Talk:Mahar Regiment: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:43, 1 January 2021

India Start‑class Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / South Asia C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Reverted edits

Hi, I've reverted the edit made by 128.8.143.140 for the following reasons:

I think it is important to mention that the Mahar Regiment is one of the only regiments in the Indian Army to recruit troops from all over India.
I don't think the phrase "recruits from a broader field" is strictly grammatically correct.

-- Kunal 17:22, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please add award winner brave soldiers of mahars Shubham gauddab (talk) 12:17, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some statements related to General Lord Roberts' study seem to highly violate Wikipedia's non-bias and neutral-point-of-view policy. They don't seem to be fair to some communities. This could enrage them. They should be deleted. If we go by the history then we see that the Mughals never controlled the Deccan. Infact, the Marathas(although hugely outnumbered by Mughals) repulsed all Mughal attacks and inflicted huge casualties on the Mughals(having mostly Northern and North-Western men).Kesangh (talk)

Hi, could you please specify what specifically in the section "The Martial Races Theory and Disbandment" you think violates NPOV? Thanks. --Kunal ^(Talk) 17:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mahar Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121011161008/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORCES/Units/Infantry/114-Mahar-Regt.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORCES/Units/Infantry/114-Mahar-Regt.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:46, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overview

User:Diannaa

Quotes of the scholars must be copied as it is you can change it. Most of the content I wrote by myself so I advise you to not revert my work Ghoshpreet singh (talk) 04:02, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Diannaa

User:Ghoshpreet singh You are correct the overview article was one of the best article that was ever written on Mahar Regiment. I believe this User:Diannaa guy is hard core casteist person he cant digest lower cast (according to Diannaa) Mahar is getting so much praise. If wikipedia doesnt take approapriate action against him we should consider booking him under SC/ST prevention act. We have clear evidence he is being casteist.

Wait brother we have asked User:Diannaa to give explanation about why reverted the overview section. He needs to give explanation for each and every line, like if he has removed one line he needs to give explanation why he removed the line likewise for all lines he removed. If he doesn't show up here with explanation within 2 to 3 working days then you can consider booking him. Ghoshpreet singh (talk) 05:43, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 [[User:Ghoshpreet singh]] You are correct the overview article was one of the best article that was ever written on Mahar Regiment. I believe this [[User:Diannaa]] guy is hard core casteist person he cant digest lower cast (according to Diannaa) Mahar is getting so much praise. If wikipedia doesnt take approapriate action against him we should consider booking him under SC/ST prevention act. We have clear evidence he is being casteist.
+Wait brother we have asked
+[[User:Diannaa]] to give explanation about why reverted the overview section. He needs to give explanation for each and every line, like if he has removed one line he needs to give explanation why he removed the line likewise for all lines he removed. If he doesn't show up here with explanation within 2 to 3 working days then you can consider booking him. [[User:Ghoshpreet singh|Ghoshpreet singh]] ([[User talk:Ghoshpreet singh|talk]]) 05:43, 1 January 2021 (UTC)