User talk:Inurhead: Difference between revisions
→July 2009: did the template wrong |
Ravensfire (talk | contribs) 3RR warning |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==July 2009== |
==July 2009== |
||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attack]] other editors, as you did at [[:User talk:Inurhead]]. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please [[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|stay cool]] and keep this in mind while editing. Personal attacks such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Inurhead&oldid=302006211 this] are not conducive to editing harmony.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> Cheers. <font color="green">[[User:Lifebaka|''lifebaka'']]</font>[[User talk:Lifebaka|'''++''']] 13:32, 14 July 2009 (UTC) |
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attack]] other editors, as you did at [[:User talk:Inurhead]]. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please [[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|stay cool]] and keep this in mind while editing. Personal attacks such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Inurhead&oldid=302006211 this] are not conducive to editing harmony.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> Cheers. <font color="green">[[User:Lifebaka|''lifebaka'']]</font>[[User talk:Lifebaka|'''++''']] 13:32, 14 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:The Hurt Locker|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:The Hurt Locker]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:I've started a discussion on the talk page, let's try to resolve this there.|I've started a discussion on the talk page, let's try to resolve this there.|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Ravensfire2002|Ravensfire2002]] ([[User talk:Ravensfire2002|talk]]) 15:10, 14 July 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:10, 14 July 2009
Message Board for Inurhead
Messages will be deleted as soon as read. Thank you.
Warning re: trolling, vandalism
Inurhead, your edit warring and biased edits to The Hurt Locker are one thing. However, it is entirely different to follow an editor around and revert changes just for the sake of "getting even". Your recent reverts have restored incorrect or misplaced material, and, more seriously, restored a spammed link placed by an account adding multiple links to sites he or she likely owns or is involved with. Your desire to "hurt" me aside, that was a revert of an administrative action and not something I would advise you to repeat. --Ckatzchatspy 02:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- I see you've chosen to ignore this warning, and that you have also dishonestly reverted my effort to incorporate the relevant portions of your changes. (Ebert's review was not "deleted", as you claimed.) In fact, you are the one who is deleting material that criticizes the film, replacing it with excessive quotes and puff material. So be it. --Ckatzchatspy 03:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Echoing Ckatz a bit, I suggest that you keep disputes to wherever they're at. Dispute spillover is how large drahmahz get started, and large drahamhz tend to attract the more trigger-happy parts of the community. I'm going to assume this won't happen again, and we can just leave it at that. Cheers. lifebaka++ 04:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
July 2009
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Inurhead. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Personal attacks such as this are not conducive to editing harmony. Cheers. lifebaka++ 13:32, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Hurt Locker. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. I've started a discussion on the talk page, let's try to resolve this there. Ravensfire2002 (talk) 15:10, 14 July 2009 (UTC)