User talk:Weedwacker: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Weedwacker (talk | contribs) |
Weedwacker (talk | contribs) archive |
||
| (41 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archives|auto=yes|search=yes}} |
|||
==Notice: sanctions apply to [[Gamergate controversy]] topics=={{Ivmbox |
|||
|'''Please read this notification carefully:'''<br>A [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive265#Proposed Gamergate solution by Hasteur|community discussion]] has authorised the use of [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|general sanctions]] for pages related to the [[Gamergate controversy]].<br>The details of these sanctions are described [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Gamergate|here]]. |
|||
[[Wikipedia:General sanctions|General sanctions]] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behaviour]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Gamergate#Log of notifications|here]]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
|||
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. —[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="Gold">琉竜</font>]]) 22:46, 26 November 2014 (UTC) |
|||
| Commons-emblem-notice.svg |
|||
| icon size = 50px}} |
|||
== Editing your comments? == |
|||
I'm not sure I see what you're referring to on the evidence page when you say I edited your comments. I did not intentionally change anything in your comments and I don't actually see what the change was supposed to do or why I would make it. It was most likely just something that got fouled up as I was typing in my commentary somehow. In any case it wasn't purposeful and I apologize if you found it alarming. [[User:ReynTime|ReynTime]] ([[User talk:ReynTime|talk]]) 20:53, 1 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:{{ping|ReynTime}} I highly doubt it wasn't intentional to edit a comment of mine 800 lines up the page from the new comment you added. The fact that you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate/Workshop&diff=prev&oldid=636032242 made the change] and then [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate/Workshop&diff=prev&oldid=636033989 removed it 18 minutes later] tells me it was more than just a simple editing error (if that were even possible). I doubt you don't know what you're doing since you seemed to know how policies here work on your first day of editing. If you are truly a week old account of a new editor, perhaps you should take time doing other activities to familiarize yourself with wikipedia decorum before immediately engaging in an arbitration case just because you hold a strong opinion about it. Since you did revert the change yourself, even if i think the original edit was done purposefully, i'll accept your apology and strike the link to the edit from my evidence. [[User:Weedwacker|Weedwacker]] ([[User talk:Weedwacker#top|talk]]) 23:27, 1 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== RfC United States same-sex marriage map == |
|||
I opened up an RfC for the U.S. same-sex marriage map due to the complicated situation of Kansas: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Samesex_marriage_in_USA.svg#RfC:_How_should_we_color_Kansas.3F RfC: How should we color Kansas?] [[User:Prcc27|Prcc27]] ([[User talk:Prcc27|talk]]) 03:28, 13 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Please comment on [[Talk:Shooting of Trayvon Martin#rfc_35BBEAA|Talk:Shooting of Trayvon Martin]] == |
|||
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to [[Talk:Shooting of Trayvon Martin#rfc_35BBEAA|participate in the request for comment]] on '''Talk:Shooting of Trayvon Martin'''. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see {{section link|Wikipedia:Requests for comment|Suggestions for responding}}. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at [[WP:Feedback request service]]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 18471 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 00:03, 15 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== I have unreviewed a page you curated == |
|||
Hi, I'm Harsh 2580. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, [[Jagapati]], and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on [[User_talk:Harsh 2580|my talk page]]. Thank you. <span style="text-shadow:#333333 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">[[User:Harsh_2580|Harsh]]</span>[[User talk:Harsh_2580|<font color="blue"> <small>(talk) </small></font>]] 03:54, 16 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Please comment on [[Talk:United States House Select Committee on Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in Benghazi#rfc_FF68ECC|Talk:United States House Select Committee on Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in Benghazi]] == |
|||
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to [[Talk:United States House Select Committee on Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in Benghazi#rfc_FF68ECC|participate in the request for comment]] on '''Talk:United States House Select Committee on Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in Benghazi'''. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see {{section link|Wikipedia:Requests for comment|Suggestions for responding}}. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at [[WP:Feedback request service]]. <!-- Template:FRS message -->— <!-- FRS id 18657 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 00:03, 19 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Using talk pages == |
|||
New sections on talk pages go at the bottom, and should be preceded by a header, like this one is. [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]] ([[User talk:Hipocrite|talk]]) 13:53, 19 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
All posts to talk pages should be followed by a signature with timestamp, like this one is. [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]] ([[User talk:Hipocrite|talk]]) 13:53, 19 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Re:Workshop == |
|||
Am I not allowed to point out to someone that there are formatting errors on an article that if I were to actually edit there'd be a collective aneurism on Reddit?—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="Gold">琉竜</font>]]) 03:51, 22 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:{{ping|Ryulong}} Admittedly none of the suggestions were content related. I posted that more for the benefit of the editor I was responding to than as an accusation of any wrongdoing, because of his statement that you had removed yourself from the article. If you had made formatting suggestions to almost any editor i'm sure they wouldn't have ignored them and would have taken action on fixing them. I appreciate you taking this concern to my talk page and not on the workshop, and i'm going to add a clarification to my statement that I don't find fault with any of the suggestions you made. [[User:Weedwacker|Weedwacker]] ([[User talk:Weedwacker#top|talk]]) 04:05, 22 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
