User talk:JzG: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:39, 5 May 2014

Note to admins reviewing any of my admin actions (expand to read).

I am often busy in that "real life" of which you may have read.

Blocks are the most serious things we can do: they prevent users from interacting with Wikipedia. Block reviews are urgent. Unless I say otherwise in the block message on the user's talk page, I am happy for any uninvolved admin to unblock a user I have blocked, provided that there is good evidence that the problem that caused the block will not be repeated. All I ask is that you leave a courtesy note here and/or on WP:ANI, and that you are open to re-blocking if I believe the problem is not resolved - in other words, you can undo the block, but if I strongly feel that the issue is still live, you re-block and we take it to the admin boards. The same applies in spades to blocks with talk page access revoked. You are free to restore talk page access of a user for whom I have revoked it, unless it's been imposed or restored following debate on the admin boards.

User:DGG also has my permission to undelete or unprotect any article I have deleted and/or salted, with the same request to leave a courtesy note, and I'll rarely complain if any uninvolved admin does this either, but there's usually much less urgency about an undeletion so I would prefer to discuss it first - or ask DGG, two heads are always better than one. I may well add others in time, DGG is just one person with whom I frequently interact whose judgment I trust implicitly.

Any WP:BLP issue which requires you to undo an admin action of mine, go right ahead, but please post it immediately on WP:AN or WP:ANI for review.

The usual definition of uninvolved applies: you're not currently in an argument with me, you're not part of the original dispute or an editor of the affected article... you know. Apply WP:CLUE. Guy (Help!) 20:55, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

This editor is a Most Plusquamperfect Looshpah Laureate and is entitled to display this Book of All Knowledge with Secret Appendix and Errata Sheet.

This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

This user is a
Rouge admin.

This user has been on Wikipedia for 19 years, 3 months, and 22 days.

This user has been an admin for
18 years, 10 months, and 25 days.

This user resists the POV pushing of lunatic charlatans.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70
71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80
81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100
101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110
111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120
121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130
131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140
141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150
151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160
161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170
171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180
181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190
191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200
201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210
211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

In science, any compromise between a correct statement and a wrong statement is a wrong statement. Thanks, user:Stephan Schulz.
Sad now. Special:Contributions/Geogre.
My Last.fm profile
vGuyUK on Twitter | SceptiGuy on Twitter

Obligatory disclaimer: I work for Dell Computer but nothing I say or do here is said or done on behalf of Dell. You knew that, right?

Dean Radin

Check the latest comments on the Dean Radin article/talk-page. I am pretty sure the IP 67.163.161.226 is 159.118.158.122 (Jamenta). He's got the same writing style, forgets to sign some of his comments, and he's talking yet again about "skeptic POV". He's also edited the Carl Jung talk-page on his old IP [1], compare that to the recent edits on this recent IP [2] which are in the same section. Goblin Face (talk) 02:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

67.163.161.226 is a confirmed proxy IP. Is there anyway we can report this user for that? Goblin Face (talk) 11:35, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where's confirmation it's a proxy? Guy (Help!) 11:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[3] or [4] Goblin Face (talk) 11:49, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Likely that Jamenta is now using the IP 208.194.97.5 (talk · contribs) where he has commented on the Dean Radin talk-page, same writing style and he forgets to sign his comments. Goblin Face (talk) 23:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you reverting this IP user?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:MyWikiBiz&action=history

Just thought I'd ask. I'm sure there's a reason for it. Tutelary (talk) 04:06, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is a banned user evading their ban (see Jimbo's talk page where this is pretty much openly admitted). Guy (Help!) 09:20, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mira Road and Parking Lot pic issue

Hi sir, i have a query do adding a free image is subject for revert? My images are not violating any copyrights. And by representing the photos are really infringing the rights? I just added a photo to Mira Road & Parking lot. You're admin of Wikipedia so i have a query do adding information is wrong? TekkenLeiWulong (talk) 12:11, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is normal editorial judgment. You think your photo is a good addition to those articles, others disagree. The default is to remove, then you can propose it on Talk with your rationale for inclusion. Guy (Help!) 12:20, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Traditional Chinese medicine". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 04:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your semi of Telepathy

Hi, Guy, do you mind if I unprotect Telepathy? The IP has been blocked for a month and the disruptive registered account for two weeks. I asked for a checkuser yesterday, and they (of course) turned out to be the same person. Bishonen | talk 11:39, 29 April 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Yup, fine. The IP was the problem. I removced sprot. Guy (Help!) 14:05, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, JzG. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure.
Message added 01:07, 30 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:07, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proxy

188.27.144.144 who has been leaving comments on cold fusion talk-pages and pushing various fringe beliefs is a proxy IP. [5]. An internet search also reveals a lot of forum spam and dodgy stuff associated with it [6]. It is definitely a proxy. Other users should be informed about this because they are wasting a heck of lot of time talking to this guy. Goblin Face (talk) 20:10, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. Please tell Bishzilla Guy (Help!) 20:15, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mmmm… Bishzilla kind of new at this. Attempted connect through that IP at port 80 and 81, but hands may be too big. Goblin Face, IP is proxy, but to make sure is open proxy, please ask Materialscientist or Kww. Little 'shonen be happy to block for a year if answer positive, but she scared lay about her with tools without certainty. bishzilla _ROARR!! 20:47, 30 April 2014 (UTC).[reply]

[Liek] Guy (Help!) 21:50, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move request at Talk:Sarah Jane Brown.

Dear JzG,

The block you put on my IP address has now expired, meaning I am able to edit pages other than my own talk page once again. I have read through the posts made subsequent to the block and I have numerous concerns. Would you be happy to discuss these?

131.111.185.66 (talk) 23:20, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No. Obsessing over the names of biographies is a sign of the kind of person we absolutely do not need at Wikipedia. Guy (Help!) 08:35, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Sarah Brown

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Sarah Brown and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, 131.111.185.66 (talk) 03:39, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 101: / Line 101: @@
 [[Special:Contributions/131.111.185.66|131.111.185.66]] ([[User talk:131.111.185.66|talk]]) 23:20, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 :No. Obsessing over the names of biographies is a sign of the kind of person we absolutely do not need at Wikipedia. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 08:35, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
+== [[Talk:Sarah Brown]] ==
+You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Sarah Brown]] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
+* [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for arbitration]];
+* [[Wikipedia:Arbitration guide]].
+Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> [[Special:Contributions/131.111.185.66|131.111.185.66]] ([[User talk:131.111.185.66|talk]]) 03:39, 5 May 2014 (UTC)