User talk:Thisisashan

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:08, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Antifeminism for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 16:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

@EvergreenFir: Okay, what you have done is vandalism. I spoke specifically given solid facts and reasoning. You edited that page in an attempt to hide information, which is intellectually dishonest. It was not being used as a discussion, it was a statement to the fact that the Anti-feminist wiki entry should be written by the affirmative, primary, source. Per wikipedia rules, you cannot as a feminist, claim ownership to the anti-feminist wikipedia entry. Likewise, censorship of material is against guidelines. Not assuming good faith, against guidelines. Not adhering to a neutral point of view? against guidelines. Further Malicious editing will be reported.Thisisashan (talk) 16:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

You made personal attacks against users (policy) and ranted about stuff other than the article content (also against policy). AGF is not a suicide pact. NPOV is about content of articles, not personal views. You're an SPA. Continue to do this, and you'll likely be blocked from Wikipedia. As for the article, wikipedia is not a platform for specific groups to promote their cause; we describe topics based on secondary, reliable sources. For this topic, the majority of those are feminist academic ones. The concept of anti-feminism is largely a feminist one in the first place. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 16:35, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

@EvergreenFir:I have made no personal attacks against any users. The only thing I 'ranted' about was in complete topicality, which is anti-feminism. What you are doing now is harassing me, reliable sources for anti-feminism, are anti-feminists. You are speaking to one. Feminists are the con, the negative, when speaking in affirmation to anti-feminism. If you are not familiar with academia or debate, this means that the primary source is absolutely anti-feminism, and not feminism.Thisisashan (talk) 16:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Talk:Antifeminism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Acroterion (talk) 01:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Acroterion beat me to the 3RR warning. I'll add that I'm giving you a "final warning" regarding you disruptive behavior as well. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 02:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)