User talk:KarlV: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:33, 4 August 2006

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 17:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Answer on the article discussion!--KarlV 19:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for 24 hours for violation WP:3RR on Bad Nenndorf. This includes the edit you made as an IP. pschemp | talk 20:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:POINT

You have been blocked indefinitely for an egregious violation of WP:POINT concerning the article Bad Nenndorf. Wikipedia is not an experiment for you to play with. Your actions incited disruption and unneeded edit warring. The place where you admit that you used Wikipedia as an experiment is documented here. pschemp | talk 21:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this block: it's great when Wikipedians from other languages cross over to another language, but please don't use other Wikipedias for your experiments, thanks! --Joanne B 22:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KarlV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

None given

Decline reason:

You have given no assurance that you will abide by WP:POINT in future and therefore it is likely you would continue to disrupt the English-language Wikipedia with your "experiments". Therefore the block is well justified and must stay in place. --➨ ЯEDVERS 12:33, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 : I agree with this block: it's great when Wikipedians from other languages cross over to another language, but please don't use other Wikipedias for your experiments, thanks! --[[User:JoanneB|Joanne]][[User talk:JoanneB|B]] 22:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
+{{unblock reviewed|None given|decline=You have given no assurance that you will abide by [[WP:POINT]] in future and therefore it is likely you would continue to disrupt the English-language Wikipedia with your "experiments". Therefore the block is well justified and must stay in place. --[[User_talk:Redvers|➨ ]]<b><font color="red">[[User:Redvers|ЯEDVERS]]</font></b> 12:33, 4 August 2006 (UTC)}}
-{{unblock}}