User talk:Fastily

File:Andy Johnson-Laird Streak Image - Daisies.jpg

Apologies. I saved this image before I realized that Andy Johnson-Laird needed to email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org (which he has now done). I'm new to Wikipedia, so I wonder whether you might be able to tell me whether I need to re-upload the image or whether you can restore it? Thanks in advance. QueenieBeeIsMe (talk) 23:16, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

I searched the system for it, but I could not find the email in question. What was the subject header of the email Mr. Johnson-Laird sent? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:27, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

The subject line is: Permission to use file Andy Johnson-Laird Streak Image - Daisies.jpg The From line is: andy@jli.com The To line is: permissions-en@wikimedia.org The email body reads: Please take this email as explicit permission to use, without restriction, the thumbnail image uploaded as "Andy Johnson-Laird Streak Image - Daisies.jpg" on Wikipedia. Thanks in advance Andy Johnson-Laird

Please let me know if the above is not the correct thing to be doing. QueenieBeeIsMe (talk) 23:45, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

I should have also perhaps mentioned that his email included his "business card" as an embedded graphic and his PGP public key -- both of which were intended to authenticate the email.

But might they have caused the email to have been rejected? QueenieBeeIsMe (talk) 01:18, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Could you ask Mr. Johnson-Laird to send another email, in which he specifically indicates a Wikipedia-compatible license to irrevocably release the file under? Once that has happened, let me know and I'll restore the file. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:49, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. He has done so. He chose to use the Creative Commons: Attribution-ShareAlike, so I will arrange to put the appropriate tag in the template. QueenieBeeIsMe (talk) 16:41, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

I searched the system for the email you described, but can't seem to find it. What was the subject header of the new email that Mr. Johnson-Laird sent? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:35, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Gee. I'm really sorry about all of this, Fastily. I'm still trying to learn how to do this right.

Mr. Johnson-Laird confirms that he just sent another email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, the subject line of which is: "Permission to use file Andy Johnson-Laird Streak Image - Daisies.jpg". The text of the message is: "Attention: WP Administrator Fastily. Please take this email as explicit, irrevocable, permission to use, subject to the Creative Commons: Attribution-ShareAlike license described on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ICTIC#For_image_creators, the thumbnail image uploaded as "Andy Johnson-Laird Streak Image - Daisies.jpg" on Wikipedia. Thank you for being so attentive to licensing details. It is much appreciated. Regards Andy Johnson-Laird"

I've also asked him to remove the in-line graphic and the PGP public key (which is just text) from his message, in case this is causing the message to be rejected. QueenieBeeIsMe (talk) 04:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Deleting "File:Stjohntribunedetail.jpg" ‎

Hi, you've deleted this file WRONGLY in my opinion. It's a newspaper footage from over 80 years ago, and it's irreplaceable. If you think I can replace it, with a reasonable effort, or you can do it with not too many difficulties, please adice me how. Thx! עמירם פאל (talk) 07:12, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

User:Fastily/E#F7 -FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

I've seen the F7 section and written the above afterwards. Please respond to the content. It will be a shame to lose this footage in St. John article. עמירם פאל (talk) 08:24, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

On second thought, you're right. But the file does seem to fail WP:NFCC#3a. I'll list it as such. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Please, don't look for ways to discourage me from contributing to the en:wiki. You've marked four images which illustrate four different aspects of St. John's life, as redundant. Don't you agree they add interest to the article? illustrate it? Maybe some of them can be considered as free licensed?

Help me, please, instead of the other way around! עמירם פאל (talk) 07:11, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

I've tried to repair File:Robert William St. John.jpg and added the rationale - Please correct me where needed and advice concerning the other three images - Help me make the article better instead of deleting the images! Thank you! עמירם פאל (talk) 08:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Costa Navarino Icons

Hi fastily. I am a new user from Greece that I am trying to "promote" better the Greek region of Messinia. By word promote I mean re write or add content always within wikipedia standarts about History and traditions of my region. At this concept I tried to add Navarino Icons a Greek brand that has traditional Greek products under the category of . I haven't finished adding the article with a friend of mine and realize that you delete. Please alow me to add the whole article for your cosideration and give me suggestions of what to change in order no to look like an advertisment. I do not want to look as advertisment either but I amnot en experience user. So maybe the reference I used was not the best ones. but I think is much better tah similar article in this category. So just asing you to let it up and let me and the community to shape it and make it better.

Thank you very much I hope you will find some time to reply and help me out.

I am User Grzontan

User:Fastily/E#G11 -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:12, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Approved Page is now Deleted

You have deleted an article created by me [1] which was approved by another editor [2] . While i understand it is unambiguous advertising as per you, i don't understand how an article approved by an editor can be deleted by another. Please let me know what i need to change to get my article online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prateekshah03 (talk • contribs) 14:28, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

You can appeal the deletion at WP:DRV. I highly doubt that an AfC submission that falls under G11 would be accepted. --Bmusician 14:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of "ISO/IEEE 11073 Personal Health Data (PHD) Standards"

Dear Fastily

If I understand it, you are responsible for deletion of the above page, with a reason "(Expired PROD, concern was: No indication of notability)"

Is that correct?

IMHO the topic is "notable". The standards dscribed here are the subject of a considerable amount of work by a committee of an international standards organisation (the sponsor is the IEEE 11073 Standards Committee of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society), and are the basis of products being certified and promoted by a significant trade body concerned with the interoperabiity of personal health devices (go here and search for "11073" http://www.continuaalliance.org/connected-health-vision.html).

If you can be specific about your concerns then I can attempt to get others involved with the creation and use of these standards to address your concerns.

In the mean time it would be very kind of you to restore the page. You are welcome to contact me for further clarification.

Thanks. Charles Palmer charles.palmer@acutetechnology.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acutetech (talk • contribs) 17:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

User:Fastily/E#PROD -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:13, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Fastily, you see that bit where it says "it would be very kind of you to restore the page"? So why did you point him at a page saying "You may request that the page be restored"? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 23:27, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

I've restored the page, per the above request. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 23:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

(edit conflict) So that Acutetech understands our PROD policy and acknowledges what they're asking for. Once they've done that, I restore the page. Hardly unreasonable imo. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:31, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

WP:Deletion policy doesn't say "understand PROD policy", it says "Even after the page is deleted, any editor can have the page restored by any administrator simply by asking." Therefore, putting hoops in their way to jump through is unreasonable. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 23:40, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Nonsense. I believe that an informed decision saves users a lot of trouble in the long run. At any rate, I find this is a problem with the current system and I plan on starting an RfC on it soon. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

If the page has no chance at all, I will usually so advise the person in a personal note, but restore it if they still want; often they do not, when given an adequate explanation. Fastily, the principle that a prod can always be restored is important, and we don't want to put hurdles in people's way, like links to a page of boilerplate that says no more than the original Prod notice--though it certainly says it briefer and more clearly.But the person is obviously a paid PR agent "If you can be specific about your concerns then I can attempt to get others involved with the creation and use of these standards to address your concerns." and the page contain some obvious copyvio--the wording of the "note" is quite indicative of that & is not encyclopedic, and the situation warrants some attention, more so than just this one article, which I will give. If you're going too fast to carefully read the entire article and make appropriate comments and advice, and deal with concerns that arise that need an admin, such as a COI user with a company user name, you're going too fast. (I see OrangeMike already took care of the username block). Deleting improper material is necessary, but it's not always sufficient. DGG ( talk ) 00:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Luciann Mosescu‎ possible serial copyright violator

Greetings Fastily, Thank you for dealing with the deletion of copyrighted image File:Eurovision Selectia Nationala 2012.PNG (as shown on this deletion log). I have deepest concerns that the user, who I named above, may be a serial copyvio. Luciann has uploaded several images over the last 12 months, all of which are based upon the non-free Eurovision Song Contest images; which they appears to manipulate, and then adds licencing tags stating the work belongs to them. On their main Wikipedia page, the user has had several warnings about this, and yet they still continues to violate copyright legislations. The same user has had File:Malta Eurovision Song Contest 2012.PNG deleted only a few hours ago for the same copyright violation. Plus several other images deleted, all for the same copyvio reason.

This isn't the first time that File:Eurovision Selectia Nationala 2012.PNG has been removed either. On February 3, 2012 the image was nominated for speedy; and subsequently deleted for copyvio on February 11, 2012 (I think you may have deleted that one too). During the nomination process, Luciann personally removed deletion tags, to which they were warned about. With all of these copyright issues cropping up time and time again, I fear that the user may be wandering down a disruptive path unknowingly. Is there any action that should now be taken to prevent further copyvio disruptions from this user? Thank you in advance for your time reading this. Wesley☀Mouse 23:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

You've taken the appropriate action by leaving the user warnings. If they continue to upload copyvios, let me know and we'll remedy this with blocks. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind advice. I've had the user on my watchlist now, since the last few copyios, so no doubt will notice them as soon as any get uploaded. Will keep you informed if they do. Wesley☀Mouse 23:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Sandbox

I couldn't find your reason for deleting Wikipedia:Sandboxes on that reason list you have on a feature of your talk page.

I discovered that it wasn't there when I was leaving headnotes on my sandbox. It had a link to "Wikipedia:Sandboxes" and I see it red. So I click it, and I see on the list the only person who deleted it. So should I recreate the page? Er...? Please respond on this section because I will be watching this page.

ObiwanLostToBarney (talk) 02:23, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

It looks like you were looking for the Wikipedia:Sandbox. It's not clear if that was what you were asking about, but I've fixed the link in your sandbox. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:37, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Kevin Perez photo

Hi, you deleted Kevin Perez photo by mistake. And my brother who's a photographer of the photo, send you email that he's allowing me to publish the photo on this site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marelica5 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

When the email you claim to have sent is processed by our OTRS team, the file will be automatically restored. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:54, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Alice Smith School page deletion - creative commons licence granted. How to reinstate?

Dear Fastily,

I am writing about the deletion of the Alice Smith School Wikipedia page. I have already sent in the Creative Commons Attribution about the piece of text that I assume was the G12 issue.

From here, how do I reinstate the page? Many thanks for your help, Lorien Holland Lorienholland (talk) 03:58, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

The history is as follows: 1: 22 DECEMBER 2011: This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference.

   03:18, 22 December 2011 Fastily (talk | contribs) deleted "Alice Smith School" ‎ (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of )

2: email from me (Vice Chair of the Alice Smith School Council of Governors lholland@alice-smith.edu.my) to permission-en@wikimedia.org on Feburary 9, 2012 about the piece of text which I assume was the G12 issue. The text is below.

I hereby affirm that The Alice Smith School is

the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the school report by Mrs Patricia Lee on the 25th anniversary of the Alice Smith Schools Association presented at the Annual General Meeting

I agree to publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0" (unported) and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

[SENDER'S NAME AND DETAILS (Lorien Holland lholland@alice-smith.edu.my)] [SENDER'S AUTHORITY (Vice Chair, Alice Smith Schools Association, Kuala Lumpur)] [DATE] 8 February 2012

Lorienholland (talk) 03:58, 14 February 2012 (UTC) Lorien Holland 2 Lurah Tunku Bukit Tunku 50480 Kuala Lumpur

+60123030105 Lholland@alice-smith.edu.my

When the email you claim to have sent is processed by our OTRS team, the page will be automatically restored. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:54, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your help Fastily. Do you know how long the OTRS team take to process issues like this? Thanks, Lorien Lorienholland (talk) 03:43, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Excelsior JET page

Hi Fastily

Just noticed a *Excelsior JET* page had existed, but was deleted (Reason: Wikipedia:PROD). I do think it is valid to have a page about the product, beacuse (1) it is still used to speed up Java start up (2) other articles link to it.

Is it ok, if I go ahaed and create a new page about? If so, where can I find the old page content?

Halloleo (talk) 04:51, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Right here. Click here to view it -FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:55, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Herguan University

You speedy-deleted Herguan University as a blatant hoax. I believe this was a mistake. The subject of the article is a scam operation, and thus could be considered a hoax (see this article in Chronicle of Higher Education and this archived piece from San Jose Mercury-News), but the article (which has been here almost 3 years and had over 200 edits) is no hoax. Please reconsider your deletion. --Orlady (talk) 05:48, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Ah...that would explain a lot.  Restored. Thanks for letting me know. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:56, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks --Orlady (talk) 06:02, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Template:Non-free use rationale

I am writing to inquire about the purpose of Template:Non-free use rationale, as used on File:Krenek's chord classification from Studies in Counterpoint.png and other files. It seems that the written out rationale where superior to the table's lone assertion that the file is used as an example of the subject. What makes the template preferable? Hyacinth (talk) 07:24, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

The table is cleaner and easier to read; uniformity saves us 10 or so file workers reviewing time and makes it easier for newbies to read file description pages. FWIW, it's unnecessary to spell out all of the information implied by the template. If you think that a wall of text is going to prevent your files from being nominated for deletion, you are sorely mistaken. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 13:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

What do you mean by "10 or so file workers reviewing time"? Ten people's time? Since in the past that text is exactly what has kept files from being deleted you may know I am not mistaken, or was not. Perhaps what I am asking is: would you happen to know what changed? Hyacinth (talk) 20:53, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Okan Derici

Hi! I saw you deleted Okan Derici due to the previous discussion. But I'm pretty sure you have also seen that the reason for deletion was WP:NFOOTBALL because of having not yet made a first team or senior international appearance. Long after that discussion he played in a 2011-12 Turkish Cup match. I think, at least it should be reconsidered before direct deleting.Hcagri (talk) 08:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Fair enough,  Restored. Thanks for letting me know. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 13:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Question

Does this look like an inappropriate edit summary? :[3] Abhijay (☎ Talk) (✐ Deeds) 11:18, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Eh, it's not exactly ideal. I'll mention this to Dave. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 13:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks for the note (for that Forrest Gump-styled edit summary quote but just so you'd know, I'm a great fan of Don Rickles and his preferred genre of insult comedy... so there~!) but the thread starter was having some issues with his partner during his vacation and came to grind his axe on my talk page instead, I have since forgiven him for his folly. Note also that the thread starter had been WP:Canvassing for support to belittle me on not just your talk page but also on a few others including another Admin, if that is not "having a axe to grind" then I don't know what is. Like I've said, I took the liberty of forgiving the troll and imposing an interaction ban with him so if he starts another round, you know what to do. Me, on the other hand, has got to be going to work my graveyard shift soon. Cheers and best. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 13:36, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

I am not with my partner on vacation. I'm on a school vacation Dave. I simply wanted to ask Fastily a question about if your edit summary was considered appropriate or not. Arrgh. Forget this. I'm out of here. Thank you all for being good people here. I've now made the decision to retire in peace. Fastily, remove my rollbacker and autopatrolled rights. I don't want them anymore. Abhijay (☎ Talk) (✐ Deeds) 13:39, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

• Ladies and germs, that's how the fat lady sings~! Well, Abhijay... suit yourself for the quagmire you got yourself into, it is your choice, after all. Just try to remember the interaction ban, will'ya? Best and out. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 16:02, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello again...

Hi there. On the 7th February, you deleted File:Accrington Stanley FC.svg, because it was an unused non-free file. However, it was only unused because someone uploaded a version to Commons and used that in the original file's place. When the Commons file was inevitably deleted for being non-free, the page became logo-less. Could you un-delete the original if at all possible? Cheers, It's Malpass⁹₃! (_drop me a ^___) 12:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done -FASTILY ^(TALK) 13:20, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

To fastily

Remove my autopatrolled and rollback rights. I don't want them anymore. I'm retiring from Wikipedia. Abhijay (☎ Talk) (✐ Deeds) 13:55, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry to hear that. Hope you decide to come back one day. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:03, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

I've come back now after some peace and quiet. I admit I was upset, and that in that issue between me and Dave both of us were upset. He said things he didn't mean to say and I did things I didn't mean to say. Well if that issue isn't heading to anywhere and he constantly blames me as a troll and among other things, I'd rather refrain from coming near his path ever again. Abhijay (☎ Talk) (✐ Deeds) 01:30, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Advice needed

I have created a navigation template for Michelin restaurants in the Dutch provinces Groningen, Friesland and Flevoland. But when finished, I noticed that all restaurants are still red links and only the links to related templates are existing. In effect, I guess that the template, at this moment, is a straight candidate for the firing squad. Am I right in that and should I wait with launching till I have done at least 1 restaurant? Night of the Big Wind _talk 16:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Good call. Yes, for the reasons you mentioned above, I'd definitely recommend waiting until at least one or two of the links are blue before turning the template live. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:12, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Deletion review for Paul J. Alessi

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Paul J. Alessi. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Trismosin (talk) 17:16, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

An annoying uploader

Would you kindly have a look at the uploads of Mythy88 who has uploaded several images whose authors or sources are not himself. Several of the images have clear metadata attributions to someone else. He keeps removing deletion notices and now has started claiming some images as his own work and uploading the same previously tagged images to the commons under the new self claims though with somewhat different names. Besides the usual image deletion notices I have posted a number of tailored detailed warnings and information about permission but he has ignored all advise. I can keep tagging the images both here and on the commons or start making formal deletion nominations but I think he need more than that with an admin's intervention. TIA. ww2censor (talk) 17:57, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

See File:Liberty Center Bucuresti.JPG He's marked the upload Copyright Dico si Tiganas who are firm of architects. My bet is he works for these guys - he asked for their article to be created. My worry is - I don't know if he has permission to upload these photographs even, let alone release them on any kind of license. I've blocked him 12 hours, just to stop him and see if we can get his attention. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 18:33, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

And he claimed this for File:Liberty Center Bucuresti.JPG. Quite difficult and, as EotR says, possibly works for them but fails to engage in any way so we cannot determine anything concrete. ww2censor (talk) 21:04, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

No derivatives? That's not encouraging. I just nuked the user's uploads on Commons. I guess we can let the PUFs run their course locally, but fwiw, the end result will probably be the same. Thanks for helping out with this Elen. Best, FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:27, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of Melanie Paxson

I do not know who the user was that PROD'd the article, but the nominator is complete wrong, the person does indeed pass WP:ENTERTAINER, the article just did not have references from what I remember. If I had known the article PROD tagged, I would have worked on the article myself to have it in better shape. Can you userify the content for me please: User:QuasyBoy/Melanie Paxson, so I can work on it. QuasyBoy 20:58, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks QuasyBoy 22:22, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Truebinaryclock anthony liekens.png

Hello Fastily,

I received a message about a week ago that an image (File:Truebinaryclock anthony liekens.png) I uploaded was going to be deleted because it said that there was no proof that the author agreed to the CC Attribution license. As instructed I forwarded the email thread between myself and the author to the permissions-en@wikimedia.org address where the author specified the CC Attribution license. Also as instructed I put {{OTRS pending}} on the file description page to prevent premature file deletion. I did not hear anything back but just noticed that the image was deleted. ???

Could you please reply on my talk page so that I am notified?

A goethals (talk) 21:00, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Seems to be back now. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:28, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Just The Funny

Hi Fastily,

I'm not sure what was on Talk:Just The Funny, but I think it was deleted by mistake. Here's why:

• Just The Funny was initially created, and then speedy deleted (I was not involved with that initial tag).
• Talk:Just The Funny was subsequently tagged for deletion under G8.
• Just The Funny was re-created, and tagged by me for speedy deletion. I left the G8 tag in place on the Talk page as a result.
• Additional content was added, and I removed my own speedy deletion tag, but forgot to remove the G8 tag from the Talk page.
• Talk:Just The Funny was deleted by you under G8.

Anyway, given that I removed my own speedy deletion tag from the article, the Talk page should probably not have been deleted under G8. Singularity42 (talk) 22:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Yes, probably not.  Restored. Thanks for letting me know. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:29, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

SWFINAL deleted

Hello, I believe I just labeled the photo that was deleted in correctly, and if you could help guide me on how to label it would be so very much appreciated. I owe the image I uploaded, it is a poster used (and approved by all in image) for any and all things connected with our production of SNOW WHITE forever. It is available online for all to use and reference as well. How do I better label so it won't be deleted again? Cheers and Best. Beckbah Beckbah (talk) 22:50, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Link the file in question? It's not clear what you're referring to -FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

King Arthur Court

Evening Fastily, I somehow have found myself looking into King Arthur Court, Tennessee which was a deleted Prod a couple years back. It's really weird that this place is in GNIS, and is featured on the Bearden Quadrangle yet it doesn't seem to exist in real life. You live in the area, do you have any further insight? -Marcusmax(speak) 02:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Mystery solved I think..."King Arthur Court" is the name of a subdivision, if you have access to Knoxville News-Sentinel archives it is identified as a subdivision in the foreclosures page. Not sure if I should remake an article though, foreclosure listings aren't exactly a reliable source. -Marcusmax(speak) 03:11, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

I managed to confirm it's existence via KGIS, hence I recreated. Sorry about all the messages on your page like this. -Marcusmax(speak) 03:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

A DRV connected to you. User:Bittergrey/CAMH Promotion

Hi Fastily,

You performed a deletion of User:Bittergrey/CAMH Promotion as seen here. The deletion is now under review at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2012_February_14#User:Bittergrey.2FCAMH_Promotion. The CSD-tagging admin has undeleted. You contribution to the DRV would be welcome. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:49, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

That was fast...

After I requested User talk:Bmusician/unprotectedtalk for deletion, it was done before it even finished re-loading! Thank you! --Bmusician 12:15, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Sure thing. Happy to have been able to help. Best, FASTILY ^(TALK) 12:15, 15 February 2012 (UTC)