User talk:DangerousPanda

This user has opted out of talkbacks

Note: please do not use talkback {{tb}} templates here unless you are referring to discussion areas that I have not yet been a part of; I do monitor my conversations

Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

UTRS Account Request

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. the panda ₯’

User:-- -- -- hit by autoblock of User:Funnycoolman

Hello DP. Please see this unblock request. If this user is in fact logging on through the same IP as User:Funnycoolman then you may want to check if it seems to be the same person. If not then the autoblock might be lifted. The areas of interest of User:-- -- -- and User:Funnycoolman look to be quite different. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 22:31, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

I concur. This does not look like Funnycoolman. But I am curious. When Funnycoolman edits logged out, it always ends up showing as the currently blocked IP.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 22:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Thanks for helping CutestPenguin {talk • contribs} 10:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Unclear

This is in reference to the deletion of article title Yeezianity

First of all I apologize for recreating it, I thought I did something wrong and it was deleted by a bot. I didn't realize someone thought it was unfit for publication. I am still unsure what is needed for it to be published.

I don't understand what makes it "junk", it got press and public reaction. The article clearly explains what the idea is. It is a substantive idea. What is needed for the article to qualify? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theonlybman (talk • contribs) 21:42, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

You're fully aware it wasn't deleted by a bot - you came here yesterday to talk about it, but then recreated it instead and removed your message. the panda ₯’ 09:04, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Meytal Cohen - further clarification

Hey DP, I read your reasoning for not un-deleting Meytal Cohen's page (Not done for 2 reasons: first, the only text in the article was pointing people to their website where people can buy stuff - wrong. Second, the notability requirements for music are rather strict, and this person does not meet them.) I believe she meets the requirements in Notability (People):

Entertainers
Actors, voice actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and celebrities:
2. Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.

Meytal is the most subscribed drummer on YouTube and has a large fan base and significant "cult" following.
Here are some links:
Meytal's Facebook page (+780,000 fans)
Meytal's YouTube channel (+100,000,000 views, +600,000 subscribers)

Some of her works and collaborations: Solo commercial for Tabitha Simmons and Craig McDean: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoKsSD1eZak
Collaboration with Jordan Rudess (Dream Theater): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgXfRGLTdyg
Collaboration with N.E.R.D and Nelly Furtado (directed by Jonas Akerlund): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6ZfA5QZDHY
Profile article on channel 10 (Israel) news: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ImBZHyvYqY
Drum educational DVD package Maximum Meytal: http://www.maximummeytal.com
Endorsed as a top artist by Meinl Cymbals, DW Drums, Roland, Vic Firth, Evans and others: http://www.rolandus.com/artists/view/1791 http://meinlcymbals.com/artists/Artist/show/meytal-cohen-692

If you were so kind to undelete the page, I'm positive that one of Meytal's fans will quickly re-write the problematic 'commercial' language to a neutral, educational article.
Thanks so much.

It may be an idea to re-create an undeleted article in your userspace and get it proofed later on (I don't mean copy+paste from the previous article). It won't guarantee it against deletion but whilst it's in your userspace, there will be less focus. Badanagram (attempt) 08:59, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Before you insist that I was "wrong", get your facts straight

Entire prose of deleted article
Meytal Cohen is a drummer and an online drum instructor. She has several You Tube videos of heavy metal cover songs. Her web site is http://(Redacted) Here you will find information about the artist, her pictures and videos and her merchandise. She sells shirts, posters and drumsticks.

None of that, and none of what you state above meets WP:NMUSIC the panda ₯’ 09:39, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

DP - Understood, obviously the original contributor was very wrong in the nature of their contribution. Meytal is one of the most respected YouTube musicians, with close to 1M followers. Does she meet the criteria at WP:NPEOPLE? (2. Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DannyFromGA (talk • contribs) 17:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Well, try creating a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT or use WP:AFC (unfortunately, the "AFC review drive" is ending momentarily, or else it could have been reviewed very quickly) - use valid reliable sources (hint: youtube isn't one, nor is facebook). Have it reviewed. the panda ₯’ 18:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Your close of AFD discussion on History of the Jews in Nepal

You claim that the close was "a clear policy-based keep", but cite no policies, and would seem to have based the decision on a vote count. Please explain the policy-based rationale of your decision.

Secondly, you have suggested that my removal of fringe and unreliably sourced material was disruptive, while other editors agreed with the removal on the Talk page and have questioned what was re-inserted by the editor that is apparently editing in a field outside the scope of his competence. In particular, the "ancient history" section is completely devoid of reliably sourced content that affirms the existence of anything falling within the scope of history. That was added after numerous editors pointed out in the thread that, while ostensibly an article about history, the was nothing of historical note in the article whatsoever. Some of those editor's suggested a merge--with which I would not object--others a move without coming up with a fitting title that would meet Wiipedia's notability criteria.

Please explain what was disruptive about my contributions, or retract the comment. Thank you.--Ubikwit ^連絡 _{見学/迷惑} 03:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Do you intend to venture a response to the above query?--Ubikwit ^連絡 _{見学/迷惑} 05:02, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

No, it was best not to respond - especially based on your continued personal attacks in your original statement above. It was best to leave it alone and let it archive, AND let you take a few days to rethink your strategy and goals on the project. You have, after all, been appearing on admin radar in hazardous ways, and the above was unacceptable the panda ₯’ 09:36, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

You deleted Andreas Hansen's page.. Why??

Andreas Hansen is a newly promoted goal keeper in Brøndby. He has been the first choise in the Under-19's team for 3-4 years and he has been on the bench on the first team more than just a couple of times, when he was still an under-19's player. Now he is the third keeper and I don't see a signle reason why he shoudn't be on Wikipedia, when he is third choise in the biggest club in Denmark and has been on several youth national teams too. I honestly don't know why you go around deleting paged about things you know absolutely NOTHING about.

Kongen af fodbold (talk) 09:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

First thing: when you posted here, you saw the words "In short, an intelligent discussion is better than a diatribe or attack". So, "Things I know nothing about"? Here's a question for you, Kongen: has he played a game in a fully professional league? No, I'm not asking if he sat "on the bench", but actually played? No? Not yet? Still only 3rd choice? Then he fails to meet the strict notability requirements for footballers. Now, let's not even get into my extensive knowledge of football because that's a path you don't want to go down the panda ₯’ 10:09, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Request for admin attention

I would appreciate a admin set of eyes as review on Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC 3 with specific attention to Darkwarriorblake's actions. I consider their response from 17:47, 30 June 2014 onward to be personal attacks against both myself and Werieth. I attempted to resolve this by relocating the offending sub-thread to the talk page base on WP:TPO Removing harmful posts, including personal attacks, trolling and vandalism... with a hook from the original location. Darkwarriorblake did not consider the points to be personal attacks and had been called out by Werieth as being an attack. I request that you please review the actions and take action in the guise of an administrator to prevent further attacks from derailing the purpose of the RFC. I had previously appealed at Dennis Brown's talk page but was turned away because he is far too busy today and I would like feedback in a reasonable time frame. Hasteur (talk) 20:38, 30 June 2014 (UTC)