Workers Party, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamil Nadu Peasants and Workers Party. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Shovon (talk) 21:02, 13 October 2008 (UTC) Shovon (talk) 21:02, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK nomination for Jewish Socialist Workers Party

Question have been raised on this DYK nomination. You might want to respond on the Template talk:Did you know page. SpinningSpark 22:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

The figures refer to SERP in 1906, which according to your article is the JSWP, and more specifically it has "one hundred were killed during the fighting, three hundred wounded, and about one thousand arrested." If you are interested, Frankel cites this as the source of the figures:

• Hess, Moses Hess:Briefwechsel, p.368.

SpinningSpark 06:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Kiribati-Cuba

Thank you very much! It's always nice to know that my contributions are actually being read. And thanks for the nomination. I have to say, that was quick; you listed it just nine minutes after I created it! Good work to you as well, with your numerous contributions. Aridd (talk) 23:12, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

I've got a book that briefly mentions relations between Cuba and Vanuatu. I don't think it says much, though. I'll have a look tomorrow. Thanks for reminding me! (Incidentally, I think Tonga established relations with the Soviet Union, primarily as a way of getting increased aid from a suddenly worried West. But you're right, Vanuatu was by far the closest to the Eastern Bloc, with a foreign policy resolutely independent from the West.) Aridd (talk) 23:25, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

I've written a short article on Vanuatu–Cuba relations. Aridd (talk) 13:39, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Jewish Socialist Workers Party

On 15 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jewish Socialist Workers Party, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:14, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Modification to Pinarayi Vijayan Page

I have noticed 2 things in the page, which I thought need modification.

1. V. S. Achithanandan's suspension from PB also was mentioned with that of Pinarayi Vijayan. But entry back to PB was mentioned only of Pinarayi. I think its intentional delivery of partial information. I have modified that point, please edit appropriately if you fee to do so.

2. Children's education. Agitation against self financing colleges was a very controversial and prolonged one. The Kuthuparamba firing was part of it. I think it is important to mention these things in relation to the fact that his children got education from self financing colleges. Here too, pls do "reasonable" editing if you feel so.

Joju (talk) 11:57, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Canarian Socialist Party

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Canarian Socialist Party, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stormbay (talk) 22:44, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

First Secretary of Central Committee of Communist Party of Soviet republic of Lithuania

Hi. Check if we can save any information of this one. Probably we have to merge it somewhere. -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:20, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Folksgrupe

On 18 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Folksgrupe, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- How do you turn this on (talk) 00:25, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Socialistpartymk.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Socialistpartymk.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:11, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

U. Muthuramalingam Thevar

I didnt read all the way down. The "In Jail" section sounds like it was a plot to put him jail. Dont u think? Docku:“what up?” 16:03, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

yes, that is certainly the version given in the source. --Soman (talk) 16:16, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

I dont have enough knowledge of this particular incident, but I would check other sources as well. Docku:“what up?” 16:22, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

That is probably a good idea. However, [3] gives no results except wiki and wiki mirrors. --Soman (talk) 16:28, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

I take your word for it that they are the mirrow. Docku:“what up?” 16:30, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Kiribati–Cuba relations

On 21 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kiribati–Cuba relations, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cirt (talk) 17:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Just a word of Thanks

In contrast, I am seriously thinking of using Wikipedia:Administrators#Grievances_by_users_.28.22Administrator_abuse.22.29 on that issue Wikipedia:Requests for comment/YellowMonkey. But I need two editors support. As per policy (at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this sysop and have failed.), do you think that may I do it at this juncture? (Thinking of this too) --Googlean ^Results 10:43, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Vanuatu Labour Party

On 23 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Vanuatu Labour Party, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Allen3 ^talk 11:55, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Uzhavar Uzhaippalar Katchi

A tag has been placed on Uzhavar Uzhaippalar Katchi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ravichandar_{My coffee shop} 14:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Maoists in Nepal to be renamed in Communist Party of Nepal

Hi. Have you heard of that? Check [4]. "Nepal Maoists ready to abandon Mao", 17 Oct 2008, 1800 hrs IST, TNN. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:37, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes. But I think the article makes some mistakes in analysis. The nameshift has nothing to do with sino-nepalese relations. Its a condition but by Unity Centre-Masal for a merger. If such a name change would take place, we should move CPN(M) to Communist Party of Nepal and the old CPN to Communist Party of Nepal (1949). --Soman (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I also believe this has nothing to do with any sino-nepalese relations. We must be prepared to have rename some articles. That's all. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:43, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for supporting my RfA

Thanks for the support. I am looking forward cooperating with you. -- Magioladitis (talk) 19:33, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

WFTU-AM

Be VERY careful when moving radio station pages as there is no "-AM" in AM call signs, like in the move you made. If you wish to move a page, please go to WP:RM and request a move, an admin will move it for you to avoid problems like these. - NeutralHomer • Talk • October 25, 2008 @ 15:20

I reacted rather strongly against the logic of letting a U.S. college AM station have precedence over an international federation with 130 million members, and thus took the bold step of doing an unilateral move. Honestly, I think the -am/(am) differentiation appears to be less problematic. --Soman (talk) 08:05, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Liberal Party Bangladesh

I am puzzled about the Liberal Party Bangladesh, but I found Bangladesh Election Commission - Participating Parties and their symbols for Parliament Election 2001 http://www.ecs.gov.bd/English/PartySymble.php?&electionid=8&electionName=Parliament%20Election%202001 which suggests that a party by that name participated in the 2001 general elections. When I used the Google Chrome browser to try to visit Liberal Party Bangladesh at http://www.liberalbd.org/ , I got a warning that it was a malware site. I added a hoax tag to the article, which you can remove if you wish. See also Liberal Democratic Party (Bangladesh), which may be related. -- Eastmain (talk) 12:42, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

I do think there are some vanity issues here, that the article was created to promote a very small party. But per my findings, see article talk page, i don't think its a complete hoax. --Soman (talk) 12:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fjce05.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Fjce05.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

You are still a champion!

Still fighting the good fight around the DK articles I see and all with polite, informed and logical argument. Soman I take my hat off to you - you rock. Paxse (talk) 15:16, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Slpplogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Slpplogo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:57, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:TULFS.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:TULFS.jpeg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:04, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Tkip.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Tkip.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 14:56, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

DYK for International Secretariat of National Trade Union Centres

On 3 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article International Secretariat of National Trade Union Centres, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Workers Committee for National Liberation

On 3 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Workers Committee for National Liberation, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:23, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Upfa.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Upfa.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Vpkmoms.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vpkmoms.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 07:57, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

WCNL

Hiya.. The problems I saw:

• 5 out of 6 references are to a single source; more sources are better
• Tone and language: terms like "government crackdown" and "repressive measures" are both POV and essentially weasel words; if repressive measures were taken, for example, then detail them with sources. [ roux ] [x] 08:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

right-wing politics

Hello, you think you can structure the right-wing politics article like you did the left-wing one? Bobisbob2 (talk) 04:19, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, but I'm sorry i won't. I don't have detailed knowledge of the subject, i don't know many of the details regarding the development of the term in question. --Soman (talk) 10:08, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bundelkhand Mukti Morcha

I have nominated Bundelkhand Mukti Morcha, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bundelkhand Mukti Morcha. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Bongomatic 17:56, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Egyptian Communist Organisation

On 8 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Egyptian Communist Organisation, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 15:50, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Wouldn't mind a chat...

... off wiki sometime. I keep falling over these great Cambodian history articles you've written - I don't even bother to check the history anymore - I just guess it was Soman. Send me a mail sometime and we can swap sources - I've got email enabled in my prefs. Just been reading Keo Meas, Nop Bophann, Um Neng and Cambodian parliamentary election, 1955 - keep up the great work. Cheers, --Paxse (talk) 15:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely, Cambodia and its history are fascinating (that's most of why I first came here in '96). Unfortunately, Cambodia coverage on Wikipedia is still poor - though thanks to you and others like User:Dr. Blofeld things are a hell of a lot better than they were 18 months ago. I love adding articles on Cambodia and improving the ones that we have. However, It's the two steps forward one step back aspect of working on Cambodia that frustrates the hell out of me. The pointless CSDs, PRODs and AfDs of Cambodian (or any little known third world country) topics that are just part of basic coverage - it shits me to tears. When I stumbled across WP:CSB in early 2007 it became one of the first (the first?) places I signed up on the 'pedia. Keep on keeping up the good fight against ignorance, narrow-mindedness, bigotry and plain old racism - it's appreciated by plenty of people both on and off wikipedia. Including me! Cheers, --Paxse (talk) 17:49, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Uvlogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Uvlogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

The Left (Germany)

I'd appreciate it if you help me keep an eye on this article, since an edit war seems to be unfolding. I might seek arbitration or other measures. Thanks. --Linkswechsel (talk) 16:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marxist Study Centre

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Marxist Study Centre, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Notability has not been established. Unable to find significant coverage in secondary sources as per Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies).

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Barkeep ^{Chat | $} 21:18, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Request for Arbitration

Please note that I have referred User:Jörg ÖA to the Arbitration Committee for their consideration. I have listed you as a party in the dispute. Let me know if you would not like to be involved. The request can be found at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Edits by User:Jörg ÖA. You may add a statement of 500 words in this section that describes your experiences. --Linkswechsel (talk) 05:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)