User talk:66.102.157.201

July 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at South Pacific (musical), you may be blocked from editing. Copperopolis guy previously blocked for adding original research, when he was using the Copperopolis IP Special:Contributions/66.102.146.179. Binksternet (talk) 03:49, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Bink, you might consider creating the page with a welcome template like {{welcomeunsourced}} instead of this scary warning template. ~Adjwilley (talk) 04:34, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Just read your talk page and that of your friends also harassing me. You guys are loose cannons - frequently engaging in the exact same behaviors for which you condemn others and have no business being the pots that call the kettles black. These other kids may tolerate that behavior, I do not. Your recent conduct and that of your friends has been reported to administration for review.

Go bother somebody else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.102.157.201 (talk) 18:43, 28 July 2015‎ (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, 66.102.157.201, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. 

FYI

I saw your post at AN and I wanted to let you know that your experience and knowledge are a gift and deserve respect. Unfortunately, here at Wikipedia they are only a starting point for editing articles. Any info added to articles require reliable sources that come from WP:SECONDARY publications. The links in the message above lead to policies and guidelines that will help to get you started. Question can be asked at the Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions. One last comment that is meant in humor - this is not the best place for peace and quite as way too many of us can tell you. Please don't let that put you off from editing though. MarnetteD|Talk 05:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

What good does it do if 3/4 of my time has to be taken up every month reverting people's reversions of MY revisions to a piece? Like I say all over - these kids need to go bother some other kids who have time energy and tolerance to be tolerating the drama.

I do not. When I was teaching, the last time I had to tolerate challenges to my work, my children were little and I wasn't even on tenure track yet. As I have become a respected member of the community - it's like a drill instructor in the military. you do what I tell you or you're not in this man's (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard etc) very long.

And like I said - generally people leave me and my work alone even on Wikipedia. To the first-time offenders I tell them just what I wrote on the AN page. Hardheads that do it again I stomp on, and repeat offenders I report to administration - and THEN they go bother somebody else - especially since blocking entire ranges of an ISP in the big city or major university is pointless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.102.157.201 (talk) 18:51, 28 July 2015‎ (UTC)

Sourcing; Reusing info from other articles

Hi. I have seen some of your recent talk page comments, and I hope I can help you to avoid further difficulty in contributing to Wikipedia. Your knowledge of broadcasting and recording is, of course, useful in building the encyclopedia -- Because you have this knowledge, you should be able to find sources to support the information that you add to the encyclopedia. WP:V and WP:OR are two of our most important content policies, and if you read them, they will explain why sources need to be cited to verify the facts given in this encyclopedia. If you transfer information from one article here, to another, please make sure that you also transfer the citations to sources given in the first article. If sources are cited there, then the information should not be transferred until you, or someone, researches the facts and finds a reliable source for them. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:39, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for Promising to edit war. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The block has already expired. But please be aware of the need to get consensus for any edits that other people may disagree with. You were reported at WP:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive289#MarnetteD repeated edit warring (Result: IP blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

BBZZZZTTT I reported THEM for harassment not the other way around.

You may have me backed into a corner for now due to the technological limitations of this itty bitty town out in the podunks - but once I ditch this retirement life and move back to the Peninsula where I belong - where I can hang up every twenty minutes and get a new IP - all your blocking threats will return to the status of ``ineffective and a waste of time.

Especially when I re-inherit my cadre of graduate student assistants who will like nothing better than to re-revert everybody's reversions all day long everyday - and then hang up every twenty minutes as well to get a new IP.

Happy Blocking.