Talk:BGM-75 AICBM: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:03, 12 December 2010

BGM-75 AICBM has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 10, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 12, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that silos for the Advanced Intercontinental Ballistic Missile were intended to be 10 times harder than those used by Minutemen?

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States / Cold War GA‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

GA

This article has been rated as GA-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:BGM-75 AICBM/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:54, 10 December 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Change the reference on aircraft designations to the one on missile designations.
Done. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:13, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Not a whole lot here to cover, but it's comprehensive enough for what was actually done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:54, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:10, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone explain me,

why this stub is a good article? --David.s.kats (talk) 15:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 {{Talk:BGM-75 AICBM/GA1}}
+== Can someone explain me, ==
+why this stub is a good article? --[[User:David.s.kats|David.s.kats]] ([[User talk:David.s.kats|talk]]) 15:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)