User talk:Kuguar03: Difference between revisions
Daedalus969 (talk | contribs) →ANI: r |
|||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
::No, Arbiter's original post has, at best, a tenuous connection to reality. I haven't bothered giving my side of the story as the whole thing's gotten ridiculously out of hand due to his escalations, but it's all there in the previous discussions. I'm sure you could find it if you looked. |
::No, Arbiter's original post has, at best, a tenuous connection to reality. I haven't bothered giving my side of the story as the whole thing's gotten ridiculously out of hand due to his escalations, but it's all there in the previous discussions. I'm sure you could find it if you looked. |
||
::I've said I won't pursue this as long as the other editors leave me alone, so your attempt to drag me back in is borderline harassment. [[User:Kuguar03|Kuguar03]] ([[User talk:Kuguar03#top|talk]]) 19:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC) |
::I've said I won't pursue this as long as the other editors leave me alone, so your attempt to drag me back in is borderline harassment. [[User:Kuguar03|Kuguar03]] ([[User talk:Kuguar03#top|talk]]) 19:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::That again has a very specific definition on wikipedia; telling you our posts were not irrelevant is nothing like harassment. You said you won't continue this further, but your attacks have yet to cease.— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|<font color="Blue">dαlus</font>]]<sup><big><span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Daedalus969&action=edit§ion=new <font color="grey">+</font>]</span></big> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 21:20, 22 December 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:20, 22 December 2010
Welcome!
Hello, Kuguar03, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 23:13, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Re: Your edit at WP:RFPP
The relevant policy is WP:Protection policy. I feel I should point out, however, that what is on that page should at best be taken as a rough guideline - not too many cases are so cut and dried as to guarantee a specific protection level, and most times it ultimately comes down to the protecting administrator's discretion. —Jeremy (v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.!) 08:51, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- The article in question is the unsourced additions to 2011 IndyCar Series season. I saw your post at WP:MOTOR and I wasn't convinced that ordinary reverting wouldn't be enough (at least at the time that you posted the comment). Some of the anon edits appear to be helpful. If the ratio of bad edits to good edits become too awful then this decision should be revisited. Or if the problems continue to the point of being real disruptive. Keep me informed on my talk page. I see a lot of activity in the past few days which is concerning. Royalbroil 04:12, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Re:Try to Avoid Personal Attacks
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Piast93 23:03, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Piast93 16:02, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The ArbiterTalk 00:23, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- ... Our comments are not at all irrelevant. If you read the original post at the start of the thread, you would see that in reality, it is your comments which are; the thread is not about whether you were right or wrong to nominate an article to AfD, but that you were accusing others of attacking you when no such attacking was taking place. As you refuse to acknowledge this ongoing issue with your behavior, this horse is not yet dead.— Dædαlus+ Contribs 11:33, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- No, Arbiter's original post has, at best, a tenuous connection to reality. I haven't bothered giving my side of the story as the whole thing's gotten ridiculously out of hand due to his escalations, but it's all there in the previous discussions. I'm sure you could find it if you looked.
- I've said I won't pursue this as long as the other editors leave me alone, so your attempt to drag me back in is borderline harassment. Kuguar03 (talk) 19:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- That again has a very specific definition on wikipedia; telling you our posts were not irrelevant is nothing like harassment. You said you won't continue this further, but your attacks have yet to cease.— Dædαlus+ Contribs 21:20, 22 December 2010 (UTC)