Talk:Flag Institute: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:11, 22 February 2012

	Heraldry portal Flag Institute is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Yorkshire Start‑class Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Flag Institute is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Criteria for Inclusion in the UK Flag Registry

Why should only the single criterion for county flags (listed third out of eight in the source) be deemed worthy of note in the article? I'm not sure that the size of the article warrants inclusion of all eight. So, if all eight are not listed, I think it's fair not to give any undue weight by including only one? What do other editors think? Martinevans123 (talk) 19:52, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because it excludes the Met counties, that is the only purpose of that statement and is such is controversial. If the Institute was neutral it would include flags for all local government areas not just the ones that it approves of.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 19:58, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but why exactly is a link to the Westmorland Association of particular relevance to this article? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:40, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is evidence, if you read the page, that they are quiet happy to take nominations from any ragtag bunch for counties pre 1972. Demonstrating once again there agenda.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 21:23, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are presenting evidence for a particular point of view. But that's contary to WP:POV. It's you that seems to have an agenda here? Why should pre-1972 counties represent a "ragbag"? Martinevans123 (talk) 22:11, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 ::I'm sorry, but why exactly is a link to the [http://www.westmorland-association.org.uk/ Westmorland Association] of particular relevance to this article? Thanks. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 20:40, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 :::It is evidence, if you read the page, that they are quiet happy to take nominations from any ragtag bunch for counties pre 1972. Demonstrating once again there agenda.--[[User:Kitchen Knife|Kitchen Knife]] ([[User talk:Kitchen Knife|talk]]) 21:23, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
+::::You are presenting evidence for a particular point of view. But that's contary to [[WP:POV]]. It's you that seems to have an agenda here? Why should pre-1972 counties represent a "ragbag"? [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 22:11, 22 February 2012 (UTC)