User talk:PAVA11: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 281: | Line 281: | ||
<font face="Old English Text MT" size="3px" bgcolor="black"><span style="background-color: black;">[[User:Axmann8|<font color="#66FFFF"><u>-Axmann8</u></font>]] [[User talk:Axmann8|<font color="#66FF00">(<u>Talk</u>)</font>]]</span></font> 19:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC) |
<font face="Old English Text MT" size="3px" bgcolor="black"><span style="background-color: black;">[[User:Axmann8|<font color="#66FFFF"><u>-Axmann8</u></font>]] [[User talk:Axmann8|<font color="#66FF00">(<u>Talk</u>)</font>]]</span></font> 19:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
::To be frank, I don't really care about your opinion. There's userboxes for commies and those supporting President Bush's prosecution, so I think mine is fine. <font face="Old English Text MT" size="3px" bgcolor="black"><span style="background-color: black;">[[User:Axmann8|<font color="#66FFFF"><u>-Axmann8</u></font>]] [[User talk:Axmann8|<font color="#66FF00">(<u>Talk</u>)</font>]]</span></font> 19:13, 26 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:13, 26 March 2009
This is the user talk page for Grsz11, where you can send messages and comments.
Please leave new messages at the bottom of the page.
I will reply to messages left here on here unless you request I reply on your talk page.
Also note, I automatically archive my talk page using MiszaBot. Any topics older than 28 days will be sent to the archives.
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:PAVA11. |
Penguins
This must be what it feels like to be an Islanders' fan! If the Steelers weren't still in it I'd be going crazy. blackngold29 04:46, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- It would appear that the players are trying to get rid of him; there's definately something going on. If they are, they're certainly doing a good job. I just hope the don't do too good of a job and ruin the season. Have fun at the game! blackngold29 04:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- The rumors have certainly been flying, but that's the first name I've heard. That'll throw a nice wrench into List of Pittsburgh Penguins head coaches, which I was going to nom for FLC soon... hmmm, howabout this for an interesting fact, from Pat Quinn (ice hockey): "Quinn became an assistant coach for the Philadelphia Flyers in 1977 under Fred Shero" as in Ray Shero's father. That's kinda neat. The only thing he seems to lack is a Cup. blackngold29 23:49, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oh man, a Jagr comeback would be crazy! He kind of came off like a jerk when he left, but I'd definately love to see him back. blackngold29 06:05, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- They really dominated, and in front of 19,000+ who can't come up with anything more original than "Crosby sucks" to chant. Those points were big, but tomorrow is bigger because we have to keep it rolling... oh yeah, there's some Ovechkin guy involved too. blackngold29 04:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm leaning toward the "just with the Pens" option; do you know if it's been discussed at WP:HOCKEY? Not that I'm thinking too much about the Pens right now... WHOOOO! blackngold29 05:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- I miss one game to watch Lost and they kill them? What's up with that! blackngold29 15:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Well I guess that's that with Therrien. There's not much hope left for the playoffs, but there's some. Good video on the new Bucs's pitchers, I'll try to work on their articles some, sooner or later they're gonna make it up to the bigs. blackngold29 02:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Should we record Crosby's 250th career assist or just go by every 100? Great game, I want to see a Crosby vs. Ovie fight tomorrow, lol. blackngold29 01:06, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- For what we're giving up (which is different according to the Pens site "If the Penguins make the playoffs, it will be a fourth-round pick. If the Penguins win a playoff round and Guerin plays in 50 percent of the games, it will be a third-round pick.") it seems pretty good. Any idea how long his contract is? Not sure what they're thinking to do with Satan, just keep him around in case of injury I suppose, because he's a Free Agent after this season. I certainly bet Guerin is happy to get out of NY. blackngold29 23:12, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- No problem, that new cite is better anyway. blackngold29 02:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Indiana County Courthouse
--Dravecky (talk) 08:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Bilateral relations
If you're going to take them to AFD, please don't do a batch nomination. While some bilateral relations aren't notable, most are, and mixing them together is unpleasant (there was the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argentina–Singapore relations not too long ago, and it was very clear to me that if two countries exchange embassies, they'll have notable bilateral relations. If not, maybe not, though in many cases yes (i.e. Israel-Arab Country pairs or North Korea-South Korea or such)). So if you want to go that way, please do one article = one discussion, and not 2800 articles nom'd the same day (I'll wear out my googles). Cheers, WilyD 00:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- While I disagree and would argue that they can be grouped, I don't plan on opening AFDs. Grsz11 00:17, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- Well, if you're not planning to, I suppose it don't matter much, but the grouping above certainly seemed to be a mistake, as some articles (like Ethiopia–Ireland relations were very notable, while even the titular one may not have been.) Makes sensible discussion impossible. WilyD 00:25, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Argentina–Holy See relations
I have moved this article to AFD, because I feel that a closer look is warranted. I have explained why in the nom, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argentina–Holy See relations. This is a procedural nomination, I am neutral to the outcome. Aecis·(away) talk 00:55, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Idlewild depot.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Idlewild depot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 14:13, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
- Books extension enabled
- News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
- Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Ireland naming question
You are receiving this message because you have previously posted at a Ireland naming related discussion. Per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ireland article names#Back-up procedure, a procedure has been developed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration, and the project is now taking statements. Before creating or replying to a statement please consider the statement process, the problems and current statements. GnevinAWB (talk) 18:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Image deletion
Hey Peripitus, I was wondering how the FfD for Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_February_28#Idlewild_depot.jpg when there were 3 keeps and 3 deletes? It doesn't appear that there was any consensus to delete. User:Jappalang is very active in image-checking and supported my argument for fair-use. Grsz11 03:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- For deletion discussions of non-free images consensus is far from a nose count—I see three on the keep side (Jappalang, yourself and Ejfetters) and four on the delete side (Stifle, PhilKnight, Nyttend, JohnnyMrNinja) . I'm conscious in closing these that the weight of the arguments, as they apply to the non-free content criteria, is often far more important than the number of participants on each side. In this case the deletion assertion is largely that, as the building still exists, a free alternate could be taken so the image fails criteria #1. While it is truly asserted that the surrounds of this building now differ from what they were originally, this is true for all buildings of any significant age and so by itself is not a reason to keep a non-free image. I could not see any compelling argument as to why this image, over and above a contemporary free image of the same building, significantly increased readers understanding. - Peripitus (Talk) 10:36, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations
Congrats on the FA star for Idlewild and Soak Zone. I know you worked hard on this, and I'm glad to see it finally made it. Kudos. Finetooth (talk) 23:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. I thought I was doomed by image deletions. Grsz11 23:16, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
- News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
- Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK
Hi. I have responded to your question at Template talk:DYK#List of Law & Order: Criminal Intent episodes regarding the reliability of TVShowsOnDVD.com. Regards, Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 01:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: Jerusalem
But I'm only one person... there's 6 or 7 of them! ;-) You might as well go ahead and block. I doubt anyone would protest as they haven't edited in an awful long and obviously they are just SPA's. ScarianCall me Pat! 11:45, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Please remove the numbering from your entry, and trim it to one selection per DYK/GA/FC line. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 20:08, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Triple Crown
RE:Spencer Steedley
Yes I recently put some information on his page and I was there at both of those highlights of his career and I am his cousin and that stuff is right and I can't figure out why you would delete all of that when it is all true. OK, he wanted me to put that on there so I did for him, and he is wondering why people don't believe any of the stuff I recently put on there.--Lkeever2 (talk) 22:22, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Big East POY
The backbone is there, but it needs some work.
- Lead obviously needs expanded
- Pictures would be nice, shouldn't be too difficult as many went on to the NBA
- All players need a reference
- I would probably rename the "Team" column "School" or "College"
- Rename the "Source" column "Ref" or "References"
- Remove the sort feature from the Ref column
- Sort the players by their last name (See List of Pittsburgh Pirates managers and owners)
- Add this template: {{Big East Men's Basketball Player of the Year}}
That should get you started. I'll add it to my watchlist and let you know if I think of anything else. I think Blair got ripped off this year; but quite a few analysts liked Thabeet, but head-to-head it was no match. blackngold29 05:36, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- That's one of the best single day article improvments that I've seen. Great job! I guess Pitt wanted the extra days rest for the big tourney. blackngold29 02:03, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think I mind it. As bad as it is to lose in the first round (to WVU no less), they've got a week to get their crap together. Pens-Jackets...much more entertaining. Grsz11 02:09, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Now as far as list prose goes, how much is needed? Is it okay just to say some things about the players or schools like I have so far? Grsz11 02:11, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- It also looks like a screwed up the sort function along the way. I'm guessing it's the coloring codes I used. How do I fix that? Grsz11 02:15, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, it's the merged row for the year when they were shared awards. Any clue how to deal with that? Grsz11 02:21, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Length of the lead looks decent, it would probably be good to have it on par with other similar list, but after looking at WP:COLB this might be breaking some new ground. As long as there are no major gaps, and I don't see any, it should be fine. I would move the picture of Chris Mullin up to the lead. As for the sorting, I don't think I've had to vertically merge columns like that before. You might try here (I didn't see anything skimming it, though it might be in there somewhere) and if that fails try User:SRE.K.A.L.24 he's done a ton of sports FLs; if it's not possible, I would just unmerge them. Glad the Pens got atleast one point, though I thought they were gonna pull it out there at the SO. blackngold29 03:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
"Colonial Athletic Association Men's Basketball Player of the Year" article?
Hey. I saw what a good job you did to the Big East Conference Men's Basketball Player of the Year and I was wondering if you could make the same style of page for the Colonial Athletic Association? I've already made the navbox for the CAA POY (here) but there is no Wikipedia page to link it back to a main article. What do you think? Jrcla2 03:33, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Only problem is I had a heck of a time finding sources for the Big East, I can't imagine CAA would be a walk in the park. If you could find me a group of sources, I don't think it would be a problem to put together sometime next week. Grsz11 03:35, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'll see what I can do and get back to you whenever I get the chance. Thanks. Jrcla2 06:16, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Okay I found some sources. The most important one is this one, which on pages 11-12 has every POY listed as well as All-Conference selections. Additional websites I found regarding various CAA POYs are: Brett Blizzard; Johnny Newman; David Robinson (1) (2) (3); Jose Juan Barea; George Evans (this is a particularly interesting story). Something of interest is that Odell Hodge won the award in his freshman and senior seasons, but not during his sophomore or junior campaigns (source). It might also be interesting to note that Hodge, Robinson, and Kenny Sanders all established themselves as members of the 2000/1000 club while competing in the CAA. Let me know if you need any further assistance. Jrcla2 19:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- That's ok. By the way, after a little further research, I found out that Odell Hodge actually won CAA POY for his sophomore and redshirt senior seasons, not his true freshman and senior seasons. His true freshman season he won CAA ROY. Jrcla2 14:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- Looks great. As I have the time I'll add to it. Thanks for starting it. Jrcla2 01:22, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'll see what I can do and get back to you whenever I get the chance. Thanks. Jrcla2 06:16, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar
Thank you! — [[::User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] ([[::User talk:Malik Shabazz|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|contribs]]) 00:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
invitation
You're invited to sign up as a founding member, at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#WikiProject Historic Sites ! :) doncram (talk) 05:46, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Historic Sites is opened up. I took the liberty of assuming your support for the wikiproject meant you wanted to join as a member, and I copied your signature to the Members list on the main page. Please visit and add to, or remove, your listing there. It would be great to hear about what you're interested in the Wikiproject becoming, in your member comment and/or at the Talk page, shortcut wt:HSITES. Thanks for your support! doncram (talk) 17:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
RE: Barack Obama
Erm... you actually felt the need to pipe to edit warring? And sticking to your "Stephanie Holmes" article is just embarrassing. Ottre 18:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well, your response says volumes. Grsz11 18:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Pardon me? Ottre 18:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009
- News and notes: License update, Commons cartoons, films milestone, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Manufactured scandal, Wikipedia assignments, and more
- Dispatches: New FAC and FAR appointments
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:49, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Obama Elitism
"Disparage" means the same thing as "said to offend," and does so with less words at a higher lexicon. This isn't worth an edit war, but you should revert your change. Ejnogarb (talk) 17:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- No. You were claiming it as a fact, which I fixed to reflect that it was an opinion ... that they were "interpreted as disparaging" comments. Grsz11 17:30, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- "that were interpreted as offending to" is, in fact, worse. Not only is it grammatically incorrect in this context, but it's the worst kind of being overly political correct. Read the article. He was criticized by Democrats and Republicans alike for disparaging small-town Pennsylvanians. Ejnogarb (talk) 17:39, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Professor Ayers
To say that William Ayers is "Distinguished Professor" hardly expresses a POV; instead, it states the title given to him by his university. -- Hoary (talk) 01:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Not a problem by me, just trying to appease a certain POV-warrior. Perhaps you'll keep an eye on him too? Grsz11 01:26, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
There is no edit war
Please see the discussion page, and accompanying comments with my edit. I'm only trying to improve the article.MrSpammy (talk) 03:21, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- That doesn't mean it's appropriate. There is no "right" side of an edit war. Grsz11 03:22, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- I am contributing to the discussion and added comments to my edits. COSMIC LATTE et al, are editing without discussing or making any attempt whatsoever to refute. Please advise.MrSpammy (talk) 03:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Arbcom
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#User:Stevertigo's disruptive trolling and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks, 21:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Big East Conference Men's Basketball Player of the Year
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Obama articles/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Obama articles/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Mailer Diablo 18:16, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
tourney
survive and advance, this is the wake up call they needed...I hopeCrazyPaco (talk) 22:40, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
International competition for baseball
I have done some searching; I just haven't gotten the time to actually pull a template and start working on it. I'm at a good resting place on my FT right now that I could look at it this evening. I'll get back to you then if that works for you. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 13:21, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- I will, thanks. By the way, there's going to be a navbox in that Silver Slugger article with those lists once the topic is complete, so I'm going to take them out of the table headers since they are mostly redlinks right now. Thanks! KV5 (Talk • Phils) 13:38, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Reviewing books for the Signpost
- Special report: Abuse Filter is enabled
- News and notes: Flaggedrevs, copyright project, fundraising reports, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Alternatives, IWF threats, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
OK, I think I have Washington & Jefferson Presidents football up to 1500 characters. Thanks for the source, too. --Jwilkinsen (talk) 01:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Please answer a question
Why did you threaten to block me for violating the 3 revert rule, but not make the same threat to the person with whom I was edit warring? Grundle2600 (talk) 13:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
My Userbox
Yes, I do think it is appropriate. It is part of who I am, and if other polemic userboxes are allowed (such as those for commies), then I should be able to use it.
-Axmann8 (Talk) 19:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- To be frank, I don't really care about your opinion. There's userboxes for commies and those supporting President Bush's prosecution, so I think mine is fine. -Axmann8 (Talk) 19:13, 26 March 2009 (UTC)