Jump to content

Yazid I: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
rv - anon, that seems incredible -- do the Shi'a REALLY believe that?
Line 23: Line 23:
=== Shi'a view of Yazid ===
=== Shi'a view of Yazid ===


For Shi'a Muslims, Yazid is the consummate villain, who will always be remembered for his murder of Husayn and persecution of his family. He is said to have been fond of wine and the company of courtesans, and completely careless of his religious duties. He is quoted, by some sources, as saying: "Banu Hashim (the tribe of the Prophet) have played a game to attain wealth, no news came from above nor was there a revelation."
For Shi'a Muslims, Yazid is the consummate villain, who will always be remembered for his murder of Husayn and persecution of his family. He is said to have been fond of wine and the company of courtesans, and completely careless of his religious duties.


The events at Karbala figure prominently in Shi'a thought, and many Shi'a Islamist movements liken their causes to Husayn's struggle against Yazid. Leaders of the 1979 [[Iranian Revolution]] that overthrew the [[Pahlavi]] government frequently drew such comparisons. The 10th of Muharram (also known as [[Aashurah]]), the Islamic calendar date on which the Battle of Karbala occurred, is commemmorated as a day of mourning by Shi'a Muslims around the world. Shi'a rituals on Aashurah usually involve public processions during which Shi'a Muslims curse Yazid, recite poems commemorating Husayn and his death, and flagellate themselves in order to share the pain of Husayn.
The events at Karbala figure prominently in Shi'a thought, and many Shi'a Islamist movements liken their causes to Husayn's struggle against Yazid. Leaders of the 1979 [[Iranian Revolution]] that overthrew the [[Pahlavi]] government frequently drew such comparisons. The 10th of Muharram (also known as [[Aashurah]]), the Islamic calendar date on which the Battle of Karbala occurred, is commemmorated as a day of mourning by Shi'a Muslims around the world. Shi'a rituals on Aashurah usually involve public processions during which Shi'a Muslims curse Yazid, recite poems commemorating Husayn and his death, and flagellate themselves in order to share the pain of Husayn.

Revision as of 02:07, 6 January 2006

Yazid ibn Muawiyah (Arabic: يزيد بن معاويه) (c. 645 - 683), was the sixth caliph, and the second of the Umayyad dynasty; he succeeded his father Muawiyah I. He died suddenly in 683, after only three years of rule.

Accession to the caliphate

Since the succession of the caliphate had proved so divisive in the past (see Succession to Muhammad), Muawiyah I decided on the highly controversial step of breaking with the Arabian tradition of shura, consultation by the leading men of the tribe to choose the new leader. He founded the first Islamic dynasty by directly designating his son Yazid to succeed him. He did however attempt to observe shura by requiring his subjects to "choose" his son and swear allegiance to him in his own lifetime. Yazid was duly proclaimed caliph upon his father's death. However, he faced immediate opposition from other Muslims who rejected the dynastic principle, or supported the claims of different lineages.

Battle of Karbala

Yazid was first opposed by the grandson of Muhammad, Husayn bin Ali, the son of the assassinated former caliph Ali ibn Abi Talib and the brother of Hasan ibn Ali, who had challenged Yazid's father for the caliphate. Husayn, as the descendant of Muhammad, had a very good claim to the caliphate in the eyes of many Muslims. Many Muslims of Kufa, in Iraq, which had been the stronghold of his father Ali, assured Husayn that they would support him if he bid for the caliphate. Based on this information, Husayn decided to march against Yazid. He started from Mecca and headed towards Kufa.

Husayn neared Kufa and found that he had thoroughly overestimated his support in the city, which was held fast against him. Few thousands of Yazid's army, led by ‘Umar ibn Sa’d, was closing around him. Some Shia sources say that he only had seventy-two men with him, in addition to women and children. At the Battle of Karbala, he and his warriors were all killed. Shi'a Muslims, the partisans of Ali, say that Husayn and his men performed miracles of bravery and defiance during this unequal battle.

Revolt in Arabia and death of Yazid

Other Arabs, who were used to choosing leaders by consultation rather than heredity, refused to pledge allegiance to Yazid. Abdullah bin Zubayr claimed the caliphate for himself and launched an insurgency in the Hejaz, the former heartland of the Islamic empire. Yazid sent armies against him in 683. Medina was captured and Mecca was besieged. During the siege, the Kaaba was damaged, reportedly causing significant ill feeling among the inhabitants of Mecca as well as many Muslims thoughout the Islamic empire. The siege ended when Yazid died suddenly in 683 CE. The exact place of Yazid's burial is unknown. He was briefly succeeded by his son, Muawiya II.

Assessments of Yazid

Shi'a view of Yazid

For Shi'a Muslims, Yazid is the consummate villain, who will always be remembered for his murder of Husayn and persecution of his family. He is said to have been fond of wine and the company of courtesans, and completely careless of his religious duties.

The events at Karbala figure prominently in Shi'a thought, and many Shi'a Islamist movements liken their causes to Husayn's struggle against Yazid. Leaders of the 1979 Iranian Revolution that overthrew the Pahlavi government frequently drew such comparisons. The 10th of Muharram (also known as Aashurah), the Islamic calendar date on which the Battle of Karbala occurred, is commemmorated as a day of mourning by Shi'a Muslims around the world. Shi'a rituals on Aashurah usually involve public processions during which Shi'a Muslims curse Yazid, recite poems commemorating Husayn and his death, and flagellate themselves in order to share the pain of Husayn.

Some Shi'as in India and Pakistan refer to Yazid as "the tyrant".

Sunni view of Yazid

Sunni Muslims have no one position on Yazid and the Battle of Karbala. Though Sunnis generally agree that Yazid was not a righteous Caliph, they differ on the nature of Husayn's opposition to Yazid's rule and Yazid's culpability in Husayn's death. Some Sunni authorities have claimed that Husayn opposed Yazid's ascension to the Caliphate but did not actively revolt against him, and that Husayn's killing was ordered not by Yazid but by the Umayyad governor of Iraq, Ubaidallah ibn Ziyad. Others have refrained from taking a position on the matter, claiming that although Husayn's martyrdom was an unfortunate event, the evidence on exactly how it occurred and who bears responsibility is too inconclusive to merit judgment. Still others have joined the Shi'a position, cursing Yazid and denouncing him as an illegitimate ruler. In any event however, Yazid, Husayn, and the Battle of Karbala do not occupy a central position in Sunni thought as they do in the Shi'a tradition, and Sunnis generally do not ascribe religious significance to the events at Karbala.

A handful of Sunni scholars consider Hasan ibn Ali to be a legitimate caliph occupying the fifth title designation, after his father Ali bin Abu Talib and before Muawiyah I. Under this scenario, Yazid I would be the seventh rather than sixth caliph. However, this is a minority opinion, and most chronologies do not count Hasan, and place Yazid at sixth.

References

Hawting, G.R., The First Dynasty of Islam: the Umayyad Caliphate AD 661-750, Second edition, Routledge, 2000, ISBN 0415240735 or ISBN 0415240727

Preceded by Caliph
680–683
Succeeded by