Jump to content

Johan Galtung: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m →Accusations of anti-Semitism: logical glitch fix
Tertoger (talk | contribs)
70 edits
rv BLP violation
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 99: Line 99:


Commenting further on these views on the radio and television program ''[[Democracy Now]]'', he stated that he loved the [[American Republic]] and hated the [[American imperialism|American Empire]]. He added that many Americans had thanked him for this statement (on his lecture tours) because of the great difficulty they were having in trying to resolve the conflict between their love for their country and their displeasure with its foreign policy.<ref>[http://www.democracynow.org/2010/6/15/i_love_the_us_republic_and Galtung on ''Democracy Now'']</ref>
Commenting further on these views on the radio and television program ''[[Democracy Now]]'', he stated that he loved the [[American Republic]] and hated the [[American imperialism|American Empire]]. He added that many Americans had thanked him for this statement (on his lecture tours) because of the great difficulty they were having in trying to resolve the conflict between their love for their country and their displeasure with its foreign policy.<ref>[http://www.democracynow.org/2010/6/15/i_love_the_us_republic_and Galtung on ''Democracy Now'']</ref>
==Accusations of anti-Semitism==
Further controversy erupted in 2011 and 2012 in the pages of the Journal of the [[Norwegian_Humanist_Association|Norwegian Humanist Association]] where Galtung is accused of repeatedly making anti-Semitic remarks. <ref>[http://humanist.no/galtung2.html Galtung leker med ilden (Galtung playing with fire) By John Faerseth in Humanist Online April 23, 2012]</ref> Initially at a lecture by Galtung at the University of Oslo in 2011 and subsequently in a follow up article written by Galtung and also published in the Journal of the [[Norwegian_Humanist_Association|Norwegian Humanist Association]]. <ref>[http://humanist.no/galtung.html Om klare linjer og tvisyn (Clear lines and ambivalence) By Johan Galtung in Humanist Online April 23, 2012]</ref> [[Haaretz]] published an article [http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/pioneer-of-global-peace-studies-hints-at-link-between-norway-massacre-and-mossad-1.427385 Pioneer of global peace studies hints at link between Norway massacre and Mossad] April 30th, 2012 levelling further accusations at Galtung including quotes from an email exchange between Galtung and the paper.

Amongst the statements causing the accusations directed at Galtung are his claim of a possible link between [[Mossad]] and [[Anders Behring Breivik]] and the possibility that Breivik may have been acting on orders from Mossad when committing the [[Norway massacre]]. Galtung is also accused of promoting the notorious anti-Semitic forgery [[Protocols of the Elders of Zion]] as well as for justifying “terrible Auschwitz” on the basis that it should have been predicted in a society where Jews occupied so many key niches. Galtung is also purported to have claimed that the Jews control the American media. Galtung is also said to have said that he cannot read [[Protocols of the Elders of Zion]] without making a connection to the investment bank Goldman Sachs and that he challenges that the [[Protocols of the Elders of Zion]] is a forgery. <ref>[http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/pioneer-of-global-peace-studies-hints-at-link-between-norway-massacre-and-mossad-1.427385 Pioneer of global peace studies hints at link between Norway massacre and Mossad. Haaretz April 30th, 2012]</ref>


==Selected works==
==Selected works==

Revision as of 07:48, 3 May 2012

Johan Galtung
Johan Galtung in May 2011 at the 41. St. Gallen Symposium
Born(1930-10-24)24 October 1930
Oslo, Norway
Alma materUniversity of Oslo
Known forPrincipal founder of peace and conflict studies
Awards Alternative Nobel Prize (1987)
Scientific career
FieldsSociology, Peace and conflict studies
InstitutionsColumbia University, University of Oslo, Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO)

Johan Galtung (born 24 October 1930) is a Norwegian sociologist and the principal founder of the discipline of peace and conflict studies.[1] He founded the Peace Research Institute Oslo in 1959, serving as its Director until 1970, and established the Journal of Peace Research in 1964. In 1969, he was appointed by the King-in-Council to the world's first chair in peace and conflict studies, at the University of Oslo. He resigned his professorship in 1977, and has since held professorships at several universities around the world. Galtung is a prolific researcher, having made contributions to many fields in sociology. He has published more than 1000 articles and over 100 books.[2] He was awarded the Alternative Nobel Prize in 1987, and has received many other accolades.

Biography

Galtung was born in Oslo. He earned the cand. real. (PhD) degree in mathematics at the University of Oslo in 1956,[3] and a year later completed the mag. art. (PhD) degree in sociology at the same university. Galtung received the first of nine honorary doctorates in 1975.[4][5]

Galtung's father and paternal grandfather were both physicians. The Galtung name has its origins in Hordaland, where his paternal grandfather was born. Nevertheless, his mother, Helga Holmboe, was born in central Norway, in Trøndelag, while his father was born in Østfold, in the south. Galtung has been married twice, and has two children by his first wife Ingrid Eide, Harald Galtung and Andreas Galtung, and two by his second wife Fumiko Nishimura, Irene Galtung and Fredrik Galtung, the co-founder and chief executive of Tiri.[6]

Upon receiving his mag.art. degree, Galtung moved to Columbia University, in New York City, where he taught for five semesters as an assistant professor in the Department of Sociology.[7] In 1959, Galtung returned to Oslo, where he founded the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO). He served as the institute's director until 1969, and saw the institute develop from a department within the Norwegian Institute of Social Research into an independent research institute with enabling funds from the Norwegian Ministry of Education.[8]

In 1964, Galtung led PRIO to establish the first academic journal devoted to Peace Studies: the Journal of Peace Research.[8] In the same year, he assisted in the founding of the International Peace Research Association.[9]

In 1969 he left PRIO for a position as professor of peace and conflict research at the University of Oslo, a position he held until 1978.[8] He then served as the director general of the International University Centre in Dubrovnik, also serving as the president of the World Future Studies Federation.[10] He has also held visiting positions at other universities, including Santiago, Chile, the United Nations University in Geneva, and at Columbia, Princeton and the University of Hawaii.[11] He has served at so many universities that he has "probably taught more students on more campuses around the world than any other contemporary sociologist."[10] Galtung is currently teaching courses in the Human Science Department at Saybrook University.[12]

He is a member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters.[13]

Mediation for peace

Galtung experienced World War II in German-occupied Norway, and as a 12 year old saw his father arrested by the Nazis. By 1951 he was already a committed peace mediator, and elected to do 18 months of social service in place of his obligatory military service. After 12 months, Galtung insisted that the remainder of his social service be spent in activities relevant to peace, to which the Norwegian authorities responded by sending him to prison, where he served six months.[7]

While Galtung's academic research is clearly intended to promote peace, he has shifted toward more concrete and constructive peace mediation as he has grown older. In 1993, he co-founded "Transcend - A Peace, Development and Environment Network,"[3] an organization for conflict transformation by peaceful means. There are four traditional but unsatisfactory ways in which conflicts between two parties are handled:

  1. A wins, B loses;
  2. B wins, A loses;
  3. the solution is postponed because neither A nor B feels ready to end the conflict;
  4. a confused compromise is reached, which neither A nor B are happy with.

Galtung tries to break with these four unsatisfactory ways of handling a conflict by finding a "fifth way," where both A and B feel that they win. The method also insists that basic human needs – such as survival, physical well-being, liberty, and identity – be respected.[14]

Galtung himself has employed the "Transcend" Method while serving as a negotiator in a number of international conflicts. He views his role as that of helping the parties clarify their objectives, and working to come up with solutions that meet the objectives of all parties. He presents them with concrete proposals that are intended to give both sides the sense that they are winners. The 1995 negotiations between Ecuador and Peru are an example of the apparent success of these methods: the two countries had fought three wars since 1941 over an uninhabited and resource-poor border region. Galtung proposed converting the area to a bi-national park, and both sides found this an acceptable solution.[14]

Major ideas

Galtung's theoretical work proposes that there are four ways in which conflict can emerge: conflicts within a person or between persons; conflicts between races, sexes, generations, or classes; conflicts between states; and conflicts between civilizations or multi-state regions, such as the Cold War.[14]

He first conceptualized peacebuilding by calling for systems that would create sustainable peace. The peacebuilding structures needed to address the root causes of conflict and support local capacity for peace management and conflict resolution.[15]

Galtung has held several significant positions in international research councils and has been an advisor to several international organisations. Since 2004 he has been a member of the Advisory Council of the Committee for a Democratic UN.

He has also written many empirical and theoretical articles, dealing most frequently with issues of peace and conflict research. His work is distinguished by his unique perspective as well as the importance he attributes to innovation and interdisciplinarity.

He is one of the authors of an influential account of news values which are the factors which determine what coverage is given to what stories in the news. Galtung also originated the concept of Peace Journalism, which is increasingly influential in communications and media studies.

Galtung is frequently referenced with regard to concepts with which he is strongly associated:

  • Structural violence - widely defined as the systematic ways in which a regime prevents individuals from achieving their full potential. Institutionalized racism and sexism are examples of this.
  • Negative vs. Positive Peace - introduced the concept that peace may be more than just the absence of overt violent conflict (negative peace), and will likely include a range of relationships up to a state where nations (or any groupings in conflict) might have collaborative and supportive relationships (positive peace).

He has also distinguished himself in public debates concerning, among other things, less-developed countries, defence issues, and the Norwegian EU-debate. In 1987 he was given the Right Livelihood Award. He developed the TRANSCEND Method described above. Economist and fellow peace researcher Kenneth Boulding has said of Galtung that his "output is so large and so varied that it is hard to believe that it comes from a human".[16]

Predictions

Since the fall of the Soviet Union, Galtung has made several predictions of when the USA will no longer be a functioning superpower, a stance that has attracted some controversy. After the beginning of the Iraq War, he revised his prediction of the "downfall of the US-Empire", seeing it as more imminent.[17] He claims the U.S. will go through a phase as a fascist dictatorship on its path down, and that the Patriot Act is a symptom of this. He claims the election of George W. Bush cost the U.S. empire five years - although he admits that this estimate was set a bit arbitrarily. He now sets the date for the end of the American Empire at 2020, but not the American Republic. Like Great Britain, Russia and France, he says the American Republic will be better off without the Empire.

Galtung has made predictions which have failed to materialize. For example, City Journal claims that in 1953, Galtung predicted that the Soviet Union's economy would soon overtake the West.[18]

Criticism

During the course of his career, some of Galtung statements and views have drawn criticism. A 2007 article by Bruce Bawer published in City Journal magazine and a subsequent article in February 2009 by Barbara Kay in the National Post criticised some of Galtung's statements.

Both authors criticized Galtung's opinion that while Communist China was “repressive in a certain liberal sense,” Mao Zedong was “endlessly liberating when seen from many other perspectives that liberal theory has never understood” because China showed that “the whole theory about what an ‘open society’ is must be rewritten, probably also the theory of ‘democracy’—and it will take a long time before the West will be willing to view China as a master teacher in such subjects.” The authors also criticized Galtung's opposition to Hungarian resistance against the Soviet invasion in 1956 and his description in 1974 of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and Andrei Sakharov as “persecuted elite personages”.[19][20]

Both of the above articles alleged that he has suggested that the annihilation of Washington, D.C., would be a fair punishment for America’s arrogant view of itself as “a model for everyone else.” However, Galtung has called the September 11 attacks "criminal political violence".[21]

Views on the "US Empire"

For Johan Galtung, the U.S. is simultaneously a republic and an empire, a distinction he believes is highly relevant. The U.S. is on the one hand loved for its republican qualities, and on the other loathed by its enemies abroad for its perceived military aggressions.

Among the former qualities are its work ethic and dynamism, productivity and creativity, the idea of freedom, or liberty, and a pioneering spirit.

On the other hand its military and political manipulation are censured for their aggressiveness, arrogance, violence, hypocrisy and self-righteousness, as well as the US public ignorance of other cultures and extreme materialism.[22]

In 1973, Galtung criticised the “structural fascism” of the United States (and other Western countries) that make war to secure materials and markets, stating that: “Such an economic system is called capitalism, and when it’s spread in this way to other countries it’s called imperialism,” and has praised Fidel Castro for “break[ing] free of imperialism’s iron grip.” Galtung has stated that the United States is a “killer country” that is guilty of “neo-fascist state terrorism” and compared the United States to Nazi Germany for bombing Kosovo during the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia.”[23] [24]

In an article published in 2004 in Galtung predicted that the US Empire will "decline and fall" by 2020." A complex hypothesis he has developed into a prognosis expanded on in his 2009 book titled The Fall of the US Empire - and Then What? Successors, Regionalization or Globalization? US Fascism or US Blossoming?[25][26]

According to Galtung, the US Empire causes "unbearable suffering and resentment" because the "exploiters/ killers/ dominators/ alienators, and those who support the US Empire because of perceived benefits" are engaging in "unequal, non-sustainable, exchange patterns." However, Galtung added that the decline of the US Empire does not imply a fall and decline of the US republic and that the "relief from the burden of Empire control and maintenance...could lead to a blossoming of the US Republic." In the Article, Galtung lists fourteen 'contradictions' that, he believes, in the next fifteen years, in 2020, will cause the 'decline and fall' of the American empire.[26]

Commenting further on these views on the radio and television program Democracy Now, he stated that he loved the American Republic and hated the American Empire. He added that many Americans had thanked him for this statement (on his lecture tours) because of the great difficulty they were having in trying to resolve the conflict between their love for their country and their displeasure with its foreign policy.[27]

Selected works

  • Statistical hypothesis testing (1953, Department of Sociology, University of Oslo [in Norwegian])
  • Gandhi's political ethics (1955) (with philosopher Arne Næss)
  • Theory and Methods of Social Research (1967)
  • Members of Two Worlds (1971)
  • Peace, violence and imperialism (1974)
  • Peace Research – Education – Action (1975)
  • A Shaping Nightmare (1983)
  • Europe in the Making (1989)
  • Global Glasnost: Toward a New World Information and Communication Order? (1992) (With R. C. Vincent)
  • Peace By Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization (1996)
  • Johan without land (2000) (Autobiography for which he won the Brage Prize)
  • 50 Years: 100 Peace and Conflict Perspectives, (2008)
  • Democracy - Peace - Development (2008) with Paul Scott
  • 50 Years: 25 Intellectual Landscapes Explore(2008)
  • Globalizing God: Religion, Spirituality and Peace (2008) with Graeme MacQueen

Selected awards and recognitions

References

  1. ^ John D. Brewer, Peace processes: a sociological approach, p. 7, Polity Press, 2010
  2. ^ TRANSCEND biography on Johan Galtung
  3. ^ a b Transcend.org
  4. ^ Johan Galtung's Curriculum Vitae
  5. ^ Sites.google.com
  6. ^ Genealogical data for Johan Galtung
  7. ^ a b Life of Johan Galtung (in Danish)
  8. ^ a b c PRIO biography for Johan Galtung
  9. ^ History of the IPRA
  10. ^ a b (E. Boulding 1982: 323)
  11. ^ Dagens Nyheter 2003-01-15.
  12. ^ Saybrook.edu
  13. ^ "Gruppe 7: Samfunnsfag (herunder sosiologi, statsvitenskap og økonomi)" (in Norwegian). Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters. Retrieved 26 October 2009.
  14. ^ a b c The "fifth way"
  15. ^ PEACEBUILDING & THE UNITED NATIONS Peacebuilding Support Office, United Nations
  16. ^ (K. Boulding 1977: 75)
  17. ^ Amerikas imperium går under innen 2020 Adressa September 23, 2004.
  18. ^ Bawer, Bruce. 2007. "The Peace Racket". City Journal. Summer 2007..
  19. ^ The Peace Racket by Bruce Bawer, City Journal, Summer 2007.
  20. ^ Barbarians within the gate by Barbara Kay, National Post, February 18, 2009.
  21. ^ "September 11 2001: Diagnosis, Prognosis, Therapy" by Johan Galtung
  22. ^ Article by Dr Zeki Ergas "Out of Sync with the world: Some Thoughts on the Coming Decline and Fall of the American Empire".
  23. ^ The Peace Racket by Bruce Bawer, City Journal, Summer 2007.
  24. ^ http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=1299901 Barbarians within the gate] by Barbara Kay, National Post, February 18, 2009.
  25. ^ Prof. J. Galtung: 'US empire will fall by 2020' Russia Today, (posted on Youtube.
  26. ^ a b On the Coming Decline and Fall of the US Empire by Johan Galtung, Transnational Foundation and Peace and Research (TFF), January 28, 2004.
  27. ^ Galtung on Democracy Now
  28. ^ "Jamnalal Bajaj Awards Archive". Jamnalal Bajaj Foundation.

Sources

  • Bawer, Bruce. 2007. "The Peace Racket". City Journal. Summer 2007. Link.
  • Boulding, Elise. 1982. "Review: Social Science--For What?: Festschrift for Johan Galtung." Contemporary Sociology. 11(3):323-324. JSTOR Stable URL
  • Boulding, Kenneth E. 1977. "Twelve Friendly Quarrels with Johan Galtung." Journal of Peace Research. 14(1):75-86. JSTOR Stable URL
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Johan Galtung.

Video

Template:Persondata

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johan_Galtung&oldid=490430604"