User talk:Trickipaedia/Archive 1

Trickipaedia, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Trickipaedia! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Hello, I'm Gazoth. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dipak Misra, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Gazoth (talk) 14:05, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Citation added. Please ask before removal of good faith, constructive edits. Wikipedia is not a PhD dissertation where every word has to be cited before the defence committee mauls you. It takes time to add citations. Thanks anyways. I appreciate that something new has been created here as a result of this and I learnt new information too, honestly. Hope you are working on your Balakot project diligently, adding proofs for what happened or did not happen or both happened and not happened or neither happened nor not happened. :) --Trickipaedia (talk) 17:49, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on Talk:Jammu and Kashmir were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 20:00, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice but it would have helped if you had moved it as I was unable to do so back then.--Trickipaedia (talk) 08:25, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

References

Just follow the steps 1, 2 and 3 as shown and fill in the details

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

1. While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
2. Then click on "templates",
3. Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,
4. If the article is available in Pubmed Central, you have to add the pmc parameter manually -- click on "show additional fields" in the template and you will see the "pmc" field. Please add just the number and don't include "PMC".

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:18, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aditya Pancholi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FIR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:10, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of culinary herbs and spices, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pennyroyal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:24, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kartikeya Sharma

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kartikeya Sharma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tolly4bolly 08:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Kautilya3 (talk) 21:46, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Is this a threat for my edit to the Citizenship Amendment Bill? Why guise it as a generic message having no relevance to my edits? It's people like you who dissuade more people from editing the Wikipedia. I have seen you around for more than a decade, I think and you're still doing the same thing, ie starting unnecessary edit wars. You had a problem with my edit; you removed it. Why issue a moronic threat? You really think I give a duck? Dude, this is not an army where you could get me court-martialled. Get a life (outside the Wikipedia) and never contact me again. --Trickipaedia (talk) 06:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I hadn't noticed that you asked a query here. The notice that I gave is an "alert", not a "warning". It states that you are required to follow all the Wikipedia policies in editing India/Pakistan/Afghanistan topics. Otherwise you could face sanctions. The policies you need to follow are often pointed out to you, like I do below. You need to read and understand the policies, and adhere to them. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:17, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

You should refrain from spreading policing posters and focus more on ACTUALLY contributing to encyclopedic writing. Stop dreaming of becoming a powerful admin of the future and just be a productive editor today. Just my two paise... --Trickipaedia (talk) 08:26, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Godhra train burning, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:08, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Moringa oleifera, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Use WP:MEDRS sources for all content pertaining to health, medical or clinical topics. Zefr (talk) 17:48, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Moringa oleifera shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Zefr (talk) 18:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Moringa oleifera. How many times do you need to be advised to use WP:MEDRS reviews? Zefr (talk) 19:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

You should consider treatment. It will help you more than juvenile Moringa edit wars. It was not unsourced and you know it very well. Z. Naturforsch. C is an old peer reviewed journal and you could never get a paper in it in three lifetimes, certainly not with your whole days spent on the Wikipedia in stubbornly arguing that moringa has no medicinal benefits whatsoever. Stop obscuring. Specifically say what is wrong with this journal. What the hell is "lab research"? You know that research is often done in a lab, right? You should get a refund on your mickey mouse degree from Disneyland University. --Trickipaedia (talk) 22:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

MEDRS applies to human health and medicine and not biochemistry or microbiology. My last edit had nothing to do with medicine as it merely noted that isothiocynates from moringa have antimicrobial activity against gram positive bacteria. You see. You have an agenda. It is hijacking the moringa page and not allowing even the remotest suggestion that moringa could do anything other than filling someone's stomach. It is really sad what a failed career in research can do to people.--Trickipaedia (talk) 22:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mangal Pandey (Bihar politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siwan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:51, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sikandar Shah Miri into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 19:57, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the heads up but what purpose does it serve?--Trickipaedia (talk) 06:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Koeri, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 10:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Please purchase a new pair of glasses as it was someone else who did this unconstructive edit [1]. --Trickipaedia (talk) 10:56, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

You are correct of course, I made a mistake in my rollback, fixed it afterwards, forgot about the warning message. My apologies. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 11:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks!--Trickipaedia (talk) 13:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Raymond3023. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.Template:Z186 Raymond3023 (talk) 14:29, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

• Don't engage in edit warring and petty disruption. The source completely disagrees with the blatant misrepresentation you are trying to smear.[2] Stop your disruptive editing right now. ArvindPalaskar (talk) 16:15, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Clarify exactly what "misrepresentation" I'm trying to "smear" and how the source contradicts it. Stop being a vile and petty moron and go get a life.--Trickipaedia (talk) 16:18, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

You are misrepresenting the sources by watering down the existing scholarly culture contrary to the reliable sources. Then you are using a source from 1857 instead of sticking to relevant scholarship. Don't make personal attacks. ArvindPalaskar (talk) 16:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)