User talk:Seb az86556

Karen Paterson

I would have no idea how to go about making it a DYK as I've never done that before but I think it's a good idea if you are happy to do it and you think the article qualifies. JoRoFo (talk) 13:22, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Talk:castle

69.86.162.170‎ (talk · contribs) has been blocked for personal attacks. Please refrain from putting words in other people's mouth such as claiming the user called Deb illiterate, that is not what they said. Nev1 (talk) 16:37, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Strictly speaking, yes, that was inaccurate. thanks. Seb az86556 (talk) 19:15, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Re socks: I'm going to try being ultra polite and see what happens. There's certainly no wiki rules about patronizing someone. CJ DUB (talk) 12:25, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

---

dude, that cookie was delicious!--Asdfg12345 02:00, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Seb az86556. You have new messages at Cpl Syx's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Lima

Hello. Thank you for your recent help with the vandal at the Lima article. I submitted an abuse report, but I'm not sure if I did it completely right. It's here. Otherwise, I'm getting ready to request a page protect on that page. I don't know what is so objectionable about the parts that the person is deleting, over and over again. Hires an editor (talk) 13:29, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Cooookkie

File:CookieMonsterToys1.JPG

Thank you for cookie. Me eat cookie! Nom nom nom. :) John Carter (talk) 13:48, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Cookie

Why didn't I get a cookie. I deserve one.--FalunGongDisciple (talk) 15:02, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

You got blocked. That's your cookie. Seb az86556 (talk) 23:15, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Edit summary

Hi, did you address me with the edit summary left on Raja De Singh? If so, thanks, but I just put the first paragraph into google. Regards Hekerui (talk) 00:36, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

I did the same thing... apparently, your google is better :P... Seb az86556 (talk) 00:45, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

I guess I was lucky :) Hekerui (talk) 00:59, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

"easter" in Acts 12:4

On the talk page, I have expressed my opinion that this article falls into the "partisan screed" exception to CSD G1. On the other hand, you are much more experienced than I in these matters, so I hesitate to remove your db-nonsense message. I agree that the article needs to go and, for my own education, would appreciate anything further that you can tell me about the process. Thanks. Peter Chastain (talk) 08:18, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Good point. whenever you find another good reason for deletion, add

{{prod2|reason}}

below the tag, replacing "reason" by your thoughts. try it. makes for a stronger case. Seb az86556 (talk) 08:24, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't think there is a stronger case to be made. My point is that, if I am reading WP:PN correctly, this article would more appropriately be handled as an AfD. My concern is that, by telling the author that the article is nonsense (which I don't think it is), we are being unfair to the author and missing an opportunity to address the real issue, i.e., that Wikipedia is not a forum for essays that promote a particular point of view. If Justinthyme11 takes that to heart (and works on writing skills), Justinthyme11 could possibly become someone who contributes to Wikipedia in a positive way. Peter Chastain (talk) 08:54, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

As you suggested on my talk page, I did the AfD nomination. Thanks for the help and support. I really appreciate it! Peter Chastain (talk) 09:37, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Stop being a hypocrite Seb

You're attacking me indirectly, take your own advice and stop edit warring and stop libeling. The one not keeping your cool is you. Cite your sources libeler.Serpentdove (talk) 08:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC)