Jump to content

Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reporting Cvisiontechnologies. (TW)
Reporting Cvisiontechnologies. (TW)
Line 31: Line 31:
*{{user-uaa|1=HarshitDMX}} &ndash; Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Maybe a sock of the Fuerdai vandal?. [[User:Money emoji |<span style ="color: Green">💵Money💵emoji💵</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Money emoji|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 15:46, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
*{{user-uaa|1=HarshitDMX}} &ndash; Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Maybe a sock of the Fuerdai vandal?. [[User:Money emoji |<span style ="color: Green">💵Money💵emoji💵</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Money emoji|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 15:46, 26 April 2018 (UTC)


*{{user-uaa|1=Cvisiontechnologies}} &ndash; Promo name. Promo edits.. [[User:GreenMeansGo|<span style="font-family:Impact"><span style="color:#07CB4B">G</span><span style="color:#449351">M</span><span style="color:#35683d">G</span></span>]][[User talk:GreenMeansGo#top|<sup style="color:#000;font-family:Impact">talk</sup>]] 16:16, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
*{{user-uaa|1=Cvisiontechnologies}} &ndash; Promotional username and promotional edits. . [[User:Ammarpad|Ammarpad]] ([[User talk:Ammarpad|talk]]) 16:16, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:16, 26 April 2018

    Usernames for administrator attention

    This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report.

    1. Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks.
    2. Real names are permitted, except when the editor implies they are someone other than themselves, such as impersonating a notable living person.
    3. Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional.
    4. For libellous usernames or usernames that contain another editor's nonpublic personal information, please contact an oversighter and do not report it here.
    5. Discuss less-serious violations with the user on their talk page so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith. Templates such as {{Uw-username}} or {{Uw-coi-username}} may be used. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
    6. Do not leave a username warning on a user's talk page and also immediately report them here. Do one or the other, and not both simultaneously.
    7. Patrollers are asked to remove reports that have been declined, are bot-reported false positives or are otherwise non-blatant or stale reports.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
    This page was last updated at 20:21 on 12 December 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
    Note: Patrollers are kindly asked to monitor usernames listed at Filter 102, Filter 148, Filter 149, Filter 354 (tags), Filter 579, WP:UAA/HP, and CAT:UAA.


    User-reported

    Being discussed with the user. It’s a very blatant vio but another user has opted for discussion already. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:39, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Looks like they are drafting an article about wrestling to me. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:50, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. "WTC" can stand for many many things, and it wouldn't necessarily be a blatant violation if it did stand for "World Trade Center". --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. That’s not a rule.Beeblebrox (talk) 22:50, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    QuickWittedHare The rule is if the name contains "Wikipedia" and only in a way that suggests the user has some authority or official status, like "Wikipedia CEO" or "Official Wikipedia editor". 331dot (talk) 09:10, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Not a blatant violation of the username policy, but it's worth keeping an eye on their edits. We are all "Wiki reviewers". They may be editing promotionally, though. 331dot (talk) 09:18, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]