Jump to content

Talk:Sidharth Shukla: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Reverted 1 edit by 2A01:4C8:72:F87B:8842:6D67:E831:ABFD (talk): Don't modify other people's comments.
Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
Line 25: Line 25:


{{edit semi-protected|Sidharth Shukla|answered=y}}
{{edit semi-protected|Sidharth Shukla|answered=y}}
I want to change the page of Sidharth shukla as it is not mentioned that he had recently won the show "BIGG BOSS 13" [[User:Kanchan.jsn gupta|Kanchan.jsn gupta]] ([[User talk:Kanchan.jsn gupta|talk]]) 09:12, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
I want to change the page of Siddharth shukla as it is not mentioned that he had recently won the show "BIGG BOSS 13" [[User:Kanchan.jsn gupta|Kanchan.jsn gupta]] ([[User talk:Kanchan.jsn gupta|talk]]) 09:12, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;'''Not done:''' please provide [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:MadGuy7023|MadGuy7023]] ([[User talk:MadGuy7023|talk]]) 09:24, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;'''Not done:''' please provide [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:MadGuy7023|MadGuy7023]] ([[User talk:MadGuy7023|talk]]) 09:24, 16 February 2020 (UTC)



Revision as of 15:12, 18 January 2021

Template:Vital article

Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2020

I want to change the page of Siddharth shukla as it is not mentioned that he had recently won the show "BIGG BOSS 13" Kanchan.jsn gupta (talk) 09:12, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. MadGuy7023 (talk) 09:24, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More edits

There is no content about his modelling career ,where he became 1st asian to have won world's best model and other modelling work. No media image such as most desirable men in india , biz personallity of the air , ormax media etc. About his personal life. His media image. Awards section is not complete and full table of awards should be updated. Princepratap1234 (talk) 15:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request to add more content.

There is no content about his modelling career ,where he became 1st asian to have won world's best model and other modelling work. No media image such as most desirable men in india , biz personallity of the air , ormax media etc. About his personal life. His media image. Awards section is not complete and full table of awards should be updated. Princepratap1234 (talk) 06:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Princepratap1234: As per WP:FILMCRITICLIST Awards included in lists should have a Wikipedia article to demonstrate notability. So if the awards have a Wiki page and reliable source to support Shukla's achievement than only it will be added here. Regards. Sid95Q (talk) 15:20, 17 March 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Hello

Hi User:Princepratap1234 I have noticed that u removed the appearances for all tv actors where there was an reliable source and when it came to Sidharth Shukla the guest appearances have not been removed. I understand ur a Shukla fan but many actors like Sanaya Irani and Hina Khan had appearances why remove them when I they had sources. So please get them back. Or if not remove the guest appearances in Shukla page as well.

Questionable sources

@Princepratap1234: In this edit you added references for two award items, a 2013 Star Guild award nomination for Best Actor in a Drama Series for Balika Vadhu. I can't verify that at the source you provided. I see wins, but not nominations. I also don't see the 2014 nomination for the same award at the same source. Where is this information? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:44, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I only got winning sources not nominated one so I just put it there to show that he didn't win those awards Princepratap1234 (talk) 17:48, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Princepratap1234: That doesn't make any sense. The lack of a win doesn't mean the person was nominated. Please use better judgement in the future, as this edit looks like you were trying to sneak in a meaningless reference to populate the reference column. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:48, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:07, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Please update infobox image to newest one as that image is of 2013 which is very old. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4063:2294:7499:5436:4ED9:1ADF:FE9 (talk) 10:13, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request to consider image change

In this article, the lead image is more than 4 years old and the celebrity does not looks that slim now like he is in the lead image (thumb), and I suggest that thumb is a better alternative as this image is hardly 5 months old when he won a reality competition. So is the second image better?? Pritam Shaw (talkcontribs) 18:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:28, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cyphoidbomb, I can't get it. Is according to you the earlier lead image is reasonable or my request is reasonable? Pritam Shaw (talkcontribs) 00:45, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Pritam Shaw: I think your request is reasonable. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thankyou. Pritam Shaw (talkcontribs) 00:57, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content

Somebody has removed content from this article for no reason Please help Cyphoidbomb ,I think the better version is this 1 Princepratap1234 (talk) 15:50, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Princepratap1234 and SaUp2014: First of all, you are both edit-warring, and you'd both better stop before you both wind up with your editing privileges pulled. Pratap, why didn't you open a discussion here and ask SaUp2014 why they made the changes they did. Or, you could have looked at the totality of their recent edits here and tried to figure out what they were doing. Some of it gets confusing, but some of what they did was move the prose content about various recognitions, and move them to the bottom of the Awards/recognitions section.
I will note that the claim that he won World's Best Model at the "one of world's most prestigious modelling contests", is entirely unsourced nonsense. Who said it was one of the world's most prestigious modelling contests? The editor who added it? We're making it seem like a huge deal when there are only 40 contestants. As far as I can tell nobody else has ever won that award. You'd think if it were prestigious, we'd know everybody else who won it. Reeks to me of promotion. It's also problematic that this content is presented in the lede, where it over-inflates the subject's importance. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:11, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
SaUp2014 has removed the whole section of media image which is very common section in actor's BLP. Revert it. It included many things and previous one was better.

Princepratap1234 (talk) 16:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, there were a lot of basic linguistic mistakes in the whole article. Secondly, all the things that were listed in the media image section are recognitions that he's received throughout his career. Since awards and nominations section is already there, all his recognitions must be listed there, not in the media image section. Thirdly, the article lacked basic detailing, which has been fixed as per the requirement. Thank you. SaUp2014 (talk) 16:57, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


SaUp2014 but you removed the whole section which included other things too. Read other articles like Hina khan or any BLP. Princepratap1234 (talk) 17:10, 17 July 2020 (UTC) Hina Khan[reply]

Nothing else was there, other than his recognitions, one can check. SaUp2014 (talk) 17:47, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the version in question. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:11, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SaUp2014 I think you are a fan of Asim Riaz that’s why you are deleting his media section many tv actors have that section anyways look at Drashti Dhami. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:72:4894:E55B:9EA1:C2ED:A75E (talk) 21:07, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know that personalities have the media image section, but in this case, the whole section comprises of his recognitions, which happens to be another section. Therefore, the media image section was removed. If someone has something to add to the media image section go ahead. But, it shouldn't be his recognitions. SaUp2014 (talk) 21:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SaUp2014 The section which had this He was ranked at 34th, 33rd, 44th and 41st in The Times 50 Most Desirable Men list in 2013, 2014, 2017 and 2018 are in other tv celebs too why deleting this from the recognitions from the award section as this is not an award. This should be in the media section. Do it like this instead of fighting with Pratap. See this in Drashti’s article [1] about the most desirable. From times of India — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:72:4894:3414:A483:2AF5:C9B8 (talk) 21:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes ,would you remove a career section as it is also in FILMOGRAPH. Having a recognition in media image is very common in actors BLP. Please read all Blps as your edit history shows you rarely edit BLP's of actors. Princepratap1234 (talk) 09:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's no point in comparing other articles to this one. If you're willing to compare, compare outside the bracket as well. Media image section should contain information on his image in the industry, not just his recognitions. Therefore, as I said earlier, the whole section comprises of his recognitions, which happens to be another section. Therefore, the media image section was removed. If someone has something to add to the media image section go ahead. While adding, please verify with reliable sources. SaUp2014 (talk) 10:16, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't reinstate all the things , just those things which are not a problem and he is also not understanding that that it's very common things to be in a articles. Princepratap1234 (talk) 17:21, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Months months months

In this edit I removed an excessive amount of unsourced and very unnecessary detail. @Cristmess619127: I know that Curdle was kind enough to explain on your talk page that the "In YYYY" format is list-y and not very professional, so I'm a bit surprised why you've doubled-down on it by adding months. Why do we need to know which month something happened? Also, what quality article are you looking at to help guide you through this one? Maybe you should have a look at our GA-rated articles and pick one that is a good analogue for this one? You might want to go to Wikipedia:Good articles/all and look in the Media and drama section for some articles that might serve as good examples, rather than making guesses about what constitutes a quality article. Thanks and regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:13, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

like

i like u Ankush devi (talk) 02:59, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ankush devi: I like Windows 98. The second edition to be precise. —usernamekiran (talk) 11:26, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

removal of co-host

Regarding the edit special:diff/985511300, if articles of others dont mention the co-host, then update them. Kindly do not remove factual information from here. If you have any doubts, kindly discuss them. If you continue to remove information, I will have to block you. —usernamekiran (talk) 11:21, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]