User talk:Emarsee

Welcome to Emarsee’s talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:

• If I left a message on your talk page, please post a reply to my talk page. I might be unable to see your message if you post it on your talk page.

Thus, if I have left a message on your talk page please post a reply here.

• If you choose to not respond on my talk page, please use a talkback template, {{tb|Insert your username here}}.
• Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.

• Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
• Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.

• To initiate a new conversation on this page click on this link.
• Remember to post new messages at the bottom of my talk page.
• I will not continue on with a conversation if it involves off-Wikipedia conversation. (eg, telephone, email, IM, social networking, etc.) If you have concerns that you are uncomfortable to discuss on Wikipedia, use the Email this user tool.
• You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).
• Thank you.  єmarsee  • Speak up!

Talk Page Archives

1 2 3 4 5 6

Bolding

thanks for letting me know. GWST11 (talk) 03:43, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

No problem.

Orphaned non-free image (File:Wfntv.svg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wfntv.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 06:43, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

David Thompson Secondary School

You sir have been systematically and categorically discriminatory towards the David Thompson Secondary School article. Please explain why such particular attention to that one article? It conforms to the standards set by other secondary school articles. --24.85.138.182 (talk) 03:03, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Can't wait to see what's going to happen when Eric Hamber is checked out, He or She is going to wipe the whole page... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.181.7.180 (talk) 09:50, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Non-free logos

Hello. Thank you for trying to save the logos from the television station pages. However, simply interspersing them through the rest of the article doesn't really justify their use. Non-free media must achieve something than simple words cannot. Can you find a reliable source discussing the change in branding, or something, which directly relates to a specific logo? The JPS^{talk to me} 17:13, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Most logo changes happen when the networks have a rebranding and they can be found on the Canadian Communication Foundations. Other than that, I don't believe there are a lot of sources out there, besides Youtube videos.  єmarsee  • Speak up! 17:49, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

You have not added critical commentary. You've merely thrown the images in where there is a lot of text. The images are at the moment purely decorative. I'm not going to revert again today because of the 3RR. Without sources and genuine critical commentary you cannot use the logos. The JPS^{talk to me} 18:04, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

I believe I have added critical commentary. If you don't see what I've did as critical commentary then nothing I do will ever please you enough for the logos to stay on. As I mentioned before, sources for logo changes are usually from the CCF, but they are very vague.  єmarsee  • Speak up! 18:12, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

The yellow 'A' logo shows promise, but the other two in that rather messy section are problematic. I don't see the critical commentary that justifies using these non-free media. Critical commentary isn't a currency -- a 'History' section doesn't buy you an image. You need to justify every image. The JPS^{talk to me} 18:21, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

I can add some more commentary to these logos, but it's going to take a lot of time. I have a question regarding wordmark logos. Are they still considered NFC when they only contain words and simple shapes? See this as an example. As far as I understand, they are in public domain. Correct me if I'm wrong. єmarsee  • Speak up! 18:29, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

CIVI

But on CTVglobemedia's website, they reffer to the station as 'A' Vancouver Island, so that's why I've changed it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.233.75.211 (talk) 18:39, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Why??

Hey man long time no talk. With regards to the Lougheed, and the thing being split and not part of Highway 7, I have figured out a solution. Basically, what we could do is make an article for the "Lougheed Highway" and then have a section that says "Highway 7" and say "this part and this other part past Ottawa Street are provincial Highway 7, while the rest of the route was decomissioned in 200??" What do you think about that?? I now see that you are right about highway 7 being divided, but the lougheed is still a major arterial route, and deserves it's own article. I think BC Highway 7 should redirect to the subsection of the Lougheed Highway article entitled "Highway 7"

Thoughts comments??

With regard to User:Rettetast what a fool. WHy would you remove all the images of highway markers, in an article about Highways. His actions have no context, what makes it worse is it's an admin. TotallyTempo (talk) 01:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

British Columbia Highway 15

If British Columbia Highway 1A is not a provincial highway, then why is it in the BC roads template under provincial highways out of curiosity? --Admrboltz (talk) 04:05, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

My mistake. Google once again seems to be out of date. Its been 6 years since I've been up that way, and almost every time I would cut over to Highway 99 via 8 Avenue. I have undid your change from Blaine to Seattle, as this is no where near Seattle. And thanks for clarifying the Metro Vancouver item as well. --Admrboltz (talk) 04:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry. I don't use Google Maps as a reliable source of maps. I rely on a Canadian map company called MapArt for all my map-related sources. єmarsee  • Speak up! 04:18, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

(both times I've tried to comment I EC :p) Before I get into a 3RR situation - the "city" column is not the destination of the route, it is the city the interchange happens in, which is Blaine. The destination is listed in the {{jct}} template, not the city column. Blaine can be removed from the Jct template however. --Admrboltz (talk) 04:19, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Oh *@&(... I didn't see I put that into the city column. My mistake, I apologize if I caused any troubles. I meant to put Seattle into the jct template. єmarsee  • Speak up! 04:21, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry about it. I still need to clean up the article and cite the BC portion of it, but I figured instead of trying to expand WA 543 anymore, I could tackle a combined article. --Admrboltz (talk) 04:47, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Hey

Hey, check out what I got on my talk page: "The WP:NFCC is a Wikipedia policy, and must be followed. I have reverted your edits on British Columbia Highway 7 as you are still failing criterion 8 and do not have fair use rationale listed for these images. If you want to dispute the copyrighted status of these route markers, then talk to WP:MCQ. Thank you.

Isn't that special. Other highway articles use signs for marking highways, I fail to see how BC is any differentI'ma deal with this tomorrow probably around 6 pm EST or so, after I return from work. TotallyTempo (talk) 04:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

On this point, since I left this message - the US route shields and state route shields are all public domain as US government work. The BC traffic signs from what I understand are still copyrighted items, and per their copyright notice template were refused to be published as a free item. --Admrboltz (talk) 04:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

I have asked uninvolved people their opinion on this matter at Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#British_Columbia_route_images. Thank you --Admrboltz (talk) 04:29, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

2007 Canada broadcast TV realignment

You should seriously have read the article before you removed that. Apparently all relevant update were NOT done a long time ago unless 2007 lasted until 2009- that would make it the longest year in history! --208.38.59.163 (talk) 23:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Chch1986.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Chch1986.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 16:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Ontvlogo.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ontvlogo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --–Drilnoth (T • C • L) 20:14, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Chch1986.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chch1986.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: Logos needing "sourced commentary"

To be honest, I don't know what they mean when they say "sourced commentary". I have really given up on trying to figure that one out. Me and another user (an admin) have locked horns on this image removal and this "sourced commentary" thing. Please ask your favorite admin what they think it means, they will probably have a better idea than I would. Sorry I couldn't help more :S. Take Care...NeutralHomer • Talk • 21:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

J Milburn did not remove File:CHCH1990s.png from the CHCH-TV article, The GateKeeper07 removed it in this edit. Powergate92Talk 23:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Also File:Ontvlogo.png is not in typeface so it is not public domain see WP:Public domain#Fonts for info about that. Powergate92Talk 23:44, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

If the logo is public domain, let J Milburn know that so he can readd it. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 23:48, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Logo

(Edit) No, it's a duplication. No point in having this image when there's such a similar one in the lead. Revert it if you want, but I don't see the point. Black Kite 23:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Marking text logos as PD

Thankyou. Much as you probably see me as some evil logo-removing bastard, as long as the images are tagged properly I haven't got a problem. There's probably a lot more images on TV station articles that fit the text-only bill as well. Black Kite 01:01, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

CHCH-TV

There are new comments on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 08:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

File:BChighway15.svg

Is there any way you can expand this map slightly to include the WA 543 section? --Admrboltz (talk) 19:17, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Yeah a marker for the border would be nice. --Admrboltz (talk) 22:32, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! --Admrboltz (talk) 01:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Re:PunchMuch

Hey, sorry for the long response, I've been away from the comp for awhile. But yeah, sure the logo for PunchMuch is fine. musimax. (talk) 20:29, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Emarsee. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Powergate92Talk 04:32, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

YTV (TV channel)

Stop removing my mentions that the logo and promo style was changed. If you *watch* YTV, you'll notice that the logo is quite changed, with the YTV letters completely white, and the background little bit modified. Also the promo font and style is changed. You don't have to *remove* stuff. tablo (talk) 22:49, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Logo really changed. Although the website's logo hasn't changed, the logo on TV clearly changed. I will soon come up with a screenshot if so. tablo (talk) 00:41, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Chch1986.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chch1986.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)^(Talk) 02:21, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

CKXT's Logo

I just posted my opinion in the discussion about that logo at WT:Non-free content#Free or non-free logo?. Powergate92Talk 23:36, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Emarsee. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 September 11.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Powergate92Talk 23:33, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

CBC Television logo

Hi,

I noticed you uploaded the logo for CBC Television that is currently in the CBC TV articles. They have recently changed their logo (the new one just has the letters CBC underneath the CBC corporate logo, the television part is gone), any possibility you could update the file to the new logo?! I noticed it is an SVG file, I don't know how to create those so if I upload the new logo it will be in PNG format. Let me know, thanks! The GateKeeper07 (talk) 03:35, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

 Done.  єmarsee  • Speak up! 04:07, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Thmc1 re Chinatown, Vancouver - now at 4RR

As of his latest reversion he's now at $RR reverting the same content, as he'd done the same to two previous attempts of mine to "stay the course". See User_talk:Piano_non_troppo#4RR and the preceding section, ando note warnings on User:Thmc1 re other Chinatown type pages and a similar pattern of edits/conduct. Actual definitions and stats would help (to cite although elsewhere he's deleted Britannica references because they didn't suit his taste/line....)Skookum1 (talk) 20:51, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Warned him for 3RR, will report him.  єmarsee  • Speak up! 21:07, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Chinatown, Vancouver size

Hi Emarsee, I'm glad I now have the chance to express my intentions and actions to you.

Let me first say that I am a novice at Wikipedia editing and this, in fact, is the first time I am even finding my way around to get to a Talk page. I actually requested Editorial assistance, and editor(?) "Jayron" (or is it "Jayron32"?) advised me to air my same concern on the Talk page of the "Chinatown, Vancouver" article. I proceeded to try that, but I then stumbled upon your message, which I'm glad I did, because I sincerely did not understand why my completely legitimate edit kept being reverted, or by whom, especially when I took great care every single time to actually express my rationale carefully in the Edit Summary.

Let me next convey that I am a very nice person who has absolutely no intention of engaging in an "edit war." I also only subsequently learned about this "3-revert" rule.

Let me additionally address statements made by "Skookum1" and "Piano_non_troppo". First of all "Skookum1" may possibly be begrudging at me because I was actually able to prove to him numerically that he was incorrect regarding his insistence that the SF Bay Area has a larger ethnic Chinese population than the NYC metropolitan area -in fact, NY's is larger, with over 600,000 (as compared to over 500,000 for the Greater SF Bay Area) by Census American Community Survey 2007 estimates. Regarding "Piano_non_Troppo" (editor?)'s comment, I didn't realize that a Britannica reference was held sacred even with regards to modifiying its comment as a former fact, until I saw his warning about that issue to replace the Britannica reference with an equally authoritative reference. For the record, I have NOT seen any warning fom him about a "3RR," not to say that he didn't send one - I just haven't seen one, as your message to me has been the first that I have seen in that vein. Finally, I am surprised that he would state that I have been short on statistics, because I seem to be the one quoting them more often than most others! I also firmly believe in statistical integrity myself.

All that under the bridge, let me address the actual content of my complaint, as I did to the Editorial Assistance site:

Regarding the first line in the "Chinatown, Vancouver" article: I propose that this line needs to be re-stated as, "Chinatown in Vancouver, British Columbia, is the largest Chinatown in Canada and one of the largest in North America." The allusions to the San Francisco and New York Chinatowns are absolutely inappropriate there and should be removed from that context. Such a statement as I propose contains integrity and would avoid and replace an irrelevant, numerically unsubstantiated, unreferenced, and almost certainly inaccurate phrase, including the relatively extreme superlatives. The appropriate idea to be conveyed is that Vancouver's Chinatown is indeed the largest in Canada and one of the largest in North America, rather than an imprecise comparison with other specific Chinatowns and even more significantly, a comparison BETWEEN two OTHER Chinatowns, certainly an inappropriate statement to be present in the first line of "Chinatown, Vancouver." Clearly, therefore, references to San Francisco's Chinatown as well as New York's "Chinatown" (by the way, which one in NYC? - there are multiple in the city proper alone) should be eliminated entirely from this context.

Furthermore, the phrase in question itself is clearly inaccurate, given that the Manhattan Chinatown of 2009 enumerates about 80,000 to 90,000 Chinese residents and is apparently experiencing a very recent resurgence of immigration from Fujian and Zhejiang Provinces in Mainland China, while San Francisco Chinatown's proper could have AT MOST (and unlikely) 60,000 such residents, if recent Census place/zip code estimates are an accurate indication. Additionally, it is important to note that Chinatown boundaries have further blurred in recent years as they have expanded, and there are no official Census counts for such "Chinatowns."

I have no vested interest in any of these issues, but I strongly feel that facts need to be updated when they change with time. Otherwise, editorial credibility is sacrificed.

Restating the line as I propose endows neutrality and integrity to the content of the article and strengthens it to encyclopedic quality. The line in its present form is absolutely invalid and unacceptable.

Thank you, Emarsee, and I hope to hear back from you. I'm just not completely sure at which site I would receive your message.

Respectfully yours,

Thmc1Thmc1 (talk) 02:37, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Ckcobbs.svg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ckcobbs.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:11, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Mctvbbs.svg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mctvbbs.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Mctv.svg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mctv.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ontvlogo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Ontvlogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 21:25, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Your moves

Your recent moves of articles such as Main Street–Science World Station, in which you removed the spaces from the dashes were incorrect per WP:DASH, which says "All disjunctive en dashes are unspaced, except when there is a space within either one or both of the items" (italics mine for emphasis). I have reverted them; please try to use an edit summary in the future. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Take "Main Street" and "Science World Station" for example: because they have internal spaces, the dash between them is spaced. Many websites and organizations do not follow standard dash rules; that does not mean we shouldn't. Feel free to ask more. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:37, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: Non-free logos

I think it will work as it is a third party reliable source. Powergate92Talk 00:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Maisontv.svg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Maisontv.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  єmarsee  • Speak up! 05:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Hpitv.svg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hpitv.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  єmarsee  • Speak up! 05:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Screamtv.svg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Screamtv.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  єmarsee  • Speak up! 05:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Re:OnTV logo

I was taking it from the OnTV website, from what I've seen, I've only seen them use the black background version and from watching the station awhile back, the black background version seems to be mroe familiar to me and I can't remeber seeing the svg file version you uploaded. But if the svg file is more accurate then I'm fine with it. musimax. (talk) 17:35, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

• Since it's not plain text, though (the device of the "n" hooked through the "O"), I'd still consider it to cross the threshold of originality. This may be worth a discussion at WP:PUI. Consider File:McDonald's Corporate Logo.svg, which is all text, but uses the large "M" device. Black Kite 17:52, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:CHCH ONTV.svg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CHCH ONTV.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Black Kite 17:59, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Television channels Wiki

Because of the problems we been having with old logos do to WP:NFCC, I have decided to start Television channels Wiki on Wikia. On Television channels Wiki you only need to have {{Fairuse}} on a logo to add it to an article. Powergate92Talk 02:54, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Image uploads

Please do not upload copyrighted images and license them as CC-ATT 2.5 images from http://www.seataf.com/ (Copyright © 2009 SeaTaf Productions. All Rights Reserved). feydey (talk) 20:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

My mistake, the CC lic. image is really tiny -- I had to look though the page for some time. Apologies, feydey (talk) 21:26, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

All images restored. feydey (talk) 21:31, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Your continued edits about the BC highway system

You are posting factually wrong information as true for certain articles. I was originally hesitant to edit the article because people like you tend to "own" articles. You are what is wrong with Wikipedia. Had you bothered to do any actual research you would see that highway 7 does in fact end at Broadway and Granville.

Anyway. Have fun owning your article. I'm sending a link over to a local roadfan site here. They are going to squish you like a bug. 24.86.118.7 (talk) 22:27, 3 October 2009 (UTC)