Jump to content

User talk:Devilman52: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Bartloesville, Oklahoma. (TW)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Brad Shoemaker and Bartlesville, OK==
==Brad Shoemaker and Bartlesville, OK==
I note that you are adding Brad Shoemaker under the section "Notable people" or Bartlesville, OK. The wikilink for Shoemaker redirects to [[Giant Bomb]], which only mentions Shoemaker in p-asing and provides no reliable source indicating his relationship to Bartlesville nor establishes his notability (see [[WP:NOTE]]. You need to provide a link to a reliable source that documents this relationship and notability. Perhaps you can write a wiki article about Shoemaker. Meanwhile, I am removing Shoemaker from the Bartlesville article. [[User:Wkharrisjr|Wkharrisjr]] ([[User talk:Wkharrisjr|talk]]) 19:58, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
I note that you are adding Brad Shoemaker under the section "Notable people" or Bartlesville, OK. The wikilink for Shoemaker redirects to [[Giant Bomb]], which only mentions Shoemaker in p-asing and provides no reliable source indicating his relationship to Bartlesville nor establishes his notability (see [[WP:NOTE]]. You need to provide a link to a reliable source that documents this relationship and notability. Perhaps you can write a wiki article about Shoemaker. Meanwhile, I am removing Shoemaker from the Bartlesville article. [[User:Wkharrisjr|Wkharrisjr]] ([[User talk:Wkharrisjr|talk]]) 19:58, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

== March 2013 ==
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] Your recent editing history at [[:Bartloesville, Oklahoma]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[WP:EDITWAR|edit war]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[WP:BLOCK|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[WP:REVERT|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's [[WP:TALK|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. See [[WP:BRD|BRD]] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Wkharrisjr|Wkharrisjr]] ([[User talk:Wkharrisjr|talk]]) 17:11, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:11, 1 March 2013

Brad Shoemaker and Bartlesville, OK

I note that you are adding Brad Shoemaker under the section "Notable people" or Bartlesville, OK. The wikilink for Shoemaker redirects to Giant Bomb, which only mentions Shoemaker in p-asing and provides no reliable source indicating his relationship to Bartlesville nor establishes his notability (see WP:NOTE. You need to provide a link to a reliable source that documents this relationship and notability. Perhaps you can write a wiki article about Shoemaker. Meanwhile, I am removing Shoemaker from the Bartlesville article. Wkharrisjr (talk) 19:58, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Your recent editing history at Bartloesville, Oklahoma shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Wkharrisjr (talk) 17:11, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]