User talk:Toddy1

Can you become the Supreme Leader of the Supreme Cabal?

Wikibreak	Third opinion $220	Chance ?	Mediation $220	Arbitration $240	Jimbo Wales $200	In the news $260	On this day $260	MediaWiki $150	Did you know $280	You are banned!
RFA $200	WIKIOPOLY									FPC $300
PERM $180										POTD $300
Community discussion										Community discussion
Editor review $180										FAC $320
Developers $200										Rouge admin $200
Deletion review $160										Chance ?
AFD $140										TFA $350
Wikimedia Foundation $150										Edit war (pay $100)
CSD $140										Main Page $400
WP:BANNED Just browsing	WikiProject Spam $120	UAA $100	Chance ?	AIV $100	Admin cabal $200	Teh Drahmaz (pay $200)	AN $60	Community discussion	ANI $60	Go Collect $200 salary as you pass

Disruptive editing

There is disruptive editing going on in the article Shool, but now you dont want to respond. Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 11:28, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

. Please could you modify the edit-warning notice that you placed at User talk:Sid95Q#3RR to say which page or pages he/she is edit warring on - my guess is it is Shool - but technicalities are important. In my opinion correctly placed edit-warring notices help users, because they encourage them to use the article talk page, and remind them that they are reverting a lot. If an editor is not edit-war aware, it is easy for them to do too many reverts.

You have made a lot of edits to the article on Shool but none to Talk:Shool. According to the rules governing the three revert rule, he reverted you once on 2 August, and twice on 19 August, whereas you have reverted him/her three times on 19 August. In terms of expected Wikipedia behaviour, you need to explain your edits on the article talk page (Talk:Shool); and I strongly advise not making any more reverts at Shool for about 36 hours.If somebody makes a really bad edit that needs reverting, do not revert, create a section on the article talk page explaining what is wrong with the edit, and saying that the edit should be reverted.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Note that the editor who made this edit to your talk page is an admin.^[1] -- Toddy1 (talk) 20:43, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Re: Mohamed Atta

The date format was changed without consensus by an IP editor about a year ago (making a simple click of an undo button impossible). This happens to be the longest, most in-depth article about the hijackers and I quickly found that fixing it back (pending any possible discussion about the format) was exhausting, so I stopped midway through without thinking about it. In any case it's tedious and boring enough, and my request to have a bot do it was denied (even though it would be useful in many other cases of flip-flopping date formats without discussion). For what it's worth, I've found the IP editor who insisted on the change was not even completely thorough, leaving some dates unchanged (on other hijackers' articles and likely this one too). I've already fixed several of the hijackers' articles back, but I'm bored and frustrated now, so I think I'm done. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 18:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

I have copied your comment to Talk:Mohamed Atta#Date format and will reply there.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 221, September 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hog Farm looks at the bayou battles for Vicksburg

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Santadas Kathiababa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Santadas Kathiababa, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santadas Kathiababa (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)