User talk:Meethamonkey: Difference between revisions
Meethamonkey (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
@alivardi you can be assured that my additions are in good faith as well as factual , the book I have cited is not only by a reputed source but also widely available , unlike authors like ram Pande . |
@alivardi you can be assured that my additions are in good faith as well as factual , the book I have cited is not only by a reputed source but also widely available , unlike authors like ram Pande . |
||
As an editor , I would also expect the same good faith from you. Thankyou . [[User:Meethamonkey|Meethamonkey]] ([[User talk:Meethamonkey#top|talk]]) 17:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC) |
As an editor , I would also expect the same good faith from you. Thankyou . [[User:Meethamonkey|Meethamonkey]] ([[User talk:Meethamonkey#top|talk]]) 17:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC) |
||
:[[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|Assuming good faith]] means that you should have the assumption that ''other'' editors are acting in good faith and that they are not being intentionally malicious. Posting messages such as this |
|||
{{quote|the changes you are making are malicious in nature and inaccurate promoting theories of fringe historians}} |
|||
:makes it very difficult for editors to have constructive discussions with each other.<br/>[[User:Alivardi|<span style="font-family:Aparajita">Alivardi</span>]] [[User talk:Alivardi|<span style="font-family:Aparajita">(talk)</span>]] |
Revision as of 17:58, 13 August 2020
Meethamonkey, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Meethamonkey! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 9 August 2020 (UTC) |
August 2020
Hello, I'm Alivardi. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Bharatpur State. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 16:53, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
@alivardi - it seems to me the dispute here is which author you have chosen to believe . Anybody who has studied indian history - from a. Reputed source like - Satish chandra , Bipin Chandra etc. Would know that this Wikipedia page is promoting hearsay and mythology rather than presenting a fact based version of history . Also in the history section we clearly see that first the subject is lineage , then an abrupt jump to Rajaram and the again an abrupt jump to a dispute in the Bharatpur state , where as there is no mention of Churaman Jat who was responsible for establishing the state in 18 th century when the Mughals had become weak . Also there is no mention on how the kingdom was established.
So it seems to me , that i should tell you , that the changes you are making are malicious in nature and inaccurate promoting theories of fringe historians , and you should refrain from inserting false information in such an unsystematic way. Meethamonkey (talk) 17:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
@ alivardi please don't remove the relevant information I had put in , regarding how the Bharatpur state came into being . I hope you understand that no censorship does not mean that you can present in accurate information as true . Also since you know that there is no censorship, I fail to understand why you would remove my edits for which I had provided citations from the page ? Meethamonkey (talk) 17:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 17:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
@alivardi you can be assured that my additions are in good faith as well as factual , the book I have cited is not only by a reputed source but also widely available , unlike authors like ram Pande . As an editor , I would also expect the same good faith from you. Thankyou . Meethamonkey (talk) 17:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Assuming good faith means that you should have the assumption that other editors are acting in good faith and that they are not being intentionally malicious. Posting messages such as this
the changes you are making are malicious in nature and inaccurate promoting theories of fringe historians