User talk:Dayewalker: Difference between revisions
Dayewalker (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
I've assumed good faith in the past regarding you but realizing that you're practicing [[Wiki:Hounding]] with me and chasing me through this website for no apparent reason I ask are you in fact a Dreamhost customer? And could you please stop viewing my contributions.--[[User:194x144x90x118|194x144x90x118]] ([[User talk:194x144x90x118|talk]]) 00:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC) |
I've assumed good faith in the past regarding you but realizing that you're practicing [[Wiki:Hounding]] with me and chasing me through this website for no apparent reason I ask are you in fact a Dreamhost customer? And could you please stop viewing my contributions.--[[User:194x144x90x118|194x144x90x118]] ([[User talk:194x144x90x118|talk]]) 00:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
:I'm not doing anything of the sort. If you want to make accusations against me, please take it to the correct venue. As for personal questions about other editors, that's not something of any relevance on wikipedia. The edits of a WP editor should stand alone, and be judged on their own merit. [[User:Dayewalker|Dayewalker]] ([[User talk:Dayewalker#top|talk]]) 01:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC) |
:I'm not doing anything of the sort. If you want to make accusations against me, please take it to the correct venue. As for personal questions about other editors, that's not something of any relevance on wikipedia. The edits of a WP editor should stand alone, and be judged on their own merit. [[User:Dayewalker|Dayewalker]] ([[User talk:Dayewalker#top|talk]]) 01:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
::Seeing as you have refused my request to stop viewing my contributions I too will be taking a greater interest in your contributions from now on.--[[User:194x144x90x118|194x144x90x118]] ([[User talk:194x144x90x118|talk]]) 01:39, 1 July 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:39, 1 July 2009
Welcome to my page, and go Celtics! Leave a message for me below, and I'll respond on this page unless you ask otherwise.
Bobby Fischer
Hi could you do me the favour of taking a further look both at the article and the edit and give your opinion here if this information belongs in the article or not. It seems to me as if it's over focusing on Fiscers anti semitism with trivial details but his antisemitism is already refereed to plenty in the article.--194x144x90x118 (talk) 19:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the revert!
Thanks [1]! — Kralizec! (talk) 03:44, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of DreamHost
An article that you have been involved in editing, DreamHost, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DreamHost_(2nd_nomination). Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Judas278 (talk) 17:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Consistency
If you are going to issue me that warning, please review the other users talk page and issue the same, for consistency. User_talk:Toddst1 --DoyleCB (talk) 18:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- In all good faith, I'd suggest you calm down with your reverts. You seem to enjoy a fight you'll quickly lose here, the best thing to do would be to just get over your previous block and move on. Dayewalker (talk) 19:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
The user above is a sock of User:MascotGuy. Checkout the userpage for a link to the Long term abuse page. I've submitted several requests for a block.— Dædαlus Contribs 06:06, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
3RR compaint
I was filed the 3RR complaint on user:Niex05at the same time. Do you have experience with SPI complaints? Niteshift36 (talk) 02:20, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Not really with the socks page. I'm not completely sold on the two editors being socks, but it is coincidental enough to look into. Dayewalker (talk) 02:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- If you look, his edits and user:Kasper4000 take place in the same articles and the same material in them. I belileve he is doing it in an attempt to dodge the 3RR. Both accounts are less than a month old and have limited themselves to the same 3 articles.Niteshift36 (talk) 02:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Revert of ANI
Hey there - I reverted your removal of the ridiculous rant by User:Professionresearchharvard over at ANI. While your reasons were fine, it is generally bad form to delete material at ANI. It is actually useful to the community to know of the actions of users like this, particularly when they use ANI to launch a personal attack (a DUMB thing to do, trust me). Regards Manning (talk) 02:48, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Gotcha, I understand. Thanks for the explanation, makes sense to me. Take care! Dayewalker (talk) 02:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oops, never mind. Turns out the author was already blocked for vandalism anyway. Best to delete it after all. Manning (talk) 02:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'd like to refer you to Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Pioneercourthouse. Please delete any similar contributions on sight. Katr67 (talk) 21:21, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Dreamhost customer?
It would be helpful to know if you are a dreamhost customer.
I've assumed good faith in the past regarding you but realizing that you're practicing Wiki:Hounding with me and chasing me through this website for no apparent reason I ask are you in fact a Dreamhost customer? And could you please stop viewing my contributions.--194x144x90x118 (talk) 00:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not doing anything of the sort. If you want to make accusations against me, please take it to the correct venue. As for personal questions about other editors, that's not something of any relevance on wikipedia. The edits of a WP editor should stand alone, and be judged on their own merit. Dayewalker (talk) 01:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Seeing as you have refused my request to stop viewing my contributions I too will be taking a greater interest in your contributions from now on.--194x144x90x118 (talk) 01:39, 1 July 2009 (UTC)