User talk:Wobble

Archives

Apr 2004 - Oct 2006

Oct 2006 - Nov 2006

Dec 2006

Remember: "Assume good faith" is a nicer restatement of "Never assume malice when stupidity will suffice."

Genetic views on race

Wobble, take a look at this article - specifically the Risch 2002 source in it. It seems to be saying something other than what the article claims it is saying (1. "Race" is being used as a proxy for "geographic origin" in this article according to [[1]] and 2. Risch doesn't seem to be saying that arguments for the existence of race have largely been based on non scientific principles, but that the discussion about the existence of race has been). Still, I don't have specialized training in genetics and could use someone else's eye on it. Thanks.-Psychohistorian 14:19, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

Regarding [2], Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Lukas19 00:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Scottish People

Hey, I would just like to thank you for reverting the scottish people bit about indigenous ethnic groups and including some info on r1b in that statement. I hope this anon user like you say gets bored or gets banned, anyway have a happy new year! --Globe01 11:28, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for giving me my very first Barnstar. My user page will wear it with pride :-) -Psychohistorian 03:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Response to your message on my talk page

I left the links with "white" in the title of the articles, and I have not really read the Nordic theory article. If you feel those should not be in the See Also section of the White people article, go ahead and delete them. However, links to articles about topics like Nazism, slavery and the Holocaust are really crossing the boundaries of what See Also sections are intended for. Also, your blind revert to the White people article, which destroyed my corrections to the formatting of several footnotes, was counterproductive and unjustified. Spylab 22:55, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

• Happy New Year to you to. In response to your second message, if some of that information is important enough to be on Wikipedia, it should be in the body of the article, not in the footnotes. Spylab 17:18, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

White British

No worries. I was glancing over some of the ethnic group articles a while ago and noticed the bizarre phenomenon of census classifications and general terms now being changed into pseudo-ethnicities (I don't know why we have 'white people' and 'black people' articles, for example). Wikipedia is not the place for the rewriting of science. michael ^talk 11:40, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Anon user conduct

I have already reported this user here who you seem to know too:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#anon_user_conduct

Maybe you want to add some comments there.

Veritas et Severitas 03:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

--deleted offensive material-- David D. (Talk) 20:20, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

My god, I hope that some administrators will see these comments. Veritas et Severitas 18:43, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

I have reported him again. See the notice board above again. Obviously you can never be sure, but if he is not Epf he uses the same arguments, often exactly the same language, he is interested in the same articles and he usually deletes or manipulates the same type of information. On the other hand, I think that Epf was not so radical and offensive in his approach and language, so as said, there is always the doubt. Veritas et Severitas 18:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

• Wobble, feel free to excise the above from your Talk page, it won't stop admins finding it and it won't stop the anon being trout-slapped if he does it again. Guy (Help!) 19:09, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

remove trolling [3] David D. (Talk) 22:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

hahahah, Wobbs, u have got to be trippin. I admit I am Eoganan but are you really foolish enough to think Im Epf ? Maybe we has some things in common but that guys just wrong on some much of his issues and ive seen his arguments with you and others which is why I started attacking both him and you and others. Not that it matters that im Eoganan since most peopel already know ive used different IP accounts and that one before. It doensmt mean much comin from u since your a vandal and opinion pusher yaself, so leave it alone alone before ya get whats comin to you. Eoganan, IP #'s, yeah im the same user and your the same instigator of of ignorance on so many aritcles. (This is acutally awesome because Ive been accused of Epf before with Eoganan on the Scottish peoples article which pissed off that guy so bad !!!! hahahahah) 70.48.30.28 21:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC) restored by Eoganan (talk · contribs)

Eoganan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has now been indefinitely blocked for personal attacks and sockpuppets. Gwernol 22:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC)