User talk:Gschadow: Difference between revisions
reply |
|||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
:::Which one? [[User:Gschadow|Gschadow]] 04:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
:::Which one? [[User:Gschadow|Gschadow]] 04:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
::[[WP:POINT]]. You expressed the desire to edit-war and disrupt wikipedia to make your point. That is illegal here. [[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 05:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
::[[WP:POINT]]. You expressed the desire to edit-war and disrupt wikipedia to make your point. That is illegal here. [[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 05:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
:::Well you just violated [[WP:3RR]]. I did not express a desire to edit-war, I expressed the resolve to protect my edits from your baseless reversions. And since I am adhering to policy, I will not revert your 3rd reversal for today until 24 hours from now. But, I will consider following up. [[User:Gschadow|Gschadow]] 05:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::Also, your edits are apologetic of the violent actions of Christian missionaries who are spreading communalism in India. Please try to keep edits non-partisan otherwise your edits are tendentious in nature.[[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 05:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
::Also, your edits are apologetic of the violent actions of Christian missionaries who are spreading communalism in India. Please try to keep edits non-partisan otherwise your edits are tendentious in nature.[[User:Rumpelstiltskin223|Rumpelstiltskin223]] 05:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
:::I know of no apologetics of violent actions. I am detached from this whole issue. Quite interesting what is going on here. I pray for peace. |
Revision as of 05:08, 2 January 2007
Welcome!
Hi fellow Wikipedian, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!
- Editing tutorial, learn to have fun with Wikipedia.
- Picture tutorial, instructions on uploading images.
- How to write a great article, to make it an featured article status.
- Manual of Style, how articles should be written.
Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :
Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: (~~~~). This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =) BorgQueen 22:00, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Vandal
Your edits to the talk page of Talk:Anti-Brahmanism express an intent to vandalize and disrupt. If you persist then action will be necessary.
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Rumpelstiltskin223 04:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, I touched a hot iron. I am not vandalizing: I have made edits with comments in Talk, you have reverted them wholesale with some spurious allegations. I am confident in the record showing the truth plainly. Gschadow 04:48, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- The record only shows your violation of wikipedia policies.Rumpelstiltskin223 04:57, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Which one? Gschadow 04:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- WP:POINT. You expressed the desire to edit-war and disrupt wikipedia to make your point. That is illegal here. Rumpelstiltskin223 05:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well you just violated WP:3RR. I did not express a desire to edit-war, I expressed the resolve to protect my edits from your baseless reversions. And since I am adhering to policy, I will not revert your 3rd reversal for today until 24 hours from now. But, I will consider following up. Gschadow 05:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Also, your edits are apologetic of the violent actions of Christian missionaries who are spreading communalism in India. Please try to keep edits non-partisan otherwise your edits are tendentious in nature.Rumpelstiltskin223 05:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- I know of no apologetics of violent actions. I am detached from this whole issue. Quite interesting what is going on here. I pray for peace.
- The record only shows your violation of wikipedia policies.Rumpelstiltskin223 04:57, 2 January 2007 (UTC)