User talk:Rgulerdem/Archive 4 (Apr 27, 06): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Previous council: invalid warning |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
: Resid, thank you for responding to my message here. I disagree with the proposal in it's entirety... and don't honestly and [[WP:AGF|in good faith]] see how it could ever be reworked. As far as striking your comments is concerned it's because they do not correspond to the terms of the "Approval Poll". [[User:Netscott|Netscott]] 02:02, 2 April 2006 (UTC) |
: Resid, thank you for responding to my message here. I disagree with the proposal in it's entirety... and don't honestly and [[WP:AGF|in good faith]] see how it could ever be reworked. As far as striking your comments is concerned it's because they do not correspond to the terms of the "Approval Poll". [[User:Netscott|Netscott]] 02:02, 2 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
:: Assuming [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANetscott&diff=46536206&oldid=46534419 your warning] was done in [[WP:AGF|good faith]] I thank you for that... however your warning is invalid. [[User:Netscott|Netscott]] 02:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC) |
:: Assuming [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANetscott&diff=46536206&oldid=46534419 your warning] was done in [[WP:AGF|good faith]] I thank you for that... however your warning is invalid. [[User:Netscott|Netscott]] 02:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
==3R warning on [[Wikipedia_talk:Wikiethics/Archived_Polls%2C_Apr_1%2C_06#Summary_of_Approval_Poll|Summary of Approval Poll]]== |
|||
Just a friendly reminder to inform you that you are at your revert limit on [[Wikipedia_talk:Wikiethics/Archived_Polls%2C_Apr_1%2C_06#Summary_of_Approval_Poll|Summary of Approval Poll]]. Thanks. [[User:Netscott|Netscott]] 02:47, 2 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:47, 2 April 2006
Archive
New Messages
You can leave your messages below this line...
Previous council
Resid, my previous council might be best to follow as already several editors have expressed their view rejecting outright the continuation of work on the WikiEthics policy. Sincerely, Netscott 01:53, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Resid, thank you for responding to my message here. I disagree with the proposal in it's entirety... and don't honestly and in good faith see how it could ever be reworked. As far as striking your comments is concerned it's because they do not correspond to the terms of the "Approval Poll". Netscott 02:02, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Assuming your warning was done in good faith I thank you for that... however your warning is invalid. Netscott 02:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
3R warning on Summary of Approval Poll
Just a friendly reminder to inform you that you are at your revert limit on Summary of Approval Poll. Thanks. Netscott 02:47, 2 April 2006 (UTC)