User talk:MR.Texan281

Nonsense of Charlotte Sting: Reloaded

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Charlotte Sting: Reloaded, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Charlotte Sting: Reloaded provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Charlotte Sting: Reloaded, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:40, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with The Mark (Xavier Album). Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:15, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ST47 (talk) 23:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Charleston Lowgators

I put the context tag on the article because nowhere does it explain in the article just what sport they play? No point in being nasty about it, I didn't mark it for deletion or anything, and I see you've been warned about making attacks on other people before. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 23:19, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Stop fooling around

Please stop being immature on the Utah Starzz page. We have explained to you why the season-by-season table is the way it is. On wikipedia, nobody cares what you like. Nobody cares how you want to see things.

Look at the other WNBA team pages. Look at the NBA team pages. They have the table that you keep changing.

Please stop. It is turning into vandalism now, and I will get a moderator involved if I have to. Nickv1025 (talk) 10:51, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

After all the time and hard work I have put into these pages, I am utterly disgusted that you find this immature act so funny. I have contacted a wiki moderator, and the official wiki help board. Before I came here, the WNBA pages on wiki were crap. I have made them better. I have made wiki better. How dare you play this childish game with me because you want cluttered and unprofessional-looking tables. I modeled the tables after the NBA tables. We model all WNBA pages after NBA pages. Nickv1025 (talk) 01:06, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

I am qualified to comment neutrally here as I have no interest or real knowledge about basketball. As a disinterested third party I have to tell you that Nickv's versions of the tables are ten times clearer than the other versions - I could understand immediately what information Nickv's version was trying to convey but the other version was incomprehensible. As part of the purpose of wikipedia is to communicate knowledge effectively I support using Nickv's versions over the others - they simply do the job better. Exxolon (talk) 22:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Agree with Exxolon. In addition, your preferred version doesn't have edit tags for the individual sections. Normally, wiki pages broken into sections should be editable by each section, similar to how your talk page looks. This makes it easier to edit those sections.

Also, when you get into a content dispute, consider using the talk pages of the articles. This is a bit different because it's the same dispute over multiple articles, but you can either pick one article, or copy to all of them. This allows others looking at the article to see the context of the dispute and weigh in with their comments. Running such a dispute on talk pages makes it hard for people to follow and express their comments. Ravensfire2002 (talk) 16:55, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Unacceptable

Regardless of your feelings regarding this situation this [1] kind of thing is unacceptable. We do not allow personal attacks, continue in this vein and you're liable to be blocked. Exxolon (talk) 23:34, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Apology

He who cannot forgive cannot expect to be forgiven himself.

I know it is hard to go back on your own word after you fight it for so long. Thanks for coming around.

Nickv1025 (talk) 21:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to List of Houston Rockets seasons appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. —Chris! _ct 23:05, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

As a courtesy, I am notifying you about a report I filed against your pov edits. It is located here.—Chris! _ct 01:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Edit summaries in this edit and especially this one are unacceptable, and you will be blocked if you continue to make comments of an uncivil nature. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:19, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Stop edit warring immediately or you will be reported. I am not playing game with you anymore. Considered yourself warned.—Chris! _ct 21:41, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

You don't scare me Chris. Face it, I'm evil, and you are nothing but trash and that is what you will be for the rest of your life! Infonerd2216 (talk) 00:08, 23 May 2009 (UTC)Infonerd2216

File:HoustonThunderbears.gif

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:HoustonThunderbears.gif has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[2][3]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:12, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

• I fixed it for you.--2008Olympian^chitchat 07:14, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

List of Toronto Raptors seasons

Regarding this edit: What's wrong is that you deleted the regular-season and playoff totals (and also disregarded Wikipedia's policy on en dashes). I really don't see the logic in saying "If you don't like it, leave it alone"; I dislike vandalism, but how would Wikipedia benefit from having it left alone instead of having it removed immediately? Continued personal attacks (e.g. calling another editor a "moron") will get you blocked, and adding "What the hell" to your edit summary is arguably uncivil. —LOL ^T/_C 03:35, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Please do not continue to edit war with other editors on List of Toronto Raptors seasons. Wikipedia works on a consensus system, and the previous version of the article had consensus. If you wish to make changes with which others disagree, please discuss them on the article's talk page. Thank you. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:12, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Comments such as this are not conducive to a positive editing environment. Wikipedia is a wiki; collaboration is vital to its success, and you must be civil and accomodating at all times. Remember that nobody owns articles. Notice the message at the bottom of the editing window that says "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed for profit by others, do not submit it. ". Dabomb87 (talk) 00:09, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Please be civil

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kingturtle (talk) 05:03, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, MR.Texan281. You have new messages at Dabomb87's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dabomb87 (talk) 02:27, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

See Talk:List of Toronto Raptors seasons. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:05, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

For making personal attacks and threats of violence, I have indefinitely blocked you from editing. Such actions are completely unacceptable and will not be tolerated at Wikipedia. If you wish to contest this block, you may request an univolved admin using {{unblock|your reason here}}. --auburnpilot talk 00:20, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

The Real Apology

I have an announcement to make. First of all, to all users that were treated with disrespect by me, I am very sorry for my improbable actions made on Wikipedia. I now realize that the things I had done on here was never tolerated and I was never like that ever in the past. The reasons why I treated all of you so rude because I was like following some of the other blocked users on Wikipedia like vandalism and edit warring and also I went through a very hard depression in my life. Anyway, I really had missed this site since my indefinite block from editing pages on the site. I also want to apologize for creating multiple accounts which I wasn't supposed to do that when blocked. I really want to be unblocked and I promise to this day, you guys won't have to worry about me edit warring no longer. Also, I have since changed and went to rehab to recover from the issues i've been in. If you guys feel my apology is really truthful, please let me know. Once again, I am really sorry for my actions here and I promise I will never ever do that again. Infonerd2216 (talk) 02:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Infonerd2216

P.S. I am also hoping everyone is doing fine here on Wikipedia.

I was asked to comment here, but I cannot do anything since I am not an admin. I will ask the blocking admin to comment. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:33, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I have requested AuburnPilot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), the blocking admin, to take a look. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:37, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

• Infonerd2216, I'm willing to extend a bit of good faith to you and lift the block, but only if you understand that personal attacks and threats of violence are completely unacceptable. Any return to the behavior that led to your current block, including edit warring or abusive sockpuppetry, and you will be reblocked. Do you agree to use only this account, to refrain from reverting any user more than twice, and to abide by Wikipedia:Civility? --auburnpilot talk 02:58, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

• Yes, I agree to use this only account and the Civility from the site. Infonerd2216 (talk) 03:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Infonerd2216