User talk:SlimVirgin/History 2: Difference between revisions
SlimVirgin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Fred jones (talk | contribs) Hi there!!! |
||
| Line 198: | Line 198: | ||
so, yeah the will mcwhinney article certainly has you all in a tizzy. I'm not looking to out anyone or anyhting, it's just gotten to the point that well, i think there's a reason, and other people too, to read about this fascinating community activist. I was telling Will beback, i've been a memebr of Sierra club since i was akid, my parents enlisted me and made some rather large donations in my name throughout my life, and i've done the same wiht my own children. It's a cool way to move things forward, like that movie, but hoefulyl much less trite. Anyhow.. what's the good word with you today? I think of our battles more like the old warner brothers cartoon with the coyote and the sheepdog, punching in before they set out to undermine one another. Because that's whats happening here, I'm actualyl writing some pretty solid stuff here, and you and will beback are bending over backwards to break rules and uphold them agaijnst me. Look, over at biff rose, there was a flargrant violation of the 3rr standard, and I pointed out that to Will beback that each time i made that violation, i was blocked and banned. i see that the person who did it this time was not blocked or banned. so you know, I've got a whole list of these that is being sandboxed by another ip, to follow up on, as i told will, you need to play fair for me to adhere to any standards you want to uphold. you can't just block an article, because true information is being disseminated through it. Well you can, but it's against the wiki rules, and so you are in violation, though i don't really think you care, anyhow, hope you keep your head above water, and I'l lsee you at the fights, so to speak. Have a good day, I''ll remain civil, as long as you do.. but you 've got to remain civil in your actions too, ok? Ok. [[User:Jonah Ayers|Jonah Ayers]] 22:58, 21 January 2006 (UTC) |
so, yeah the will mcwhinney article certainly has you all in a tizzy. I'm not looking to out anyone or anyhting, it's just gotten to the point that well, i think there's a reason, and other people too, to read about this fascinating community activist. I was telling Will beback, i've been a memebr of Sierra club since i was akid, my parents enlisted me and made some rather large donations in my name throughout my life, and i've done the same wiht my own children. It's a cool way to move things forward, like that movie, but hoefulyl much less trite. Anyhow.. what's the good word with you today? I think of our battles more like the old warner brothers cartoon with the coyote and the sheepdog, punching in before they set out to undermine one another. Because that's whats happening here, I'm actualyl writing some pretty solid stuff here, and you and will beback are bending over backwards to break rules and uphold them agaijnst me. Look, over at biff rose, there was a flargrant violation of the 3rr standard, and I pointed out that to Will beback that each time i made that violation, i was blocked and banned. i see that the person who did it this time was not blocked or banned. so you know, I've got a whole list of these that is being sandboxed by another ip, to follow up on, as i told will, you need to play fair for me to adhere to any standards you want to uphold. you can't just block an article, because true information is being disseminated through it. Well you can, but it's against the wiki rules, and so you are in violation, though i don't really think you care, anyhow, hope you keep your head above water, and I'l lsee you at the fights, so to speak. Have a good day, I''ll remain civil, as long as you do.. but you 've got to remain civil in your actions too, ok? Ok. [[User:Jonah Ayers|Jonah Ayers]] 22:58, 21 January 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Hi there!!! == |
|||
how are you doing? How's the old block scenario working out? look i've, under another name reported you, and well i thin kthis is going ot end badly for you, so quit blocking the jonah acocunt, and we can go from there, email me if you must at the jvsanborn@gmail account.. okey dokey slim and pokey11 yo uare so fun!!!!!! by now [[User:Fred jones|Fred jones]] 01:38, 22 January 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:38, 22 January 2006
| Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing. — Jimbo Wales [1] | |
snow-coat.jpg) Education is the ability to listen to almost anything without losing your temper. — Robert Frost
Request concerning Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Carl HewittI'd like to ask a favour: that you help try to find a suitable principle that can be used in this RfAr case. Two things that you should read:
Do you think you might be able to help with this? --- Charles Stewart 20:41, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Mark Ames ArticleDear SlimVirgin, There is an anonymous IP (technically two of them) from Central European University that is very insistent on reverting the Mark Ames article to a version you made last November. This user keeps breaking 3RR and won't bothering explaining his reasons, but he seems to be quite fond of you. Could you talk to this user and encourage him to engage in a meaningful debate rather than a revert war? --Ryan Utt 03:51, 14 January 2006 (UTC) Update: I'm almost positive the anon IP is Peter Ekman. That's why he's so insistent on deferring towards you as an authoritative source. Belated thanksI now have a few extra tabs at the top of my Wikipedia pages. Thanks for your comments on my RfA. One needs critics as well as friends, but better still, one needs a critical friend. To that end, if I come across a sticky situation, I hope you will not mind if I ask your advice; and if you see me do something questionable, I would appreciate your letting me know. Banno 08:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC) Thank you!
"Conspiracy theory" title neutrality proposal 2.0 voting has begunHello Slim, I am still open to debate and discussion on the issue if you are interested. See here and Wikipedia:Title Neutrality. zen master T 20:31, 14 January 2006 (UTC) questionWhat does one do with a biographical article for a person who seems notable but the article itself is a mess? EG: Homeyra who according to Google is an Iranian singer of some renown. Sumergocognito 09:02, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
New "conspiracy theory titles" discussion and proposal areaHello Slim, the new conspiracy theory titles proposal and discussion area can be found here: Wikipedia talk:Conspiracy theory titles, if you want me to I can copy over the old counter argument from Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory or Wikipedia:Title Neutrality (the later was moved to my userspace) but for now I left a space for an updated counter argument to go underneath version 2.0 of the proposal at: Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory titles. zen master T 18:46, 16 January 2006 (UTC) Mediation Cabal requestDear SlimVirgin: Hello, I'm Nicholas Turnbull, mediator and coordinator down at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal. A user, Gmaxwell has named you as a party in a mediation request; I would be most exceptionally grateful if you would review the request and present your perspective of the issue, indicating whether or not you would be prepared to enter mediation. The mediation request is here: Remember, if you don't want to participate in the mediation, you don't have to, and you won't be subject to any disciplinary action as a result of either participating in the mediation or refusing to take part. If you need any help or assistance relating to either this conflict or the mediation case, please feel free to contact me; I am entirely at your service. Best regards, --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 18:47, 16 January 2006 (UTC) Hi Sarah. I just wanted to clarify a few things. Firstly, I can assure you that I did not intend to hide anything by discussing anything on IRC, and I apologize. I also think that we (and everyone) can come to a reasonable agreement. So, no bad blood between us, I hope?--Sean|Black 09:42, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Slim, I love you like a brother from another mother, but would it kill you to use the talk page there as well as editing the policy page? If for no other reason than that it makes us look less like the people contributing are squabbling and more like they are discussing. I'm fairly sure that we want the same thing in the end, but I don't understand the rush. - brenneman(t)(c) 03:08, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
<rant>
</rant>
ProtectionHi, looks like you protected your page two months ago but forgot to check to see if the vandal had gone away. I've taken the liberty of unprotecting. Please restore protection if the vandal returns. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 13:32, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Hope you are wellPlease check out the discussion at Talk:Islamofascism (term); proposal is to redirect to Neofascism and religion. Any insights or opinions you feel like sharing would be welcome. BYT 20:21, 17 January 2006 (UTC) OuidaHi, I know you had other stuff going on so it's OK. Cheers Arniep 03:34, 18 January 2006 (UTC) RequestWould you please take a look at User talk:IanDavies, sections LSHTM and Personal attacks. There's a good bit more, but basically I would like a non-involved admin to take a look and see if anything can be done. He's not happy about the sources for an article, started an edit war, I was pulled in and stated they look fine to me and to stop the edit war. He has given no specifics on content he feels may be inaccurate, although he has been asked repeatedly to do so. I suggested if he still had an issue, to try WP:DR or put it on Article Rfc. He seems to have confused Article Rfc with User Rfc, which I have not mentioned, and is making some rude comments about me, to put it blandly. He also directly implied the other editor of the page is a "spotty little network zit". Thaks for your assistance - KillerChihuahua?!? 15:07, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Re: User PageThanks! It is my wish that perhaps someone can be shown the way of Wikipedia through the basic philosophies of the Wikipedian community, all nicely packaged in an attractive userpage :). Cheers, Bratschetalk | Esperanza 04:13, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Blocking users over fair-use image disputesAw, thanks! Heh...for the most part, I've tried to stay out of the fair use controversy—I'm not sure I understand all the subtleties of it and I don't want to get too stressed =) That said, looking at the discussion, it looks like you have good support for your proposal—hope it works out! — Knowledge Seeker দ 06:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Dominion of MelchizedekHi SV, long time no see. Well I have contacted you because I need your help. The DOM article is once again being reverted by Johnski and his marry band of twits. As you probably know, right now that the arbitration committee is in flux. Therefore, the arbitration case is stalled and it may be awhile until something is done. I was hoping you could protect this page, at least for awhile. I've also asked Fred if there is any way to get an injunction, but there might not be enough arbitrators to do this. I would appreciate it if you could let me know. Thanks.. Davidpdx 08:02, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Islamist terrorismHey could you read this discussion[2] and give your two cents? If you think its appropriate, I would suggest making a protected move, as there is no question that policy dictates this move based on the discussion[3].--Urthogie 14:26, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Help tracking down some changes to Ashton-TateQuadell suggested I write to you about this. A while back I basically re-wrote the entire Ashton-Tate article. Following a lead from another editor, I bought a copy of In Search of Stupidity, which has a chapter of the decline and fall of this company during the 1980s. I then used that information to dramatically expand the "middle section" of the article, in particular outlining the famed behaviour of Ed Esber Jr. that made users adbandon the company in droves. I recently re-visited the article and noted it had been heavily edited by a series of three anonymous editors, all over a short period, all changing all mention of Esber to something that is, well, glowing. All of the company's problems are smoothed over, and some of the more amusing antedotes (like the power being cut) were removed outright. I have a feeling these three people are in fact one person, and that that person is either Esber, or someone closely related (either via blood or job). However I have no idea what to do next to try to find out who this was. I wrote to Quadell, and he sent me here. Is there a wiki-cabal for tracking down this sort of thing? Maury 16:31, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Great ape logoReally? Drat. I was clearing out WP:IFD from the 13th. The image was listed there as "not a logo" with no comments, it certainly didn't look like a logo, and neither article I removed it from identified it as a logo. My bad. I'll replace it. Jkelly 01:17, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Will McwhinneyRead tthe article, and tell me if it's got too much personal info, I never outed anyhone, simply addressed the issues the subject works with. you guys can try and delete it, but i donj't think it warrants that. I think that you and the admin both abuse your power here, i'll not get into that, i saw the case with rangerdude, and you both had action taken against you. this article is very different, it's a biographical stub, and it deals with a community activist, as well as someone who was invovlved in a public battle in the leadership of the sierra club, all of these tenets warrant an article on the subnject. by implying that I harrassed anyone in the creation of said article is tantamount to harrassment on your behalf. I suggest you drop the matter. the article stays.Jonah Ayers 22:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC) we can talk herethe details are familiar to you I believe, because i've followed your discussions with willmcw aka Will Beback about the biff rose article, you haven't done a lot over there, but you've posted enough thati m well aware that you are familiar with that particular case. i don't have time to email back and forth about this.... we can talk here fine.. i believe that Will McWhinney is a great community activist, and that an article about him, will help the Sierra club entry, which I intend to address, but without the minor biogrpahical stub, it won't read right ,adressing the jackass immigrationo reforrm movement. So that biogrpahical stub will work in relation to the sierra club piece. i'm not going to say anything about the subject's perciecvced relation to wikipedia because apparently that's a no no. I've worked very hard on the biff rose piece, and the first people to do sock puppets were actually the people that beback is supporting, and I feel pretty aggravatged about that, but in turn, I have no intention of extending that aggravation into the mcWhinney article. they are as unconnected as can be, in my mind, i have postive things to say about mcWhinney, not so postive things to say about the admins and editors at the biff rose page. thanks for looking out. good luckJonah Ayers
Question about fr and de coding added to articlesHi, Slim. We haven't spoken to each other for a while, so hello! I noticed that you endorsed Robert McClenon's comment at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Katefan0. I deleted that page this evening. I thought I'd let you know. (See my message to her and hers to me for reason why.) I'm sorry I haven't been able to give you more support recently. I've been trying to take a Wiki-break. However, I have seen messages on your talk page, as it's on my watchlist, and I haven't liked all of them, starting on 9 January. You've probably seen the discussion at WP:RFP, which has just been removed by Katefan0. I have a quick question. I notice when looking at the source of articles, rather than the articles as they appear to readers, that quite often some things beginning with "de" or "fr" are added. For example, at the end of the article on Therese Neumann, if I click on "edit", I see [[de:Therese Neumann]]. But if I look at the article itself, I don't see anything. I presume it has something to do with the fact that there's an article on Therese Neumann at the German Wikipedia, but that article would be linked to by use of the coding [[:de:Therese Neumann]]. So what's the purpose of putting all the fr and de things at the end of articles, among categories? Cheers. AnnH (talk) 23:07, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Please help me understand
Your actions in the above quoted case, and several others similar to it recently, have pretty much left me speechless. From where I sit it appears that you have embarked on a relentless campaign to attack, discredit, defame, disrespect, and generally...well... treat me like crap. I can't even begin to imagine what would motivate someone to act in this way... How can you make such a character assault which appears to be unsupportable by fact, and then respond to my request that you substantiate your words by criticizing me for making it personal. Is it really your expectation that I would sit quietly while you make all sorts of untrue statements about me? Do you really think that I should be considered at fault for defending myself? Especially I've already learned that if I don't dispute the untrue claims you will report them as true and others will assume them to be true [4]. I must be misunderstanding you because I see how hard you've worked to improve things here, but if I am then I have no idea at all what you are trying to accomplish. Please keep your response here with my query. --Gmaxwell 02:54, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Category:Antisemitism (People)Please review problem here. [[5]] Also, please note that 100% of all entries into this category have been deleted, including Martin Luther.Doright 19:28, 21 January 2006 (UTC) hi!!!how are you today? I've been looking over your fetal alcohol work, and it's pretty sharp. my dad's a doc, and he did a lot of work at johns hokins with that, he looked at it too. good work. so, yeah the will mcwhinney article certainly has you all in a tizzy. I'm not looking to out anyone or anyhting, it's just gotten to the point that well, i think there's a reason, and other people too, to read about this fascinating community activist. I was telling Will beback, i've been a memebr of Sierra club since i was akid, my parents enlisted me and made some rather large donations in my name throughout my life, and i've done the same wiht my own children. It's a cool way to move things forward, like that movie, but hoefulyl much less trite. Anyhow.. what's the good word with you today? I think of our battles more like the old warner brothers cartoon with the coyote and the sheepdog, punching in before they set out to undermine one another. Because that's whats happening here, I'm actualyl writing some pretty solid stuff here, and you and will beback are bending over backwards to break rules and uphold them agaijnst me. Look, over at biff rose, there was a flargrant violation of the 3rr standard, and I pointed out that to Will beback that each time i made that violation, i was blocked and banned. i see that the person who did it this time was not blocked or banned. so you know, I've got a whole list of these that is being sandboxed by another ip, to follow up on, as i told will, you need to play fair for me to adhere to any standards you want to uphold. you can't just block an article, because true information is being disseminated through it. Well you can, but it's against the wiki rules, and so you are in violation, though i don't really think you care, anyhow, hope you keep your head above water, and I'l lsee you at the fights, so to speak. Have a good day, Ill remain civil, as long as you do.. but you 've got to remain civil in your actions too, ok? Ok. Jonah Ayers 22:58, 21 January 2006 (UTC) Hi there!!!how are you doing? How's the old block scenario working out? look i've, under another name reported you, and well i thin kthis is going ot end badly for you, so quit blocking the jonah acocunt, and we can go from there, email me if you must at the jvsanborn@gmail account.. okey dokey slim and pokey11 yo uare so fun!!!!!! by now Fred jones 01:38, 22 January 2006 (UTC) |
