User talk:Unionhawk: Difference between revisions
→Arbcom: Fixing link. |
→Notification of a NEW request to amend ArbCom case: new section |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
==Arbcom== |
==Arbcom== |
||
You are mentioned in an arbcom request for modification. Fortunately such requests should not be as prolonged or as indepth as the main arbcom as it is just a request for an ammendment. Unfortunately scuro's latest comment on wiki med collaboration project has made me feel that it is time to bring this to the attention of the arbcom.[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Request_to_amend_prior_case:_ADHD]] Other issues can be mediated but this one I feel is one that needs arbcom intervention.--[[User:Literaturegeek|<span style="color:blue">Literature</span><span style="color:red">geek</span>]] | [[User_talk:Literaturegeek |<span style="color:orange">''T@1k?''</span>]] 03:14, 19 September 2009 (UTC) |
You are mentioned in an arbcom request for modification. Fortunately such requests should not be as prolonged or as indepth as the main arbcom as it is just a request for an ammendment. Unfortunately scuro's latest comment on wiki med collaboration project has made me feel that it is time to bring this to the attention of the arbcom.[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Request_to_amend_prior_case:_ADHD]] Other issues can be mediated but this one I feel is one that needs arbcom intervention.--[[User:Literaturegeek|<span style="color:blue">Literature</span><span style="color:red">geek</span>]] | [[User_talk:Literaturegeek |<span style="color:orange">''T@1k?''</span>]] 03:14, 19 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Notification of a NEW request to amend ArbCom case == |
|||
A new [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment request for amendment] of the ADHD remedies has just been filed. This one asks for additions to Remedy 3) Scuro placed under mentorship. This notification is being added to the talk pages of scuro, Literaturegeek, Jmh649, Unionhawk and WhatamIdoing. - [[User:Hordaland|Hordaland]] ([[User talk:Hordaland|talk]]) 09:25, 19 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:25, 19 September 2009
Request for mediation not accepted
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.
- Many thanks for the effort. Just uncertain if this would really move use any farther ahead. I could put together a list of a hundred article from governmental organization to research scientist and still the conclusion by some would be that no one in the scientific community believes ADHD is controversial. In the production of the list I would be called anti psychiatric and out to harm people I am sure. It is all a little frustrating.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:02, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Notice
Hi. I'm posting to let you know that your name has been mentioned on a list of Highly active users on the talk page for RfA's here. If you are interested in running for administratorship, or if you would like to make any comments, feel free to join the discussion. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 17:36, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Arbcom
You are mentioned in an arbcom request for modification. Fortunately such requests should not be as prolonged or as indepth as the main arbcom as it is just a request for an ammendment. Unfortunately scuro's latest comment on wiki med collaboration project has made me feel that it is time to bring this to the attention of the arbcom.Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Request_to_amend_prior_case:_ADHD Other issues can be mediated but this one I feel is one that needs arbcom intervention.--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 03:14, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Notification of a NEW request to amend ArbCom case
A new request for amendment of the ADHD remedies has just been filed. This one asks for additions to Remedy 3) Scuro placed under mentorship. This notification is being added to the talk pages of scuro, Literaturegeek, Jmh649, Unionhawk and WhatamIdoing. - Hordaland (talk) 09:25, 19 September 2009 (UTC)