User talk:Baseball Bugs/Snapshot100130: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:22, 21 January 2009

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article nor the talk page for an encyclopedia article. Be aware that if you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mindless parrot. Be aware that the page may be inundated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself, if that. Be aware that this user likes to say "Be aware that..." Be aware that the original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Baseball_Bugs/Snapshot100130.

Ark-Hives

Useful warnings

Caution to vandals on WP:ANI: Don't get Plaxicoed.

Vandalism warnings

Your proposition may be good / But let's have one thing understood / Whatever it is, I'm against it / And even when you've changed it or condensed it / I'm against it.

Proposed change to warning boxes inspired by another editor [1]

a compliant has been opended regarding youse behavieurs on WP:ANI. Please refrain from subtle vnadlaism.
No matter how subltel you think youa rebing you can e suiqt secertian that you are still commiting an act of vandlaism.
if you merely need an d outlet to practice editing please see WP:SANDBOX DINTRSTEAD of mutiliating articles on the mainspace ot violating articles here on wikipedia.
I hope you will return to make many mroe sponstructive edits in the future.
IF you require a sponsor, please see WP:SPONSOR to assit you in making many better editors into the near future.

Now, who can argue with that?
Not only is it authentic internet gibberish, but it expresses a courage that is little seen in this day and age.

Spam warnings

3RR warnings

Transients welcome

Letters from fans

BASEBALLS BUGS IS AN UGLY IGNORANT FOOL —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.49.166.166 (talk) 23:09, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're stupid. Mayallld (talk) 01:29, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How about that obviously immature Basebuggs? Tanninglamp 20:03, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hehhehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe! ROFLMFAO! @ Baseball Bugs. That guy makes the dumbest jokes. You gotta love him for trying though. LMFAO! HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA! =D Cheers! Cheers dude 05:27, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hehehehehehehe! Baseball Bugs is a cutie. 65.31.103.28 05:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is your problem? Why are you being a jerk? 69.14.244.157 (talk) 20:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BO is a muslim

I have a reliable source - http://www.conservapedia.com/Barack_Obama and want to add it to the article. Also please stop beaming messages to me via my TV. --Cameron Scott (talk) 15:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're funny. But how did you know about the TV? Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 15:06, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Einstein

Am already composing an email to oversight the offending edits, which should help. (FWIW I'm surprised the page could be deleted, as there were over 5,000 revisions - I suspect the page crashed on Toddst1 as he was dealing with it.) Regards, Bencherlite ^Talk 13:59, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh, how true. Anyway, email sent. Bencherlite ^Talk 14:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Outsourcing has come to Wikipedia

When a Talker spells Christian as 'christin' (or whatever), it occurs to me the wingnuts are outsourcing the actual work of their smear campaigns to cheap labor in other countries. It's a reasonable explanation for the odd grammar and spelling of some of the trolls. Reminds me of when the Republican Party had a calling campaign about protecting jobs and outsourced it to an Indian call center. I think that's right - I remember it was outside the U.S. Flatterworld (talk) 20:24, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That would figure. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 03:24, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Second transitive verb definition for 'flaunt':

'To treat contemptuously' HalfShadow 04:05, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN/EW note

Not that you have anything to worry about, but Tanninglamp apparently believes you're a repeat violator, and this issue was wholly created by you... --Onorem ♠Dil 18:26, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw. For the record - I don't do sockpuppetry. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 20:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You asked me once...

...whatever happened to that guy. Well, speak of the devil, here he is. It's an open proxy (i.e. not really in Poland). Oy. Makes my head hurt just looking at it. Antandrus (talk) 22:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 23:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

I have posted a reply on the talk page of the article. Cheers! 82.230.24.185 (talk) 17:42, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution

Re your question at AN/I about Tales23. The exact requirements of GFDL about tracking contributors are murky (in my opinion). But if a user is concerned that his edit was 'misappropriated,' we could get him to add the same edit again in the new article. The thread seems to exist because dougweller thought that NittyG's material was taken without proper attribution. So, if the article gets deleted, the problem is fixed. As to whether material should ever be copy-pasted between articles, that sounds like a question for a policy talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 07:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it is of more use to define the content which is in debate of ownership. In particular NittyG besides my polite asking at least 6 times refuses to define his so called material. The same NittyG told me to make a new wiki btw. Further EdJohnston proposed a deletion, argueing its a fork - which again fails. So maybe ask the authors of the claims first about it, before we have a policy discussion which is based on pure populism and accusiations without proove or any substance at all. --Tales23 (talk) 13:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obama & Roberts

It took a few seconds longer, but Roberts (mainly) & Obama got through the swearing-in ceremony. GoodDay (talk) 02:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 04:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roberts

agreed. i just finished reporting him on the BLP noticeboard. a warped ethic at work here - slander and defamation are okey dokey for robert's article, but not for other people's articles. check out these edit summaries: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruth_Parasol&diff=prev&oldid=264824272

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=263735307

Anastrophe (talk) 07:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

9 DegenFarang (talk) 07:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do not attempt to threaten me

This ridiculous back and forth you're attempting has already been pointed out by moderators. This is your SECOND warning to cease threatening me when all five of us have refuted you and shown that your source is invalid, unless you can find an actual reason we should include your racist comments in the article we will CONTINUE to revert it. And pretending you have any power to ban me when moderators have already warned you to stop is laughable. Cease it or I will report you after your third warning. 121.221.33.231 (talk) 10:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC) Harlquin[reply]

@@ Line 202: / Line 202: @@
 [[User:DegenFarang|DegenFarang]] ([[User talk:DegenFarang|talk]]) 07:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
+== Do not attempt to threaten me ==
+This ridiculous back and forth you're attempting has already been pointed out by moderators. This is your SECOND warning to cease threatening me when all five of us have refuted you and shown that your source is invalid, unless you can find an actual reason we should include your racist comments in the article we will CONTINUE to revert it. And pretending you have any power to ban me when moderators have already warned you to stop is laughable. Cease it or I will report you after your third warning. [[Special:Contributions/121.221.33.231|121.221.33.231]] ([[User talk:121.221.33.231|talk]]) 10:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC) Harlquin