Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Noticeboard for edit warring}} |
{{Short description|Noticeboard for edit warring}} |
||
{{pp-vandalism|small=yes}} |
|||
<!--Adds protection template automatically if semi-protected--><noinclude>{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|{{pp|small=yes}}}}__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}{{/Header}}[[Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed]] [[Category:Wikipedia edit warring]] |
<!--Adds protection template automatically if semi-protected--><noinclude>{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|{{pp|small=yes}}}}__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}{{/Header}}[[Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed]] [[Category:Wikipedia edit warring]] |
||
{{pp-move|small=yes}} |
{{pp-move|small=yes}} |
||
| Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}} |
|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}} |
||
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
||
|counter = |
|counter = 489 |
||
|algo = old(2d) |
|algo = old(2d) |
||
|key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f |
|key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f |
||
|archive = Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d |
|archive = Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d |
||
}}</noinclude> |
|||
}}</noinclude><!--<?xml version="1.0"?><api><query><pages><page pageid=" ns="4" title="Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring"><revisions><rev>=Reports=>khi |
|||
<!-- NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. --> |
|||
NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. --> |
|||
== [[User:AirshipJungleman29]] reported by [[User:176.88.165.232]] (Result: declined) == |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Khwarezmian Empire}} <br /> |
|||
== [[User:Horse Eye's Back]] reported by [[User:Darouet]] (Result: No action) == |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|AirshipJungleman29}} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [diff preferred, link permitted] |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Id Kah Mosque}} <br /> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Horse Eye's Back}} |
|||
<br> |
|||
Previously editing as {{userlinks|Horse Eye Jack}} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' (see below) |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
||
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= |
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khwarazmian_Empire&diff=prev&oldid=1256229418] |
||
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= |
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khwarazmian_Empire&diff=prev&oldid=1256538860] |
||
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= |
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khwarazmian_Empire&diff=prev&oldid=1256545733] |
||
# [diff] |
|||
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Id_Kah_Mosque&type=revision&diff=1021044887&oldid=1021044447] @ 16:11, 2 May, removes recently added content, also disputed [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Id_Kah_Mosque&type=revision&diff=1020333970&oldid=1020238180][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Id_Kah_Mosque&type=revision&diff=1020349459&oldid=1020334149][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Id_Kah_Mosque&type=revision&diff=1020352450&oldid=1020349459] |
|||
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Id_Kah_Mosque&type=revision&diff=1021046265&oldid=1021044963] @ 16:20, 2 May, as above |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AHorse_Eye%27s_Back&type=revision&diff=1021046556&oldid=1020613841] |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AId_Kah_Mosque&type=revision&diff=1020373642&oldid=1019991673 diff] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Id_Kah_Mosque#WP:CRYBLP_and_Memet_Jume section] |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page;''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AHorse_Eye%27s_Back&type=revision&diff=1021129997&oldid=1021049294] |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [link] |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AirshipJungleman29&diff=prev&oldid=1256213542] |
|||
Horse Eye's Back [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AHorse_Eye%27s_Back&type=revision&diff=1021046912&oldid=1021046556 states] that the fourth and fifth reverts don't cross the [[WP:3RR]] bright line because {{tq|"That fourth diff isnt related to the other three"}}. This is despite my protest [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Horse_Eye%27s_Back&diff=next&oldid=1021046912], {{tq|"Just because the statement was contested a couple days ago doesn't mean that removing it now no longer counts as a revert,"}} and the definition of 3RR at [[WP:EDITWAR]]: |
|||
{{talk quote|The 3RR says an editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, '''whether involving the same or different material,''' on a single page within a 24-hour period. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside of the 24-hour slot may also be considered edit warring. There are certain exemptions to 3RR, such as reverting vandalism or '''clear violations of the policy on biographies of living persons'''.''(emphasis added)''}} |
|||
Horse Eye has subsequently argued [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Horse_Eye%27s_Back&diff=next&oldid=1021047778] that they {{tq|"removed a statement in breach of [[WP:BLP]] (a WP:3RR exception even if it was a revert)"}}. However, Horse Eye has breached 3RR to remove the imam's insistence that his mosque — the most venerated in Xinjiang — is real (widely reported in Chinese media, e.g. here [http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-07/22/c_139232644.htm]). As discussed on the talk page [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Id_Kah_Mosque#WP:CRYBLP_and_Memet_Jume], it's highly dubious to use [[WP:BLP]] to effectively slander a living person and prevent them from defending themself or their religious community. Horse Eye's insistence that BLP exempts them from 3RR looks like a classic case of [[WP:CRYBLP]], that while |
|||
{{talk quote|a few exceptional editing powers that have been granted to prevent or reduce harm to living persons, these can be abused as some sort of trump card to give an advantage to one side in an editing dispute.}} |
|||
I've asked Horse Eye to self-revert [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AHorse_Eye%27s_Back&type=revision&diff=1021046556&oldid=1020613841], and <s>instead they've doubled down with a 5th revert</s> ''and they have not done so''. Unfortunately, because Horse Eye believes that a 4th revert on other contested material on a page doesn't break 3RR, and/or that they are exempt from 3RR in this case, they have effectively promised (e.g. here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Id_Kah_Mosque&type=revision&diff=1020349459&oldid=1020334149]) this behavior is not going to stop. -[[User:Darouet|Darouet]] ([[User talk:Darouet|talk]]) 02:09, 3 May 2021 (UTC) Clause struck, and italic text added, per Horse Eye comment below. -[[User:Darouet|Darouet]] ([[User talk:Darouet|talk]]) 13:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
: Current consensus on Xinhua is that they are not a reliable source for such statements "Xinhua News Agency is the official state-run press agency of the People's Republic of China. There is consensus that Xinhua is generally reliable for factual reporting except in areas where the government of China may have a reason to use it for propaganda or disinformation. Xinhua is also generally reliable for the views and positions of the Chinese government and its officials. For subjects where the Chinese government may be a stakeholder, the consensus is almost unanimous that Xinhua cannot be trusted to cover them accurately and dispassionately; some editors favour outright deprecation because of its lack of editorial independence. There is no consensus for applying any one single label to the whole of the agency. Caution should be exercised in using this source, extremely so in case of extraordinary claims on controversial subjects or biographies of living people. When in doubt, try to find better sources instead; use inline attribution if you must use Xinhua.” I went through a great deal of trouble to replace an unreliable source with a reliable one, Darouet even thanked me for doing so[]. The contention "I've asked Horse Eye to self-revert and instead they've doubled down with a 5th revert.” is false, my last edit to the page [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Id_Kah_Mosque&diff=1021046265&oldid=1021044963] was *before* Darouet’s first edit to my talk page [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Horse_Eye%27s_Back&diff=1021046438&oldid=1020613841]. I made it clear that I was acting under BLP in my talk page edits as well as in the relevant edit summaries, there was no consensus to include the contested BLP information so it *must* immediately be removed or sourced to a WP:RS, thats exactly what I did. Beyond all that there is no ongoing conflict, why Darouet thought it was necessary to file such an aspersion filled and error ridden report is beyond me. [[User:Horse Eye's Back|Horse Eye's Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye's Back|talk]]) 02:42, 3 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
: Also jeezy petes Darouet by "this behavior” do you mean removing a completely unsourced BLP statement or do you mean removing a poorly sourced BLP statement? Because both happened in that diff and both are required by policy. we are all required to do that per [[WP:BLP]] "We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by an inline citation to a reliable, published source. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.” [[User:Horse Eye's Back|Horse Eye's Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye's Back|talk]]) 02:45, 3 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::Multiple editors support inclusion of the text, and Jume's comments are also video recorded, leaving no doubt as to their veracity. BLP is meant to protect living people, not prevent them from defending themselves. If an editor believes 3RR no longer applies to them because they can spuriously claim a BLP exemption, they will edit war without acknowledging 3RR. That's what has happened here, and you're promising it will continue to happen. -[[User:Darouet|Darouet]] ([[User talk:Darouet|talk]]) 13:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::: Multiple editors have also opposed inclusion... As you well know, without a consensus to include a poorly sourced BLP statement stays off the page (or perhaps you did not know that?). BLP is broader than that. How does their being a video change the WP:RS situation? Videos are as reliable as the source which publishes them, they are not themselves sources and videos are no more veracious than any other form of media. I promise to continue to follow our WP:BLP policy, if the policy changes so will my editing behavior. It would be wonderful if you would start following the BLP policy. [[User:Horse Eye's Back|Horse Eye's Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye's Back|talk]]) 14:33, 3 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::: Also please acknowledge that you now understand that you were mistaken about the timeline of events and that all my edits to the Id Kah Mosque happened before your first post on my talk page. [[User:Horse Eye's Back|Horse Eye's Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye's Back|talk]]) 14:34, 3 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::::A BLP exemption to 3RR requires a {{tq|clear violation}} of BLP policy, not a dubious case. Otherwise both BLP and 3RR become meaningless. -[[User:Darouet|Darouet]] ([[User talk:Darouet|talk]]) 17:59, 3 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::::: Using Xinhua for a BLP statement related to Xinjiang, islam, and the the Uyghur genocide is a clear violation of our BLP policy, we clearly have consensus that Xinhua is not a reliable source in that situation. Did you see the second post? [[User:Horse Eye's Back|Horse Eye's Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye's Back|talk]]) 18:04, 3 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::::::All of this is proving my point - you believe that [[WP:3RR]] doesn't apply because you're ''right'', but here you're using "BLP" ''against'' the subject in question. If this issue isn't handled here it needs to be escalated to WP:AN because according to this logic, you can break 3RR to remove Chinese-language news sources all across Wikipedia, any time a human being ("BLP") is involved. -[[User:Darouet|Darouet]] ([[User talk:Darouet|talk]]) 20:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::::::: No claims are being made against the imam and we’re only talking about Xinhua not Chinese-language news sources all across Wikipedia, what are you talking about? [[User:Horse Eye's Back|Horse Eye's Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye's Back|talk]]) 20:47, 3 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::That's well covered in the complaint above and on the talk page. -[[User:Darouet|Darouet]] ([[User talk:Darouet|talk]]) 21:14, 3 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Result:''' No action. It is unclear that 3RR was violated on 2 May and anyway that is now three days in the past. The parties seem to be engaged now at [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#RfC: The Globe and Mail]] about a similar issue. Trying to get an answer at RSN looks to be a better idea than an edit war. If the RSN regulars don't believe the issue belongs there, the matter may need to come back to [[Talk:Id Kah Mosque]] or go through DRN or an RFC. In my opinion people may be trying to get answers that the sources are not strong enough to deliver. We can't know everything we would like to know. The final answer may be to tweak the prose so it doesn't exaggerate WP's level of confidence in whatever is really happening. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 04:35, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' [diff] |
|||
== [[User:Luwanglinux]] reported by [[User:TrangaBellam]] (Result: Blocked) == |
|||
''' |
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
||
Does not raise any objection on talk page. My contribution came with 3 different sources, 2 of which corraborates the first one. 1 from official government website and 1 from academic paper (which was available online and in English, link attached to the citation). but Airshipjungleman29 did not raise any objection even though I invited him both on talk page and in edit-summary panel. Just kept edit warring without raising any objection [[Special:Contributions/176.88.165.232|176.88.165.232]] ([[User talk:176.88.165.232|talk]]) 20:29, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Luwanglinux}} |
|||
:'''The most important par'''t is that, I assert, AirshipJungleman29's behaviour is political: In the current version of the article, the section "Culture, the section he was sabotaging is unsourcedly attributed to Persians: when a content is attributed to Persians without a source, AirshipJungleman29 and HistoryofIran do not dispute it but when triple sourced content attributes the culture into Turkmens, HistoryofIran and AirshipJungleman29 immediately starts edit war. [[Special:Contributions/176.88.165.232|176.88.165.232]] ([[User talk:176.88.165.232|talk]]) 20:47, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [diff preferred, link permitted] |
|||
* {{AN3|d}} for oh so many reasons: |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
** The page is already protected. |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anglo-Manipur_War&diff=1019453188&oldid=1019442846] |
|||
** You're the only one who has actually broken 3RR on this page. (Were it not for the protection this would be [[WP:BOOMERANG]].) |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anglo-Manipur_War&diff=1019764372&oldid=1019761262] |
|||
** Your report is malformed, and the "page" link goes to a completely different page from your diffs. |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anglo-Manipur_War&diff=1019765683&oldid=1019765534] |
|||
** Your link to the attempt to resolve the dispute on the article's talk page goes to the other editor's user talk page; I don't see you trying to discuss this on the article's talk page at all. |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anglo-Manipur_War&diff=1019840238&oldid=1019797932] |
|||
* --Chris | <small>[[User:Crazycomputers|Crazycomputers]] ([[User talk:Crazycomputers|talk]])</small> 20:56, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anglo-Manipur_War&diff=1020113636&oldid=1020110159] |
|||
*:* The report Has nothing to do with the protection. |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anglo-Manipur_War&diff=1020117848&oldid=1020113801] |
|||
*:* The report has nothing to do with 3RR |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anglo-Manipur_War&diff=1020795754&oldid=1020758988] |
|||
*:* Both the page link and 3 diff links go to the same pageç |
|||
*:* 1. they did not try to discuss their complainment on the article's talk page but their report was not declined. then, how is my report declined? :D Lol. Just state you are siding with them so that you can cover each other. I won't leave it here. |
|||
*:[[Special:Contributions/176.88.165.232|176.88.165.232]] ([[User talk:176.88.165.232|talk]]) 21:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::The page link does go somewhere else -- to a page that redirects to the article in question. Thus, the "history" link does not show the edit warring. |
|||
*::I cannot speak as to why another report evaluated by a different administrator was accepted or declined. You would have to ask them. --Chris | <small>[[User:Crazycomputers|Crazycomputers]] ([[User talk:Crazycomputers|talk]])</small> 21:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::Wait, why did you ignore that he does not raise any objection? He just reverts without arguing anything. The page being protected has nothing to do with their reverts being completely unexplained or my 3RR has nothing to do with their arbitrary reverts. These are just red-herring to cover their faults so that fellows are not penalized [[Special:Contributions/176.88.165.232|176.88.165.232]] ([[User talk:176.88.165.232|talk]]) 21:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* Oh and I didn't even notice that there was already an actioned ANEW report involving you. This report therefore also seems retaliatory. --Chris | <small>[[User:Crazycomputers|Crazycomputers]] ([[User talk:Crazycomputers|talk]])</small> 21:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:They can report without discussing on talk page but I can not report without discussing on talk page? Obviously, corrupted admin sides with his/her fellows. Unsourced content gets free pass when it is about Persians but triple sourced content rejected when it is about Turkmens. You are racists --[[Special:Contributions/176.88.165.232|176.88.165.232]] ([[User talk:176.88.165.232|talk]]) [[Special:Contributions/176.88.165.232|176.88.165.232]] ([[User talk:176.88.165.232|talk]]) 21:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::Please see [[WP:ONUS]] and [[WP:BRD]]. If you are trying to add content and that addition gets reverted, ''you'' are expected to open discussion on the ''article's'' talk page. |
|||
*::And I'd suggest striking your personal attack. Aside from being inappropriate, I wasn't even aware of the other ANEW report when I evaluated this one. My conclusion was reached completely independently, based solely on your behavior. --Chris | <small>[[User:Crazycomputers|Crazycomputers]] ([[User talk:Crazycomputers|talk]])</small> 21:14, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::Nor WP:ONUS neither WP:BRD has such policy. Otherwise, you could revert any edit and then that editor would have been expected to open discussion. Do you even see how absurd your excuse is? [[Special:Contributions/176.88.165.232|176.88.165.232]] ([[User talk:176.88.165.232|talk]]) 21:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::::That's... literally what they both say. Yes, that is exactly what is expected to happen. At this point I'm not going to reply any further as this clearly is a case of [[WP:IDHT|I didn't hear that]]. Note that there are about 850 administrators, many of whom frequent this page. If they disagree with my decision here they are welcome to chime in. --Chris | <small>[[User:Crazycomputers|Crazycomputers]] ([[User talk:Crazycomputers|talk]])</small> 21:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
I have put a CTOPS notice on the talk page since the article comes under the scope of [[WP:ARBIPA|ARBIPA]]. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 03:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Luwanglinux&diff=1019765575&oldid=1019442871] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Luwanglinux&type=revision&diff=1020332324&oldid=1019765575&diffmode=visual] |
|||
== [[User:Hariwulf]] reported by [[User:Ermenrich]] (Result: Partially blocked 2 weeks) == |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Anglo-Manipur_War#Seeking_Consensus] |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Merseburg charms}} <br /> |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page;''' [diff] |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Hariwulf}} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Merseburg_charms&oldid=1256762195] |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
|||
I am not TrangaBellam, but I would point out that the editor warred with four different editors here: me, {{U|Austronesier}}, {{U|Gotitbro}} and {{U|TrangaBellam}}. The talk page discussions are akin to beating a head against a wall. No conclusions are ever reached. The editor also gives all of us warnings on our talk pages: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kautilya3&diff=prev&oldid=1019765838], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Austronesier&diff=prev&oldid=1019801813], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TrangaBellam&diff=prev&oldid=1020796782] |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
The user has a persistent history of edit-warring, ever since came on the scene. His [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?target=Luwanglinux&namespace=0&tagfilter=mw-undo&start=&end=&limit=400&title=Special%3AContributions contributions history tagged mw-undo] shows him doing: |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Merseburg_charms&diff=1257039602&oldid=1256762195] |
|||
* 3 reverts at [[Puya (Meitei texts)]] all on 24 October 2020 |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Merseburg_charms&diff=1257040856&oldid=1257039927] |
|||
* 1 revert at [[Manipuri cuisine]], also no 24 October 2020 |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Merseburg_charms&diff=1257044097&oldid=1257043700] |
|||
* 6 reverts at [[Meitei people]] ( 4 reverts between 24-26 October 2020) |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Merseburg_charms&diff=1257046341&oldid=1257044957] |
|||
* 13 reverts [[Manipur State Constitution Act 1947]] (4 reverts on 29 October 2020, 3 between 25-27 November 2020) |
|||
* 4 reverts at [[Manipur (princely state)]] |
|||
* 5 reverts at [[Anglo-Manipur War]], plus two others apparently not tagged as mw-undo |
|||
Some of this edit-warring was also regarding [[WP:COPYVIO]], for which he had to face an extended block. -- [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 15:17, 3 May 2021 (UTC)</br> |
|||
'''Comments'''</br> |
|||
I wonder if user Kautilya, TrangaBellam forgot wikipedia is a platform for collective efforts,most of the time I faced revert from him it was because of this specific reason Manipur was not a part of India or Manipur was sovereign(independent). I am not trying to shove my personal POV to wikipedia but trying to help improve the content and correctness of information in the article I edited with reliable references,The specific reference I added to Causes section of Anglo Manipur War was Kautilya choice as a notable source[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAnglo-Manipur_War&type=revision&diff=1019508564&oldid=1019493395]. I discussed a lot on talk pages and even corrected his concerns regarding punctuation.To me Kautilya and TrangaBellam behaviour is like we don't like this so this is not allowed. He did not even like the insertion of Major Paona Brajabasi at first, he even reverted two times on Khongjom battle content [[User:Luwanglinux|<span style="color:red">🐲</span> <span style="color: blue">ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Luwanglinux|<span style="color:green">ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) </span>]]</sup> 17:29, 3 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
: "Collective effort" by no means implies that you get to railroad your POV, no matter what objections may be raised. All Wikipedia content requires [[WP:CONSENSUS]]. It is ironic that you open a talk page section called "Seeking consensus" and then reinstate your content! You were specifically [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anglo-Manipur_War&diff=1020750948&oldid=1020134409 warned] by TrangaBellam that he was the fourth editor that was oppositing your edit, and if you reinstated it, you would be taken to this noticeboard. You still reinstated it. -- [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 19:50, 3 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::What user TrangaBellam did was not a revert,he firstly removed the One event two state journal reference and next thing he edited a bit and finally removed the causes section stating badly drafted,with due respect I asked others opinion time and again including yours as well as listened to their opinion and reflect it on my edit and give edit summary as anyone to freely improve the content I added with reliable source which is totally in a collegial spirit but you were acting too bossy and acted as if you don't like certain lines so this can't be accepted irrespective of the source.[[User:Luwanglinux|<span style="color:red">🐲</span> <span style="color: blue">ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Luwanglinux|<span style="color:green">ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) </span>]]</sup> 20:27, 3 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anglo-Manipur_War&type=revision&diff=1020798135&oldid=1019747672 This] is the difference between your original contribution and your latest reinstatement. As you can see, most of the content is still there, except for one small passage that {{U|TrangaBellam}} removed, saying it was duplicating material that is covered in another section. My original objection saying that it was too much space being given for one scholar's ''views'' (not facts) has not been addressed. TrangaBellam said the section was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anglo-Manipur_War&diff=1020750338&oldid=1020702787 "very poorly drafted"]. That has not been addressed either. You added four new citations at the end. They were all deadlines. I flagged them, but you haven't bothered to fix them. Neither do we know where in those book sources support for the material is supposed to be found. |
|||
::: Since you start off by claiming that your content is fine and reinstate it immediately, your claim that you are "listening to their opinion" isn't evidenced. You are basically [[WP:STONEWALLING]] the discussion and reinstating the problematic content endlessly. Our only option seems to be to get tired and give up. -- [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 10:03, 4 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:::: Well I have stated anyone can modify my edit on causes section by using reliable source, and I did not object your point of view when you reminded me I neglected the rot in Palace of Manipur among the brothers ( any one can refer talk section) and blamed only British Government .Problematic content for why? because It was not written in the way you want?..user TrangaBellam and you are similar in editing style removing content or reference or texts he do not like sucha as this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=RK_Meghen&type=revision&diff=1021291323&oldid=1020457144&diffmode=source] ..No matter how much one try to cooperate if the other party is like a curled tail of a dog, consensus is almost impossible. Also in the article of [[Kabaw Valley#History]] you claim the history section as POV even if there is clear evidence of all content added with reliable source, it seems like your usual habit to put POV tag if the contents do not satisfy what you expect and you never bothered to modify or improve the history section of that article with reliable source to remove that tag yourself...My only option seems to be ignore every article you took interest in too.. [[User:Luwanglinux|<span style="color:red">🐲</span> <span style="color: blue">ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Luwanglinux|<span style="color:green">ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) </span>]]</sup> 13:38, 4 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::It looks to me that [[User:Luwanglinux]] is risking a block for long-term edit warring on South Asian topics. He might be able to avoid this if he will promise to make no more reverts on articles he has previously edited without first getting a consensus on the talk page. His comments above suggest he sees no problem at all with his editing. He is constantly being reverted by many other people, some of them quite experienced. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 17:50, 4 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::: I was not reverting article on my personal POV or without [[Wp:RS|reliable source]] , I never say my edits are all genuine( {{tq| His comments above suggest he sees no problem at all with his editing. He is constantly being reverted by many other people, some of them quite experienced.}} ) but I hope for a cooperative editing environment instead of reverting every edits users have a better choice of checking the information added and present it in a more readable way , Was I at fault for inserting topic about Khongjom battle along with Major Paona Brajabasi role in the war with source which Kautilya reverted twice...hope other editors do check why such edit warring even happened ?, am I the only one who is at fault in edit warring of Anglo Manipur War ?[[User:Luwanglinux|<span style="color:red">🐲</span> <span style="color: blue">ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Luwanglinux|<span style="color:green">ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) </span>]]</sup> 18:29, 4 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::::Luwanglinux, please answer yes or no whether you agree to wait for a talk page consensus before making any reverts on South Asian articles you have worked on previously. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 19:01, 4 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::::: I always agree to wait for consensus not only on South Asian article but any article in English wikipedia, but its very hard to reach consensus if other party act like owner of article and have right to choose what should be inserted or not, should not consensus be reached based on the topic and its reliability with notable source? Also admins kindly see the the edit warring history of the user Trangabellam (the one who warned me for edit warring also reported me to ANI ) [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TrangaBellam&action=historysubmit&type=revision&diff=1017014924&oldid=1015031679&diffmode=source] his edits were not constructive at all, see his latest edit on Manipur related article [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_Manipur&type=revision&diff=1021443338&oldid=1019476625&diffmode=source] , user like him never bother trying to search for source or checking the information added previously [[User:Luwanglinux|<span style="color:red">🐲</span> <span style="color: blue">ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Luwanglinux|<span style="color:green">ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) </span>]]</sup> 19:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*{{AN3|b}} – One week for long term edit warring. I was hoping that this user would agree to wait for consensus on the disputed articles, but a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Luwanglinux#You_are_risking_a_block_for_long-term_edit_warring discussion at User talk:Luwanglinux] did not result in clear acceptance of my proposal. I'm opting for a regular block. Since the user has been alerted to [[WP:ARBIPA]], a topic ban remains an option if the unusual editing pattern continues. Luwanglinux has extreme confidence that he is right while constantly clashing with long time contributors, even giving them [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kautilya3&diff=prev&oldid=1019765838 templated warnings] for their misbehavior. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 15:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:Ckruschke]] reported by [[User:KidAd]] (Result: Both warned) == |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|South Dakota School of Mines and Technology}} <br /> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Ckruschke}} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=South_Dakota_School_of_Mines_and_Technology&oldid=1021095540] |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AHariwulf&diff=1257045267&oldid=1257044929] |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=South_Dakota_School_of_Mines_and_Technology&type=revision&diff=1021435344&oldid=1021095540 Revert #1] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=South_Dakota_School_of_Mines_and_Technology&type=revision&diff=1021436448&oldid=1021435944 Revert #2] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=South_Dakota_School_of_Mines_and_Technology&type=revision&diff=1021437562&oldid=1021436570 3RR violation] |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACkruschke&type=revision&diff=1021438280&oldid=1018153381] |
|||
'''Diff of |
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AHariwulf&diff=1257053898&oldid=1257053856] |
||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page;''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ckruschke&diff=prev&oldid=1021447512] |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
||
:Fairly clear-cut case here. Ckruschke has violated [[WP:3RR]] for the purpose of inserting the names of non-notable individuals under "notable alumni" on [[South Dakota School of Mines and Technology]]. User has repeatedly ignored [[WP:ONUS]], which states {{tq|The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content}}. In response to attempts to engage with them on the article's talk page and a standard warning template warning them of their [[WP:3RR]] violation, they left me a personalized and ''highly'' condescending [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KidAd&diff=prev&oldid=1021442828 message] that reads, in part, {{tq|Hi - welcome to Wikipedia! I see you have been an editor for a little over a year and its great that you have taken such an interest in Wikipedia! We need more editors with your passion. Unfortunately, I am firmly in the right on this issue}}. While I appreciate the welcome, it is ''three'' years overdue. And though I appreciate that Ckruschke took the time to complement my passion, however sarcastically, I must disagree. Wikipedia needs more editors who can abide by [[WP:CIVILITY]] and [[WP:AGF]] guidelines. [[User:KidAd|<span style="background-color: black; color: orange">KidAd</span>]] • [[User talk:KidAd|<span style="color: gray">'''SPEAK'''</span>]] 19:11, 4 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
New user (started as an IP) adding unsourced material to the article and then simply re-adding it after given links to [[WP:RS]] and edit warning templates.--[[User:Ermenrich|Ermenrich]] ([[User talk:Ermenrich|talk]]) 00:34, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::It appears that my friend, [[User:KidAd|<span style="background-color: black; color: orange">KidAd</span>]], is very protective of his edits. I was attempting to restore the page as his non-constructive edits constitute a clear change to the Notability policy on the SDSM&T page (WRT notability being primarily embodied in whether the person has a Wikipedia page which is astonishingly laughable). Instead of taking the issue to Talk, since the [[WP:ONUS]] is on [[User:KidAd|<span style="background-color: black; color: orange">KidAd</span>]] as the editor who is attempting to change policy, he kept reverting my restoration to the original page so that discussion could happen on a clean slate. Clearly the editor does not understand what [[WP:ONUS]] means and is simply using it and other Wiki terms, like [[WP:3RR]], [[WP:CIVILITY]], and [[WP:AGF]], as hammers to further his viewpoint and shout down a dissenter. Its too bad that new editors get their back up after an editor reaches out to them (sarcasm? No...) and learn all the "get out of my yard" Wikipedia buzz words to tell other editors to shut up long before they understand what terms like onus and civility actually mean... Note that the only time this editor reached out to me was to use the Admin hammer so clearly [[WP:CIVILITY]] is for lessor editors than he. |
|||
::I started a Talk post on the page, which is the clear way to solve this rather than bringing it to admins and what he should have done after my first restoration. Whatever you guys decide is fine with me - I don't have an ego so if I'm wrong, I'm wrong. [[User:Ckruschke|Ckruschke]] ([[User talk:Ckruschke|talk]]) 12:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Ckruschke |
|||
:User Ermenrich acted as a totalitarian authority of Wikipedia with the ability to delete edits (without stating clearly the reason for doing so) rather than even considering to build around them. I also edited the page only twice with my account (meaning after having read and agreed on the Terms). |
|||
*'''Result:''' Both [[User:Ckruschke]] and [[User:KidAd]] are '''warned'''. Either may be blocked if they revert the article again (or if they modify the list of alumni) unless they get a prior consensus for their change on the talk page. The steps of [[WP:Dispute resolution]] are open to you. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 17:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:In the 90 minutes of life of my account, I have been warned and reported, while Ermenrich refused to find, together with me, an amicable resolution to the issue (he finds my edit "ludicrous", albeit we are referring to simple phonetics). |
|||
:That's fair. Thanks again - [[User:Ckruschke|Ckruschke]] ([[User talk:Ckruschke|talk]]) 18:42, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Ckruschke |
|||
:I may be new and have quoted Wikipedia on the Talk page instead of the source of the article, however this was on the Talk page itself and to foster discussion. |
|||
:Also, while not related to this subject, I would like to state my indignation towards the unfriendliness and attitude towards new users here on Wikipedia. I did come across a number of rants addressed at Editors acting in "one-sided", "entitled" and "owning" ways, and apparently I should have better heeded the warning. |
|||
:No one enjoys facing this amount hostility and issues moments after joining a community with the hope to help it. It is the same as trying to scare away newcomers. |
|||
:With this in consideration, I look forward to what the Administrators will have to say on the matter. [[User:Hariwulf|Hariwulf]] ([[User talk:Hariwulf|talk]]) 01:06, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::...or, instead of ranting about how you've been wronged by my telling you you can't add unsourced material to Wikipedia, you could simply self-revert your addition of unsourced nonsense to the article.--[[User:Ermenrich|Ermenrich]] ([[User talk:Ermenrich|talk]]) 01:10, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*{{AN3|pb|2 weeks}} [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 01:14, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Just FYI, Hariwulf appears to be engaged in block evasion: an IP has continued to reinstate his edits: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Merseburg_charms&diff=1257073630&oldid=1257059943], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Merseburg_charms&diff=1257075336&oldid=1257073871].--[[User:Ermenrich|Ermenrich]] ([[User talk:Ermenrich|talk]]) 21:59, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User: |
== [[User:Earl of Arundel]] reported by [[User:Muboshgu]] (Result: Blocked one week) == |
||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks| |
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Talk:2024 United States presidential election}} |
||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks| |
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Earl of Arundel}} |
||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adal_Sultanate&type=revision&diff=1020185268&oldid=1020159242] |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adal_Sultanate&type=revision&diff=1020192132&oldid=1020191366] |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adal_Sultanate&type=revision&diff=1021456041&oldid=1021447630] |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adal_Sultanate&type=revision&diff=1021458053&oldid=1021456041] |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adal_Sultanate&type=revision&diff=1021461690&oldid=1021458053] |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sultanate_of_Ifat&type=revision&diff=1021455178&oldid=1011528978] |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sultanate_of_Ifat&type=revision&diff=1019144693&oldid=1011528978] |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sultanate_of_Ifat&type=revision&diff=1021455178&oldid=1021440950] |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
||
# {{diff2|1257138330|12:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/Super Goku V|Super Goku V]] ([[User talk:Super Goku V|talk]]): Hatting an ongoing discussion is an act of censorship and will not be tolerated" |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ethiopian_Empire&type=revision&diff=1020847045&oldid=1020745093] |
|||
# {{diff2|1257066398|01:57, 13 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Reverted [[WP:AGF|good faith]] edits by [[Special:Contributions/David O. Johnson|David O. Johnson]] ([[User talk:David O. Johnson|talk]]): Censorship must not be tolerated" |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dakkar&type=revision&diff=1021444955&oldid=1021441417] |
|||
# {{diff2|1257049208|00:02, 13 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257046489|1257046489]] by [[Special:Contributions/David O. Johnson|David O. Johnson]] ([[User talk:David O. Johnson|talk]]) Reverting attempts to censor discussion on a talk page" |
|||
# {{diff2|1257046194|23:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257041182|1257041182]] by [[Special:Contributions/Esolo5002|Esolo5002]] ([[User talk:Esolo5002|talk]]) Please seek consensus on the talk page before closing active discussions" |
|||
# {{diff2|1257040589|22:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Reverted 1 edit by [[Special:Contributions/David O. Johnson|David O. Johnson]] ([[User talk:David O. Johnson|talk]]): Please seek consensus on the talk page before closing active discussions" |
|||
# {{diff2|1257029151|21:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257027093|1257027093]] by [[Special:Contributions/David O. Johnson|David O. Johnson]] ([[User talk:David O. Johnson|talk]]) Hatting without consensus is tantamount to censorship of a talk-page" |
|||
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
||
# {{diff2|1257062502|01:31, 13 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on [[:Talk:2024 United States presidential election]]." |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMagherbin&type=revision&diff=1019214818&oldid=990316312] |
|||
# {{diff2|1257163459|15:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)}} "/* November 2024 */ Reply" |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMagherbin&type=revision&diff=993651641&oldid=990893722] |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMagherbin&type=revision&diff=1011763868&oldid=1011749451] |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMagherbin&type=revision&diff=1021461284&oldid=1019214818] |
|||
'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
||
# {{diff2|1257065932|01:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC) on User talk:Earl of Arundel}} "/* November 2024 */ Censorship must not be tolerated" |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sultanate_of_Ifat#Origins_of_the_Ifat_Sultanate_and_Walashma_Dynasty] |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Adal_Sultanate#Adal_Sultanate_capital] |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
||
This user is incredibly disruptive literally waging edit wars on multiple pages and was recently blocked for edit warring. It seems like he didn't learn his warning. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMagherbin&type=revision&diff=1012148946&oldid=1012146903] [[User:Ayaltimo|Ayaltimo]] ([[User talk:Ayaltimo|talk]]) 21:36, 04 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
: Ayaltimo keeps defending Ragnimo's edits who is now blocked for socking and I was reverting their disruption across several articles [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ragnimo] Ayaltimo and Ragnimo have been harassing me for quite some time including personal attacks on talk pages see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AYusuf_bin_Ahmad_al-Kawneyn&type=revision&diff=990342983&oldid=990318379]. I warned the user [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAyaltimo&type=revision&diff=990890526&oldid=990316705] but it has continued [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAdal_Sultanate&type=revision&diff=1021373401&oldid=1021263240]. Ayaltimo now claims I made 4 reverts on the Adal Sultanate article when i've only reverted twice [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMagherbin&type=revision&diff=1021461284&oldid=1019214818] I've read the references in most of the articles in question and they do not state whats implied on the pages. This user and I are currently in a content dispute with an ongoing RFC, it is not going in Ayaltimo's favour hence this report. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sultanate_of_Ifat#Rfc:_What_is_the_origin_of_the_Ifat_Sultanate?]. We can continue to discuss on the talk pages, i'm fine with that, I had thought the user would understand the consensus from the RFC which clearly reveals users oppose the views held by Ayaltimo and Ragnimo sock [[User:Magherbin|Magherbin]] ([[User talk:Magherbin|talk]]) 21:52, 4 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
User violated 3RR yesterday, but had not received the talk page warning, so I warned them rather than report. They responded by indicating that [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Earl_of_Arundel&diff=prev&oldid=1257065932 they will not stop]. Editor is clearly viewing [[WP:ARBAP2]] as a [[WP:BATTLEGROUND]] – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 15:34, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::You kept removing sourced content and I kept restoring the revisions on Adal Sultanate like four times and some of them even were before when Ragnimo got banned. You have a habit of randomly removing sourced content and not discussing it on the talk page. You may not do it three times within 24 hours but you still do it regardless of how long it is and you think this is a way to avoid a warning. You are incredibly disruptive and you have been ever since you were unblocked from edit warring. Let the moderators review your behaviour because this cannot continue. [[User:Ayaltimo|Ayaltimo]] ([[User talk:Ayaltimo|talk]]) 23:28, 04 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:I was reverting attempts to suppress '''discussion''' on a '''talk page'''. The purpose of the 3RR is to prevent disruptive edits of articles (which I have respected). Moreover, your reversion [[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2024_United_States_presidential_election&diff=1257165212&oldid=1257164556]] of my [[Wikipedia:NPOV|NPOV]] revisions is just another example the kind of partisan-biased wording that is currently rampant across the project. [[User:Earl of Arundel|Earl of Arundel]] ([[User talk:Earl of Arundel|talk]]) 16:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::: I did not see you in the previous discussion I had with the sock puppet Ragnimo yet you claim I dont discuss my edits on the talk page. Read the talk pages carefully before making accusations [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Adal_Sultanate#Major_issues_with_this_article]. [[User:Magherbin|Magherbin]] ([[User talk:Magherbin|talk]]) 23:10, 4 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::Actually, 3RR applies to talk pages too. See [[WP:3RR]]. — '''[[User:Czello|<i style="color:#8000FF">Czello</i>]]''' <sup>''([[User talk:Czello|<i style="color:#8000FF">music</i>]])''</sup> 16:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::Yup. And I detailed what was wrong with the main page edit with wikipolicy. An [[WP:IDHT]] response calling it "partisan" is not promising for future collaboration. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 16:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::See exemption #4. Suppression of discussion is '''vandalism''': "On Wikipedia, vandalism has a very specific meaning: editing (or other behavior) deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose, which is to create a free encyclopedia, in a variety of languages, presenting the sum of all human knowledge.The malicious removal of encyclopedic content, or the changing of such content beyond all recognition, without any regard to our core content policies of neutral point of view (which does not mean no point of view), verifiability and no original research, is a deliberate attempt to damage Wikipedia." [[User:Earl of Arundel|Earl of Arundel]] ([[User talk:Earl of Arundel|talk]]) 16:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::I don't recognise the attempts to hat that discussion as suppression of discussion or vandalism. The discussion had descended into debates about whether Haitians eating people's pets, with spurious videos being posted as proof. This isn't constructive to the project. — '''[[User:Czello|<i style="color:#8000FF">Czello</i>]]''' <sup>''([[User talk:Czello|<i style="color:#8000FF">music</i>]])''</sup> 16:47, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*{{AN3|b|one week}}. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 16:58, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:2601:243:1A00:4510:D4:B6C6:C0D0:4EC7]] reported by [[User:Vipz]] (Result: /64 blocked three months) == |
|||
:::: When I undid your revision on 27 of April [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adal_Sultanate&type=revision&diff=1020192132&oldid=1020191366] you came back a week later making the same comments "see talk page" when you could've just tagged me. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adal_Sultanate&type=revision&diff=1021456041&oldid=1021447630] then you continued to edit war. You're very disruptive and you did the same thing on other pages. After you were blocked you should've learned your lesson so it's important I report your misconduct again. [[User:Ayaltimo|Ayaltimo]] ([[User talk:Ayaltimo|talk]]) 00:26, 05 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::::: I've explained why I removed the content, however the edit summary provided by you here is insufficient [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adal_Sultanate&type=revision&diff=1020192132&oldid=1020191366], and you have broken 3rr before and let off with a warning hence pretending otherwise is futile [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive422#User:Ayaltimo_reported_by_User:Magherbin_(Result:_Warnings)]. Even after that warning you continued editwarring but no action was taken [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive427#User:Ayaltimo_reported_by_User:Ragnimo_(Result:_)] My suggestion is to withdraw the case or risk a block as well. As I stated earlier I will not continue reverting and I have not violated 3RR. [[User:Magherbin|Magherbin]] ([[User talk:Magherbin|talk]]) 23:51, 4 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::::: [[User:Ayaltimo]] seems to have withdrawn per this edit [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FEdit_warring&type=revision&diff=1021489605&oldid=1021487058]. [[User:Magherbin|Magherbin]] ([[User talk:Magherbin|talk]]) 19:50, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::*'''Result:''' Withdrawn by the submitter, [[User:Ayaltimo]], per [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FEdit_warring&type=revision&diff=1021489605&oldid=1021487058 this edit]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 20:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Josip Broz Tito}} <br /> |
|||
== [[User:78.43.29.7]] reported by [[User:Poojean]] (Result: Partial block) == |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|2601:243:1A00:4510:D4:B6C6:C0D0:4EC7}} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [diff preferred, link permitted] |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Dersim rebellion}} |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|78.43.29.7}} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
||
On article [[Josip Broz Tito]]: |
|||
# {{diff2|1021478517|23:00, 4 May 2021 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 1021478265 by [[Special:Contributions/FDW777|FDW777]] ([[User talk:FDW777|talk]]) Adding a paragraph of what it is sometimes called isn't a really scientific way of propagating a topic. Please let's avoid adding terms which "some people" say to Wikipedia and focus on facts" |
|||
# [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive487#User:2601:243:1A00:4510:96E:83E1:3331:3B57 reported by User:Vipz (Result: /64 blocked for a week)|Diffs listed in the first report]] |
|||
# {{diff2|1021478149|22:56, 4 May 2021 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 1021477874 by [[Special:Contributions/FDW777|FDW777]] ([[User talk:FDW777|talk]])" |
|||
# [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive488#User:67.175.12.221 reported by User:Vipz (Result: Blocked 3 days)|Diffs listed in the second report]] |
|||
# {{diff2|1021477662|22:51, 4 May 2021 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 1021476882 by [[Special:Contributions/FDW777|FDW777]] ([[User talk:FDW777|talk]]) Adding a paragraph of what it is sometimes called isn't a really scientific way of propagating a topic. Please let's avoid adding terms which "some people" say to Wikipedia and focus on facts." |
|||
# [[Special:Diff/1257086742]] |
|||
# {{diff2|1021476621|22:42, 4 May 2021 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 1020700704 by [[Special:Contributions/Semsûrî|Semsûrî]] ([[User talk:Semsûrî|talk]])" |
|||
On article [[Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia]]: |
|||
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
|||
# [[Special:Diff/1257087517]] from [[Special:Diff/1253652929]] |
|||
# {{diff2|1021478354|22:58, 4 May 2021 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on [[:Dersim rebellion]]." |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [[Special:Diff/1257243658]] |
|||
'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [diff] |
|||
*'''Result:''' The IP editor, [[User:78.43.29.7]], has been partial-blocked from editing [[Dersim rebellion]] for two weeks by [[User:ToBeFree]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 20:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' [[Special:Diff/1254126495]]. |
|||
:Oh, thanks, I should have closed the report as well. I had probably found this via AIV. [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 20:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:Tony1811]] reported by [[User:KyleJoan]] (Result: Blocked) == |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Joy Behar}} <br /> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Tony1811}} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joy_Behar&type=revision&diff=1020896910&oldid=1020809542] |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joy_Behar&type=revision&diff=1021016872&oldid=1020953615] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joy_Behar&type=revision&diff=1021094910&oldid=1021044686] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joy_Behar&type=revision&diff=1021281155&oldid=1021128661] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joy_Behar&type=revision&diff=1021345166&oldid=1021322623] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joy_Behar&type=revision&diff=1021347181&oldid=1021345672] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joy_Behar&type=revision&diff=1021366244&oldid=1021348425] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joy_Behar&type=revision&diff=1021421386&oldid=1021399475] |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATony1811&type=revision&diff=1021324337&oldid=1021323092] |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tony1811&diff=prev&oldid=1021323092] |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page;''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATony1811&type=revision&diff=1021491536&oldid=1021346756] |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
||
See comments made in the previous report. Classic [[WP:BE|block evasion]]. Apart from the aforementioned two articles, [[Prime Minister of Yugoslavia]] has also become a target of this single-purpose IP hopper. –[[User:Vipz|Vipz]] ([[User talk:Vipz|talk]]) 23:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Tony1811 repeatedly included a BLP violation (i.e., criticism toward the subject when no source that exists mentions such criticism, not even the ones they cited). Sources they cited include a video from [[Newsmax]], a deprecated source; a ''[[Washington Examiner]]'' report via MSN, a source that {{tq|should not be used to substantiate exceptional claims}} per [[WP:RSP]]; [[LifeZette]], a questionable source; and [[Fox News]], which is {{tq|biased or opinionated for politics}} per RSP. Please let me reiterate as well that none of these sources even mention the criticism included in any capacity. They claimed that their violation of BLP policies was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKyleJoan&type=revision&diff=1021348169&oldid=1021001974 {{tq|part of a larger conversation around left-wing bias in the media}}] as well as {{tq|free speech issues}}. [[User:KyleJoan|<span style="font-family:Consolas; color:#CD8C95">'''K'''yle'''J'''oan</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:KyleJoan|<span style="font-family:Consolas; color:#8B6969">talk</span>]]</sup> 00:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:{{AN3|b|three months}} {{rangevandal|2601:243:1A00:4510:0:0:0:0/64}} [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 03:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User: |
== [[User:TypicallyRyan]] reported by [[User:Northern Moonlight]] (Result: Declined – malformed report) == |
||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks| |
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|The Voice (franchise)}} <br /> |
||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks| |
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|TypicallyRyan}} |
||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [ |
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [diff preferred, link permitted] |
||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
||
# |
# https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Voice_(franchise)&oldid=1257205985 |
||
# |
# https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Voice_(franchise)&oldid=1257206101 |
||
# https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Voice_(franchise)&oldid=1257206226 |
|||
# https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Voice_(franchise)&oldid=1257254774 |
|||
# https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Voice_(franchise)&oldid=1257255773 |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGaeltober&type=revision&diff=1020981948&oldid=1020981892] |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TypicallyRyan&oldid=1257256104 |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' n/a |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [diff] |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page;''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGaeltober&type=revision&diff=1021539464&oldid=1021481064] |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TypicallyRyan&oldid=1257207461 |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' [diff] |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
||
* Bonus: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:French20&diff=prev&oldid=1257255440 Falsely accusing me of being a bot]. [[User:Northern Moonlight|<span style="background-color:#f3f3fe;padding:2px 5px;border-radius:3px;white-space:nowrap">Northern Moonlight</span>]] 01:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Article is under a 1RR restriction per [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/The Troubles#Final remedies for AE case]]. I attempted to meet the user half-way by [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Martina_Anderson&type=revision&diff=1021473553&oldid=1021453728 retaining some of their addition], and also [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gaeltober&diff=prev&oldid=1021478949 twice] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gaeltober&diff=prev&oldid=1021480876 requested] they self-revert their 1RR breach, and in the latter request asked them to seek consensus for the change on the article's talk page. They refused to do so. [[User:FDW777|FDW777]] ([[User talk:FDW777|talk]]) 08:03, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*{{AN3|mr}} [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 01:01, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:TypicallyRyan]] reported by [[User:Northern Moonlight]] (Result: No violation) == |
|||
FDW777 has not attempted to "meet half way". He objected to "speculation" about Martina Anderson retiring, once the "speculation" was confirmed by Martina Anderson, he objected to the edit being too long. It was shortened. ~He then objects to the edit also saying why she is retiring. God knows why. The edit warring is his. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Gaeltober|Gaeltober]] ([[User talk:Gaeltober#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Gaeltober|contribs]]) 09:49, 5 May 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
*{{AN3|b}} – 31 hours for violation of the [[WP:TROUBLES]] 1RR restriction. The user was given a chance to self-revert but would not do so. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 20:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|The Voice (franchise)}} |
|||
== [[User:RossButsy]] reported by [[User:RPBG]] (Result: No action) == |
|||
''' |
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|TypicallyRyan}} |
||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|RossButsy}} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
||
# {{diff2|1257255773|00:47, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257255159|1257255159]] by [[Special:Contributions/Northern Moonlight|Northern Moonlight]] ([[User talk:Northern Moonlight|talk]]) Dude, I read your comment. You dont have a right to make any major changes like yours to an article YOU DONT OWN. Stop messing with it and leave it alone." |
|||
# {{diff2|1257254774|00:40, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257233603|1257233603]] by [[Special:Contributions/Northern Moonlight|Northern Moonlight]] ([[User talk:Northern Moonlight|talk]]) Listen man, don't mess with the article formatting. I didn't make this article in the first place. It was completely fine the way it was, and if you don't like it then don't bother lookin back on this page. But just please leave it." |
|||
# {{diff|oldid=1257205224|diff=1257206226|label=Consecutive edits made from 20:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC) to 20:02, 13 November 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
## {{diff2|1257205985|20:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Leave them the way they were, no use in getting rid of the colors. It helps people figure out when each season begins or ends." |
|||
## {{diff2|1257206101|20:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257201501|1257201501]] by [[Special:Contributions/Northern Moonlight|Northern Moonlight]] ([[User talk:Northern Moonlight|talk]]) Same with this one don't get rid of the hosts or coaches." |
|||
## {{diff2|1257206226|20:02, 13 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257201053|1257201053]] by [[Special:Contributions/Northern Moonlight|Northern Moonlight]] ([[User talk:Northern Moonlight|talk]]) Dont' get rid of the winners either, please leave them alone." |
|||
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
||
# {{diff2|1257256104|00:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
||
# {{diff2|1257207461|20:10, 13 November 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
||
* Bonus: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:French20&diff=prev&oldid=1257255440 Falsely accusing me of being a bot]. [[User:Northern Moonlight|<span style="background-color:#f3f3fe;padding:2px 5px;border-radius:3px;white-space:nowrap">Northern Moonlight</span>]] 01:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:I apologize for the comment. I shouldn't have said that. I was only trying to defend the article. But it's no excuse. [[User:TypicallyRyan|TypicallyRyan]] ([[User talk:TypicallyRyan|talk]]) 01:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::{{AN3|noex}} That series of three edits at the bottom is the original edit, not a revert. I would also note that the diff of "effort to resolve differences on the article talk page" is actually a diff of an edit to the reported user's talk page. That won't fly. Attempting to resolve differences on the article talk page (which has not been used for most of the year, much less recently) is to be greatly preferred as this is more conducive to other, previously uninvolved users getting into the discussion and reaching a consensus. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 03:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:{{re|RPBG}} Please engage in discussion at the article's talk page. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 21:03, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User: |
== [[User:Hanada12]] reported by [[User:Seawolf35 HGAV]] (Result: Declined) == |
||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks| |
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|1932 United States presidential election}} |
||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks| |
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Hanada12}} |
||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
||
# {{diff2|1257270024|02:14, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Name one candidate since 1932 that called their opponent a "fat capon" or a "chameleon in plaid."" |
|||
# {{diff2|1021545278|09:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)}} "Alright, it looks like the talks on the talk page are over. Here is the restored text with adjustments. If one would like to know where they can find more detailed info about what is covered in the lead in the article, they can consult the Geography section, the Economy section and/or the navbox. Glad this is over" |
|||
# {{diff2|1257269391|02:09, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Information and details about the campaign and contention between the candidates." |
|||
# {{diff|oldid=1021531642|diff=1021532015|label=Consecutive edits made from 06:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC) to 06:40, 5 May 2021 (UTC)}} |
|||
# {{diff2|1257268373|02:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257268163|1257268163]] by [[Special:Contributions/Jon698|Jon698]] ([[User talk:Jon698|talk]])" |
|||
## {{diff2|1021531816|06:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC)}} "Look at his contributions, all he does is revert peoples edits and he never contributes anything of value, its gonna be hard to get approval from this guy" |
|||
# {{diff2|1257268085|02:01, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "I think they are worthy of being in the article." |
|||
# {{diff2|1257263781|01:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "It provides more information about the campaign, so it does contribute to the article. Also, it was in an earlier version of the article." |
|||
# {{diff2|1021455674|20:04, 4 May 2021 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 1021454989 by [[Special:Contributions/Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677|talk]]) revert vandalism" |
|||
# {{diff2|1257232633|22:22, 13 November 2024 (UTC)}} "/* Campaign */" |
|||
# {{diff2|1021446128|19:04, 4 May 2021 (UTC)}} "thirteen provinces and territories, kuroshio current, english de facto, borders what, area, Vancouver population, politics" |
|||
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
||
# {{diff2| |
# {{diff2|1257269765|02:12, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on [[:1932 United States presidential election]]." |
||
# {{diff2|1021533177|06:51, 5 May 2021 (UTC)}} "/* May 2021 */ +" |
|||
'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
||
: The editor left this on my talk page as I slept before resuming the edit war: |
|||
:: I have noticed that you have are in an edit war, reverting good edits and citing false reasons for doing so. Like in the article, the paragraphs introduce resume and talk about: the less than 5% arable land that is used for farming, forestry and mining, cinematography, shipping, the real estate market, tourism, geography, climate, population size and area size. You can find this information in the article itself in the Economy section and the Geography section. Furthermore, the introduced texts revises the lead by making it neutral and straight-to-the point, creating a more encyclopedic leading text. Do you have any further questions or additions? [[User:Safyrr|Safyrr]] ([[User talk:Safyrr|talk]]) 07:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
: The editor decided to carry on a discussion on their own talk page rather than on the article's. This is what leads me to believe that the editor is new. [[User:Walter Görlitz|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz|talk]]) 16:17, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
||
Warned and then immediately reverted again. -- [[User:Seawolf35 HGAV|Seawolf35]] ([[User talk:Seawolf35 HGAV|talk]]) 02:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
: [Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring The reported editor thought that they could close the discussion]. [[User:Walter Görlitz|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz|talk]]) 19:12, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:: {{re|Walter Görlitz}} [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=1021611279&oldid=1021608917 That edit] is what made me decide to look into this user. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 19:14, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::: Odd. I thought I copied the link. I'm sorry that I failed to paste it in. The editor has been wikihounding me as well: reverting two explained reverts I made. I am currently opening a discussion on the first article's talk page. [[User:Walter Görlitz|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz|talk]]) 19:19, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:Has the other party been warned as well? I did not see any indication of this. Thank you. [[User:Hanada12|Hanada12]] ([[User talk:Hanada12|talk]]) 02:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{AN3|c}} I noticed the wikihounding. On the other hand, the user has been inactive for over an hour. I'm going to wait and see what they do next. I'm monitoring their contributions. If they participate civilly in talk page discussion, all is good. If they continue with edit warring or wikihounding, then I'm prepared to block them. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 19:22, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::I recognize I should have used the talk page, but the other party did the same thing I did and he was not warned, so I believe this demonstrates favoritism towards one side. [[User:Hanada12|Hanada12]] ([[User talk:Hanada12|talk]]) 02:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
** That is a reasonable approach. As I noted, they are likely a new, enthusiastic editor. [[:WP:AGF]], I recognize that the edits were an attempt to improve the article, even if it was not particularly well received or successful. I do not want to annoy someone who is earnestly attempting to improve Wikipedia. I do want the editor to start behaving in a more cooperative way. I noted on the article's talk page that it was a sincere effort to improve the article, and hope that we can collectively achieve this goal. [[User:Walter Görlitz|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz|talk]]) 19:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:::I just warned him. [[User:MessageApp|MessageApp]] ([[User talk:MessageApp|talk]]) 02:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Like Walter I think we have a new editor that wants to help. They just need to learn the wiki ways. ....that unfortunately is a huge learning curve. Think they are a bit younger....well then me a 60 year old. ....why? because they rely on websites over scholarly publications. They are doing well with additions regardless of minor problems formatting and sourcing preferences. We just need them to understand we have a process and that process is not fast.... we are not McDonald's we are any encyclopedia bulit by consensus. Let's get someone to welcome them with open arms and try to explain a little bit how things work. I would but my disability causes my grammar voice to text to be horrific. Pick 3 of a potential good editor here if we can just point them in the right direction <span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">[[User:Moxy|Moxy]]</span>-[[File:Maple Leaf (Pantone).svg|15px|link=User talk:Moxy]] 20:14, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::::Thank you. It would have been nice if it was done at the same time, to avoid showing favoritism to one side or the other. But I appreciate that you have now notified both sides. Thank you. [[User:Hanada12|Hanada12]] ([[User talk:Hanada12|talk]]) 02:21, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Also notifying [[User:Jon698]] as well, the other editor involved in this. -- [[User:Seawolf35 HGAV|Seawolf35]] ([[User talk:Seawolf35 HGAV|talk]]) 02:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Thank you. It would have been nice if it was done at the same time, to avoid showing favoritism to one side or the other. But I appreciate that you have now notified both sides. Thank you. [[User:Hanada12|Hanada12]] ([[User talk:Hanada12|talk]]) 02:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{AN3|d}} Hanada just created their account today (well, "today" by North American time) and as such could not reasonably be expected to have been aware of 3RR. They have also been very collegial here. But now that you know that you can't just revert away, Hanada, please behave accordingly. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 03:43, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::Thank you very much for your consideration. Yes, I was not aware of the rules and I was also shocked at the way the other member was coming at me. But I will be more careful next time, thank you again. [[User:Hanada12|Hanada12]] ([[User talk:Hanada12|talk]]) 05:51, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User: |
== [[User:108.44.242.138]] reported by [[User:MrOllie]] (Result: Blocked 24h) == |
||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks| |
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Modern monetary theory}} |
||
'''Users being reported:''' {{userlinks|Fredbasing}} and {{userlinks|148.252.133.24}} |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|108.44.242.138}} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Type_26_frigate&oldid=1018564605] |
|||
''' |
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Type_26_frigate&diff=1021580311&oldid=1021579580&diffmode=source] (as Fredbasing) |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Type_26_frigate&diff=prev&oldid=1021579567&diffmode=source] (as Fredbasing) |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Type_26_frigate&diff=prev&oldid=1021577558&diffmode=source] (as 148.252.133.24) |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Type_26_frigate&diff=prev&oldid=1021577130&diffmode=source] (as 148.252.133.24) |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Type_26_frigate&diff=prev&oldid=1021566379&diffmode=source] (as 148.252.133.24) |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:148.252.133.24&diff=1021577977&oldid=1021577147&diffmode=source] (DE warning) |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on user talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:80.5.170.11&diff=1019723717&oldid=1019722403&diffmode=source] (see comments) |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page;''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fredbasing&diff=1021605039&oldid=1021599603&diffmode=source] |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
|||
Edit amounts to removal of a significant amount of content. Was first attempted twice by way of another IP address on April 24 ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Type_26_frigate&diff=1019645283&oldid=1019630299&diffmode=source]). Seven edits in total, the last five linked above occur in the space of less than 2 hours. Reverted by 4 different editors, with repeated encouragement to use the the talk page, which this user couldn't have missed as they've shown they're quite familiar with edit summaries, using them extensively. (Also see the near identical summaries between the IP and registered accounts). User also familiar with EW policy, stopped at 3RR with the IP account, then created the user account and continued with the exact same reverts. This kind of policy-dodge should not be permitted. - [[User:Thewolfchild|<span style="color: black">wolf</span>]] 16:57, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Zero attempt at resolving the editing not attempt made in the talk page or information on why edits where being reverse however I have put into the information box why I was removing the unnecessary information from the page FredBasing 18:07 5 may 2021 (bst) <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Fredbasing|Fredbasing]] ([[User talk:Fredbasing#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Fredbasing|contribs]]) 17:07, 5 May 2021 (UTC)</span> |
|||
:Please don't delete part of the report, you can contest them here in the comments, (as you just have), but really, you should be trying to explain why you feel your repeated attempts to remove that content was justified, instead of leaving it be and discussing it as you were encouraged to do. (Not now, ''back then''). - [[User:Thewolfchild|<span style="color: black">wolf</span>]] 17:21, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
* {{AN3|p}} {{u|Fredbasing}} when multiple editors are reverting you it is you that needs to start discussion. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]], [[User talk:CambridgeBayWeather|Uqaqtuq (talk)]], [[Special:Contributions/CambridgeBayWeather|Huliva]] 04:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User: Derwood1558]] reported by [[User:Rockchalk717]] (Result: Partial Blocked 48 hours) == |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Will Parks}} <br /> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Derwood1558}} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Will_Parks&diff=1021627334&oldid=1021626794] |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
||
# {{diff2|1257369153|15:36, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257368995|1257368995]] by [[Special:Contributions/MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie|talk]])" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Will_Parks&diff=1021628240&oldid=1021627609] |
|||
# {{diff2|1257368802|15:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "As noted there is not consensus, if you continue you will be reported to the edit warring noticeboard I've already contacted all the people you have been defaming, and they agree you are basically defaming their work" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Will_Parks&diff=1021629390&oldid=1021628559] |
|||
# {{diff2|1257367786|15:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "removing that MMT supports a zero interest rate policy is POV pushing, sorry dude, it is supported by secondary sources" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Will_Parks&diff=1021636100&oldid=1021635091] |
|||
# {{diff2|1257364655|15:06, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1256886571|1256886571]] by [[Special:Contributions/MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie|talk]])" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Will_Parks&diff=1021636612&oldid=1021636235] |
|||
''' |
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
||
# {{diff2|1257368746|15:33, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule." |
|||
''' |
'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
||
# {{diff2|1257367145|15:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "/* This article is incredibly flawed and inaccurate - likely vandalized. */ Reply" |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page;''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Derwood1558&diff=1021637439&oldid=1021636752] |
|||
Pro-fringe pov pushing. Note that one of the edit summaries contains a threat about defamation. IP has also been calling other users vandals in the linked talk page discussion. [[User:MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie|talk]]) 15:39, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
|||
:User also threatened to edit war [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Derwood1558&diff=1021636228&oldid=1021635990 here]--<span style="background-color:blue; color:red;">'''Rockchalk'''</span>[[User:Rockchalk717|7]][[User talk:Rockchalk717|17]] 20:42, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*{{AN3|b|48 hours}} Partial blocked for 48 hours. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 20:59, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
MrOllie along with others have been defaming the works of a number of living MMT economists by implying they support universal tax increases as a primary response to inflation and that Murray Rothbard (who has been dead since 1995) has commented on MMT. The sources clearly establish a litany of ways MMT proposes to deal with inflation, both secondary and primary, and which are not limited to taxation. Recently New School NYC professor [https://www.andres-bernal.com/about Andrés Bernal], among others, have come to Wikipedia try to explain some of of this to Ollie and Avatar, but neglected to mention the secondary sources also support more than just taxation as a way to address inflation from an MMT framework. Additionally, 0 sources state the MMT support a universal tax increase to combat inflation, not even the out of context quote in the WSJ hit job, making that implication something between a misleading fabrication and WP:UNDUE for the lede. |
|||
== [[User:PostcolonialLitNerd<!-- Place the name of the user you are reporting here -->]] reported by [[User:Pikavoom]] (Result: ) == |
|||
Mr. Ollie and Avatar have been engaging in edit warring against a broad number of people for months, including people inside and outside academia, and have only referenced 1-2 sources throughout the whole ordeal compared to the nearly dozen plus WP:RS sources they've reverted with often no reason given. Rather than taking an honest look at the Vox, Bloomerg, and many other sources in question they prefer to try to find ways to ban as many people who disagree with them as possible, and then stating no RS was given in talk. The most recent phrase in question, specifically "According to MMT, governments do not need to worry about accumulating debt since they can pay interest by printing money" has actually had no proper source presented for it whatsoever, is contradicted by the included source in any version of the lede, and Ollie keeps acting like the lede is untouchable by anyone just because another IP hasn't presented RS. There's even a Bloomberg article where the founder of MMT founder specifically advocates against excessive interest payments because of inflation worries, and is why he advocates a 0 interest rate policy. [[Special:Contributions/108.44.242.138|108.44.242.138]] ([[User talk:108.44.242.138|talk]]) 15:46, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Priyamvada Gopal<!-- Place name of article here -->}} <br /> |
|||
:{{AN3|b|24 hours}} [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 21:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|PostcolonialLitNerd<!-- Place the name of the user you are reporting here -->}} |
|||
== [[User:5.107.87.236]] reported by [[User:Belbury]] (Result: Semi-protected one week) == |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1018834674&oldid=1018754017] (specifically ""Depending on your point of view, Priyamvada Gopal is either a warrior for racial justice or a professional victim with a persecution complex." quote and framing of controversies as "media attention") |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Malabar Muslims}} |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1018834674&oldid=1018754017 20 April] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1019043456&oldid=1018856132 21 April] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1019243026&oldid=1019242721 22 April] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1019256637&oldid=1019246962 22 April] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1019423019&oldid=1019368993 23 April] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1019755287&oldid=1019500272 25 April] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1020446177&oldid=1020205967 29 April] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1020630207&oldid=1020572541 30 April] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1021140772&oldid=1021140100 3 May] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1021529327&oldid=1021327729 5 May] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1021554996&oldid=1021530803 5 May] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1021686848&oldid=1021575791 6 May] |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|5.107.87.236}} |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PostcolonialLitNerd&diff=1019425288&oldid=1018237765] |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Priyamvada_Gopal#Goebbels_comment this section and below] |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page;''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PostcolonialLitNerd&diff=prev&oldid=1021703405] |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> This is slow edit warring against multiple users, PostcolonialLitNerd is the only one reverting this version in and is reverted by myself, [[User:Ohnoitsjamie]], [[User:Xxanthippe]], [[User:Atchom]], and [[User:15]]. PostcolonialLitNerd might not have reached 4 reverts in 24 hours, but they've got up to 3 reverts a couple of times and has reached something like twelve reverts total on this content. |
|||
Furthermore, PostcolonialLitNerd is a [[WP:SPA]] that only edits this article, see: [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Priyamvada Gopal]] and the user's talk page where multiple users have raised concerns about their involvement. |
|||
In addition, PostcolonialLitNerd has been combative against other users and BLP journalists on talk and has engaged in blatant canvassing on the talk page with selective pings ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1018436305&oldid=1018237608], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1019422351&oldid=1019368683] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1019755823&oldid=1019500914 "I will continue to revert edits that are malign and foolish"], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1020976299&oldid=1020651068], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1020976675&oldid=1020976299 "was mindlessly restored by 15"]). The user has persisted in canvassing despite warnings ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1018442598&oldid=1018438146], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Priyamvada_Gopal&diff=1019500914&oldid=1019433606]) [[User:Pikavoom|Pikavoom]] ([[User talk:Pikavoom|talk]]) 06:24, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment'''. I too am concerned about the behavior here. [[User:PostcolonialLitNerd]] has made around 100 edits in their Wikipedia career. Everyone of them has been about [[Priyamvada_Gopal]] and many of them have been reverts of consensus views. There is not a ''single edit'' outside this subject. I conclude that [[User:PostcolonialLitNerd]] is not here to build a neutral encyclopedia but to fight one side of a particular political battle. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 08:09, 6 May 2021 (UTC). |
|||
*'''Comment'''. I agree with what everyone has said above and shall not rehash the contents at undue length. PostcolonialLitNerd is a belligerent SPA who has engaged in blatant canvassing (despite being warned several times by several users), and who appears to be set on waging a war of attrition against all of the other editors involved (who are by no means in agreement about many issues) until they get their way. This is not simply a case of an over-enthusiastic editor feeling possessive about the page as per [[WP:OWN]], but a case of blatant bad faith editing. [[User:Atchom|Atchom]] ([[User talk:Atchom|talk]]) 16:36, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' Endorse block; continued edit-warring after numerous warnings, [[WP:BATTLEGROUND]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 23:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' I want to take this opportunity to point out that [[User:Pikavoom|Pikavoom]], [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]], [[User:Ohnoitsjamie|Ohnoitsjamie]] and [[User:Atchom|Atchom]] have made no attempt to understand the legitimate objection I have to their edits. Moreover, it's instructive to note that the complainants have repeatedly reintroduced a slur and personal attack against Gopal into the article without consensus and in the face of opposition by other editors. The offending material reads: {{xt|"warrior for racial justice or a professional victim with a persecution complex"}} & {{xt|"the Torquemada of the New Woke Inquisition"}}. These remarks are not presented 'responsibly, conservatively, and in a disinterested tone'. It's abusive and in contravention of [[WP:BLPBALANCE]] policy. [[User:Pikavoom|Pikavoom]], [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]], [[User:Ohnoitsjamie|Ohnoitsjamie]] and [[User:Atchom|Atchom]] have continued to revert to these comments. That was and continues to be my primary objection. Anyone who sets out to introduce material that unreasonably and abusively paints the subject in a less than favourable light is not fit to edit articles on Wikipedia. There are other minor content disputes covered on the talk page. I strongly encourage Administrators to read my edit summaries and comments on the talk page. I have carefully explained my changes and attempted to uphold Wikipedia's content policies. It is appropriate to revert changes that have not achieved consensus or contravene Wikipedia's policies and standards. Other editors have been supportive and thanked me for my edits. [[User:PostcolonialLitNerd|PostcolonialLitNerd]] ([[User talk:PostcolonialLitNerd|talk]]) 07:12, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:95.235.96.59]] reported by [[User:Ghmyrtle]] (Result: 31h) == |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Britain (place name)}} <br /> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|95.235.96.59}} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Britain_(place_name)&oldid=1017125242] |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
||
# {{diff2|1257392721|17:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "sanghi vandalism by IP 207.96.13.12. Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257392475|1257392475]] by [[Special:Contributions/207.96.13.12|207.96.13.12]] ([[User talk:207.96.13.12|talk]])" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Britain_%28place_name%29&type=revision&diff=1021547109&oldid=1017125242] |
|||
# {{diff2|1257392341|17:56, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "indian sanghi vandalism. Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257392239|1257392239]] by [[Special:Contributions/207.96.13.12|207.96.13.12]] ([[User talk:207.96.13.12|talk]])" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Britain_(place_name)&diff=1021547375&oldid=1021547325] |
|||
# {{diff2|1257392103|17:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "indian sanghi vandalismUndid revision [[Special:Diff/1257391973|1257391973]] by [[Special:Contributions/207.96.13.12|207.96.13.12]] ([[User talk:207.96.13.12|talk]])" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Britain_(place_name)&diff=1021550312&oldid=1021549728] |
|||
# {{diff2|1257390871|17:47, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "vandalism. Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257389432|1257389432]] by [[Special:Contributions/207.96.13.12|207.96.13.12]] ([[User talk:207.96.13.12|talk]])" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Britain_(place_name)&diff=1021702381&oldid=1021642415] |
|||
# {{diff2|1257379654|16:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257379424|1257379424]] by [[Special:Contributions/207.96.13.12|207.96.13.12]] ([[User talk:207.96.13.12|talk]])" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Britain_(place_name)&diff=1021703057&oldid=1021702916] |
|||
# {{diff2|1257379308|16:36, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257379058|1257379058]] by [[Special:Contributions/207.96.13.12|207.96.13.12]] ([[User talk:207.96.13.12|talk]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|1257378525|16:31, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257377410|1257377410]] by [[Special:Contributions/ItTollsForThee|ItTollsForThee]] ([[User talk:ItTollsForThee|talk]])" |
|||
# {{diff|oldid=1257376053|diff=1257377307|label=Consecutive edits made from 16:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC) to 16:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
## {{diff2|1257376905|16:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
## {{diff2|1257377307|16:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
# {{diff|oldid=1257353953|diff=1257374351|label=Consecutive edits made from 15:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC) to 16:06, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
## {{diff2|1257367227|15:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
## {{diff2|1257374351|16:06, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
''' |
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
||
# {{diff2|1257392767|17:59, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on [[:Malabar Muslims]]." |
|||
''' |
'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
||
# {{diff2|1257377952|16:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC) on Talk:Malabar Muslims}} "/* Mappila are descendants of lower caste hindus */ new section" |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page;''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:95.235.96.59&diff=1021704297&oldid=1021703041] |
|||
Edit warring with [[User:207.96.13.12]] (who has also gone beyond 3RR after a warning). 207.96.13.12 opened a talk page thread but the other IP has not responded. [[User:Belbury|Belbury]] ([[User talk:Belbury|talk]]) 18:02, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
|||
*The article has been semi-protected for one week by another admin.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 18:10, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Blocked for 31h for disruptive editing'''. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 07:35, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User: |
== [[User:5.59.181.17]] reported by [[User:Ymblanter]] (Result: Blocked 24 hours) == |
||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks| |
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Nikolai Sudzilovsky}} <br /> |
||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks| |
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|5.59.181.17}} |
||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= |
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikolai_Sudzilovsky&diff=prev&oldid=1253828441] |
||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= |
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikolai_Sudzilovsky&diff=prev&oldid=1257400603] + [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikolai_Sudzilovsky&diff=prev&oldid=1257401449] |
||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= |
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikolai_Sudzilovsky&diff=prev&oldid=1257404386] |
||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= |
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikolai_Sudzilovsky&diff=prev&oldid=1257408006] |
||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title= |
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikolai_Sudzilovsky&diff=prev&oldid=1257409754] |
||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sreejith_Panickar&type=revision&diff=1021706863&oldid=1021686086] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sreejith_Panickar&type=revision&diff=1021706863&oldid=1021686086] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sreejith_Panickar&type=revision&diff=1021748506&oldid=1021713290] |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:5.59.181.17&diff=prev&oldid=1257409392], also gave them a contentious topics alert |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' The talk page has a discussion on the topic from 2008, but, well, who reads talk pages. |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
|||
Unsourced words being newly inserted are *right-wing*, *insensitive*, *misogynistic*, *uncivilized*, *communal* etc. |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:5.59.181.17&diff=prev&oldid=1257413119] |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASreejith_Panickar&type=revision&diff=1021713155&oldid=1021710345] |
|||
Warnings were issued to this user on their Talk page by two users including me. All he did was to use abusive and obscene vernacular in his reply and a threat that the edits will continue. The article Talk page is now updated with details. |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page;''' |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAnjo_James&type=revision&diff=1021165214&oldid=1021160829] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAnjo_James&type=revision&diff=1021685849&oldid=1021635023] |
|||
Done. |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
||
* The IP is edit-warring trying to insert nationalistic bullshit into an article on a contentious topic. Their only conclusion was that I am a "Russian editor".[[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter|talk]]) 19:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Person was warned multiple times by multiple users on their Talk page. But the person replied in abusive and vulgar language with a threat they would repeat the edits. |
|||
*{{AN3|b|24 hours}}. I have also warned the IP about their nationalistic aspersions. [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] (<sup>[[User talk:Ivanvector|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ivanvector|Edits]]</sub>) 20:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
[[User:Jstore Master|Jstore Master]] ([[User talk:Jstore Master|talk]]) 07:41, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
: |
*:I have added a CTOPS notice (ARBEE) to the talk page. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 22:03, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
||
::Done. Thanks. [[User:Jstore Master|Jstore Master]] ([[User talk:Jstore Master|talk]]) 07:56, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:Belevalo]] reported by [[User:Nick-D]] (Result: ) == |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Special Air Service Regiment}} <br /> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Belevalo }} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special_Air_Service_Regiment&oldid=1018274496] |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special_Air_Service_Regiment&type=revision&diff=1021269230&oldid=1020854093] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special_Air_Service_Regiment&type=revision&diff=1021400793&oldid=1021393512] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special_Air_Service_Regiment&type=revision&diff=1021551748&oldid=1021548414] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special_Air_Service_Regiment&oldid=prev&diff=1021564432] |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABelevalo&type=revision&diff=1021551852&oldid=1021393668] |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' Discussion at: [[Talk:Special Air Service Regiment#War crimes & introduction]], which Belevalo commented in before their most recent revert [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASpecial_Air_Service_Regiment&type=revision&diff=1021552965&oldid=1021550365] and has since commented in without reverting themselves [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASpecial_Air_Service_Regiment&type=revision&diff=1021589323&oldid=1021582655] |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page;''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABelevalo&type=revision&diff=1021722147&oldid=1021575466] |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
|||
This is a report of prolonged edit warring despite the editor being aware there was a talk page discussion, rather than a 3RR violation. As shown by [[User talk:Belevalo]], they have been warned multiple times for disruptive editing over recent weeks in related articles. [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 09:32, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*They have literally reverted twice following the 3RR warning. Four in 24, not good. [[Special:contributions/Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:#960303">'''——'''</span>]][[User talk:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:blue">'''S'''erial</span>]] 13:00, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
**This is not an isolated incident. This user's [[Special:Contributions/Belevalo|history]] shows multiple disputes, with multiple editors on multiple pages, including slow edits wars, personal attacks and refusal to engage. (fyi) - [[User:Thewolfchild|<span style="color: black">wolf</span>]] 15:21, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
***Oooh. Even less good. Depending on what happens here, AN/I incoming. [[Special:contributions/Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:#960303">'''——'''</span>]][[User talk:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:blue">'''S'''erial</span>]] 16:01, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*The 4 reverts span 40 hours so there is no 3RR violation; I would defer to the above-mentioned ANI. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 16:07, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::What did Nick-D say, {{u|Stifle}}? [[Special:contributions/Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:#960303">'''——'''</span>]][[User talk:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:blue">'''S'''erial</span>]] 16:32, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
There is no ANI report. I'd be grateful if an admin could action this report ({{ping|Stifle}}). [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 09:11, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:Newtlamender]] reported by [[User:TriiipleThreat]] (Result: ) == |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Marvel Cinematic Universe}} <br /> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Newtlamender}} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marvel_Cinematic_Universe&oldid=1021696621] |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marvel_Cinematic_Universe&diff=prev&oldid=1021788844] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marvel_Cinematic_Universe&diff=prev&oldid=1021782361] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marvel_Cinematic_Universe&diff=prev&oldid=1021780083] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marvel_Cinematic_Universe&diff=prev&oldid=1021791226] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marvel_Cinematic_Universe&diff=prev&oldid=1021792065] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marvel_Cinematic_Universe&diff=prev&oldid=1021794388] |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANewtlamender&type=revision&diff=1021790037&oldid=1016231673] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANewtlamender&action=historysubmit&type=revision&diff=1021793869&oldid=1021790673] |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AMarvel_Cinematic_Universe&type=revision&diff=1021792489&oldid=1021440560] |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page;''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANewtlamender&action=historysubmit&type=revision&diff=1021796491&oldid=1021793869] |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
|||
User has continued to edit war despite warnings from multiple users.—[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 18:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
'''Comment:''' Just noting that user wanted to resolve the issue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Marvel Cinematic Universe|here]]. Since I am neutral I would recommend an actual consensus this time. Since his last discussion didn’t have results.[[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 19:03, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:Just pointing out that this attempt was made after repeated warnings and posting on this noticeboard.--[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 19:13, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
::In my defense, until TriiipleThreat revealed to me the other means that could be used to end the discussion, I didn't know about them. When I did, I looked into ending this discussion trough these means, and stop reverting the edits. — [[User:Newtlamender|Newtlamender]] ([[User talk:Newtlamender|talk]]) 17:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:::I appreciate that. [[Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers|I didn’t mean to bite]] because you might be new. Hopefully you editors come as a compromise or something. [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 21:58, 6 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{yo|Newtlamender}} then how do you explain the reverts you made ''after'' your were warned against further edit warring? Or your [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Newtlamender&diff=next&oldid=1021790037&diffmode=source response] to the warning? And this isn't about "ending a discussion" (which btw is ''still'' [[WP:DTS|ongoing]]), it's about the reverts you continually chose to make, despite multiple warnings from multiple editors, both on talk pages and in edit summaries. - [[User:Thewolfchild|<span style="color: black">wolf</span>]] 03:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:Kolya77]], [[User:Redrose64]], [[User:Parquito98]] reported by [[User:EnLarissais]] (Result: )== |
|||
Τhese users have reverted my edits at the following articles: |
|||
*[[2020-21 Moldovan Cup]] |
|||
*[[Kent and East Sussex Railway]] |
|||
*[[2020-21 Slovak Cup]]--[[User:EnLarissais|EnLarissais]] ([[User talk:EnLarissais|talk]]) 05:40, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User: |
== [[User:92.53.13.55]] reported by [[User:StephenMacky1]] (Result: Blocked 1 week; page protected for a month) == |
||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks| |
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Šar Mountains}} |
||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks| |
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|92.53.13.55}} |
||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
||
# {{diff2|1257596419|19:22, 15 November 2024 (UTC)}} "No I see coordinated attack and bully from organized Bulgarian internet brigade. Why are you constantly obsessed with my country? And despite giving practical source you are still vandalising the page. If bigger Wikipedia moderators tolerate this let it be but individuals like these are destroying this website credibility. Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257595118|1257595118]] by [[Special:Contributions/StephenMacky1|StephenMacky1]] ([[User talk:StephenMacky1|talk]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|1021886729|06:41, 7 May 2021 (UTC)}} "This is not relevant to any topic…" |
|||
# {{diff2|1257590170|18:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Please explain how this is vandalism. It would be required against you indeed. Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257589859|1257589859]] by [[Special:Contributions/Jingiby|Jingiby]] ([[User talk:Jingiby|talk]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|1021866260|03:16, 7 May 2021 (UTC)}} "This is not relevant at all (how is this a current event)? Stop removing my rightful edits" |
|||
# {{diff2|1257589545|18:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)}} "It is an improvement because ~56% of Shara belongs to N. Macedonia and the local context is missing out, btw I live on the mountain and you can check it by the IP. Anyway I added a practical source Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257588676|1257588676]] by [[Special:Contributions/Jingiby|Jingiby]] ([[User talk:Jingiby|talk]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|1021854270|01:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)}} "This is not relevant" |
|||
# {{diff2|1257587387|18:19, 15 November 2024 (UTC)}} "As it writes this is Macedonian tradition and I added the local context about the name because it missed out in the article and it is well known among population here, you don't need academic sources but can simply check it in Google Translate. Just tried to use my knowledge and contribute to a better content :) Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257583073|1257583073]] by [[Special:Contributions/StephenMacky1|StephenMacky1]] ([[User talk:StephenMacky1|talk]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|1021825857|21:58, 6 May 2021 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
# {{diff2|1257582346|17:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Added English source Undid revision [[Special:Diff/1257573778|1257573778]] by [[Special:Contributions/Βατο|Βατο]] ([[User talk:Βατο|talk]])" |
|||
# {{diff2|1021807444|19:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
||
| Line 544: | Line 358: | ||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
||
Persistent edit warring and also making personal attacks. Note that the IP is also partially blocked for edit warring. [[User:StephenMacky1|StephenMacky1]] ([[User talk:StephenMacky1|talk]]) 19:26, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{AN3|b|1 week}}. {{ping|StephenMacky1}}, the IP is not partially blocked [[User:Ponyo|<span style="color: Navy;">'''Ponyo'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Ponyo|<span style="color: Navy;">''bons mots''</span>]]</sup> 19:36, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:All right. Thank you. Must have been some sort of error then. [[User:StephenMacky1|StephenMacky1]] ([[User talk:StephenMacky1|talk]]) 19:54, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Ponyo also protected the article for a month. I have added a CTOPS notice to the talk page [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 22:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User: |
== [[User:Ship man five]] reported by [[User:RachelTensions]] (Result: Blocked 48 hours) == |
||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks| |
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Saint John, New Brunswick}} |
||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Generalsagar}} |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Ship man five}} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
||
# {{diff2|1257639855|23:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_pandemic_in_India&diff=prev&oldid=1020975830 05:30, 2 May 2021 diff hist +1,106 COVID-19 pandemic in India →2021] - The edit he made over which he is edit warring. |
|||
# {{diff2|1257604862|20:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_pandemic_in_India&diff=prev&oldid=1020984288 07:11, 2 May 2021 diff hist +1,106 COVID-19 pandemic in India Undid revision 1020982987 by ViperSnake151 (talk)] |
|||
# {{diff2|1257594380|19:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_pandemic_in_India&diff=prev&oldid=1021376466 11:27, 4 May 2021 diff hist +1,107 COVID-19 pandemic in India →2021] |
|||
# {{diff2|1257563930|15:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_pandemic_in_India&diff=prev&oldid=1021695624 05:01, 6 May 2021 diff hist −204 COVID-19 pandemic in India →2021] |
|||
# {{diff2|1257557462|15:10, 15 November 2024 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_pandemic_in_India&diff=prev&oldid=1021859114 02:14, 7 May 2021 diff hist −207 COVID-19 pandemic in India Undid revision 1021853684 by Yoonadue (talk)] |
|||
# {{diff2|1257340351|12:15, 14 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Insignificant information to be used as a introduction. The cities are nominally different in size. Outdated population numbers." |
|||
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_pandemic_in_India&diff=1021875448&oldid=1021872579 04:58, 7 May 2021 Generalsagar talk contribs 178,953 bytes −208 →2021: Butt-hurt Modi bhakts are removing the facts] |
|||
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_pandemic_in_India&diff=prev&oldid=1021894583 curprev 08:01, 7 May 2021 Generalsagar talk contribs 178,953 bytes −208 →2021: Readers need to know the facts and it appears that Modi's PR machinery is deleting it.] |
|||
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' {{diff2|1257604798}} |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Generalsagar&diff=1021861855&oldid=1021220852] |
|||
''' |
'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
||
# {{diff2|1257621699|22:00, 15 November 2024 (UTC)}} "/* Edit war */ Reply" |
|||
Making edits against the consensus held [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:COVID-19_pandemic_in_India#Criticism_of_Modi_holding_campaign_rallies on talk page]. |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page;''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Generalsagar#May_2021] |
|||
*{{AN3|b|48 hours}}. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 00:35, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:WickedFanAccount]] reported by [[User:Happily888]] (Result: ) == |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> User has less than 300 edits in 10 years. With talk page full of warning, unresponsive attitude and offensive edit summaries[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_pandemic_in_India&diff=1021875448&oldid=1021872579][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_pandemic_in_India&diff=prev&oldid=1021894583] this user is a case of [[WP:NOTHERE]]. [[User:Srijanx22|Srijanx22]] ([[User_talk:Srijanx22|talk]]) 07:15, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Wicked (2024 film)}} |
|||
== [[User:Egeymi]] reported by [[User:194.103.189.16]] (Result: ) == |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|WickedFanAccount}} |
|||
'''Page:'''[[Do_Rzeczy|Do Rzeczy]] <br /> |
|||
'''User being reported:''' [[User:Egeymi|Egeymi]] |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' [diff preferred, link permitted] |
|||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Do_Rzeczy&diff=1021906074&oldid=1021903285] |
|||
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Do_Rzeczy&diff=next&oldid=1021171147] |
|||
'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' [link] |
|||
'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' [diff] |
|||
[[User:Egeymi|Egeymi]] ignores the sources, the references do not match text on the page at all.The text is simply false and based on personal opinions.<br /> |
|||
(One source links to a Press.pl publication by a journalist from a rival - both economically and ideologically - newspaper. The publication is not about the Do Rzeczy, but about its chief editor. It is not neutral!) |
|||
This topic is treated as a private blog. Just check the sources and versions of this topic in other languages. |
|||
[[User:Egeymi|Egeymi]] keeps things that way by undoing all corrections. |
|||
<!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:194.103.189.16|194.103.189.16]] ([[User talk:194.103.189.16#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/194.103.189.16|contribs]]) </span> |
|||
'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page;''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Egeymi] |
|||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br /> |
|||
: I just keep the original text. IP user should provide other sources showing the statements that s/he does not like are incorrect instead of deleting these. [[User:Egeymi|Egeymi]] ([[User talk:Egeymi|talk]]) 13:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
<br /><b> |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/194.103.189.16|194.103.189.16]] ([[User talk:194.103.189.16|talk]]) 14:33, 7 May 2021 (UTC) Answers: </b> |
|||
- Please check existing references: |
|||
#2 Is about is about the career of a chief editor - Lisicki. Name of the newspaper is Do Rzeczy - it means To the point. The publication′s title is Od Rzeczy - it means opposite. Publication is not neutral. |
|||
#6 VoxEurop says Do Rzeczy is Conservative and liberal [https://voxeurop.eu/en/source/do-rzeczy-2/] |
|||
# Currently deleted link to Eurotopics wich says Do Rzeczy is Conservative [https://www.eurotopics.net/en/148616/do-rzeczy].<br /> |
|||
On the English Do_Rzeczy page in Wikipedia is |
|||
# ultra-conservative,[2] |
|||
#Catholic fundamentalist[2] and |
|||
#right-wing populist, |
|||
#Right-wing populist to far-right[1][2]. |
|||
It is clearly sombody′s personal opinions. We cannot use a single publication by a single opposition columnist and ignore the numerous other sources that say otherwise. |
|||
On Polish and Russian is conservative-liberal, socio-political. |
|||
My point is that the existing references do not support the text on the Wikipedia page. |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/194.103.189.16|194.103.189.16]] ([[User talk:194.103.189.16|talk]]) 14:33, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:Fram]] reported by [[User:Tom.Reding]] (Result: ) == |
|||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Template:Authority control (arts)}} |
|||
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Fram}} |
|||
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
'''Previous version reverted to:''' |
||
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
'''Diffs of the user's reverts:''' |
||
# {{diff2|1257694753|05:46, 16 November 2024 (UTC)}} "This is a change I made before you came in. YOU need to start the discussion. Not me. Part I is not a subtitle" |
|||
# {{diff2|1021934428|13:59, 7 May 2021 (UTC)}} "Restored revision 1021927364 by [[Special:Contributions/Fram|Fram]] ([[User talk:Fram|talk]]): Perfectly working version, nothing is disrupted, and an RfC gets easier by using this." |
|||
# {{diff2|1257687471|04:53, 16 November 2024 (UTC)}} "No colon as per source AND sequel title" |
|||
# {{diff2|1021927364|13:02, 7 May 2021 (UTC)}} "Reverted edits by [[Special:Contribs/Pigsonthewing|Pigsonthewing]] ([[User talk:Pigsonthewing|talk]]) to last version by Fram" |
|||
# {{diff2| |
# {{diff2|1257675209|03:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)}} "no colon in onscreen title" |
||
# {{diff2|1256623730|20:39, 10 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Onscreen title AND source both use a Roman numeral" |
|||
# {{diff2|1256503377|06:37, 10 November 2024 (UTC)}} "I did." |
|||
# {{diff2|1256472319|02:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
# {{diff2|1256470288|02:13, 10 November 2024 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
# {{diff2|1256469371|02:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)}} "" |
|||
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' |
||
# {{diff2|1256470336|02:13, 10 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Message re. [[Wicked (2024 film)]] ([[Wikipedia:HG|HG]]) (3.4.12)." |
|||
# {{diff2|1257676575|03:33, 16 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Welcome to Wikipedia!" |
|||
# {{diff2|1257688166|04:59, 16 November 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on [[:Wicked (2024 film)]]." |
|||
'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' |
||
# |
# {{diff2|1257715226|08:30, 16 November 2024 (UTC)}} "/* Wicked Part I or Wicked: Part I */ re" |
||
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
<u>'''Comments:'''</u> |
||
persistent vandalism and disregarding of MOS/NC; frequent edit warring. Also [[WP:SPA]]. [[User:Happily888|Happily888]] ([[User talk:Happily888|talk]]) 05:58, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)&diff=1021913451&oldid=1021912410&diffmode=source Warning 1], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)&diff=next&oldid=1021915051&diffmode=source warning 2] <b>~</b> <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">[[User:Tom.Reding|Tom.Reding]] ([[User talk:Tom.Reding|talk]] ⋅[[WP:DGAF|dgaf]])</span> 14:22, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
* Recent and longterm disruptive editing re [[Authority control]] related topics I think warrant a [[WP:TBAN]]. <b>~</b> <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">[[User:Tom.Reding|Tom.Reding]] ([[User talk:Tom.Reding|talk]] ⋅[[WP:DGAF|dgaf]])</span> 14:25, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
* Let the record show that this was a contribution I made. Changing a "1" to a "I" as per the source listed and newfound information. Someone else added in the colon. I was told I had to start a discussion to get it changed. Why do *I* have to be the one to disscuss? Shouldn't the person who MADE the change do that? [[User:WickedFanAccount|WickedFanAccount]] ([[User talk:WickedFanAccount|talk]]) 11:06, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*Two issues, the reverts and the "long-term disruptive editing warranting a topic ban". |
|||
**As can be seen, the "attempt to resolve the dispute" was objecting to the use of a sandbox for this purpose. Therefor, I moved it to a live environment instead; No further attempts to resolve this were made, only reverts by people opposed to this template and this change in general. |
|||
**The long-term disruptive editing (no evidence presented at all for this requested topic ban!) is= |
|||
***The creation of [[Template:ACArt]], which was nominated for deletion but kept |
|||
***The creation of an RfC about a new look for authority control, which was widely supported and closed as supported on 1 April |
|||
***The discussion of the implementation of this RfC, where every attempt was made to incorporate reasonable objections and suggestions of the three most vocal and strident opposers of the RfC |
|||
***The start of an RfC about the implementation of the RfC, which was requested by 2 of the 3 opposers of the original RfC, but when it was opened was described as "Forumshopping" by Tom.Reding (how an RfC at VPP to get wider input on a template being discussed at the template talk page, and following on from an RfC on that same VPP, can be forumshopping, is not clear). |
|||
**Note that this EW was started at 14.22, nearly 30 minutes ''after'' I informed Tom.Reding about an ANI discussion about these issues. For someone who cares so much about Forumshopping, it certainly looks poor form to ask for a topic ban here and now without any evidence except the current reverts. Please give them a boomerang trout and refer further discussion to ANI. [[User:Fram|Fram]] ([[User talk:Fram|talk]]) 14:35, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
***What does an AN/I notification have to do with your [[WP:3RR]] violation? <b>~</b> <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">[[User:Tom.Reding|Tom.Reding]] ([[User talk:Tom.Reding|talk]] ⋅[[WP:DGAF|dgaf]])</span> 14:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
***I can't help but think you informed relevant parties of the AN/I discussion ([[Special:Diff/1021934020|1]], [[Special:Diff/1021934085|2]], [[Special:Diff/1021934137|3]]) TWO minutes prior to [[Special:Diff/1021934428|3RR'ing]]. Kinda seems intentional, as if you thought that would absolve you of [[WP:3RR]] (of which I had no part, mind you). <b>~</b> <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">[[User:Tom.Reding|Tom.Reding]] ([[User talk:Tom.Reding|talk]] ⋅[[WP:DGAF|dgaf]])</span> 15:06, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*This (and the ANI report, and the RFCs and VPP discussions and everything else) is too complicated for me to look at, but I do want to nip one thing in the bud, before any more electrons are spilled. ''We don't do topic bans here.'' Someone will be along, I'm sure, to review the edit warring issue, but any time spent by either side about the topic ban here is time wasted. If a topic ban discussion is a good use of time - and I have no opinion on that - it should be done at ANI. --[[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam|talk]]) 15:12, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*Fram had a recent 3RR violation last month as well, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive432#User:Fram_reported_by_User:Mike_Peel_(Result:_Advice) April 2021], regarding another template that interacts with Wikidata. <b>~</b> <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">[[User:Tom.Reding|Tom.Reding]] ([[User talk:Tom.Reding|talk]] ⋅[[WP:DGAF|dgaf]])</span> 16:06, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
**While I (or anyone else) shouldn't edit war, you are aware that a 3RR violation is normally when you have 4 (or more) reverts, not when you have 3 reverts? [[User:Fram|Fram]] ([[User talk:Fram|talk]]) 16:16, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
***Oh, so you've admitted to [[WP:Gaming the system]]. If it looks like an edit war, and walks like an edit war, [[WP:DUCK|it's an edit war]]. <b>~</b> <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">[[User:Tom.Reding|Tom.Reding]] ([[User talk:Tom.Reding|talk]] ⋅[[WP:DGAF|dgaf]])</span> 17:20, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 11:06, 16 November 2024
| Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard | ||
|---|---|---|
|
This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.
You must notify any user you have reported. You may use
Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.
Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
| ||
User:AirshipJungleman29 reported by User:176.88.165.232 (Result: declined)
[edit]Page: Khwarezmian Empire (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [4]
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]
Comments:
Does not raise any objection on talk page. My contribution came with 3 different sources, 2 of which corraborates the first one. 1 from official government website and 1 from academic paper (which was available online and in English, link attached to the citation). but Airshipjungleman29 did not raise any objection even though I invited him both on talk page and in edit-summary panel. Just kept edit warring without raising any objection 176.88.165.232 (talk) 20:29, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- The most important part is that, I assert, AirshipJungleman29's behaviour is political: In the current version of the article, the section "Culture, the section he was sabotaging is unsourcedly attributed to Persians: when a content is attributed to Persians without a source, AirshipJungleman29 and HistoryofIran do not dispute it but when triple sourced content attributes the culture into Turkmens, HistoryofIran and AirshipJungleman29 immediately starts edit war. 176.88.165.232 (talk) 20:47, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Declined for oh so many reasons:
- The page is already protected.
- You're the only one who has actually broken 3RR on this page. (Were it not for the protection this would be WP:BOOMERANG.)
- Your report is malformed, and the "page" link goes to a completely different page from your diffs.
- Your link to the attempt to resolve the dispute on the article's talk page goes to the other editor's user talk page; I don't see you trying to discuss this on the article's talk page at all.
- --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 20:56, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- The report Has nothing to do with the protection.
- The report has nothing to do with 3RR
- Both the page link and 3 diff links go to the same pageç
- 1. they did not try to discuss their complainment on the article's talk page but their report was not declined. then, how is my report declined? :D Lol. Just state you are siding with them so that you can cover each other. I won't leave it here.
- 176.88.165.232 (talk) 21:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- The page link does go somewhere else -- to a page that redirects to the article in question. Thus, the "history" link does not show the edit warring.
- I cannot speak as to why another report evaluated by a different administrator was accepted or declined. You would have to ask them. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 21:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Wait, why did you ignore that he does not raise any objection? He just reverts without arguing anything. The page being protected has nothing to do with their reverts being completely unexplained or my 3RR has nothing to do with their arbitrary reverts. These are just red-herring to cover their faults so that fellows are not penalized 176.88.165.232 (talk) 21:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oh and I didn't even notice that there was already an actioned ANEW report involving you. This report therefore also seems retaliatory. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 21:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- They can report without discussing on talk page but I can not report without discussing on talk page? Obviously, corrupted admin sides with his/her fellows. Unsourced content gets free pass when it is about Persians but triple sourced content rejected when it is about Turkmens. You are racists --176.88.165.232 (talk) 176.88.165.232 (talk) 21:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please see WP:ONUS and WP:BRD. If you are trying to add content and that addition gets reverted, you are expected to open discussion on the article's talk page.
- And I'd suggest striking your personal attack. Aside from being inappropriate, I wasn't even aware of the other ANEW report when I evaluated this one. My conclusion was reached completely independently, based solely on your behavior. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 21:14, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Nor WP:ONUS neither WP:BRD has such policy. Otherwise, you could revert any edit and then that editor would have been expected to open discussion. Do you even see how absurd your excuse is? 176.88.165.232 (talk) 21:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- That's... literally what they both say. Yes, that is exactly what is expected to happen. At this point I'm not going to reply any further as this clearly is a case of I didn't hear that. Note that there are about 850 administrators, many of whom frequent this page. If they disagree with my decision here they are welcome to chime in. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 21:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Nor WP:ONUS neither WP:BRD has such policy. Otherwise, you could revert any edit and then that editor would have been expected to open discussion. Do you even see how absurd your excuse is? 176.88.165.232 (talk) 21:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- They can report without discussing on talk page but I can not report without discussing on talk page? Obviously, corrupted admin sides with his/her fellows. Unsourced content gets free pass when it is about Persians but triple sourced content rejected when it is about Turkmens. You are racists --176.88.165.232 (talk) 176.88.165.232 (talk) 21:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
I have put a CTOPS notice on the talk page since the article comes under the scope of ARBIPA. Daniel Case (talk) 03:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
User:Hariwulf reported by User:Ermenrich (Result: Partially blocked 2 weeks)
[edit]Page: Merseburg charms (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Hariwulf (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [5]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [10]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [11]
Comments:
New user (started as an IP) adding unsourced material to the article and then simply re-adding it after given links to WP:RS and edit warning templates.--Ermenrich (talk) 00:34, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- User Ermenrich acted as a totalitarian authority of Wikipedia with the ability to delete edits (without stating clearly the reason for doing so) rather than even considering to build around them. I also edited the page only twice with my account (meaning after having read and agreed on the Terms).
- In the 90 minutes of life of my account, I have been warned and reported, while Ermenrich refused to find, together with me, an amicable resolution to the issue (he finds my edit "ludicrous", albeit we are referring to simple phonetics).
- I may be new and have quoted Wikipedia on the Talk page instead of the source of the article, however this was on the Talk page itself and to foster discussion.
- Also, while not related to this subject, I would like to state my indignation towards the unfriendliness and attitude towards new users here on Wikipedia. I did come across a number of rants addressed at Editors acting in "one-sided", "entitled" and "owning" ways, and apparently I should have better heeded the warning.
- No one enjoys facing this amount hostility and issues moments after joining a community with the hope to help it. It is the same as trying to scare away newcomers.
- With this in consideration, I look forward to what the Administrators will have to say on the matter. Hariwulf (talk) 01:06, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- ...or, instead of ranting about how you've been wronged by my telling you you can't add unsourced material to Wikipedia, you could simply self-revert your addition of unsourced nonsense to the article.--Ermenrich (talk) 01:10, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Partially blocked – for a period of 2 weeks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:14, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Just FYI, Hariwulf appears to be engaged in block evasion: an IP has continued to reinstate his edits: [12], [13].--Ermenrich (talk) 21:59, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
User:Earl of Arundel reported by User:Muboshgu (Result: Blocked one week)
[edit]Page: Talk:2024 United States presidential election (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Earl of Arundel (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 12:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC) "Reverted 1 edit by Super Goku V (talk): Hatting an ongoing discussion is an act of censorship and will not be tolerated"
- 01:57, 13 November 2024 (UTC) "Reverted good faith edits by David O. Johnson (talk): Censorship must not be tolerated"
- 00:02, 13 November 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1257046489 by David O. Johnson (talk) Reverting attempts to censor discussion on a talk page"
- 23:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1257041182 by Esolo5002 (talk) Please seek consensus on the talk page before closing active discussions"
- 22:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC) "Reverted 1 edit by David O. Johnson (talk): Please seek consensus on the talk page before closing active discussions"
- 21:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1257027093 by David O. Johnson (talk) Hatting without consensus is tantamount to censorship of a talk-page"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 01:31, 13 November 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Talk:2024 United States presidential election."
- 15:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC) "/* November 2024 */ Reply"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
- 01:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC) on User talk:Earl of Arundel "/* November 2024 */ Censorship must not be tolerated"
Comments:
User violated 3RR yesterday, but had not received the talk page warning, so I warned them rather than report. They responded by indicating that they will not stop. Editor is clearly viewing WP:ARBAP2 as a WP:BATTLEGROUND – Muboshgu (talk) 15:34, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- I was reverting attempts to suppress discussion on a talk page. The purpose of the 3RR is to prevent disruptive edits of articles (which I have respected). Moreover, your reversion [[14]] of my NPOV revisions is just another example the kind of partisan-biased wording that is currently rampant across the project. Earl of Arundel (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, 3RR applies to talk pages too. See WP:3RR. — Czello (music) 16:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yup. And I detailed what was wrong with the main page edit with wikipolicy. An WP:IDHT response calling it "partisan" is not promising for future collaboration. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- See exemption #4. Suppression of discussion is vandalism: "On Wikipedia, vandalism has a very specific meaning: editing (or other behavior) deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose, which is to create a free encyclopedia, in a variety of languages, presenting the sum of all human knowledge.The malicious removal of encyclopedic content, or the changing of such content beyond all recognition, without any regard to our core content policies of neutral point of view (which does not mean no point of view), verifiability and no original research, is a deliberate attempt to damage Wikipedia." Earl of Arundel (talk) 16:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- I don't recognise the attempts to hat that discussion as suppression of discussion or vandalism. The discussion had descended into debates about whether Haitians eating people's pets, with spurious videos being posted as proof. This isn't constructive to the project. — Czello (music) 16:47, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, 3RR applies to talk pages too. See WP:3RR. — Czello (music) 16:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Blocked – for a period of one week. Bbb23 (talk) 16:58, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
User:2601:243:1A00:4510:D4:B6C6:C0D0:4EC7 reported by User:Vipz (Result: /64 blocked three months)
[edit]Page: Josip Broz Tito (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 2601:243:1A00:4510:D4:B6C6:C0D0:4EC7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]
Diffs of the user's reverts: On article Josip Broz Tito:
On article Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Special:Diff/1257243658
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: Special:Diff/1254126495.
Comments:
See comments made in the previous report. Classic block evasion. Apart from the aforementioned two articles, Prime Minister of Yugoslavia has also become a target of this single-purpose IP hopper. –Vipz (talk) 23:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Blocked – for a period of three months 2601:243:1A00:4510:0:0:0:0/64 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
User:TypicallyRyan reported by User:Northern Moonlight (Result: Declined – malformed report)
[edit]Page: The Voice (franchise) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: TypicallyRyan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Voice_(franchise)&oldid=1257205985
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Voice_(franchise)&oldid=1257206101
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Voice_(franchise)&oldid=1257206226
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Voice_(franchise)&oldid=1257254774
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Voice_(franchise)&oldid=1257255773
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TypicallyRyan&oldid=1257256104
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TypicallyRyan&oldid=1257207461
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]
Comments:
- Bonus: Falsely accusing me of being a bot. Northern Moonlight 01:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. Bbb23 (talk) 01:01, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
User:TypicallyRyan reported by User:Northern Moonlight (Result: No violation)
[edit]Page: The Voice (franchise) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: TypicallyRyan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 00:47, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1257255159 by Northern Moonlight (talk) Dude, I read your comment. You dont have a right to make any major changes like yours to an article YOU DONT OWN. Stop messing with it and leave it alone."
- 00:40, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1257233603 by Northern Moonlight (talk) Listen man, don't mess with the article formatting. I didn't make this article in the first place. It was completely fine the way it was, and if you don't like it then don't bother lookin back on this page. But just please leave it."
- Consecutive edits made from 20:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC) to 20:02, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- 20:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC) "Leave them the way they were, no use in getting rid of the colors. It helps people figure out when each season begins or ends."
- 20:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1257201501 by Northern Moonlight (talk) Same with this one don't get rid of the hosts or coaches."
- 20:02, 13 November 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1257201053 by Northern Moonlight (talk) Dont' get rid of the winners either, please leave them alone."
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
- I apologize for the comment. I shouldn't have said that. I was only trying to defend the article. But it's no excuse. TypicallyRyan (talk) 01:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
No violation – there must be four or more reverts within a 24 hour period for the 3-Revert Rule to apply; the links you have provided do not meet these criteria. That series of three edits at the bottom is the original edit, not a revert. I would also note that the diff of "effort to resolve differences on the article talk page" is actually a diff of an edit to the reported user's talk page. That won't fly. Attempting to resolve differences on the article talk page (which has not been used for most of the year, much less recently) is to be greatly preferred as this is more conducive to other, previously uninvolved users getting into the discussion and reaching a consensus. Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
User:Hanada12 reported by User:Seawolf35 HGAV (Result: Declined)
[edit]Page: 1932 United States presidential election (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Hanada12 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 02:14, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "Name one candidate since 1932 that called their opponent a "fat capon" or a "chameleon in plaid.""
- 02:09, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "Information and details about the campaign and contention between the candidates."
- 02:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1257268163 by Jon698 (talk)"
- 02:01, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "I think they are worthy of being in the article."
- 01:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "It provides more information about the campaign, so it does contribute to the article. Also, it was in an earlier version of the article."
- 22:22, 13 November 2024 (UTC) "/* Campaign */"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 02:12, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on 1932 United States presidential election."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
Warned and then immediately reverted again. -- Seawolf35 (talk) 02:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Has the other party been warned as well? I did not see any indication of this. Thank you. Hanada12 (talk) 02:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- I recognize I should have used the talk page, but the other party did the same thing I did and he was not warned, so I believe this demonstrates favoritism towards one side. Hanada12 (talk) 02:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- I just warned him. MessageApp (talk) 02:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. It would have been nice if it was done at the same time, to avoid showing favoritism to one side or the other. But I appreciate that you have now notified both sides. Thank you. Hanada12 (talk) 02:21, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- I just warned him. MessageApp (talk) 02:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- I recognize I should have used the talk page, but the other party did the same thing I did and he was not warned, so I believe this demonstrates favoritism towards one side. Hanada12 (talk) 02:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Also notifying User:Jon698 as well, the other editor involved in this. -- Seawolf35 (talk) 02:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. It would have been nice if it was done at the same time, to avoid showing favoritism to one side or the other. But I appreciate that you have now notified both sides. Thank you. Hanada12 (talk) 02:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Declined Hanada just created their account today (well, "today" by North American time) and as such could not reasonably be expected to have been aware of 3RR. They have also been very collegial here. But now that you know that you can't just revert away, Hanada, please behave accordingly. Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your consideration. Yes, I was not aware of the rules and I was also shocked at the way the other member was coming at me. But I will be more careful next time, thank you again. Hanada12 (talk) 05:51, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. It would have been nice if it was done at the same time, to avoid showing favoritism to one side or the other. But I appreciate that you have now notified both sides. Thank you. Hanada12 (talk) 02:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
User:108.44.242.138 reported by User:MrOllie (Result: Blocked 24h)
[edit]Page: Modern monetary theory (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 108.44.242.138 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 15:36, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1257368995 by MrOllie (talk)"
- 15:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "As noted there is not consensus, if you continue you will be reported to the edit warring noticeboard I've already contacted all the people you have been defaming, and they agree you are basically defaming their work"
- 15:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "removing that MMT supports a zero interest rate policy is POV pushing, sorry dude, it is supported by secondary sources"
- 15:06, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1256886571 by MrOllie (talk)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 15:33, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
- 15:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "/* This article is incredibly flawed and inaccurate - likely vandalized. */ Reply"
Comments:
Pro-fringe pov pushing. Note that one of the edit summaries contains a threat about defamation. IP has also been calling other users vandals in the linked talk page discussion. MrOllie (talk) 15:39, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
MrOllie along with others have been defaming the works of a number of living MMT economists by implying they support universal tax increases as a primary response to inflation and that Murray Rothbard (who has been dead since 1995) has commented on MMT. The sources clearly establish a litany of ways MMT proposes to deal with inflation, both secondary and primary, and which are not limited to taxation. Recently New School NYC professor Andrés Bernal, among others, have come to Wikipedia try to explain some of of this to Ollie and Avatar, but neglected to mention the secondary sources also support more than just taxation as a way to address inflation from an MMT framework. Additionally, 0 sources state the MMT support a universal tax increase to combat inflation, not even the out of context quote in the WSJ hit job, making that implication something between a misleading fabrication and WP:UNDUE for the lede.
Mr. Ollie and Avatar have been engaging in edit warring against a broad number of people for months, including people inside and outside academia, and have only referenced 1-2 sources throughout the whole ordeal compared to the nearly dozen plus WP:RS sources they've reverted with often no reason given. Rather than taking an honest look at the Vox, Bloomerg, and many other sources in question they prefer to try to find ways to ban as many people who disagree with them as possible, and then stating no RS was given in talk. The most recent phrase in question, specifically "According to MMT, governments do not need to worry about accumulating debt since they can pay interest by printing money" has actually had no proper source presented for it whatsoever, is contradicted by the included source in any version of the lede, and Ollie keeps acting like the lede is untouchable by anyone just because another IP hasn't presented RS. There's even a Bloomberg article where the founder of MMT founder specifically advocates against excessive interest payments because of inflation worries, and is why he advocates a 0 interest rate policy. 108.44.242.138 (talk) 15:46, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Daniel Case (talk) 21:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
User:5.107.87.236 reported by User:Belbury (Result: Semi-protected one week)
[edit]Page: Malabar Muslims (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 5.107.87.236 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 17:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "sanghi vandalism by IP 207.96.13.12. Undid revision 1257392475 by 207.96.13.12 (talk)"
- 17:56, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "indian sanghi vandalism. Undid revision 1257392239 by 207.96.13.12 (talk)"
- 17:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "indian sanghi vandalismUndid revision 1257391973 by 207.96.13.12 (talk)"
- 17:47, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "vandalism. Undid revision 1257389432 by 207.96.13.12 (talk)"
- 16:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1257379424 by 207.96.13.12 (talk)"
- 16:36, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1257379058 by 207.96.13.12 (talk)"
- 16:31, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1257377410 by ItTollsForThee (talk)"
- Consecutive edits made from 16:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC) to 16:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Consecutive edits made from 15:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC) to 16:06, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 17:59, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Malabar Muslims."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
- 16:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC) on Talk:Malabar Muslims "/* Mappila are descendants of lower caste hindus */ new section"
Comments:
Edit warring with User:207.96.13.12 (who has also gone beyond 3RR after a warning). 207.96.13.12 opened a talk page thread but the other IP has not responded. Belbury (talk) 18:02, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- The article has been semi-protected for one week by another admin.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:10, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
User:5.59.181.17 reported by User:Ymblanter (Result: Blocked 24 hours)
[edit]Page: Nikolai Sudzilovsky (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 5.59.181.17 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [15]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [21], also gave them a contentious topics alert
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: The talk page has a discussion on the topic from 2008, but, well, who reads talk pages.
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [22]
Comments:
- The IP is edit-warring trying to insert nationalistic bullshit into an article on a contentious topic. Their only conclusion was that I am a "Russian editor".Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Blocked – for a period of 24 hours. I have also warned the IP about their nationalistic aspersions. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- I have added a CTOPS notice (ARBEE) to the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:03, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
User:92.53.13.55 reported by User:StephenMacky1 (Result: Blocked 1 week; page protected for a month)
[edit]Page: Šar Mountains (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 92.53.13.55 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 19:22, 15 November 2024 (UTC) "No I see coordinated attack and bully from organized Bulgarian internet brigade. Why are you constantly obsessed with my country? And despite giving practical source you are still vandalising the page. If bigger Wikipedia moderators tolerate this let it be but individuals like these are destroying this website credibility. Undid revision 1257595118 by StephenMacky1 (talk)"
- 18:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC) "Please explain how this is vandalism. It would be required against you indeed. Undid revision 1257589859 by Jingiby (talk)"
- 18:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC) "It is an improvement because ~56% of Shara belongs to N. Macedonia and the local context is missing out, btw I live on the mountain and you can check it by the IP. Anyway I added a practical source Undid revision 1257588676 by Jingiby (talk)"
- 18:19, 15 November 2024 (UTC) "As it writes this is Macedonian tradition and I added the local context about the name because it missed out in the article and it is well known among population here, you don't need academic sources but can simply check it in Google Translate. Just tried to use my knowledge and contribute to a better content :) Undid revision 1257583073 by StephenMacky1 (talk)"
- 17:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC) "Added English source Undid revision 1257573778 by Βατο (talk)"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
Persistent edit warring and also making personal attacks. Note that the IP is also partially blocked for edit warring. StephenMacky1 (talk) 19:26, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Blocked – for a period of 1 week. @StephenMacky1:, the IP is not partially blocked Ponyobons mots 19:36, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- All right. Thank you. Must have been some sort of error then. StephenMacky1 (talk) 19:54, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ponyo also protected the article for a month. I have added a CTOPS notice to the talk page Daniel Case (talk) 22:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
User:Ship man five reported by User:RachelTensions (Result: Blocked 48 hours)
[edit]Page: Saint John, New Brunswick (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Ship man five (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 23:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC) ""
- 20:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC) ""
- 19:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC) ""
- 15:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC) ""
- 15:10, 15 November 2024 (UTC) ""
- 12:15, 14 November 2024 (UTC) "Insignificant information to be used as a introduction. The cities are nominally different in size. Outdated population numbers."
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning: [23]
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
- 22:00, 15 November 2024 (UTC) "/* Edit war */ Reply"
Comments:
- Blocked – for a period of 48 hours. Bbb23 (talk) 00:35, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
User:WickedFanAccount reported by User:Happily888 (Result: )
[edit]Page: Wicked (2024 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: WickedFanAccount (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 05:46, 16 November 2024 (UTC) "This is a change I made before you came in. YOU need to start the discussion. Not me. Part I is not a subtitle"
- 04:53, 16 November 2024 (UTC) "No colon as per source AND sequel title"
- 03:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC) "no colon in onscreen title"
- 20:39, 10 November 2024 (UTC) "Onscreen title AND source both use a Roman numeral"
- 06:37, 10 November 2024 (UTC) "I did."
- 02:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC) ""
- 02:13, 10 November 2024 (UTC) ""
- 02:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC) ""
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 02:13, 10 November 2024 (UTC) "Message re. Wicked (2024 film) (HG) (3.4.12)."
- 03:33, 16 November 2024 (UTC) "Welcome to Wikipedia!"
- 04:59, 16 November 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Wicked (2024 film)."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
- 08:30, 16 November 2024 (UTC) "/* Wicked Part I or Wicked: Part I */ re"
Comments:
persistent vandalism and disregarding of MOS/NC; frequent edit warring. Also WP:SPA. Happily888 (talk) 05:58, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Let the record show that this was a contribution I made. Changing a "1" to a "I" as per the source listed and newfound information. Someone else added in the colon. I was told I had to start a discussion to get it changed. Why do *I* have to be the one to disscuss? Shouldn't the person who MADE the change do that? WickedFanAccount (talk) 11:06, 16 November 2024 (UTC)