Talk:Domestic violence: Difference between revisions
Jayhammers (talk | contribs) |
Skydeepblue (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
Updates some truths about domestic violence - that women commit it 33% more often and that women initiate domestic violence at least as often as men (probably more). Watch as the feminist misandrist man-haters remove the truths in hatred of men.[[User:Jayhammers|Jayhammers]] ([[User talk:Jayhammers|talk]]) 02:45, 19 March 2010 (UTC) |
Updates some truths about domestic violence - that women commit it 33% more often and that women initiate domestic violence at least as often as men (probably more). Watch as the feminist misandrist man-haters remove the truths in hatred of men.[[User:Jayhammers|Jayhammers]] ([[User talk:Jayhammers|talk]]) 02:45, 19 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
This is [[WP:UNDUE]]. This '''has been previously discussed''' here and it has been declared [[WP:UNDUE]] (archive 4). Please stop your aggressive POV-pushing and take your anger and frustration to another place. Wikipedia articles and talk pages are not a place for you to vent. '''Other editors, please be aware at''' [[User:Jayhammers|Jayhammers]], who on his user page says that Wikipedia pages are ''"run by feminist liars"'' and uses language such as ''"feminist misandrist man-haters"'' and "''corrected lies by feminists''" and ''"censorship by feminist sexists"'' in his edits on talk pages and in summaries. Some of his posts have been archived on this talk page; he has repeatedly used this talk page as a [[WP:SOAP|soapbox]] and as place to express his hatred for feminist organizations, for ''"anti-male laws"'' and so on, see (archive 4). Either this user abides by wikipedia rules ([[WP:SOAP]], [[WP:NPOV]], [[WP:CONS]], [[WP:UNDUE]], [[WP:RS]], [[WP:CIVIL]]) or otherwise he should be blocked. |
|||
[[User:Skydeepblue|Skydeepblue]] ([[User talk:Skydeepblue|talk]]) 03:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:38, 19 March 2010
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Domestic violence article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Domestic violence is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | ||||||||||
|
Factor: education-difference between spouses
I read an abstract once of a study saying women with higher education married to men with lower education than them had higher risk of being abused. Does anyone happen to have the citation of this? (I know the reverse seems to be the case in Bangladesh[1], so presumably there's some confounding factor here.)
Ah, now I found it. Martin (2007)[2] , cites Johnson (2003)[3] as saying that "women with higher education were at greater risk of being physically and sexually assaulted by their partners", although other studies have also shown that unemployed women are at higher risk of marital rape, not sure how to interpret all this. (Martin 2007 seems to be a very good review.)
References
- ^ http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/demography/v040/40.2koenig.html
- ^ Elaine K. Martin, Casey T. Taft, Patricia A. Resick, A review of marital rape, Aggression and Violent Behavior, Volume 12, Issue 3, May-June 2007, Pages 329-347, ISSN 1359-1789, DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2006.10.003. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VH7-4MM95WJ-1/2/c7a5b2cdc68b6cb4cc0ff35af32637d0
- ^ Holly Johnson. (2003). The cessation of assaults on wives*. Journal of Comparative Family Studies: Violence Against Women in the Family, 34(1), 75-91. Retrieved February 24, 2009, from Academic Research Library database. (Document ID: 344327771). http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=344327771&Fmt=7&clientId=32064&RQT=309&VName=PQD
Has any researcher done ....
festival domestic violence...???
--58.38.42.115 (talk) 08:29, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Messy and contradictory
This page is all over the place. In some places, there are statistics that show women are victims more than men. In other places there are statistics that show it's equal. It can't be both, yet the article has no problem arguing both and referencing both claims without attempting to reconcile them. We need editors to critically evaluate the references being used by both sets of claims and to examine the overall consensus in the literature (eg. if 90% of papers on a subject favour one view, more weight should be given to that view). I don't have the topic knowledge, and a lot of the people who have knowledge on this topic have heavy POV bias one way or the other as it is an understandably sensitive subject. What we need is to step back from opinions and agendas, systematically make the article more consistent and coherent, and reduce the emphasis given to minority opinions that are not substantiated by the literature. (I am making no claims about which sets of opinions are which.) 203.217.150.69 (talk) 01:54, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
- Well the POV and experts needed banners are in place at the start of the article, all we need now are some experts (like many other Wiki articles). At least the diverging opinions in this article probably do reflect real diverse opinions and i suspect the experts dont entirely agree with each other either. As i mentioned before, IMHO the usage of the phrase "domestic violence" tends to lead to distortion and propogate POV opinions. There needs to be a Controversies or Criticism section where the differences are thrashed out.--Penbat (talk) 12:04, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
- Women are more often perpetrators of domestic violence. But feminists don't want you to hear that and wikipedia is not good at stopping censorship by majority groups such as feminists and misandrists.Jayhammers (talk) 02:29, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Showing feminism's true colors
Removing verified statistics showing women commit domestic violence more often than men while retaining the information claiming men commit murder more often remain. This article is supposed to be about domestic violence, isn't it? Then why are the statistics of domestic violence displayed for the public? Why is the truth suppressed? Jayhammers (talk) 02:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Updated truths
Updates some truths about domestic violence - that women commit it 33% more often and that women initiate domestic violence at least as often as men (probably more). Watch as the feminist misandrist man-haters remove the truths in hatred of men.Jayhammers (talk) 02:45, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
This is WP:UNDUE. This has been previously discussed here and it has been declared WP:UNDUE (archive 4). Please stop your aggressive POV-pushing and take your anger and frustration to another place. Wikipedia articles and talk pages are not a place for you to vent. Other editors, please be aware at Jayhammers, who on his user page says that Wikipedia pages are "run by feminist liars" and uses language such as "feminist misandrist man-haters" and "corrected lies by feminists" and "censorship by feminist sexists" in his edits on talk pages and in summaries. Some of his posts have been archived on this talk page; he has repeatedly used this talk page as a soapbox and as place to express his hatred for feminist organizations, for "anti-male laws" and so on, see (archive 4). Either this user abides by wikipedia rules (WP:SOAP, WP:NPOV, WP:CONS, WP:UNDUE, WP:RS, WP:CIVIL) or otherwise he should be blocked. Skydeepblue (talk) 03:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- Unassessed psychology articles
- Unknown-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- Unassessed Crime-related articles
- Unknown-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- C-Class sociology articles
- Mid-importance sociology articles
- C-Class Systems articles
- Mid-importance Systems articles
- Systems articles in systems psychology
- WikiProject Systems articles
- C-Class Gender studies articles
- Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
- WikiProject Gender studies articles
- C-Class medicine articles
- Mid-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages