Jump to content

War of the currents: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
redundant material removed or integrated (how many times do we need to make a statement about problems of DC conversion?) If there is a reason for further analysis please fulfill WP:BURDEN via finding references.
The Friedrich Uppenborn source is clearly being misinterpreted. Series connections are the same for DC and for AC; disconnecting or turning off one device shuts off the whole circuit.
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Edison.jpg|thumb|right|[[Thomas Edison]], American inventor and businessman, known as "The Wizard of Menlo Park", pushed for the development of a DC power network.]]
[[File:Edison.jpg|thumb|right|[[Thomas Edison]], American inventor and businessman, known as "The Wizard of Menlo Park", pushed for the development of a DC power network.]]
In the '''"War of Currents"''' era (sometimes, '''"War of the Currents"''' or '''"Battle of Currents"''') in the late 1880s, [[George Westinghouse]] and [[Thomas Edison]] became adversaries due to Edison's promotion of [[direct current]] (DC) for [[electric power]] distribution over [[alternating current]] (AC) advocated by several European companies<ref>[http://www.edisontechcenter.org/AC-PowerHistory.html AC Power History]. Edison Tech Center.</ref> and Westinghouse Electric based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

In the '''War of Currents''' era (sometimes, '''War of the Currents''' or '''Battle of Currents''') in the late 1880s, [[George Westinghouse]] and [[Thomas Edison]] became adversaries due to Edison's promotion of [[direct current]] (DC) for [[electric power]] distribution over [[alternating current]] (AC) advocated by several European companies
<ref>AC Power History: http://www.edisontechcenter.org/AC-PowerHistory.html</ref>
and [[Westinghouse Electric (1886)|Westinghouse Electric]] based in [[Pittsburgh|Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania]].


== Background ==
== Background ==
[[Image:ZBD team.jpg|thumb|right|The Hungarian "ZBD" Team ([[Károly Zipernowsky]], [[Ottó Bláthy]], [[Miksa Déri]]). They were the inventors of the first high efficiency, closed core shunt connection [[transformer]]. The three also invented the modern [[electric distribution systems|power distribution system]]: Instead of former series connection they connect transformers that supply the appliances in parallel to the main line.]]
[[Image:ZBD team.jpg|thumb|right|The Hungarian "ZBD" Team ([[Károly Zipernowsky]], [[Ottó Bláthy]], [[Miksa Déri]]). They were the inventors of the first high efficiency, closed core shunt connection [[transformer]]. The three also invented the modern [[electric distribution systems|power distribution system]]: Instead of former series connection they connect transformers that supply the appliances in parallel to the main line.]]
During the initial years of [[electricity distribution]], Edison's direct current was the standard for the United States, and Edison did not want to lose all his patent royalties.<ref>{{cite book | last= McNichol | first=Tom | title= AC/DC: the savage tale of the first standards war | page=80 | year=2006 | publisher=John Wiley and Sons | isbn=978-0-7879-8267-6 | url= http://books.google.com/books?id=YHbxzUwR0UgC&printsec=frontcover&dq=AC/DC:+The+Savage+Tale+of+the+First+Standards+War&hl=en&ei=WfLsTfL0Cubb0QG5wpyhAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22The%20Edison%20companies%20dominated%20the%20industry%22&f=false}}</ref> Direct current worked well with [[incandescent lamp]]s, which were the principal load of the day, and with motors. Direct-current systems could be directly used with storage batteries, providing valuable load-leveling and backup power during interruptions of generator operation. Direct-current generators could be easily paralleled, allowing economical operation by using smaller machines during periods of light load and improving reliability. At the introduction of Edison's system, no practical [[AC motor]] was available. Edison had invented a meter to allow customers to be billed for energy proportional to consumption, but this meter worked only with direct current. The transformation efficiency of the early open-core bipolar transformers was very low. Early AC systems used series-connected power distribution systems, with the inherent flaw that turning off a single lamp (or the disconnection of other electric device) affected the voltage supplied to all others on the same circuit.<ref>Friedrich Uppenborn: History of the transformer (1889)</ref> The direct current system did not have these drawbacks as of 1882, giving it significant advantages.
During the initial years of [[electricity distribution]], Edison's direct current was the standard for the United States, and Edison did not want to lose all his patent royalties.<ref>{{cite book | last= McNichol | first=Tom | title= AC/DC: the savage tale of the first standards war | page=80 | year=2006 | publisher=John Wiley and Sons | isbn=978-0-7879-8267-6 | url= http://books.google.com/books?id=YHbxzUwR0UgC&printsec=frontcover&dq=AC/DC:+The+Savage+Tale+of+the+First+Standards+War&hl=en&ei=WfLsTfL0Cubb0QG5wpyhAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22The%20Edison%20companies%20dominated%20the%20industry%22&f=false}}</ref> Direct current worked well with [[incandescent lamp]]s, which were the principal load of the day, and with motors. Direct-current systems could be directly used with storage batteries, providing valuable load-leveling and backup power during interruptions of generator operation. Direct-current generators could be easily paralleled, allowing economical operation by using smaller machines during periods of light load and improving reliability. At the introduction of Edison's system, no practical [[AC motor]] was available. Edison had invented a meter to allow customers to be billed for energy proportional to consumption, but this meter worked only with direct current. As of 1882 these were all significant technical advantages of direct current.


Alternating current had first developed in Europe due to the work of [[Guillaume Duchenne]] (1850s), [[Ganz Works]] (1870s), [[Sebastian Ziani de Ferranti]] (1880s), [[Lucien Gaulard]], and [[Galileo Ferraris]].
Alternating current had first developed in Europe due to the work of [[Guillaume Duchenne]] (1850s), [[Ganz Works]] (1870s), [[Sebastian Ziani de Ferranti]] (1880s), [[Lucien Gaulard]], and [[Galileo Ferraris]].


[[Image:DBZ trafo.jpg|left|thumb|The prototype transformer is on display at the Széchenyi István Memorial Exhibition, [[Nagycenk]], [[Hungary]]]]
[[Image:DBZ_trafo.jpg|left|thumb|The prototype transformer is on display at the Széchenyi István Memorial Exhibition, [[Nagycenk]], [[Hungary]]]]
A prototype of the high efficiency, closed core shunt connection [[transformer]] was made by the Hungarian "Z.B.D." team (composed of [[Károly Zipernowsky]], [[Ottó Bláthy]] and [[Miksa Déri]]) at [[Ganz Works]] in the autumn of 1884.<ref name="Halacsy (1961)">{{cite journal|last=Halacsy|first=A. A.|coauthors=Von Fuchs, G. H. | title=Transformer Invented 75 Years Ago|journal=IEEE Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers|year=1961|month=April|volume=80|issue=3|pages=121–125|doi=10.1109/AIEEPAS.1961.4500994|url=http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/freesearchresult.jsp?newsearch=true&queryText=10.1109%2FAIEEPAS.1961.4500994&x=29&y=16|accessdate=Feb. 29, 2012}}</ref><ref>http://www.omikk.bme.hu/archivum/angol/htm/blathy_o.htm</ref> The new Z.B.D. transformers were 3.4 times more efficient than the open core bipolar devices of Gaulard and Gibbs.<ref name=Jeszenszky>{{cite web|last=Jeszenszky|first=Sándor|title=Electrostatics and Electrodynamics at Pest University in the Mid-19th Century|url=http://ppp.unipv.it/Collana/Pages/Libri/Saggi/Volta%20and%20the%20History%20of%20Electricity/V%26H%20Sect2/V%26H%20175-182.pdf|publisher=[[University of Pavia]]|accessdate=Mar.3, 2012}}</ref> Transformers in use today are designed based on principles discovered by the three engineers.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.kfki.hu/~aznagy/lecture/lecture.htm|last=Nagy|first=Árpád Zoltán|title=Lecture to Mark the 100th Anniversary of the Discovery of the Electron in 1897 (preliminary text)| location=Budapest|year=Oct. 11, 1996|accessdate=July 9, 2009}}</ref> Their patents included another major related innovation: the use of parallel connected (as opposed to series connected) power distribution.<ref name="Ideal (2008)">{{cite web|title=Hungarian Inventors and Their Inventions|url=http://www.institutoideal.org/conteudo_eng.php?&sys=biblioteca_eng&arquivo=1&artigo=94&ano=2008|publisher=Institute for Developing Alternative Energy in Latin America|accessdate=Mar. 3, 2012}}</ref><ref name=BUTE-OMIKK-BlathyOtto>{{cite web|title=Bláthy, Ottó Titusz|url=http://www.omikk.bme.hu/archivum/angol/htm/blathy_o.htm|publisher=Budapest University of Technology and Economics, National Technical Information Centre and Library|accessdate=Feb. 29, 2012}}</ref> Ottó Bláthy also invented the AC [[electricity meter]] to complete the competition of AC and DC technology.<ref>{{cite web|author=Eugenii Katz |url=http://people.clarkson.edu/~ekatz/scientists/blathy.html |title=Blathy |publisher=People.clarkson.edu |date= |accessdate=2009-08-04| archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080625015707/http://people.clarkson.edu/~ekatz/scientists/blathy.html| archivedate = June 25, 2008}}</ref><ref>Ricks, G.W.D. This paper appears in: Electrical Engineers, Journal of the Institution of
A prototype of the high efficiency, closed core shunt connection [[transformer]] was made by the Hungarian "Z.B.D." team (composed of [[Károly Zipernowsky]], [[Ottó Bláthy]] and [[Miksa Déri]]) at [[Ganz Works]] in the autumn of 1884.<ref name="Halacsy (1961)">{{cite journal|last=Halacsy|first=A. A.|coauthors=Von Fuchs, G. H. | title=Transformer Invented 75 Years Ago|journal=IEEE Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers|year=1961|month=April|volume=80|issue=3|pages=121–125|doi=10.1109/AIEEPAS.1961.4500994|url=http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/freesearchresult.jsp?newsearch=true&queryText=10.1109%2FAIEEPAS.1961.4500994&x=29&y=16|accessdate=Feb. 29, 2012}}</ref><ref>http://www.omikk.bme.hu/archivum/angol/htm/blathy_o.htm</ref> The new Z.B.D. transformers were 3.4 times more efficient than the open core bipolar devices of Gaulard and Gibbs.<ref name=Jeszenszky>{{cite web|last=Jeszenszky|first=Sándor|title=Electrostatics and Electrodynamics at Pest University in the Mid-19th Century|url=http://ppp.unipv.it/Collana/Pages/Libri/Saggi/Volta%20and%20the%20History%20of%20Electricity/V%26H%20Sect2/V%26H%20175-182.pdf|publisher=[[University of Pavia]]|accessdate=Mar.3, 2012}}</ref> Transformers in use today are designed based on principles discovered by the three engineers.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.kfki.hu/~aznagy/lecture/lecture.htm|last=Nagy|first=Árpád Zoltán|title=Lecture to Mark the 100th Anniversary of the Discovery of the Electron in 1897 (preliminary text)| location=Budapest|year=Oct. 11, 1996|accessdate=July 9, 2009}}</ref> Their patents included another major related innovation: the use of parallel connected (as opposed to series connected) power distribution.<ref name="Ideal (2008)">{{cite web|title=Hungarian Inventors and Their Inventions|url=http://www.institutoideal.org/conteudo_eng.php?&sys=biblioteca_eng&arquivo=1&artigo=94&ano=2008|publisher=Institute for Developing Alternative Energy in Latin America|accessdate=Mar. 3, 2012}}</ref><ref name=BUTE-OMIKK-BlathyOtto>{{cite web|title=Bláthy, Ottó Titusz|url=http://www.omikk.bme.hu/archivum/angol/htm/blathy_o.htm|publisher=Budapest University of Technology and Economics, National Technical Information Centre and Library|accessdate=Feb. 29, 2012}}</ref> Ottó Bláthy also invented the AC [[electricity meter]] to compensate the competition of AC and DC technology.<ref>{{cite web|author=Eugenii Katz |url=http://people.clarkson.edu/~ekatz/scientists/blathy.html |title=Blathy |publisher=People.clarkson.edu |date= |accessdate=2009-08-04| archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080625015707/http://people.clarkson.edu/~ekatz/scientists/blathy.html| archivedate = June 25, 2008}}</ref><ref>Ricks, G.W.D. This paper appears in: Electrical Engineers, Journal of the Institution of
Issue Date: March 1896
Issue Date: March 1896
Volume: 25 Issue: 120
Volume: 25 Issue: 120
Line 20: Line 17:


[[File:George Westinghouse.jpg|thumb|upright|right|[[George Westinghouse]], American entrepreneur and engineer, financially backed the development of a practical AC power network.]]
[[File:George Westinghouse.jpg|thumb|upright|right|[[George Westinghouse]], American entrepreneur and engineer, financially backed the development of a practical AC power network.]]
In North America one of the believers in the new technology was [[George Westinghouse]]. Westinghouse was willing to invest in the technology and hired [[William Stanley, Jr.]] to work on an AC distribution system using step up and step down transformers of a new design in 1886.<ref>Great Barrington Historical Society, Great Barrington, Massachusetts</ref> After Stanley left Westinghouse, Oliver Shallenberger took control of the AC project. In July 1888, [[George Westinghouse]] licensed [[Nikola Tesla]]'s US patents for a polyphase AC induction motor and transformer designs and hired Tesla for one year to be a consultant at the [[Westinghouse Electric Corporation|Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company's]] [[Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania|Pittsburgh]] labs.<ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=WKuG-VIwID8C&pg=PA305&lpg=PA305&dq=tesla+hired+by+westinghouse&source=bl&ots=KDI0aTz0EK&sig=oct2jnPyWkQ3qvUR-JmstK9F0FI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=jRwxUKK3LtS80QHjxoGYAg&sqi=2&ved=0CEEQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=tesla%20hired%20by%20westinghouse&f=false John W. Klooster, Icons of Invention: The Makers of the Modern World from Gutenberg to Gates, page 305]</ref> Westinghouse purchased a US patent option on induction motors from Galileo Ferraris in an attempt to own a patent that would supersede Tesla's. But with Tesla's backers getting offers from another capitalist to license Tesla's US patents, Westinghouse concluded that he had to pay the rather substantial amount of money being asked to secure the Tesla license.<ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=2_58p3Z69bIC&pg=PT163&lpg=PT163&dq=%22While+Westinghouse+continued+to+survey+the+general+status+of+AC+motors%22&source=bl&ots=6T_5GZlrtX&sig=UqZBWY0jxZSRmrcTGje8g2C6agI&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22While%20Westinghouse%20continued%20to%20survey%20the%20general%20status%20of%20AC%20motors%22&f=false Jill Jonnes, Empires of Light: Edison, Tesla, Westinghouse, and the Race to Electrify the World, Edison Declares War]</ref> Westinghouse also acquired other patents for AC [[transformer]]s from [[Lucien Gaulard]] and [[John Dixon Gibbs]].<ref>{{cite book|last=Crane |first=Frank |title=George Westinghouse: His Life and Achievements, 1925 |page= 25|publisher= Kessinger Publishing| year=2003|isbn= 978-0-7661-6705-6|url= http://books.google.com/books?id=knINJOVEv9gC&pg=PA25&dq=George+Westinghouse+Lucien+Gaulard+John+Dixon+Gibbs&hl=en&ei=nNVSToLzF4ycgQfj3ImHBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=George%20Westinghouse%20Lucien%20Gaulard%20John%20Dixon%20Gibbs&f=false}}</ref>
In North America one of the believers in the new technology was [[George Westinghouse]]. Westinghouse was willing to invest in the technology and hired [[William Stanley, Jr.]] to work on an AC distribution system using step up and step down transformers of a new design in 1886.<ref>Great Barrington Historical Society, Great Barrington, Massachusetts</ref> After Stanley left Westinghouse, Oliver Shallenberger took control of the AC project. In July of 1888, [[George Westinghouse]] licensed [[Nikola Tesla]]'s US patents for a polyphase AC induction motor and transformer designs and hired Tesla for one year to be a consultant at the [[Westinghouse Electric Corporation|Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company's]] [[Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania|Pittsburgh]] labs.<ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=WKuG-VIwID8C&pg=PA305&lpg=PA305&dq=tesla+hired+by+westinghouse&source=bl&ots=KDI0aTz0EK&sig=oct2jnPyWkQ3qvUR-JmstK9F0FI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=jRwxUKK3LtS80QHjxoGYAg&sqi=2&ved=0CEEQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=tesla%20hired%20by%20westinghouse&f=false John W. Klooster, Icons of Invention: The Makers of the Modern World from Gutenberg to Gates, page 305]</ref> Westinghouse purchased a US patent option on induction motors from Galileo Ferraris in an attempt to own a patent that would supersede Tesla's. But with Tesla's backers getting offers from another capitalist to license Tesla's US patents, Westinghouse concluded that he had to pay the rather substantial amount of money being asked to secure the Tesla license.<ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=2_58p3Z69bIC&pg=PT163&lpg=PT163&dq=%22While+Westinghouse+continued+to+survey+the+general+status+of+AC+motors%22&source=bl&ots=6T_5GZlrtX&sig=UqZBWY0jxZSRmrcTGje8g2C6agI&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%22While%20Westinghouse%20continued%20to%20survey%20the%20general%20status%20of%20AC%20motors%22&f=false Jill Jonnes, Empires of Light: Edison, Tesla, Westinghouse, and the Race to Electrify the World, Edison Declares War]</ref> Westinghouse also acquired other patents for AC [[transformer]]s from [[Lucien Gaulard]] and [[John Dixon Gibbs]].<ref>{{cite book|last=Crane |first=Frank |title=George Westinghouse: His Life and Achievements, 1925 |page= 25|publisher= Kessinger Publishing| year=2003|isbn= 978-0-7661-6705-6|url= http://books.google.com/books?id=knINJOVEv9gC&pg=PA25&dq=George+Westinghouse+Lucien+Gaulard+John+Dixon+Gibbs&hl=en&ei=nNVSToLzF4ycgQfj3ImHBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=George%20Westinghouse%20Lucien%20Gaulard%20John%20Dixon%20Gibbs&f=false}}</ref>
[[File:N.Tesla.JPG|thumb|upright|left|[[Nikola Tesla]], inventor, physicist, and electro-mechanical engineer, who held several instrumental patents in the Westinghouse AC system.]]
[[File:N.Tesla.JPG|thumb|upright|left|[[Nikola Tesla]], inventor, physicist, and electro-mechanical engineer, who held several instrumental patents in the Westinghouse AC system.]]
The "War of Currents" is often personified as Westinghouse vs. Edison.{{citation needed|date=August 2012}} However, the "War of Currents" was much larger than that: It involved both American and European companies whose heavy investments in one current type or the other led them to hope that use of the other type would decline, such that their share of the market for "their" current type would represent greater absolute revenue once the decline of the other current type enabled them to expand their existing distribution networks.<ref>Deutsches Museum</ref>{{citation needed|date=August 2012}}
The "War of Currents" is often personified as Westinghouse vs. Edison.{{fact|date=August 2012}} However, the "War of Currents" was much larger than that: It involved both American and European companies whose heavy investments in one current type or the other led them to hope that use of the other type would decline, such that their share of the market for "their" current type would represent greater absolute revenue once the decline of the other current type enabled them to expand their existing distribution networks.<ref>Deutsches Museum</ref>{{fact|date=August 2012}}


==Electric power transmission==
==Electric power transmission==

===The competing systems===
===The competing systems===
Edison's DC distribution system consisted of generating plants feeding heavy distribution conductors, with customer loads (lighting and motors) tapped off them. The system operated at the same voltage level throughout; for example, 100 volt lamps at the customer's location would be connected to a generator supplying 110 volts, to allow for some voltage drop in the wires between the generator and load. The voltage level was chosen for convenience in lamp manufacture; high-resistance carbon filament lamps could be constructed to withstand 100 volts, and to provide lighting performance economically competitive with gas lighting. At the time it was felt that 100 volts was not likely to present a severe hazard of fatal [[electric shock]].
====DC====
The DC distribution system consisted of generating plants feeding heavy distribution conductors, with customer loads (lighting and motors) tapped off them. The system operated at the same voltage level throughout; for example, 100 volt lamps at the customer's location would be connected to a generator supplying 110 volts, to allow for some voltage drop in the wires between the generator and load. The voltage level was chosen for convenience in lamp manufacture; high-resistance carbon filament lamps could be constructed to withstand 100 volts, and to provide lighting performance economically competitive with gas lighting. At the time it was felt that 100 volts was not likely to present a severe hazard of fatal [[electric shock]].


To save on the cost of copper conductors, a [[split phase|three-wire]] distribution system was used. The three wires were at +110 volts, 0 volts and &minus;110 volts relative potential. 100-volt lamps could be operated between either the +110 or &minus;110 volt legs of the system and the 0-volt [[ground and neutral|"neutral"]] conductor, which carried only the unbalanced current between the + and &minus; sources. The resulting three-wire system used less copper wire for a given quantity of electric power transmitted, while still maintaining (relatively) low voltages. However, even with this innovation, the [[voltage drop]] due to the resistance of the system conductors was so high that generating plants had to be located within a mile (1.6&nbsp;km) or so of the load. Higher voltages could not so easily be used with the DC system because there was no efficient low-cost technology that would allow reduction of a high transmission voltage to a low utilization voltage.
To save on the cost of copper conductors, a [[split phase|three-wire]] distribution system was used. The three wires were at +110 volts, 0 volts and &minus;110 volts relative potential. 100-volt lamps could be operated between either the +110 or &minus;110 volt legs of the system and the 0-volt [[ground and neutral|"neutral"]] conductor, which carried only the unbalanced current between the + and &minus; sources. The resulting three-wire system used less copper wire for a given quantity of electric power transmitted, while still maintaining (relatively) low voltages. However, even with this innovation, the [[voltage drop]] due to the resistance of the system conductors was so high that generating plants had to be located within a mile (1&ndash;2&nbsp;km) or so of the load. Higher voltages could not so easily be used with the DC system because there was no efficient low-cost technology that would allow reduction of a high transmission voltage to a low utilization voltage.


[[File:WestinghouseEarlyACSystem1887-USP373035.png|right|thumb|Westinghouse Early AC System 1887 ({{US patent|373035}})]]
Since Direct current could not easily be converted to higher or lower voltages separate electrical lines had to be installed to supply power to appliances that used different voltages, for example, lighting and electric motors. This required more wires to lay and maintain, wasting money and introducing unnecessary hazards. A number of deaths in the [[Great Blizzard of 1888]] were attributed to collapsing overhead power lines in New York City.<ref>Some companies had their DC lines in that city buried underground for safety, but many lines still ran overhead.</ref><ref>[http://www.vny.cuny.edu/blizzard/building/building.html Untitled Document]</ref>
In the alternating current system, a [[transformer]] was used between the (relatively) high voltage distribution system and the customer loads. Lamps and small motors could still be operated at some convenient low voltage. However, the transformer would allow power to be transmitted at much higher voltages, say, ten times that of the loads. For a given quantity of [[electric power|power]] transmitted, the wire cross-sectional area would be [[proportionality_(mathematics)#Inverse_proportionality|inversely proportional]] to the voltage used. Alternatively, the allowable length of a circuit, given a wire size and allowable voltage drop, would increase approximately as the square of the distribution voltage. This had the practical significance that fewer, larger generating plants could serve the load in a given area. Large loads, such as industrial motors or converters for electric railway power, could be served by the same distribution network that fed lighting, by using a transformer with a suitable secondary voltage.


===Early transmission analysis===
Edison considered the need for many local power plants in the direct current system more democratic, each local could build electrical plants to suit its need and would not have to rely on a large monopoly to supply electricity. The proponents of AC counter argued that building a local plant would be too costly for rural areas, leaving them with no electrical supply at all.<ref>H. W. Brands, Reckless Decade. Page 50.</ref>
Edison's response to the limitations of direct current was to generate power close to where it was consumed (today called [[distributed generation]]) and install large conductors to handle the growing demand for electricity, but this solution proved to be costly (especially for rural areas which could not afford to build a local station<ref>H. W. Brands, Reckless Decade. Page 50.</ref> or to pay for massive amounts of very thick copper wire), impractical (including, but not limited to, inefficient voltage conversion) and unmanageable. Edison and his company, though, would have profited extensively from the construction of the multitude of power plants required to make electricity available in many areas.


Direct current could not easily be converted to higher or lower voltages. This meant that separate electrical lines had to be installed to supply power to appliances that used different voltages, for example, lighting and electric motors. This required more wires to lay and maintain, wasting money and introducing unnecessary hazards. A number of deaths in the [[Great Blizzard of 1888]] were attributed to collapsing overhead power lines in New York City.<ref>Some companies had their DC lines in that city buried underground for safety, but many lines still ran overhead.</ref><ref>[http://www.vny.cuny.edu/blizzard/building/building.html Untitled Document]</ref>
====AC====

[[File:WestinghouseEarlyACSystem1887-USP373035.png|right|thumb|Westinghouse Early AC System 1887 ({{US patent|373035}})]]
In the alternating current distribution system power could be transmitted more efficiently over long distances at high voltages, around ten times that of the loads, using lower current. A [[transformer]] was used to stepped down the (relatively) high voltage to low voltages for use in homes and factories. For a given quantity of [[electric power|power]] transmitted, the wire cross-sectional area would be [[proportionality_(mathematics)#Inverse_proportionality|inversely proportional]] to the voltage used. Alternatively, the allowable length of a circuit, given a wire size and allowable voltage drop, would increase approximately as the square of the distribution voltage. This had the practical significance that fewer, larger generating plants could serve the load in a given area. Large loads, such as industrial motors or converters for electric railway power, could be served by the same distribution network that fed lighting, by using a transformer with a suitable secondary voltage.
Alternating current could be transmitted over long distances at high voltages, using lower current, and thus lower energy loss and greater transmission efficiency, and then conveniently stepped down to low voltages for use in homes and factories. When Tesla introduced a system for alternating current generators, transformers, motors, wires and lights in November and December 1887, it became clear that AC was the future of [[electric power distribution]], although DC distribution was used in downtown metropolitan areas for decades thereafter.

[[File:US390721.png|thumb|Tesla's US390721 Patent for a "Dynamo Electric Machine"]]
Low-frequency (50–60&nbsp;[[Hertz|Hz]]) alternating currents can be more dangerous than similar levels of DC since the alternating fluctuations can cause the heart to lose coordination, inducing [[ventricular fibrillation]], a deadly heart rhythm that must be corrected immediately.<ref>Wiggers, C. J. et al. 1940</ref> However, any practical distribution system will use voltage levels quite sufficient for a dangerous amount of current to flow, whether it uses alternating or direct current. As precautions against electrocution are similar for both AC and DC, the technical and economic advantages of [[alternating current|AC power transmission]] outweighed this theoretical risk, and it was eventually adopted as the standard worldwide.

[[File:US390721.png|300px|thumb|Tesla's US390721 Patent for a "Dynamo Electric Machine"]]


=== Transmission loss ===
=== Transmission loss ===
The advantage of AC for distributing [[power (physics)|power]] over a distance is due to the ease of changing voltages using a [[transformer]]. Available [[electric power]] is the product of [[current (electricity)|current]] × [[voltage]] at the load. For a given amount of power, a low voltage requires a higher current and a higher voltage requires a lower current. Since metal conducting wires have an almost fixed [[electrical resistance]], some power will be wasted as heat in the wires. This power loss is given by [[Joule's first law]] and is proportional to the square of the current. Thus, if the overall transmitted power is the same, and given the constraints of practical conductor sizes, high-current, low-voltage transmissions will suffer a much greater power loss than low-current, high-voltage ones. This holds whether DC or AC is used.
The advantage of AC for distributing [[power (physics)|power]] over a distance is due to the ease of changing voltages using a [[transformer]]. Available power is the product of [[current (electricity)|current]] × [[voltage]] ([[Ohm's law|Ohm's Law]]) at the load. For a given amount of power, a low voltage requires a higher current and a higher voltage requires a lower current. Since metal conducting wires have an almost fixed [[electrical resistance]], some power will be wasted as heat in the wires. This power loss is given by [[Joule's laws]] and is proportional to the square of the current. Thus, if the overall transmitted power is the same, and given the constraints of practical conductor sizes, high-current, low-voltage transmissions will suffer a much greater power loss than low-current, high-voltage ones. This holds whether DC or AC is used.


Converting DC power from one voltage to another requires a large spinning [[rotary converter]] or [[motor-generator set]], which was difficult, expensive, inefficient, and required maintenance, whereas with AC the voltage can be changed with simple and efficient transformers that have no moving parts and require very little maintenance. This was the key to the success of the AC system. Modern transmission grids regularly use AC voltages up to 765,000 volts.<ref>[[Donald G. Fink]] and H. Wayne Beaty, ''Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers, Eleventh Edition'', McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978, ISBN 0-07-020974-X, chapter 14, page 14-3 "Overhead power transmission"</ref> Power electronic devices such as the [[mercury arc valve]] and [[thyristor]] made [[high-voltage direct current]] transmission practical by improving the reliability and efficiency of conversion between alternating and direct current, but such technology only became possible on an industrial scale starting in the 1960s.
Converting DC power from one voltage to another requires a large spinning [[rotary converter]] or [[motor-generator set]], which was difficult, expensive, inefficient, and required maintenance, whereas with AC the voltage can be changed with simple and efficient transformers that have no moving parts and require very little maintenance. This was the key to the success of the AC system. Modern transmission grids regularly use AC voltages up to 765,000 volts.<ref>[[Donald G. Fink]] and H. Wayne Beaty, ''Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers, Eleventh Edition'', McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978, ISBN 0-07-020974-X, chapter 14, page 14-3 "Overhead power transmission"</ref> Power electronic devices such as the [[mercury arc valve]] and [[thyristor]] made [[high-voltage direct current]] transmission practical by improving the reliability and efficiency of conversion between alternating and direct current, but such technology only became possible on an industrial scale starting in the 1960s.
Line 54: Line 54:
<ref name="BC1999a">Brandon, C. (1999). The electric chair: an unnatural American history. Page 77</ref> Acting on these directives, they were to demonstrate to the press that alternating current was more dangerous than Edison's system of direct current.<ref name="BC1999">Brandon, C. (1999). The electric chair: an unnatural American history. Page 9 (cf. "When New York began testing its new electric chair on dogs, cats, cattle and horses in 1889 it invited reporters to witness the instant death that results".)</ref> He also tried to popularize the term for being electrocuted as being "Westinghoused". Years after DC had lost the "war of the currents," in 1903, his film crew made a movie of the electrocution with high voltage AC, supervised by Edison employees, of [[Topsy (elephant)|Topsy]], a Coney Island circus elephant which had recently killed three men.<ref>[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0231523/plotsummary Electrocuting an Elephant]</ref>
<ref name="BC1999a">Brandon, C. (1999). The electric chair: an unnatural American history. Page 77</ref> Acting on these directives, they were to demonstrate to the press that alternating current was more dangerous than Edison's system of direct current.<ref name="BC1999">Brandon, C. (1999). The electric chair: an unnatural American history. Page 9 (cf. "When New York began testing its new electric chair on dogs, cats, cattle and horses in 1889 it invited reporters to witness the instant death that results".)</ref> He also tried to popularize the term for being electrocuted as being "Westinghoused". Years after DC had lost the "war of the currents," in 1903, his film crew made a movie of the electrocution with high voltage AC, supervised by Edison employees, of [[Topsy (elephant)|Topsy]], a Coney Island circus elephant which had recently killed three men.<ref>[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0231523/plotsummary Electrocuting an Elephant]</ref>


Edison opposed [[capital punishment]], but his desire to disparage the use of alternating current led to the invention of the [[electric chair]]. [[Harold P. Brown]], who was being [[secretly paid]] by Edison, built the first electric chair for the state of [[New York]] to promote the idea that alternating current was deadlier than DC.<ref>[http://inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aa102497.htm Death and Money - The History of the Electric Chair]</ref>
Edison opposed [[capital punishment]], but his desire to disparage the system of alternating current led to the invention of the [[electric chair]]. [[Harold P. Brown]], who was being secretly paid by Edison, built the first electric chair for the state of [[New York]] to promote the idea that alternating current was deadlier than DC.<ref>[http://inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aa102497.htm Death and Money - The History of the Electric Chair]</ref>


When the chair was first used, on August 6, 1890, the technicians on hand misjudged the voltage needed to kill the condemned prisoner, [[William Kemmler]]. The first jolt of electricity was not enough to kill Kemmler, and only left him badly injured. The procedure had to be repeated and a reporter on hand described it as "an awful spectacle, far worse than hanging." George Westinghouse commented: "They would have done better using an axe."<ref>Tom McNichol, '' AC/DC: the savage tale of the first standards war'', John Wiley and Sons, 2006 ISBN 0-7879-8267-9, p. 125</ref>
When the chair was first used, on August 6, 1890, the technicians on hand misjudged the voltage needed to kill the condemned prisoner, [[William Kemmler]]. The first jolt of electricity was not enough to kill Kemmler, and only left him badly injured. The procedure had to be repeated and a reporter on hand described it as "an awful spectacle, far worse than hanging." George Westinghouse commented: "They would have done better using an axe."<ref>Tom McNichol, '' AC/DC: the savage tale of the first standards war'', John Wiley and Sons, 2006 ISBN 0-7879-8267-9, p. 125</ref>
Line 66: Line 66:
When the exhibition closed, the [[power station]] at Lauffen continued in operation, providing electricity for the administrative capital, Heilbronn, making it the first place to be equipped with three-phase AC power.
When the exhibition closed, the [[power station]] at Lauffen continued in operation, providing electricity for the administrative capital, Heilbronn, making it the first place to be equipped with three-phase AC power.


Many corporate technical representatives (including E.W. Rice of Thomson-Houston Electric Company, what became General Electric) attended.<ref>The Schenectady Museum</ref> The technical advisors and representatives were impressed.
Many corporate technical representatives (including E.W. Rice of Thomson-Houston Electric Company (what became General Electric)) attended.<ref>The Schenectady Museum</ref> The technical advisors and representatives were impressed.


===AC deployment at Niagara===
===AC deployment at Niagara===
In 1893, NFPC was finally convinced by [[George Forbes (scientist)|George Forbes]] to award the contract to Westinghouse, and to reject [[General Electric]] and Edison's proposal. Work began in 1893 on the Niagara Falls generation project: power was to be generated and transmitted as [[alternating current#AC power supply frequencies|alternating current]], at a frequency of 25&nbsp;Hz to minimize impedance losses in transmission (changed to 60&nbsp;Hz in the 1950s).
In 1893, NFPC was finally convinced by [[George Forbes (scientist)|George Forbes]] to award the contract to Westinghouse, and to reject [[General Electric]] and Edison's proposal. Work began in 1893 on the Niagara Falls generation project: power was to be generated and transmitted as [[alternating current#AC power supply frequencies|alternating current]], at a frequency of 25&nbsp;Hz to minimize impedance losses in transmission (changed to 60&nbsp;Hz in the 1950s).


Some doubted that the system would generate enough electricity to power industry in [[Buffalo, New York|Buffalo]]. Tesla was sure it would work, saying that Niagara Falls could power the entire eastern United States. When finished, the first Niagara River hydraulic tunnel would have a capacity to develop {{convert|100000|hp|MW|disp=output only}}.<ref name=>{{cite book |last= |first=George W. |title=Number 25: Water resources of the state of New York, part II |url=http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/wsp25 |accessdate=29 January 2013 |year=1899 |publisher=United States Geological Survey |location=Washington, USA |series=Water Supply Paper |pages=139–142}}</ref> None of the previous polyphase alternating current transmission demonstration projects were on that scale of power:
Some doubted that the system would generate enough electricity to power industry in [[Buffalo, New York|Buffalo]]. Tesla was sure it would work, saying that Niagara Falls could power the entire eastern United States. None of the previous polyphase alternating current transmission demonstration projects were on the scale of power available from Niagara:
* The [[International Electro-Technical Exhibition – 1891|Lauffen-Neckar demonstration]] in 1891 had the capacity of 225&nbsp;kW
* The [[International Electro-Technical Exhibition – 1891|Lauffen-Neckar demonstration]] in 1891 had the capacity of 225&nbsp;kW
* Westinghouse successfully used AC in the commercial [[Ames Hydroelectric Generating Plant]] in 1891 at 75&nbsp;kW (Single phase)
* Westinghouse successfully used AC in the commercial [[Ames Hydroelectric Generating Plant]] in 1891 at 75&nbsp;kW (Single phase)
Line 84: Line 84:
In 1892, General Electric formed and immediately invested heavily in AC power (at this time Thomas Edison's opinions on company direction were muted by President Coffin and the GE board of directors). Westinghouse was already ahead in AC, but it only took a few years for General Electric to catch up, mainly thanks to [[Charles Proteus Steinmetz]], a Prussian mathematician who was the first person to fully understand AC power from a solid mathematical standpoint. General Electric hired many talented new engineers to improve its design of transformers, generators, motors and other apparatus.<ref>The General Electric Story by the Hall of History</ref>
In 1892, General Electric formed and immediately invested heavily in AC power (at this time Thomas Edison's opinions on company direction were muted by President Coffin and the GE board of directors). Westinghouse was already ahead in AC, but it only took a few years for General Electric to catch up, mainly thanks to [[Charles Proteus Steinmetz]], a Prussian mathematician who was the first person to fully understand AC power from a solid mathematical standpoint. General Electric hired many talented new engineers to improve its design of transformers, generators, motors and other apparatus.<ref>The General Electric Story by the Hall of History</ref>


In Europe, [[Siemens & Halske]] became the dominant force. Three phase 60&nbsp;Hz at 120 volts became the dominant system in North America while 220-240 volts at 50&nbsp;Hz became the standard in Europe.
In Europe Siemens and Halske became the dominant force. Three phase 60&nbsp;Hz at 120 volts became the dominant system in North America while 220-240 volts at 50&nbsp;Hz became the standard in Europe.


Alternating current power [[transmission network]]s today provide [[Redundancy (engineering)|redundant path]]s and lines for power routing from any power plant to any load center, based on the economics of the transmission path, the cost of power, and the importance of keeping a particular load center powered at all times. Generators (such as [[hydroelectric]] sites) can be located far from the loads.
Alternating current power [[transmission network]]s today provide [[Redundancy (engineering)|redundant path]]s and lines for power routing from any power plant to any load center, based on the economics of the transmission path, the cost of power, and the importance of keeping a particular load center powered at all times. Generators (such as [[hydroelectric]] sites) can be located far from the loads.


=== Remnant and existent DC systems ===
=== Remnant and existent DC systems ===
Some cities continued to use DC well into the 20th century. In central [[Helsinki]], there was a DC network in existence up until the late 1940s, and in the 1960s, Stockholm's dwindling DC network was eliminated.<ref name="ConEd-AC-no-DC">{{cite web |url=http://www.coned.com/newsroom/news/pr20071115.asp |publisher=[[Con Edison]] |date=2007-11-14 |accessdate=2013-01-20 |title=A/C BUT NO D/C: LAST CON EDISON DIRECT CURRENT CUSTOMER IS HISTORY}}</ref> A [[mercury arc valve]] rectifier station could convert AC to DC where networks were still used. In 1942, the [[Greenwich Village]] neighborhood in [[New York City]] used DC.<ref>{{cite |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=pV0l49pHk5EC&lpg=PA22&pg=PA22#v=onepage&q&f=false |page=22 |title=Loose Cannons, Red Herrings, and Other Lost Metaphors |last=Claiborne |first=Robert |authorlink=Robert Claiborne |publisher=[[W.W. Norton & Company]] |year=2001}}</ref> Parts of Boston, Massachusetts along Beacon Street and Commonwealth Avenue still used 110 volts DC in the 1960s, causing the destruction of many small appliances (typically hair dryers and phonographs) used by [[Boston University]] students, who ignored warnings about the electricity supply.<ref>{{cite |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=lGaGjE2i0S0C&lpg=PA78&pg=PA78#v=onepage&q&f=false |publisher=[[MIT Press]] |date=2011 |accessdate=2013-05-23 |title=Engineering Systems: Meeting Human Needs in a Complex Technological World |author1=de Weck, Olivier L. |author2=Roos, Daniel |author3=Magee, Christopher L. |page=78}}</ref> New York City's electric utility company, [[Consolidated Edison]], continued to supply direct current to customers who had adopted it early in the twentieth century, mainly for elevators.<ref name="ConEd-AC-no-DC"/> The [[New Yorker Hotel]], constructed in 1929, had a large direct-current power plant and did not convert fully to alternating-current service until well into the 1960s.<ref>Tom Blalock, '' Powering the New Yorker: A Hotel's Unique Direct Current System'', in ''IEEE Power and Energy Magazine'', Jan/Feb 2006</ref> This was the building in which AC pioneer Nikola Tesla spent his last years, and where he died in 1943. In January 1998, Consolidated Edison started to eliminate DC service.<ref name="ConEd-AC-no-DC"/> At that time there were 4,600 DC customers. By 2006, there were only 60 customers using DC service, and on November 14, 2007, the last direct-current distribution by Con Edison was shut down.<ref name="ConEd-AC-no-DC"/><ref>{{cite web |last=Lee |first=Jennifer |authorlink=Jennifer 8. Lee |date=2007-11-14 |publisher=[[New York Times]] |url=http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/14/off-goes-the-power-current-started-by-thomas-edison/ |title=Off Goes the Power Current Started by Thomas Edison |accessdate=2013-01-20}}</ref> Customers still using DC were provided with on-site AC-to-DC [[rectifier]]s. The city of [[San Francisco]], California featured a DC power grid to supply power for pre-1940s winding-drum elevators.<ref name="IEEE-SF-DC-grid">{{cite web |url=http://spectrum.ieee.org/energy/the-smarter-grid/san-franciscos-secret-dc-grid |title=San Francisco’s Secret DC Grid |author=Fairley, Peter |year=2012 |publisher=[[IEEE Spectrum]] |accessdate=2013-01-14}}</ref> Around the end of 2010, the DC grid was divided into 171 separate islands with each island supplying 7 to 10 customers.<ref name="IEEE-SF-DC-grid"/>
Some cities continued to use DC well into the 20th century. For example, central [[Helsinki]] had a DC network until the late 1940s, and Stockholm lost its dwindling DC network as late as the 1970s. A [[mercury arc valve]] rectifier station could convert AC to DC where networks were still used. Parts of Boston, Massachusetts along Beacon Street and Commonwealth Avenue still used 110 volts DC in the 1960s, causing the destruction of many small appliances (typically hair dryers and phonographs) used by [[Boston University]] students, who ignored warnings about the electricity supply. [[New York City]]'s electric utility company, [[Consolidated Edison]], continued to supply direct current to customers who had adopted it early in the twentieth century, mainly for elevators. The [[New Yorker Hotel]], constructed in 1929, had a large direct-current power plant and did not convert fully to alternating-current service until well into the 1960s.<ref>Tom Blalock, '' Powering the New Yorker: A Hotel's Unique Direct Current System'', in ''IEEE Power and Energy Magazine'', Jan/Feb 2006</ref> This was the building in which AC pioneer Nikola Tesla spent his last years, and where he died in 1943. In January 1998, Consolidated Edison started to eliminate DC service. At that time there were 4,600 DC customers. By 2006, there were only 60 customers using DC service, and on November 14, 2007, the last direct-current distribution by Con Edison was shut down. Customers still using DC were provided with on-site AC to DC [[rectifier]]s.<ref>Jennifer Lee, ''New York Times'' November 16, 2007, "[http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/14/off-goes-the-power-current-started-by-thomas-edison/ Off Goes the Power Current Started by Thomas Edison]" (retrieved November 16, 2007)</ref>


The Central Electricity Generating Board in the UK continued to maintain a 200&nbsp;volt DC generating station at [[Bankside Power Station]] on the [[River Thames]] in London as late as 1981. It exclusively powered DC printing machinery in [[Fleet Street]], then the heart of the UK's newspaper industry. It was decommissioned later in 1981 when the newspaper industry moved into the developing docklands area further down the river (using modern AC-powered equipment). The building was converted into an art gallery, the [[Tate Modern]].
The Central Electricity Generating Board in the UK continued to maintain a 200&nbsp;volt DC generating station at [[Bankside Power Station]] on the [[River Thames]] in London as late as 1981. It exclusively powered DC printing machinery in [[Fleet Street]], then the heart of the UK's newspaper industry. It was decommissioned later in 1981 when the newspaper industry moved into the developing docklands area further down the river (using modern AC powered equipment). The building was converted into an art gallery, the [[Tate Modern]].


Electric railways that use a [[third-rail]] system generally employ DC power between 500 and 750 volts; railways with [[overhead lines#Overhead catenary|overhead catenary]] lines use a number of power schemes including both high-voltage AC and high-current DC.
Electric railways that use a [[third-rail]] system generally employ DC power between 500 and 750 volts; railways with [[overhead lines#Overhead catenary|overhead catenary]] lines use a number of power schemes including both high-voltage AC and high-current DC.


[[HVDC|High-voltage direct current (HVDC)]] systems are used for bulk transmission of energy from distant generating stations, or for interconnection of separate alternating current systems. These HVDC systems use [[Power Electronics|electronic]] devices like [[mercury arc valve]]s, [[thyristor]]s, or [[IGBT]]s that were unavailable during the War of Currents era. Power is converted to and from alternating current at each side of the HVDC link. An HVDC system can transmit more power over a given right-of-way than an AC system, which is an advantage in overall cost. HVDC systems allow better control of power flows in transient and emergency conditions, which helps prevent blackouts. HVDC is an alternative to AC systems for long-distance, high-load transmission, see [[List of HVDC projects]] for example projects.
[[HVDC|High voltage direct current (HVDC)]] systems are used for bulk transmission of energy from distant generating stations or for interconnection of separate alternating-current systems. These HVDC systems use [[Power Electronics|electronic]] devices like [[mercury arc valve]]s, [[thyristor]]s or [[IGBT]]s that were unavailable during the War of Currents era. Power is still converted to and from alternating current at each side of the modern HVDC link. The advantages of HVDC over AC systems for bulk transmission include higher power ratings for a given line (important since installing new lines and even upgrading old ones is extremely expensive) and better control of power flows, especially in transient and emergency conditions that can often lead to blackouts. Many modern plants now use HVDC as an alternative to AC systems for long distance, high load transmission, especially in developing countries such as Russia, China, India and Brazil. (See [[List of HVDC projects]] for more details.)


DC power is still common when distances are small, and especially when energy storage or conversion uses batteries or fuel cells. These applications include:
DC power is still common when distances are small, and especially when energy storage or conversion uses batteries or fuel cells. These applications include:
* [[Electronics]], including [[integrated circuit]]s, high-power [[transmitter]]s and [[computer]]s
* [[Electronics]], including [[integrated circuit]]s, high-power [[transmitter]]s and [[computer]]s
* [[Car battery|Vehicle starting, lighting, and ignition systems]]
* [[Car battery|Vehicle starting, lighting, and ignition systems]]
Line 111: Line 111:
{{Portal|Energy}}
{{Portal|Energy}}
{{Wikipedia books|Thomas Edison}}
{{Wikipedia books|Thomas Edison}}
*General: [[Electricity]]
*[[Alternating current]]
*[[Direct current]]
*[[Extra-low voltage]]
*[[Extra-low voltage]]
*AC advocates:
*[[Charles F. Scott (engineer)]]
**[[Nikola Tesla]]
**[[Sebastian Ziani de Ferranti]]
**[[George Westinghouse]]
**[[Charles Proteus Steinmetz]]
**[[Charles F. Scott]]
**[[Miksa Déri]] of [[Ganz]], Hungary
**[[Ottó Bláthy]] of Ganz, Hungary
*DC advocates:
**[[Thomas Edison]]
**[[Arthur Kennelly]]
**[[Harold P. Brown]]
**[[William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin|Lord Kelvin]]


==References==
==References==
Line 118: Line 133:


== Further reading ==
== Further reading ==

* Berton, Pierre (1997). ''Niagara: a history of the Falls''. New York: Kodansha International.
* Berton, Pierre (1997). ''Niagara: a history of the Falls''. New York: Kodansha International.
* Beyer, Rick (2003). ''The greatest stories never told: 100 tales from history to astonish, bewilder, & stupefy''. New York: HarperResource. Pages 122 - 123.
* Beyer, Rick (2003). ''The greatest stories never told: 100 tales from history to astonish, bewilder, & stupefy''. New York: HarperResource. Pages 122 - 123.
Line 147: Line 163:
* [http://www.pinkyshow.org/videos/thomas-edison-hates-cats/ ''Thomas Edison Hates Cats''] - AC vs DC an online video mini-history.
* [http://www.pinkyshow.org/videos/thomas-edison-hates-cats/ ''Thomas Edison Hates Cats''] - AC vs DC an online video mini-history.
* [http://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_warcur.html War of the Currents]. PBS.
* [http://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_warcur.html War of the Currents]. PBS.
*[http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/dept/Courses/E-24/E-24Projects/MariaChang/The_War_of_Currents/The_War_of_Currents.htm War of the Currents]. nuc.berkeley.edu.


{{DEFAULTSORT:War Of Currents}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:War Of Currents}}
[[Category:Ideological rivalry]]
[[Category:1880s in science]]
[[Category:1880s in the United States]]
[[Category:Business rivalries]]
[[Category:Electric power]]
[[Category:Electric power]]
[[Category:Energy development]]
[[Category:History of electrical engineering]]
[[Category:History of electronic engineering]]
[[Category:History of electronic engineering]]
[[Category:Thomas Edison]]
[[Category:Ideological rivalry]]
[[Category:Nikola Tesla]]
[[Category:Nikola Tesla]]
[[Category:Business rivalries]]
[[Category:Thomas Edison]]
[[Category:1880s in the United States]]
[[Category:1880s in science]]
[[Category:History of electrical engineering]]
[[Category:Energy development]]

Revision as of 20:34, 30 June 2014

Thomas Edison, American inventor and businessman, known as "The Wizard of Menlo Park", pushed for the development of a DC power network.

In the "War of Currents" era (sometimes, "War of the Currents" or "Battle of Currents") in the late 1880s, George Westinghouse and Thomas Edison became adversaries due to Edison's promotion of direct current (DC) for electric power distribution over alternating current (AC) advocated by several European companies[1] and Westinghouse Electric based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Background

The Hungarian "ZBD" Team (Károly Zipernowsky, Ottó Bláthy, Miksa Déri). They were the inventors of the first high efficiency, closed core shunt connection transformer. The three also invented the modern power distribution system: Instead of former series connection they connect transformers that supply the appliances in parallel to the main line.

During the initial years of electricity distribution, Edison's direct current was the standard for the United States, and Edison did not want to lose all his patent royalties.[2] Direct current worked well with incandescent lamps, which were the principal load of the day, and with motors. Direct-current systems could be directly used with storage batteries, providing valuable load-leveling and backup power during interruptions of generator operation. Direct-current generators could be easily paralleled, allowing economical operation by using smaller machines during periods of light load and improving reliability. At the introduction of Edison's system, no practical AC motor was available. Edison had invented a meter to allow customers to be billed for energy proportional to consumption, but this meter worked only with direct current. As of 1882 these were all significant technical advantages of direct current.

Alternating current had first developed in Europe due to the work of Guillaume Duchenne (1850s), Ganz Works (1870s), Sebastian Ziani de Ferranti (1880s), Lucien Gaulard, and Galileo Ferraris.

The prototype transformer is on display at the Széchenyi István Memorial Exhibition, Nagycenk, Hungary

A prototype of the high efficiency, closed core shunt connection transformer was made by the Hungarian "Z.B.D." team (composed of Károly Zipernowsky, Ottó Bláthy and Miksa Déri) at Ganz Works in the autumn of 1884.[3][4] The new Z.B.D. transformers were 3.4 times more efficient than the open core bipolar devices of Gaulard and Gibbs.[5] Transformers in use today are designed based on principles discovered by the three engineers.[6] Their patents included another major related innovation: the use of parallel connected (as opposed to series connected) power distribution.[7][8] Ottó Bláthy also invented the AC electricity meter to compensate the competition of AC and DC technology.[9][10][11][12][13] The reliability of the AC technology received impetus after the Ganz Works electrified a large European metropolis: Rome in 1886.[14]

George Westinghouse, American entrepreneur and engineer, financially backed the development of a practical AC power network.

In North America one of the believers in the new technology was George Westinghouse. Westinghouse was willing to invest in the technology and hired William Stanley, Jr. to work on an AC distribution system using step up and step down transformers of a new design in 1886.[15] After Stanley left Westinghouse, Oliver Shallenberger took control of the AC project. In July of 1888, George Westinghouse licensed Nikola Tesla's US patents for a polyphase AC induction motor and transformer designs and hired Tesla for one year to be a consultant at the Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company's Pittsburgh labs.[16] Westinghouse purchased a US patent option on induction motors from Galileo Ferraris in an attempt to own a patent that would supersede Tesla's. But with Tesla's backers getting offers from another capitalist to license Tesla's US patents, Westinghouse concluded that he had to pay the rather substantial amount of money being asked to secure the Tesla license.[17] Westinghouse also acquired other patents for AC transformers from Lucien Gaulard and John Dixon Gibbs.[18]

Nikola Tesla, inventor, physicist, and electro-mechanical engineer, who held several instrumental patents in the Westinghouse AC system.

The "War of Currents" is often personified as Westinghouse vs. Edison.[citation needed] However, the "War of Currents" was much larger than that: It involved both American and European companies whose heavy investments in one current type or the other led them to hope that use of the other type would decline, such that their share of the market for "their" current type would represent greater absolute revenue once the decline of the other current type enabled them to expand their existing distribution networks.[19][citation needed]

Electric power transmission

The competing systems

Edison's DC distribution system consisted of generating plants feeding heavy distribution conductors, with customer loads (lighting and motors) tapped off them. The system operated at the same voltage level throughout; for example, 100 volt lamps at the customer's location would be connected to a generator supplying 110 volts, to allow for some voltage drop in the wires between the generator and load. The voltage level was chosen for convenience in lamp manufacture; high-resistance carbon filament lamps could be constructed to withstand 100 volts, and to provide lighting performance economically competitive with gas lighting. At the time it was felt that 100 volts was not likely to present a severe hazard of fatal electric shock.

To save on the cost of copper conductors, a three-wire distribution system was used. The three wires were at +110 volts, 0 volts and −110 volts relative potential. 100-volt lamps could be operated between either the +110 or −110 volt legs of the system and the 0-volt "neutral" conductor, which carried only the unbalanced current between the + and − sources. The resulting three-wire system used less copper wire for a given quantity of electric power transmitted, while still maintaining (relatively) low voltages. However, even with this innovation, the voltage drop due to the resistance of the system conductors was so high that generating plants had to be located within a mile (1–2 km) or so of the load. Higher voltages could not so easily be used with the DC system because there was no efficient low-cost technology that would allow reduction of a high transmission voltage to a low utilization voltage.

Westinghouse Early AC System 1887 (U.S. patent 373,035)

In the alternating current system, a transformer was used between the (relatively) high voltage distribution system and the customer loads. Lamps and small motors could still be operated at some convenient low voltage. However, the transformer would allow power to be transmitted at much higher voltages, say, ten times that of the loads. For a given quantity of power transmitted, the wire cross-sectional area would be inversely proportional to the voltage used. Alternatively, the allowable length of a circuit, given a wire size and allowable voltage drop, would increase approximately as the square of the distribution voltage. This had the practical significance that fewer, larger generating plants could serve the load in a given area. Large loads, such as industrial motors or converters for electric railway power, could be served by the same distribution network that fed lighting, by using a transformer with a suitable secondary voltage.

Early transmission analysis

Edison's response to the limitations of direct current was to generate power close to where it was consumed (today called distributed generation) and install large conductors to handle the growing demand for electricity, but this solution proved to be costly (especially for rural areas which could not afford to build a local station[20] or to pay for massive amounts of very thick copper wire), impractical (including, but not limited to, inefficient voltage conversion) and unmanageable. Edison and his company, though, would have profited extensively from the construction of the multitude of power plants required to make electricity available in many areas.

Direct current could not easily be converted to higher or lower voltages. This meant that separate electrical lines had to be installed to supply power to appliances that used different voltages, for example, lighting and electric motors. This required more wires to lay and maintain, wasting money and introducing unnecessary hazards. A number of deaths in the Great Blizzard of 1888 were attributed to collapsing overhead power lines in New York City.[21][22]

Alternating current could be transmitted over long distances at high voltages, using lower current, and thus lower energy loss and greater transmission efficiency, and then conveniently stepped down to low voltages for use in homes and factories. When Tesla introduced a system for alternating current generators, transformers, motors, wires and lights in November and December 1887, it became clear that AC was the future of electric power distribution, although DC distribution was used in downtown metropolitan areas for decades thereafter.

Low-frequency (50–60 Hz) alternating currents can be more dangerous than similar levels of DC since the alternating fluctuations can cause the heart to lose coordination, inducing ventricular fibrillation, a deadly heart rhythm that must be corrected immediately.[23] However, any practical distribution system will use voltage levels quite sufficient for a dangerous amount of current to flow, whether it uses alternating or direct current. As precautions against electrocution are similar for both AC and DC, the technical and economic advantages of AC power transmission outweighed this theoretical risk, and it was eventually adopted as the standard worldwide.

Tesla's US390721 Patent for a "Dynamo Electric Machine"

Transmission loss

The advantage of AC for distributing power over a distance is due to the ease of changing voltages using a transformer. Available power is the product of current × voltage (Ohm's Law) at the load. For a given amount of power, a low voltage requires a higher current and a higher voltage requires a lower current. Since metal conducting wires have an almost fixed electrical resistance, some power will be wasted as heat in the wires. This power loss is given by Joule's laws and is proportional to the square of the current. Thus, if the overall transmitted power is the same, and given the constraints of practical conductor sizes, high-current, low-voltage transmissions will suffer a much greater power loss than low-current, high-voltage ones. This holds whether DC or AC is used.

Converting DC power from one voltage to another requires a large spinning rotary converter or motor-generator set, which was difficult, expensive, inefficient, and required maintenance, whereas with AC the voltage can be changed with simple and efficient transformers that have no moving parts and require very little maintenance. This was the key to the success of the AC system. Modern transmission grids regularly use AC voltages up to 765,000 volts.[24] Power electronic devices such as the mercury arc valve and thyristor made high-voltage direct current transmission practical by improving the reliability and efficiency of conversion between alternating and direct current, but such technology only became possible on an industrial scale starting in the 1960s.

Alternating-current transmission lines have losses that do not occur with direct current. Due to the skin effect, a conductor will have a higher resistance to alternating current than to direct current; the effect is measurable and of practical significance for large conductors carrying thousands of amperes. The increased resistance due to the skin effect can be offset by changing the shape of conductors from a solid core to a braid of many small (isolated) wires. However, total losses in systems using high-voltage transmission and transformers to reduce the voltage are very much lower than DC transmission at working voltage.

Current wars

Edison's publicity campaign

Edison carried out a campaign to discourage the use[25] of alternating current, including spreading disinformation on fatal AC accidents, publicly killing animals, and lobbying against the use of AC in state legislatures. Edison directed his technicians, primarily Arthur Kennelly and Harold P. Brown,[26] to preside over several AC-driven killings of animals, primarily stray cats and dogs but also unwanted cattle and horses. [27] Acting on these directives, they were to demonstrate to the press that alternating current was more dangerous than Edison's system of direct current.[28] He also tried to popularize the term for being electrocuted as being "Westinghoused". Years after DC had lost the "war of the currents," in 1903, his film crew made a movie of the electrocution with high voltage AC, supervised by Edison employees, of Topsy, a Coney Island circus elephant which had recently killed three men.[29]

Edison opposed capital punishment, but his desire to disparage the system of alternating current led to the invention of the electric chair. Harold P. Brown, who was being secretly paid by Edison, built the first electric chair for the state of New York to promote the idea that alternating current was deadlier than DC.[30]

When the chair was first used, on August 6, 1890, the technicians on hand misjudged the voltage needed to kill the condemned prisoner, William Kemmler. The first jolt of electricity was not enough to kill Kemmler, and only left him badly injured. The procedure had to be repeated and a reporter on hand described it as "an awful spectacle, far worse than hanging." George Westinghouse commented: "They would have done better using an axe."[31]

Willamette Falls to Niagara Falls

In 1889, the first long distance transmission of DC electricity in the United States was switched on at Willamette Falls Station, in Oregon City, Oregon.[32] In 1890 a flood destroyed the Willamette Falls DC power station. This unfortunate event paved the way for the first long distance transmission of AC electricity in the world when Willamette Falls Electric company installed experimental AC generators from Westinghouse in 1890. That same year, the Niagara Falls Power Company (NFPC) and its subsidiary Cataract Company formed the International Niagara Commission composed of experts, to analyze proposals to harness Niagara Falls to generate electricity. The commission was led by Sir William Thomson (later Lord Kelvin) and included Eleuthère Mascart from France, William Unwin from England, Coleman Sellers from the US, and Théodore Turrettini from Switzerland. It was backed by entrepreneurs such as J. P. Morgan, Lord Rothschild, and John Jacob Astor IV. Among 19 proposals, they even briefly considered compressed air as a power transmission medium, but preferred electricity. But they could not decide which method would be best overall.

International Electro-Technical Exhibition

The International Electro-Technical Exhibition of 1891 featured the long distance transmission of high-power, three-phase electric current. It was held between 16 May and 19 October on the disused site of the three former “Westbahnhöfe” (Western Railway Stations) in Frankfurt am Main. The exhibition featured the first long distance transmission of high-power, three-phase electric current, which was generated 175 km away at Lauffen am Neckar. It successfully operated motors and lights at the fair.

When the exhibition closed, the power station at Lauffen continued in operation, providing electricity for the administrative capital, Heilbronn, making it the first place to be equipped with three-phase AC power.

Many corporate technical representatives (including E.W. Rice of Thomson-Houston Electric Company (what became General Electric)) attended.[33] The technical advisors and representatives were impressed.

AC deployment at Niagara

In 1893, NFPC was finally convinced by George Forbes to award the contract to Westinghouse, and to reject General Electric and Edison's proposal. Work began in 1893 on the Niagara Falls generation project: power was to be generated and transmitted as alternating current, at a frequency of 25 Hz to minimize impedance losses in transmission (changed to 60 Hz in the 1950s).

Some doubted that the system would generate enough electricity to power industry in Buffalo. Tesla was sure it would work, saying that Niagara Falls could power the entire eastern United States. None of the previous polyphase alternating current transmission demonstration projects were on the scale of power available from Niagara:

On November 16, 1896, electrical power was transmitted to industries in Buffalo from the hydroelectric generators at the Edward Dean Adams Station at Niagara Falls. The generators were built by Westinghouse Electric Corporation using Tesla's AC system patent. The nameplates on the generators bore Tesla's name. To appease the interests of General Electric, they were awarded the contract to construct the transmission lines to Buffalo using the Tesla patents.[36]

Competition outcome

As a result of the successful field trial in the International Electro-Technical Exhibition of 1891, three-phase current, as far as Germany was concerned, became the most economical means of transmitting electrical energy.

In 1892, General Electric formed and immediately invested heavily in AC power (at this time Thomas Edison's opinions on company direction were muted by President Coffin and the GE board of directors). Westinghouse was already ahead in AC, but it only took a few years for General Electric to catch up, mainly thanks to Charles Proteus Steinmetz, a Prussian mathematician who was the first person to fully understand AC power from a solid mathematical standpoint. General Electric hired many talented new engineers to improve its design of transformers, generators, motors and other apparatus.[37]

In Europe Siemens and Halske became the dominant force. Three phase 60 Hz at 120 volts became the dominant system in North America while 220-240 volts at 50 Hz became the standard in Europe.

Alternating current power transmission networks today provide redundant paths and lines for power routing from any power plant to any load center, based on the economics of the transmission path, the cost of power, and the importance of keeping a particular load center powered at all times. Generators (such as hydroelectric sites) can be located far from the loads.

Remnant and existent DC systems

Some cities continued to use DC well into the 20th century. For example, central Helsinki had a DC network until the late 1940s, and Stockholm lost its dwindling DC network as late as the 1970s. A mercury arc valve rectifier station could convert AC to DC where networks were still used. Parts of Boston, Massachusetts along Beacon Street and Commonwealth Avenue still used 110 volts DC in the 1960s, causing the destruction of many small appliances (typically hair dryers and phonographs) used by Boston University students, who ignored warnings about the electricity supply. New York City's electric utility company, Consolidated Edison, continued to supply direct current to customers who had adopted it early in the twentieth century, mainly for elevators. The New Yorker Hotel, constructed in 1929, had a large direct-current power plant and did not convert fully to alternating-current service until well into the 1960s.[38] This was the building in which AC pioneer Nikola Tesla spent his last years, and where he died in 1943. In January 1998, Consolidated Edison started to eliminate DC service. At that time there were 4,600 DC customers. By 2006, there were only 60 customers using DC service, and on November 14, 2007, the last direct-current distribution by Con Edison was shut down. Customers still using DC were provided with on-site AC to DC rectifiers.[39]

The Central Electricity Generating Board in the UK continued to maintain a 200 volt DC generating station at Bankside Power Station on the River Thames in London as late as 1981. It exclusively powered DC printing machinery in Fleet Street, then the heart of the UK's newspaper industry. It was decommissioned later in 1981 when the newspaper industry moved into the developing docklands area further down the river (using modern AC powered equipment). The building was converted into an art gallery, the Tate Modern.

Electric railways that use a third-rail system generally employ DC power between 500 and 750 volts; railways with overhead catenary lines use a number of power schemes including both high-voltage AC and high-current DC.

High voltage direct current (HVDC) systems are used for bulk transmission of energy from distant generating stations or for interconnection of separate alternating-current systems. These HVDC systems use electronic devices like mercury arc valves, thyristors or IGBTs that were unavailable during the War of Currents era. Power is still converted to and from alternating current at each side of the modern HVDC link. The advantages of HVDC over AC systems for bulk transmission include higher power ratings for a given line (important since installing new lines and even upgrading old ones is extremely expensive) and better control of power flows, especially in transient and emergency conditions that can often lead to blackouts. Many modern plants now use HVDC as an alternative to AC systems for long distance, high load transmission, especially in developing countries such as Russia, China, India and Brazil. (See List of HVDC projects for more details.)

DC power is still common when distances are small, and especially when energy storage or conversion uses batteries or fuel cells. These applications include:

In these applications, direct current may be used directly or converted to alternating current using power electronic devices. In the future, this may provide a way to supply energy to a grid from distributed sources. For example, hybrid vehicle owners may rent the capacity of their vehicle's batteries for load-levelling purposes by the local electrical utility company.

See also

Template:Wikipedia books

References

  1. ^ AC Power History. Edison Tech Center.
  2. ^ McNichol, Tom (2006). AC/DC: the savage tale of the first standards war. John Wiley and Sons. p. 80. ISBN 978-0-7879-8267-6.
  3. ^ Halacsy, A. A. (1961). "Transformer Invented 75 Years Ago". IEEE Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. 80 (3): 121–125. doi:10.1109/AIEEPAS.1961.4500994. Retrieved Feb. 29, 2012. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  4. ^ http://www.omikk.bme.hu/archivum/angol/htm/blathy_o.htm
  5. ^ Jeszenszky, Sándor. "Electrostatics and Electrodynamics at Pest University in the Mid-19th Century" (PDF). University of Pavia. Retrieved Mar.3, 2012. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  6. ^ Nagy, Árpád Zoltán (Oct. 11, 1996). "Lecture to Mark the 100th Anniversary of the Discovery of the Electron in 1897 (preliminary text)". Budapest. Retrieved July 9, 2009. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  7. ^ "Hungarian Inventors and Their Inventions". Institute for Developing Alternative Energy in Latin America. Retrieved Mar. 3, 2012. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  8. ^ "Bláthy, Ottó Titusz". Budapest University of Technology and Economics, National Technical Information Centre and Library. Retrieved Feb. 29, 2012. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  9. ^ Eugenii Katz. "Blathy". People.clarkson.edu. Archived from the original on June 25, 2008. Retrieved 2009-08-04.
  10. ^ Ricks, G.W.D. This paper appears in: Electrical Engineers, Journal of the Institution of Issue Date: March 1896 Volume: 25 Issue: 120 On page(s): 57 - 77 Digital Object Identifier: 10.1049/jiee-1.1896.0005
  11. ^ The Electrical engineer, Volume 5. (February, 1890)
  12. ^ The Electrician, Volume 50. 1923
  13. ^ Official gazette of the United States Patent Office: Volume 50. (1890)
  14. ^ "Ottó Bláthy, Miksa Déri, Károly Zipernowsky". IEC Techline. Retrieved Apr. 16, 2010. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  15. ^ Great Barrington Historical Society, Great Barrington, Massachusetts
  16. ^ John W. Klooster, Icons of Invention: The Makers of the Modern World from Gutenberg to Gates, page 305
  17. ^ Jill Jonnes, Empires of Light: Edison, Tesla, Westinghouse, and the Race to Electrify the World, Edison Declares War
  18. ^ Crane, Frank (2003). George Westinghouse: His Life and Achievements, 1925. Kessinger Publishing. p. 25. ISBN 978-0-7661-6705-6.
  19. ^ Deutsches Museum
  20. ^ H. W. Brands, Reckless Decade. Page 50.
  21. ^ Some companies had their DC lines in that city buried underground for safety, but many lines still ran overhead.
  22. ^ Untitled Document
  23. ^ Wiggers, C. J. et al. 1940
  24. ^ Donald G. Fink and H. Wayne Beaty, Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers, Eleventh Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978, ISBN 0-07-020974-X, chapter 14, page 14-3 "Overhead power transmission"
  25. ^ Brandon, C. (1999). The electric chair: an unnatural American history. Page 72. (cf. "Edison and his captains embarked on a no-holds-barred smear campaign designed to discredit AC as too dangerous [...]"
  26. ^ Brown and Edison's letters, as well as Brown and Kennelly's letters, indicate Brown was taking weekly directions from Edison's company. For more see, Brandon, C. (1999). The electric chair: an unnatural American history. Page 70.
  27. ^ Brandon, C. (1999). The electric chair: an unnatural American history. Page 77
  28. ^ Brandon, C. (1999). The electric chair: an unnatural American history. Page 9 (cf. "When New York began testing its new electric chair on dogs, cats, cattle and horses in 1889 it invited reporters to witness the instant death that results".)
  29. ^ Electrocuting an Elephant
  30. ^ Death and Money - The History of the Electric Chair
  31. ^ Tom McNichol, AC/DC: the savage tale of the first standards war, John Wiley and Sons, 2006 ISBN 0-7879-8267-9, p. 125
  32. ^ [1]
  33. ^ The Schenectady Museum
  34. ^ Robert L. Bradley, Jr. Edison to Enron: Energy Markets and Political StrategiesJohn Wiley & Sons, 2011 ISBN 1-118-19251-6
  35. ^ http://www.ieeeghn.org/wiki/index.php/Milestones:Mill_Creek_No._1_Hydroelectric_Plant,_1893 Mill Creek No. 1 Hydroelectric Plant, retrieved 2012 Jan 4
  36. ^ Berton, P. (1997). Niagara: a history of the Falls. Page 163. (cf., As a form of compromise, General Electric was given the contract to build the transmission and distribution lines to Buffalo, using the Tesla patents.)
  37. ^ The General Electric Story by the Hall of History
  38. ^ Tom Blalock, Powering the New Yorker: A Hotel's Unique Direct Current System, in IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, Jan/Feb 2006
  39. ^ Jennifer Lee, New York Times November 16, 2007, "Off Goes the Power Current Started by Thomas Edison" (retrieved November 16, 2007)

Further reading

  • Berton, Pierre (1997). Niagara: a history of the Falls. New York: Kodansha International.
  • Beyer, Rick (2003). The greatest stories never told: 100 tales from history to astonish, bewilder, & stupefy. New York: HarperResource. Pages 122 - 123.
  • Bordeau, Sanford P. (1982). Volts to Hertz—the rise of electricity: from the compass to the radio through the works of sixteen great men of science whose names are used in measuring electricity and magnetism. Minneapolis, Minn: Burgess Pub. Co.
  • Brandon, Craig (1999). The Electric Chair: An Unnatural American History. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & Co.
  • Brands, Henry William (1995). The reckless decade: America in the 1890s. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  • Cheney, Margaret, Uth, Robert, & Glenn, Jim (1999). Tesla, master of lightning. New York: MetroBooks.
  • Conot, Robert, A Streak of Luck: The Life and Legend of Thomas Alva Edison. New York: Seaview Books,
  • Dobson, K., & Roberts, M. D. (2002). Physics: teacher resource pack. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
  • Dommermuth-Costa, C. (1994). Nikola Tesla: a spark of genius. Minneapolis: Lerner Publications Co.
  • Edquist, Charles, Hommen, Leif, & Tsipouri, Lena J. (2000). Public technology procurement and innovation. Economics of science, technology, and innovation, v. 16. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
  • The Electrical Engineer, "A new system of alternating current motors and transformers". (1884). London: Biggs & Co. Pages 568 - 572.
  • The Electrical Engineer, "Practical electrical problems at Chicago". (1884). London: Biggs & Co. Pages 458 - 459, 484 - 485, and 489 - 490.
  • Foster, Abram John (1979). The coming of the electrical age to the United States. New York: Arno Press.
  • Mats Fridlund & Helmut Maier, The second battle of the currents: a comparative study of engineering nationalism in German and Swedish electric power, 1921-1961.
  • Hughes, Thomas Parke (1983). Networks of power: electrification in Western society, 1880-1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Tom McNichol AC/DC: the savage tale of the first standards war,John Wiley and Sons, 2006 ISBN 0-7879-8267-9
  • Munson, Richard (2005). From Edison to Enron: the business of power and what it means for the future of electricity. Westport, Conn: Praeger Publishers.
  • Reynolds, Terry S., and Bernstein, Theodore. “Edison and the Chair,” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, March 1989, pp. 19–28.
  • Seifer, Marc J. (1998). Wizard: the life and times of Nikola Tesla : biography of a genius. Secaucus, N.J.: Carol Pub.
  • Silverberg, Robert, Light for the World, Edison and the Electric Power Industry. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1967, pp. 229–243.
  • Scholnick, Robert J. (1992). American literature and science. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky. Pages 157 - 171.
  • Schurr, Sam H., Burwell, Calvin C., Devine, Warren D., Sonenblum, Sidney (1990). Electricity in the American economy: agent of technological progress. Contributions in economics and economic history, no. 117. New York: Greenwood Press.
  • Walker, James Blaine (1949). The epic of American industry. New York: Harper.
  • Westinghouse Electric Corporation, "Electric power transmission patents; Tesla polyphase system. (Transmission of power; polyphase system; Tesla patents)
  • Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company, Collection of Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company contracts, Pittsburgh, Pa.