Talk:Stephen H. Wendover: Difference between revisions
You are unnecessarily rude in your comments, referring to my additions as "shit", please be respectful, even when you are disagreeing with people making additions to article that you created. |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I urge you to stop edit-warring, Mr. Norton. The infobox is irrelevant. Please read the abovementioned argument, and come to realise that you do '''not''' own Wikipedia. Other editors have something to say too. [[User:Kraxler|Kraxler]] ([[User talk:Kraxler|talk]]) 15:17, 4 November 2012 (UTC) |
I urge you to stop edit-warring, Mr. Norton. The infobox is irrelevant. Please read the abovementioned argument, and come to realise that you do '''not''' own Wikipedia. Other editors have something to say too. [[User:Kraxler|Kraxler]] ([[User talk:Kraxler|talk]]) 15:17, 4 November 2012 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | :That passage was about whether whole categories of people can go without infoboxes. You are unnecessarily rude in your comments, referring to my additions as "shit", please be respectful, even when you are disagreeing with people making additions to article that you created. --[[User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )]] ([[User talk:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|talk]]) 16:18, 4 November 2012 (UTC) |
||
:Of course this article should have an infobox; [[WP:IDONTLIKEIT]] is not a reason for their removal. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 19:55, 4 November 2012 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ |
Revision as of 19:55, 4 November 2012
New York (state): Hudson Valley Stub‑class | |||||||||||||
|
Deletion of added material
I restored the deleted material, no reason was given for the deletion. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 14:45, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- Do not restore nonsense, Mr. Norton!!!!! The only printed source says born in 1831. The other sources, are self-published and don't say where that other date comes from, and thus unreliable. Kraxler (talk) 14:54, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
I have restored the material you have deleted. Calling my edits "shit" is not a valid reason. Please be polite, it costs you nothing. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 14:55, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Besides, whenever I see an infobox which IMO is not appropriate for the article, I will delete it. I'm not alone with my opinion, and ask you to establish consensus before adding any more infoboxes. See Talk:Richard_D'Oyly_Carte#Arguments_against_infoboxes. Kraxler (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
I urge you to stop edit-warring, Mr. Norton. The infobox is irrelevant. Please read the abovementioned argument, and come to realise that you do not own Wikipedia. Other editors have something to say too. Kraxler (talk) 15:17, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- That passage was about whether whole categories of people can go without infoboxes. You are unnecessarily rude in your comments, referring to my additions as "shit", please be respectful, even when you are disagreeing with people making additions to article that you created. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 16:18, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- Of course this article should have an infobox; WP:IDONTLIKEIT is not a reason for their removal. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:55, 4 November 2012 (UTC)