User talk:Lightningstrikers: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:18, 29 December 2019

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User Lightningstrikers. --Shirt58 (talk) 09:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, I'm Dawn Bard. I noticed that you recently removed content from Occupational stress without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dawn Bard (talk) 02:07, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dawn Bard the two sources included in the first paragraph of the article do not support the statement in any way. Please explain how removing a false statement with false sources is wrong. Why would wikipedia want articles using false statements with sources that don't even support the statement? Lightningstrikers (talk) 02:12, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for removing this false statement with false sources that this editor tried to include. I've been reading a lot about the different rules at wikipedia today and I cannot see why this editor thinks they can break the rules. Lightningstrikers (talk) 03:11, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Occupational stress, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:18, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 :Dawn Bard the two sources included in the first paragraph of the article do not support the statement in any way. Please explain how removing a false statement with false sources is wrong. Why would wikipedia want articles using false statements with sources that don't even support the statement? [[User:Lightningstrikers|Lightningstrikers]] ([[User talk:Lightningstrikers#top|talk]]) 02:12, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 ::Thank you for removing this false statement with false sources that this editor tried to include. I've been reading a lot about the different rules at wikipedia today and I cannot see why this editor thinks they can break the rules. [[User:Lightningstrikers|Lightningstrikers]] ([[User talk:Lightningstrikers#top|talk]]) 03:11, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
+<div style=clear: both></div>[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with <span class="plainlinks">[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Occupational%20stress&diff=932946173 this edit]</span> to [[:Occupational stress]], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. Please make use of the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. [[User:CASSIOPEIA|<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>]]<sup>([[User talk:CASSIOPEIA|<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>]])</sup> 03:18, 29 December 2019 (UTC)<!-- Template:Huggle/warn-delete-2 --><!-- Template:uw-delete2 -->