User talk:Marcobadotti: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:17, 23 September 2011

Welcome!

Hello, Marcobadotti, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Niko Silver 19:56, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Nicosia3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicosia3.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Aer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Aer.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Proedriko.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Proedriko.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:14, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to "Nicosia" and "Cyprus" articles

Hi - please read the Point of View guidelines. Cheers Vizjim 00:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Proerdriko.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Proerdriko.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nicosiatownhall.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Nicosiatownhall.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. RHaworth 11:34, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And please stop uploading the image multiple times. To change the licensing, edit the image description - don't re-upload. I have left the town hall image with the most sensible name - now put a proper licence tag on it.

I am a bit dubious about your {{PD-self}} tags. To help me believe, please re-upload a couple of these images at their full original resolution - that will prove that you do have access to the originals. -- RHaworth 12:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:NicosiaAerialView.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NicosiaAerialView.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:22, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Evrychou_Village_Nicosia_District.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Evrychou_Village_Nicosia_District.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Asia

Please leave an explanation of why you're blanking the section on Cyprus. There appears to be no concensus for you to do so. Hatch68 22:43, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Will Beback (talk • contribs) 23:02, 21 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Kykkos_Monastery.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kykkos_Monastery.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:41, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Lemesos.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lemesos''.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Pyli ammochostou lefkosia.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Pyli ammochostou nicosia.jpg. The copy called Image:Pyli ammochostou nicosia.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 17:48, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Mnimio stin eleftheria.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Mnimio eleftherias.jpg. The copy called Image:Mnimio eleftherias.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 19:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Eklisia palia poli.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Eklisia old city.jpg. The copy called Image:Eklisia old city.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 19:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Esplanada-lemesos.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Esplanade-limassol.jpg. The copy called Image:Esplanade-limassol.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 20:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Palia poli.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Palia poli.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Aphroditi Soloi.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Aphroditi, Soli, 100BC, Cyprus Museum, Nicosia .jpg. The copy called Image:Aphroditi, Soli, 100BC, Cyprus Museum, Nicosia .jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 15:47, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:Nicosia aerial.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Nicosia aerial.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Nicosia aerial.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Nicosia aerial.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:Nicosia aerial view.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Nicosia aerial view.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Nicosia aerial view.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Nicosia aerial view.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicosia aerial view'.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Nicosia aerial view.jpg. The copy called Image:Nicosia aerial view.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 16:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicosia aerial vista.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Nicosia aerial vista'.jpg. The copy called Image:Nicosia aerial vista'.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 20:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Aerial vista nicosia.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Aerial vista nicosia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 15:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Galata troodos.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Evrychou troodos.jpg. The copy called Image:Evrychou troodos.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 11:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:Forviotissa'.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Forviotissa'.jpg, by Staeckerbot, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Forviotissa'.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Forviotissa'.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Forviotissa'.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Marina larnakas'.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Marina larnakas.jpg. The copy called Image:Marina larnakas.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 13:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Apollon_ieron'.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Apollon_ieron'.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 18:54, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Archbishop's Palace.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Archbishop's Palace.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Conscious 05:48, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Marcos bag.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Marcos bag.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 140.247.248.182 (talk) 03:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Galata troodos.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Galata troodos.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:55, 9 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Svens Welt (talk) 13:55, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Athens lyca.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Athens lyca.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:Municipal-theatre.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Municipal-theatre.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Municipal-theatre.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Municipal-theatre.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:11, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Petra tou romiou.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Petra tou romiou.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Theatro solon.jpg

File:Theatro solon.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Theatro solon1.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Theatro solon1.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pancyprian Gymnasium'.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Pancyprian Gymnasium.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Faneromeni.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Faneromeni School.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:12, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pyli ammochostou lefkosia.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Famagusta Gate.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:47, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Troodos_Snow.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Troodos_Snow.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Venetian_Walls.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Venetian_Walls.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Venetian_walls.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Venetian_walls.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:55, 11 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:55, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Limassol-touristic area.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Limassol-touristic area.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:23, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Modern_City.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Modern_City.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Modern_City.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Modern_City.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ayia Napa.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ayia Napa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:33, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nicosia

Template:Vandalism warning warning

About these comments... And you'd better read Wikipedia:Civility. Takabeg (talk) 15:55, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing images

There is no good reason why this image cannot appear at Nicosia. Chesdovi (talk) 16:01, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Nicosia. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:09, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. This ("another Turkish troll") is unacceptable. Drmies (talk) 17:11, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marco, you're making some good edits however you need to be a bit more careful with your personal attacks and NPOV in your edits and when you talk to other users. You seem very knowledgeable about Nicosia and we need your help to improve the article. Masri145 (talk) 17:20, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. Please use the talk page, though--divided city, divided article. We need consensus. Drmies (talk) 17:24, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stop POV pushing edits

Please stop POV pushing edits. We work here in accordance with reliable sources. You have to control sources. Takabeg (talk) 03:25, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edits by Marco at Nicosia are unacceptable. There is no basis upon which he can support his removal of any mention of the northern sector of the city, as if it does not exist. He claims the Greeks are the rightful owners of North Nicosia, but does not include infomation on that section of the city. I am reverting his changes until this matter is settled. I don't see why if Marco wants a page just about "his community", South Nicosia can not be created. As long as the page is called Nicosia, which indicates the whole town, it will cover all aspect of the whole town. Chesdovi (talk) 17:07, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are an obsessive religious and nationalistic fanatic that vandalises the article on Nicosia constantly. I have not even mentioned the word Greek claim and I have respected your monuments, that are not even yours and are Frankisg Greek or Gothic and you present those twisting historical facts as Turkish. That did not suffice. People like you should not be allowed to present encyclopedic material as you are clearly unable to be unbiased.

@@ Line 278: / Line 278: @@
 Please stop [[WP:NPOV|POV]] pushing edits. We work here in accordance with '''[[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]]'''. You have to control sources. [[User:Takabeg|Takabeg]] ([[User talk:Takabeg|talk]]) 03:25, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 :The recent edits by Marco at Nicosia are unacceptable. There is no basis upon which he can support his removal of any mention of the northern sector of the city, as if it does not exist. He claims the Greeks are the rightful owners of North Nicosia, but does not include infomation on that section of the city. I am reverting his changes until this matter is settled. I don't see why if Marco wants a page just about "his community", [[South Nicosia]] can not be created. As long as the page is called Nicosia, which indicates the whole town, it will cover all aspect of the whole town. [[User:Chesdovi|Chesdovi]] ([[User talk:Chesdovi|talk]]) 17:07, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
+You are an obsessive religious and nationalistic fanatic that vandalises the article on Nicosia constantly. I have not even mentioned the word Greek claim and I have respected your monuments, that are not even yours and are Frankisg Greek or Gothic and you present those twisting historical facts as Turkish. That did not suffice. People like you should not be allowed to present encyclopedic material as you are clearly unable to be unbiased.