User talk:Acroterion

Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers.

Signpost

Regarding page deletion

Hello sir/madam,

I'm contacting you regarding the deletion of this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bharatplaza

It is mentioned there that the reason of page deletion by you is "Article about a website, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject"

So, if it is possible, please unblock the page and so we can edit the content to reflect your requirement. Thanks...

116.202.80.80 (talk) 06:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

As has been noted on three previous occasions since 2009, there is no credible indication that the company meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies. Wikipedia is not a business guide. You may wish to pursue drafting an article under the guidelines offered at articles for creation, which will allow you to incubate a prospective article for editors to review. Acroterion (talk) 11:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

hi im a noob please help me out, I am writing my first page on Olivia rayson please advise me on what to do.

A kitten for you!

thx

Silenthunder6 (talk) 20:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

THX

... for the speedy deletion. If you have a sec, can you also look at ... Maz - Son of Picasso, The Style Selektors, Sodhal Faqir Laghari, Pumpkin Patch, GE Oil and Gas, Alumni Biomedical Sciences, Sophy Robson? LavaBaron (talk) 23:39, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Block needed, and I'm involved

Would you mind giving WilliamJE an extended block for harassment and stalking? I already made one such request of another admin, but in response I was told essentially "no big deal". Basically, Orlady blocked him nearly two years ago for sustained incivility toward me, and in response, he promised then to be "watching the both of you for the next time you try what you did to me to someone else. So watch out. I'll be leading the charge for you at ANI and Arbcom till you resign or someone at wikipedia shows some guts around here to take away your absolute power to do harm to someone for absolute bullshit!" This has kept up incessantly since then, together with immediate assumptions of bad faith and attacks whenever I do or say something about it, and even making complaints about unrelated actions, e.g. here objecting to my participation in the "Admin help needed blocking a sock farm" section at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive893: That these blocks were done on flimsy evidence and at the same time permanently staining each user's account history was as I said appalling. Stronger adjectives, disgraceful being just one, are actually more fitting for what you and any other administrator did in those wrong blocks.

The last straw has involved his edits at Bellefontaine, Ohio — as you can see from the history, his first edit to the page came just a few hours after mine (the "one such request" diff demonstrates that this is his pattern, following me to the most random topics on which I edit), and when I reverted on substantive grounds (he added an inapplicable category) and told him that I wouldn't explain beyond the obvious fact that it was inapplicable, I was given a large hostile message with continued assumptions of bad faith, i.e. accusations that I reverted him because I don't like him criticizing me (funny, I didn't revert when he put in some more-applicable categories), and repeating his accusations of incompetence. So, once again...someone pledges to stalk me to get rid of me, he follows me to lots of articles he's never edited before to demonstrate that he's following me, and he tries to make trouble for me in incidents completely unrelated to his own actions. Would you mind putting an end to this? Nyttend backup (talk) 20:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

I'm in the middle of an ongoing veterinary emergency, family events and impending work-related travel, so I'm not the ideal candidate to take action that will require follow-up, appeals and recriminations at the moment. I've taken a quick look and have trouble constructing a block rationale based on present behavior, though I do see evidence of prolonged grudge-bearing and a WP:POLEMIC problem that supports the perception of a grudge. It's a bit short of what we'd block for at AE for example, and I'm meditating a formal interaction ban of some kind and action concerning the userpage content. I-bans have met with mixed results, but properly framed they set clear boundaries and conditions. Acroterion (talk) 01:49, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Nyttend's use of his alternate account (He used his main account just one minute after making this post) Administrator shopping says a great deal about him and to get around WP:Scrutiny. He is looking for an administrator to salve his supposedly hurt feelings. His behavior on the other hand, like ignoring the long standing message at the top of my message board and using his backup account in the manor he did above, can be said to be evidence of his carrying a WP:GRUDGE as he tries to get an editor blocked once again for calling him out on some of the garbage he's done around Wikipedia. I've told him multiple times to take me to ANI but he hasn't even once. Instead he uses his backup account to find an administrator to block me. You want a detailed post of Nyttend's behavior, I can give it but feel it would be one total waste of time. I don't expect an administrator to do anything against a fellow admin around here.

And please read up on what WP:NOTHERE says about not working in a collaborative fashion. I posted in a non-confrontational manor to Nyttend's talk page about Bellefontaine Ohio about inconsistencies in the article to get a reply of 'I will explain my reasoning when you pledge to stop following me wherever I edit.' His personal feelings are getting in the way of fixing/improving an article. If that doesn't violate NOTHERE, then that page needs some re-writing....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

If Nyttend had really wanted to avoid scrutiny he could have just emailed me. From what I see you're carrying a sustained grudge against Nyttend and Orlady, supported by inappropriate use of your userpage. Personal feelings getting in the way of editing are nothing new on Wikipedia and don't rise to the level of sanctionable activity against Nyttend in this case as far as I can tell - prove me wrong - but the evidence of animus on your part is strong. Your interpretation of NOTHERE is identical to editors who attempt to have their own way by accusing others in a content dispute of vandalism. Both are explicit assumptions of bad faith, in your case continuing for years. Please remove such content from your userpage. It is in fact inimical to building an encyclopedia, and you have no business making claims of NOTHERE about other editors while you maintain it on your userpage. Your highly selective and inappropriate misuse of the term is absurd and troubling. Acroterion (talk) 12:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Another administrator getting their facts wrong. You wrote- It is in fact inimical to building an encyclopedia, and you have no business making claims of NOTHERE about other editors while you maintain it on your userpage Nothere is not mentioned once on my user page or ever has been. So how can I remove it?

You're also wrong on my talk page when you write 'I've also read Orlady's comment that you quoted, and I don't think it means precisely what you think it does'. It does mean exactly what she wrote. Read a reply of Nyttend here[1]. Read her blocking message too[2]. I can find other edits in all probability too backing it up.

Nyttend once threatened to get me blocked for harassment saying I had been blocked in the past for it. Serious accusations need serious proof or they violate WP:NPA. In fact his present accusations are without proof too. It's an opinion and opinion is NOT FACT. Those sock puppet blocks were wrong and they too were based on Nyttend's opinion. NOT fact. We both know what the outcome was there and I can point out at least a half a dozen more instances where his competence comes into question.

Have the January 2014 block for personal attacks which has had multiple editors asking where those attacks were made stricken from my log and Nyttend won't ever hear from me again.

Administrators jumping on me for criticizing an administrator and not getting their facts straight. Been here, done it before....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

One more time, since you're avoiding the issue: you're maintaining an enemies list on your userpage. Please remove it, it violates WP:POLEMIC. You're claiming Nyttend is WP:NOTHERE to improve the encyclopedia, which is laughable. You really ought to know better, you've been around long enough, but you seem to be serious. As I noted at the top, I don't have time in the next couple of days to address these issues as they should be addressed, but I am concerned that you're cherishing a grudge, and it's detrimental to the project. Since Neutralhomer's posted here (apologies in advance NH), if you want to see a serious block log, take a look at his [3]. Now that's a block log! Acroterion (talk) 02:18, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

The issue is Nyttend. You fail to acknowledge he is out for me and is willing to do so under false pretenses. His own words- ""Your stalking of me, moreover, is not appreciated and will result in a request for sanctions, especially as you have been blocked in the past for harassing me." He makes a threat to get me blocked under false pretenses. (Do you know he accused me[4] of stalking him a month ago when I reverted a wrong edit[5] he made to Sylvania, Ohio and did so without any comment[6]?) That threat in bad faith should earn him some form of sanction. Where is it? Tell me why you don't block him for that behavior under NPA which says accusations need proof. Did you look at my edit history? Nyttend claims I follow him around. I edit town articles and have been doing so for a long time and that is acknowledged by adminitrator Sphilbick, so does he. Nyttend does census edits mostly and other tweaks, I work on notable people and establishment categories and do general cleanup but not census stuff. Why did you go to my USer page instead of correctly informing yourself on the situation by going where you should have gone- My talk page archives? You made two blaring errors, one of them right off the bat namely "I've also read Orlady's comment that you quoted, and I don't think it means precisely what you think it does" , so you are obviously poor in judgment in this matter or biased because Nyttend is an administrator or both. Nyttend is of far greater harm to Wikipedia, his wanting blocks against editors who criticize him and his willingness to do so in bad faith, than anything I can write on my USER page. He's been told constantly to take me to ANI, so why doesn't he. Because his behavior will be scrutunized not just mine. I can post a long list of his bad behavior and Nyttend has been before ARBCOM at some time in the past. Anyone who criticizes him in the slightest gets a NPA template on their talk page. So he looks to his fellow administrators to protect him, which they will. Look at Dangerous Panda, long known for his f bombs and other abusive behavior towards other editors, and how long he was around with noone doing anything. If Mark Arsten can't be sanctioned for calling[7] an editor a "petulant, narcissistic piece of shit", then I don't see lesser forms of bad behavior can be punishable unless there is a double standard around here. Proof of a double standard, the editor who got called that got blocked for calling someone an arsehole. Why wasn't Mark, who didn't deny saying those words get blocked too? There shouldn't be any double standard, if anything admins should be held to a higher standard. A few admins, Sphilbrick for one, has said so.

Nothing on my USer page can't be backed up. Orlady blocked me for personal attacks (or was it for complaining about Nyttend. Orlady wrote 'and would quit posting his complaints') on her friend but other than Nyttend, there isn't one single administrator or editor who said anything I said was a personal attack. That goes for Bbb23, Yunshui, Sphilbrick and they are all admins. In Sphilbrick's own words I was the victim and it was wrong no one was being held accountable. That photo was given to me in the middle of the unblocking discussion and I said I'd post it to my talk page. No objection from the at least 4 administrators (Nyttend and Orlady included) present at the time.

Administrator abuse is very much a issue at Wikipedia. Trouble is, most of the admin corp doesn't want to address it, and most editors are afraid to address it because admins like yourself will make those editors into targets.

As for grudge, I don't hide my opinion of Nyttend at all or what I think about disgraceful administrators around here. Do you think Nyttend isn't carrying a grudge about me? His threat in bad faith is pretty strong proof it. I do heavy constructive edit here at Wikipedia whatever my feelings are. I spend most of my time in article space (also category space, TFDs, CFDs, AFDs), and very little at drama boards and my talk page edits are usually about some article me or another editor have worked or are working on. Correct me if I am wrong, but I think I have made one ANI edit in 2015, If its more than one, its not by much.

The Rambling Man and I had a strong feud a couple of years back. Since that, we've worked together a few times on aviation articles. I didn't like TRM's behavior but its in the past for me, and probably him too. We share a gutwrenching personal experience, can't say more. TParis I gave a diplomacy barnstar to after he and an editor named Joefromrandb (who I once drove to get unblocked at ANI and during so received a small but helpful hand from TParis) buried the hatchet. Joe got a barnstar from me too On his retirement, TParis mentioned Joe in a thank you letter. Unfortunately even if I never addressed Nyttend again after this post, I doubt I'd receive the same. What ticks me off at admins is the bad behavior of some and most of the rest who won't do anything about the bad ones but make excuses. I also don't like glaringly wrong statements made about me and anything I've written. At least Bbb23 after doing so admitted his mistake.

The obvious thing for me to do is take Nyttend to Arbcom. I should have done it a year and a half ago. There was actually someone who expected it to end up there. That's if you don't try to muzzle me first. Protect your own, that's the first rule of most wikipedia administrators even if it does harm to Wikipedia....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:51, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

What I get out of the above is that you have a lot of "strong feuds" and that you have a long memory. I'm very much uninterested in what happened almost two years ago, I want to know what's happening right now and why you believe you're exempt from WP:POLEMIC. I get that you feel like a victim of admin oppression, but through all of this you appear to dislike Nyttend because of his editing, not because of any actions he has taken as an admin where you are directly concerned, especially in recent times (and as I said, I'm intimately familiar with the mistaken sockfarm). I see a great deal of vituperation on your part and a determination to rehash the blow-by-blow of two years ago and to classify everybody as good or bad. I fail to see how this is doing you or anybody else any good. In any case, I'm traveling and on a iPad, and don't have the time or energy to parse the wall of text above from my hotel rooom. I'll see how much time I have to devote to figuring out what's happening now as opposed to two years ago once I get back. It would be nice to see a little conciliation. My experience is that emotions in volunteer organizations are in inverse proportion to the stakes. Acroterion (talk) 02:37, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

I believe what Acroterion means by "NOTHERE" is the guideline page WP:NOTHERE. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 14:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

I did take a look at the section in question and it is in clear violation of WP:POLEMIC and in my opinion borderline WP:NPA. You can't put a long diatribe about other editors on your userpage or in your userspace. You certainly can't, even if it is as nice as you can put it, call them whatever you want.

I learned this the first month I was here. Since you have been here as long as I have, you should know this as well. If you want to rail against any user on here, get a blog. You can't do it here and you know better.

After looking at your userpage in general, it could be considered in violation of WP:UP#GOALS and WP:NOTBLOG. It's just a mess of a whole bunch of stuff that really isn't about your time, work, or recognized content here on Wikipedia. Looks like a massive blog, some with vague mentions of different users, some with editors mentioned by name. You can't have vague mentions or direct mentions of editors in your userspace, that again puts you in violation of WP:POLEMIC and WP:NOTBLOG.

Just take the whole thing down, leave the past in the past (because what you are doing now isn't gonna work) and move on to something constructive. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 14:25, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

@Acroterion: No offense taken, my block log is insane. It is what it is. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Jeremy Glick

Hello Acroterion, Could I please direct you to edits made on the above article on a Flight 93 victim by a school IP: 24.38.110.180. I have warned them about their vandalism, but they are continuing. Can I leave this with you for action please? Best regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 17:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Zzuzz got them while I was away. Thanks for keeping an eye on the subject. Acroterion (talk) 02:29, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

Discouraging stuff for me, and I know the landscape here pretty well. Thanks for your assistance and cheers, 2601:188:0:ABE6:5DC5:559E:75C4:C241 (talk) 02:16, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

• By the way, the text I tried to remove had nothing to do with a blog as source. It was an accretion of nonsense that had been added by several accounts over the last day or two. 2601:188:0:ABE6:5DC5:559E:75C4:C241 (talk) 02:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Yeah, it was schoolcruft with no particular source at all. I occasionally get cranky and turn down bad AIV reports and poorly considered speedy deletions to remind people that we're writing an encyclopedia. Cheers, Acroterion (talk) 02:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

• No, not schoolcruft, which was my point. It was apparent that this was plain vandalism, which is why I was both quick and insistent to remove it. Thanks again, 2601:188:0:ABE6:5DC5:559E:75C4:C241 (talk) 02:43, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

• Then I'm guilty too of not looking closely enough. In any case, you were doing the right thing. Thanks for watching out. Acroterion (talk) 02:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Request a longer block for User:70.53.240.5

Greetings Acroterion. Say, could I request an upgrade to an indef for the IP, given this amazingly vile edit history? This is one can we don't want to just kick down the road for 31 hours. I have in mind a rev/del request, actually, but it seemed fair to go to you first as the blocking admin. Thanks, Jusdafax 03:11, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

It certainly is vile, but absent a sign that the same user is on the IP for longer than a day or so I generally stick to 31 hours for the first time, they've only been editing (in the loosest sense) for an hour and a half. I agree that some of their edits are candidates for revdel, I'll go through in detail. I'll keep an eye on the topics, they were already on my watchlist and I saw the vandal before it came up on AIV. Acroterion (talk) 03:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Actually, I'd missed the attacks on Cannolis while I was blocking the IP. Cripes. A week. Acroterion (talk) 03:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Yeah, hopefully this one won't be back, and thanks for considering revdel. A couple of the edit summaries shouldn't be allowed to stand, in my view. Jusdafax 03:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

You are an admin, right?

Please screenshot this page and give it to me for something I need to compare Wikipedia to the out-of-the-box MediaWiki. Krett12 (talk) 03:27, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

And please respond on my talk page. Krett12 (talk) 03:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

I didn't say anything about a message. I just meant, click on the link, don't do anything, then screenshot exactly that. Krett12 (talk) 03:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

One more time: I see no reason to do that. Message or interface, I'm not interested in comparative mediawiki block page formats. Acroterion (talk) 11:21, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

A musician who won't go away

Hi Acroterion, I noticed you recently deleted Jack Ferrett (musician), and couldn't believe this is still being created. See the persistent efforts of a month ago [8]. Cheers, 2601:188:0:ABE6:5DC5:559E:75C4:C241 (talk) 03:54, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

I;m sure we'll end up create-protecting every conceivable variation. We seem to get one of these every month or so. Acroterion (talk) 04:05, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pedro E. Guerrero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Air Corps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

P.E. Guerrero

Acroterion: I hope I am doing this correctly. Yes, I am a daughter of P.E. Guerrero. Thank you for your kind words and assistance. I admit I was frightened of Wickipedia. But I thought people might want to know more about my father, particularly after the fine documentary by Paradigm Films. And there is suddenly a lot of misinformation on the web.

---

Susanshguerrero — Preceding unsigned comment added by Susanshguerrero (talk • contribs) 23:02, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

You did fine, and I appreciate your boldness in editing here, too many people are put off by the interface and the editing environment. I suppose I should be surprised that there's misinformation on the Internet about your father, but there are very few things about the Internet that surprise me anymore. If you can arrange for some more citations to references (which work and a page number) I can help you format them. It helps the article, and it helps researchers who use Wikipedia as a starting point. You can use the article's talkpage as a staging area if you need to. Please feel free to ask questions here, there or on your talkpage, I have it on my watchlist. Congratulations on the documentary! Acroterion (talk) 02:54, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIV, September 2015

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors, coordinator elections have begun Articles: Abbasids to a Yugoslav monitor Book reviews: Economics of warfare, Japan, and light horse Op-ed: We can (not) advance Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Joseph J. Biloti

Dear Acroterion,

I am writing to first off apologize for failing to disclose my ties with the article. I am an employee with the person in question and we wanted to create a wikipedia page for him. I spoke with huon over in the chat, and I was wondering if it is possible to redo the page while disclosing ties and having proof for "notability". Thank you in advance.

P.S. Is there any alternative wiki sites to host the page? Thanks! Yarnel rotellicorp (talk) 18:14, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I see that a helpful IP has left some good advice on your talkpage. I can't advise on alternate wikis, though I believe there is a coroporate wiki somewhere, it's not a WMF project. Acroterion (talk) 14:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

I can do this

Hey thanks for that, wasn't sure if it was an WP:A1 or not so that's why I PRODded it. RegistryKey^(RegEdit) 13:46, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Since I couldn't really parse it, I made it an A1. It could equally be a G2. Acroterion (talk) 13:48, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Recent page deletion

I have contested the page deletion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ossett_Town_Ladies_FC Not sure if you received a notification or not. Minnowfire (talk) 13:53, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

You should substaantiate that the club meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines by showing thath the club has received significant notice in major media outlets. Simple existence is not enough, see WP:NOTE. Acroterion (talk) 14:00, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Have responded below. Minnowfire (talk) 15:51, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:John Connally

Hi, Acroterion. If you are comfortable doing it, there is an Rfc in Talk:John Connally that appears to qualify for a snow close. Thanks! - Location (talk) 15:05, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Done. Acroterion (talk) 18:15, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks again! - Location (talk) 20:54, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Pedro E. Guerrero

Thank you for the update on how many "hits" the page received. We are thrilled. Susanshguerrero (talk) 14:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)susanshguerrero

It's been averaging about 200/day since then. Acroterion (talk) 16:39, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

what inappropriate page did I introduce into Wikipedia? I would really like to know because you threatened to block me!

thanks

Armando Christian Pérez (talk) 02:52, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

You introduced two inappropriate pages that redirected from your name to Pitbull (rapper). Don't do that. Acroterion (talk) 02:54, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Who

is this [[9]] puppetmaster? No such user. Doug Weller (talk) 15:39, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Olehal09 (talk · contribs) - left off the numbers. IPs editing from Bergen on these subjects are following the same path. Acroterion (talk) 15:56, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll keep an eye out. Doug Weller (talk) 15:57, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Appeal

The article 'Ossett Town Ladies FC' which was marked for speedy deletion is a valid informational article regarding a womens association football club in Wakefield, England. The associated mens club has their own page also. This is similar to Arsenal FC and Arsenal Ladies and Leeds United FC and Leeds Ladies FC. The article was put forward for speedy deletion in the very limited time I had to finish writing it! The article is now fully complete so I would be grateful if you could please undo this. Minnowfire (talk) 15:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

EDIT - just seen your earlier response.

If you are able to restore the page, then I can add the following two references: http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/sport/football/local-football/yep-leeds-team-of-the-week-ossett-town-ladies-1-7268283 http://www.wakefieldexpress.co.uk/news/ossett-town-ladies-football-club-looking-for-players-1-6552374

Minnowfire (talk) 15:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Mohombi Nzasi Moupondo

Any idea who this is? I was thinking maybe [10] who has inserted the same material on genetics. Email me if you prefer. Doug — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Weller (talk • contribs) 08:35, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

I'M DONE!!!!!!!

You know something? Calling my comment "stale" is so childish and despicable of you! I honestly do not care anymore if I get deleted from Wikipedia. The people here are disrespectful and rude! I have admitted I was wrong for flipping out like that, yet people still continue to target me! So if so many want me deleted so badly, then delete me from this website now! So unclassy and unprofessional of you! Jakeleereed (talk) 04:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Fields Medal Page,Again!!!

Hi,Someone has changed the "agreed" format of the table in Fields Medal article,without having a consensus on that.Since I've had a bad experience engaging 'edit warring",I'm not interested to revert those edits.would you mind 1) making a notice about making a consensus first,and next editing ,for editors there? and 2)reverting those edits to the one which doesn't have any flags included?the consensus is "to not put any flag" there.you can find it out from Talk Page archive of Fields Medal page.Thanks.Rezameyqani (talk) 23:00, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

So remove them, citing the discussion. Acroterion (talk) 01:52, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Radical Rappelling

Today I wrote a page for a game called Radical Rappelling and you deleted it. I am protesting this because the page is not written in a promotional tone, it is a factual article. Please explain why you deleted it, and what exactly made it sound promotional? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omegodriver (talk • contribs) 06:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

More accurately, it's a non-notable game, and the article is written as a game review. You've been around long enough to know that evidence of notability is needed (not just reviews), and that encyclopedia's don't address the reader in the second person. Acroterion (talk) 01:55, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Supastar Stayflexin

How come the Supastar stayflexin page got deleted ? He is a local Seattle artist and I can proof his identify to you I was on the verge of uploading pictures and everything. Please put it back up, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seattlebuzzin (talk • contribs) 03:42, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

The subject doesn't credibly meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for musical artists. Acroterion (talk) 04:16, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Gasoline

Your guidelines are hypocritical. It is Petrol global in common English whish is Wiki guidelines. but you force it to American centric Gasoline, whatever that is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.211.201.51 (talk) 13:06, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Please use the article talkpage to establish a consensus among other editors using sources to back up your views. If a consensus exists, it can be moved to a different title, but changing the lead sentence doesn't accomplish anything. I personally don't care which version it is, but that's not the way to do it. Acroterion (talk) 13:10, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Will you?

Act against the administrators I pointed out to you, TParis and The Bushranger, that violate WP:POLEMIC or will you prove what I say about the double standards here at Wikipedia?...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:28, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

This is not a quid pro quo or a means of settling scores, nor is this an exercise in bargaining. If you have a complaint against another user, please raise it in the appropriate venues, with diffs. I see nothing obvious on The Bushranger's talkpage. Tparis's departure commentary is largely positive, and its complaints against other editors lack the sharp enmity and outright contempt that you've displayed on your userpage: they're accounts of disagreements rather than denigration. In my view WP:POLEMIC is to be applied in extreme cases of personal slagging, which is what you were doing, and I limited it to just that, leaving your other polemics in place. Acroterion (talk) 15:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)