User:Orlady/List: Difference between revisions
Recollapsed comments that I earlier collapsed for a valid reason but that Doncram later decided to uncollapse. Please note that this is MY user space, NOT Doncram's. |
|||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==Original set (started April 27, 2011)== |
==Original set (started April 27, 2011)== |
||
*[[Bigelow Rosenwald School]] {{done}} [[User:Ntsimp|Ntsimp]] ([[User talk:Ntsimp|talk]]) 14:58, 14 June 2011 (UTC) |
*[[Bigelow Rosenwald School]] {{done}} [[User:Ntsimp|Ntsimp]] ([[User talk:Ntsimp|talk]]) 14:58, 14 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
{{collapse top|title=Doncram's comments}} |
|||
::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bigelow_Rosenwald_School&oldid=293628914 This stub from June 2009 by me] was fine as a stub, correctly stating that it "is or was a [[Rosenwald School]]" and linking it to that Rosenwald School article, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rosenwald_School&action=historysubmit&diff=296264376&oldid=285040244 to which i added a link] to a new [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rosenwald_School_(disambiguation)&oldid=296571961 Rosenwald School disambiguation page] that i then created. The subsequent edits improved the article and established that the past tense usage was the more correct one. Original article was fine; improvements are fine too IMO. --[[User:doncram|<font color="maroon">do</font>]][[User talk:Doncram|<font color="green">ncr</font>]][[Special:Contributions/doncram|<font color="maroon">am</font>]] 15:52, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bigelow_Rosenwald_School&oldid=293628914 This stub from June 2009 by me] was fine as a stub, correctly stating that it "is or was a [[Rosenwald School]]" and linking it to that Rosenwald School article, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rosenwald_School&action=historysubmit&diff=296264376&oldid=285040244 to which i added a link] to a new [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rosenwald_School_(disambiguation)&oldid=296571961 Rosenwald School disambiguation page] that i then created. The subsequent edits improved the article and established that the past tense usage was the more correct one. Original article was fine; improvements are fine too IMO. --[[User:doncram|<font color="maroon">do</font>]][[User talk:Doncram|<font color="green">ncr</font>]][[Special:Contributions/doncram|<font color="maroon">am</font>]] 15:52, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
{{collapse bottom}} |
|||
*[[BOC Site]] {{done}} Elkman 27 April and [[User:Station1|Station1]] ([[User talk:Station1|talk]]) 02:14, 2 June 2011 (UTC) (btw, What does BOC mean?) |
*[[BOC Site]] {{done}} Elkman 27 April and [[User:Station1|Station1]] ([[User talk:Station1|talk]]) 02:14, 2 June 2011 (UTC) (btw, What does BOC mean?) |
||
::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BOC_Site&action=historysubmit&diff=432191934&oldid=406284241 Subsequent changes] from the version i started did not particularly improve the article, IMO. One editor removed mention that the site was Address Restricted, which I restored but then reverted because I found Elkman's generator (based on NRIS) did not document Address Restriction. However, just now checking my /draft version based on NRIS, i verify that the site is address restricted, and hence I re-added that to the article. Seems to me that article is okay, still not great because no one has obtained more specific information. --[[User:doncram|<font color="maroon">do</font>]][[User talk:Doncram|<font color="green">ncr</font>]][[Special:Contributions/doncram|<font color="maroon">am</font>]] 16:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BOC_Site&action=historysubmit&diff=432191934&oldid=406284241 Subsequent changes] from the version i started did not particularly improve the article, IMO. One editor removed mention that the site was Address Restricted, which I restored but then reverted because I found Elkman's generator (based on NRIS) did not document Address Restriction. However, just now checking my /draft version based on NRIS, i verify that the site is address restricted, and hence I re-added that to the article. Seems to me that article is okay, still not great because no one has obtained more specific information. --[[User:doncram|<font color="maroon">do</font>]][[User talk:Doncram|<font color="green">ncr</font>]][[Special:Contributions/doncram|<font color="maroon">am</font>]] 16:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
Line 29: | Line 31: | ||
::The changes after i edited it, in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BPOE_Lodge%3A_Golden_Block&action=historysubmit&diff=439304099&oldid=426775107 this diff], including changes within a commented out passage that have no effect on appearance of article, seem pretty insignificant to me. The changes amount to very minor formatting and changing one allcaps word to lowercase, which is fine but no big deal. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BPOE_Lodge:_Golden_Block&oldid=426775107 This version by me] was fine, IMO. It included a parenthetical question mark (?) about 1991 being the probable date of NRHP listing of the property, which the subsequent edits removed. 1991 is a pretty good guess by me of the date of NRHP listing, based on listings of other nearby properties, but the guesswork was properly identified by the question mark. It seems to me the article is worsened by the subsequent edit removing that without a source. --[[User:doncram|<font color="maroon">do</font>]][[User talk:Doncram|<font color="green">ncr</font>]][[Special:Contributions/doncram|<font color="maroon">am</font>]] 15:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
::The changes after i edited it, in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BPOE_Lodge%3A_Golden_Block&action=historysubmit&diff=439304099&oldid=426775107 this diff], including changes within a commented out passage that have no effect on appearance of article, seem pretty insignificant to me. The changes amount to very minor formatting and changing one allcaps word to lowercase, which is fine but no big deal. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BPOE_Lodge:_Golden_Block&oldid=426775107 This version by me] was fine, IMO. It included a parenthetical question mark (?) about 1991 being the probable date of NRHP listing of the property, which the subsequent edits removed. 1991 is a pretty good guess by me of the date of NRHP listing, based on listings of other nearby properties, but the guesswork was properly identified by the question mark. It seems to me the article is worsened by the subsequent edit removing that without a source. --[[User:doncram|<font color="maroon">do</font>]][[User talk:Doncram|<font color="green">ncr</font>]][[Special:Contributions/doncram|<font color="maroon">am</font>]] 15:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
*[[Building at 317 S. 3rd St.]] {{done}} [[User:Station1|Station1]] ([[User talk:Station1|talk]]) 18:12, 30 April 2011 (UTC) |
*[[Building at 317 S. 3rd St.]] {{done}} [[User:Station1|Station1]] ([[User talk:Station1|talk]]) 18:12, 30 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
{{collapse top|title=Doncram's comments}} |
|||
::Wording edits and addition of some information from the sources I had already linked, done by Station1, improved the article. Such further development is fine and good, thanks. --[[User:doncram|<font color="maroon">do</font>]][[User talk:Doncram|<font color="green">ncr</font>]] |
::Wording edits and addition of some information from the sources I had already linked, done by Station1, improved the article. Such further development is fine and good, thanks. --[[User:doncram|<font color="maroon">do</font>]][[User talk:Doncram|<font color="green">ncr</font>]] |
||
[[Special:Contributions/doncram|<font color="maroon">am</font>]] 15:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
{{collapse bottom}} |
|||
*[[Elisha Bushnell House]] {{done}} [[User:Ntsimp|Ntsimp]] ([[User talk:Ntsimp|talk]]) 19:48, 13 June 2011 (UTC) |
*[[Elisha Bushnell House]] {{done}} [[User:Ntsimp|Ntsimp]] ([[User talk:Ntsimp|talk]]) 19:48, 13 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
::Ntsimp's edit worked from the information i had provided in the article, and I will note preserved use of the quotation i had selected from the nom document. Sure, many articles in wikipedia, including many of these, can be improved by some editing and further development from the sources provided by a creating author. I don't see any big problem here. --[[User:doncram|<font color="maroon">do</font>]][[User talk:Doncram|<font color="green">ncr</font>]][[Special:Contributions/doncram|<font color="maroon">am</font>]] 15:53, 23 July 2011 (UTC) |
::Ntsimp's edit worked from the information i had provided in the article, and I will note preserved use of the quotation i had selected from the nom document. Sure, many articles in wikipedia, including many of these, can be improved by some editing and further development from the sources provided by a creating author. I don't see any big problem here. --[[User:doncram|<font color="maroon">do</font>]][[User talk:Doncram|<font color="green">ncr</font>]][[Special:Contributions/doncram|<font color="maroon">am</font>]] 15:53, 23 July 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:20, 24 July 2011
Discussion of the purpose of this list
|
---|
This list in Orlady's userspace is a list of articles edited by me, doncram, which she has identified in order to criticize them. Elkman, Station1, Ntsimp, Polaron, and Orlady have seen fit to revise some of these articles and mark some of them "done" here. I disagree in general with some of the criticism of these articles which has been expressed elsewhere, but I also agree that most of these articles, like most articles in Wikipedia, can indeed be improved. Some of the apparent focus has been upon removing statements that I believed to be accurate, but which were deliberately ambiguous, where more precise statements of fact were not possible to write. I definitely agree that replacing an ambiguous statement with a sourced statement of fact is an improvement. IMO, simply removing a sourced ambiguous statement is not necessarily an improvement. IMO, changing an ambiguous statement to a more confident but possibly false statement is not a help. If no one objects strenuously, i will give some specific comments about the articles as created or edited by me, and about subsequent changes to them. Hopefully this will help improve understanding of what my intentions were and will help improve the articles. --doncram 20:56, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
|
Original set (started April 27, 2011)
- Bigelow Rosenwald School Done Ntsimp (talk) 14:58, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Doncram's comments
|
---|
|
- BOC Site Done Elkman 27 April and Station1 (talk) 02:14, 2 June 2011 (UTC) (btw, What does BOC mean?)
- Subsequent changes from the version i started did not particularly improve the article, IMO. One editor removed mention that the site was Address Restricted, which I restored but then reverted because I found Elkman's generator (based on NRIS) did not document Address Restriction. However, just now checking my /draft version based on NRIS, i verify that the site is address restricted, and hence I re-added that to the article. Seems to me that article is okay, still not great because no one has obtained more specific information. --doncram 16:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Boyd Mill Ruins Done --Elkman (Elkspeak) 19:25, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- The version i created was fine as a stub, IMO, but Elkman's edit, adding more information from the linked document, definitely improved the article. I also just restored to the infobox the 2 dates of significance that had been in the "built=" field, using the now-available means to add "NRIS dates of significance: c.1840, c.1900", per "Sandboxed version" discussion at template talk Infobox NRHP. --doncram 16:12, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- BPOE Lodge: Golden Block Done several people (not me) contributed to cleaning this one up -- Orlady (talk) 19:02, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- The changes after i edited it, in this diff, including changes within a commented out passage that have no effect on appearance of article, seem pretty insignificant to me. The changes amount to very minor formatting and changing one allcaps word to lowercase, which is fine but no big deal. This version by me was fine, IMO. It included a parenthetical question mark (?) about 1991 being the probable date of NRHP listing of the property, which the subsequent edits removed. 1991 is a pretty good guess by me of the date of NRHP listing, based on listings of other nearby properties, but the guesswork was properly identified by the question mark. It seems to me the article is worsened by the subsequent edit removing that without a source. --doncram 15:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Building at 317 S. 3rd St. Done Station1 (talk) 18:12, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Doncram's comments
|
---|
am 15:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
- Elisha Bushnell House Done Ntsimp (talk) 19:48, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Ntsimp's edit worked from the information i had provided in the article, and I will note preserved use of the quotation i had selected from the nom document. Sure, many articles in wikipedia, including many of these, can be improved by some editing and further development from the sources provided by a creating author. I don't see any big problem here. --doncram 15:53, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- William S. Campbell House
- Canton Center Historic District Done Polaron
- Captain Nathan Hale Monument Done Ntsimp (talk) 16:03, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- Community Building (Princeton, Iowa)
- Curry House (Fort Adams, Mississippi)
- Dinnie Block
- Electric Construction Co. Building
- Grand Forks Woolen Mills Done Station1 (talk) 06:13, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- Gen. William Hart House Done Ntsimp (talk) 19:00, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- James Hazelton House
- John Hunter House (Franklin, Tennessee) Done Ntsimp (talk) 04:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- Keller House (Hazleton, Pennsylvania)
- Liberty Hill School (Liberty Hill, Tennessee) Done Orlady (talk) 00:57, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- David Lyman II House Done Station1 (talk) 07:54, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- Lyons Garage (Grand Forks, North Dakota) Done Station1 (talk) 06:13, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- I undid Station1's edit which oddly moved the NRHP document source to a "Further Reading" section, and continued developing the article back then. Also i restored Lyons Garage disambiguation which Station1 had then redirected. Orlady in this diff hurt the article, IMO, by rewording it to focus upon who used a quoted term and then adding a "by whom" tag. Orlady coulda jolly well have just looked at the source at the end of the paragraph and added the authors' names from the source at the end of the paragraph. I just now restored my version from before her edit, so as not to dwell upon whose words exactly they were. I think the article is fine again now. There would be other ways to write the article, but IMO there was no problem here. --doncram 16:42, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- This no longer qualifies as "done." I restored the "by whom" inline template because of the unattributed quotations. See WP:INTEXT for further discussion on the fact that quotations and opinions need to be attributed to somebody in the text of the article. --Orlady (talk) 18:21, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Among other edits, Orlady has repeatedly removed useful mention, now presented as an external link, of additional records about the site being available in a university archive. Terming this mention "trivia" does not convince me. If not in the wikipedia article on a historic site, then where else is it appropriate to mention where additional information is available. --doncram 15:49, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- This no longer qualifies as "done." I restored the "by whom" inline template because of the unattributed quotations. See WP:INTEXT for further discussion on the fact that quotations and opinions need to be attributed to somebody in the text of the article. --Orlady (talk) 18:21, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- I undid Station1's edit which oddly moved the NRHP document source to a "Further Reading" section, and continued developing the article back then. Also i restored Lyons Garage disambiguation which Station1 had then redirected. Orlady in this diff hurt the article, IMO, by rewording it to focus upon who used a quoted term and then adding a "by whom" tag. Orlady coulda jolly well have just looked at the source at the end of the paragraph and added the authors' names from the source at the end of the paragraph. I just now restored my version from before her edit, so as not to dwell upon whose words exactly they were. I think the article is fine again now. There would be other ways to write the article, but IMO there was no problem here. --doncram 16:42, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Metro South Historic District Done --Polaron
- Middletown Alms House Done Polaron and Orlady (talk) 00:56, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- Midway Bridge (Johnstown, North Dakota) Done - Station1 (talk) 20:39, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company Done - already redirected.
- If this is supposed to be evidence of something nefarious about me, i don't get it. In this edit, with edit summary "start stub article, perhaps to be redirected as there should be one about this co", i started a temporary stub, with explicit invitation that it should be redirected if an appropriate target could be found. The stub is an appropriate complement to Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Building (disambiguation), a needed disambiguation page. The fact that the stub has since been redirected is fine, is what i sought. --doncram 16:04, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Noel Owen Neal House
- Oak Lodge
- Old Town Hall (Chester, Connecticut) Done Polaron
- Rapallo Viaduct Done Choess
- Red River Bridge (Arkansas)
- Red River Valley Brick Co.
- St. Luke's Methodist Church (Monticello, Iowa)
- St. Michael's Church (Grand Forks, North Dakota) Done
- Sharpe's Trout Hatchery Site
- Town Farms Inn
- William Tully House
- Valley Falls Cotton Mill Site Done Station1 (talk) 02:14, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- Villa Bella Vista
- William Ward Jr. House
- Washington School (Grand Forks, North Dakota)
- Winstead House (Franklin, Tennessee) Done Orlady (talk) 19:20, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- Wright Block
Additional entries
- John F. Cance House - Article looks fine. I think Orlady identified it here as a problem because it includes accurate statement that it "was built, or had other significant date, in 1908", and she, like me too, would prefer a more precise statement. There is decent development already from an MRA document; the article could be improved if someone obtained the individual NRHP nomination form. Seems to me like an error to have identified this as a problem in any way. --doncram 15:25, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Samuel Eliot House
- Carlott Funseth Round Barn
- William W. Johnson House - I tried to fix one of the issues with this one once, but I was reverted.-Orlady. Now Done Station1 (talk) 08:10, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thomas Lyman House Done Station1 (talk) 07:54, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- Madison Elementary School (Davenport, Iowa)
- St. Michael's Hospital and Nurses' Residence
New set (includes some duplicates)
Based on a search for "has other significance," 7 June 2011:
- For context about this article, see Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Scott County, Iowa#Development. This article was created as a demonstration to local editors who were already creating articles, this specific article was a demo showing what could be done easily using the NRIS info, and hopefully would have more added to it by them. They have not. But the article is fully sourced and is accurate and has even been locally reviewed. I don't see a problem here. --doncram 17:30, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Atwater Manufacturing Company
- Edward S. Barrows House Done - Station1 (talk) 20:23, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Beasley-Parham House Done - Station1 (talk) 20:23, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Boyd Mill Ruinshandled above- William Boyd House Done - Station1 (talk) 20:23, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Boyd-Wilson Farm Done - Station1 (talk) 20:23, 23 July 2011 (UTC) (Note: It's possible these 3 Boyd article should be merged, but it requires some research)
- BPOE Lodge: Golden Block
- Spencer Buford House
- Building at 201 S. 3rd St.
- Elisha Bushnell House
- William S. Campbell House
- Captain Nathan Hale Monument
- Cedarmont
- James E. Collins House
- Community Building (Princeton, Iowa)
- Cox House (Franklin, Tennessee)
- John Crafton House
- Craig-Beasley House
- Andrew Crockett House
- Amasa Day House
- Doane's Sawmill/Deep River Manufacturing Company
- Jedidiah Dudley House
- Electric Construction Co. Building
- Samuel Eliot House
- Emmanuel Church (Newport, Rhode Island) partially Done, I couldn't figure out what the 1912 date was for.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:29, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- First National Bank (Grand Forks, North Dakota)
- Glen Echo (Franklin, Tennessee)
- Sherwood Green House
- Hamilton-Brown House
- Franklin Hardeman House
- Gen. William Hart House
- James Hazelton House
- John Herbert House
- James Holes House
- John Hunter House (Franklin, Tennessee)
- Hartwell B. Hyde House
- Newton Jordan House
- Jordan-Williams House
- J. Nelson Kelly House
- Lay-Pritchett House
- Daniel and Mary Lee House
- Madison Elementary School (Davenport, Iowa)
- Mansfield Center Historic District
- Mansfield Hollow Dam Done merged with Mansfield Hollow Lake -- Polaron (talk · contribs)
- McGavock-Gaines House
- Minterburn Mill
- Monroe Elementary School (Davenport, Iowa)
- Montana Governor's Residence
- Oak Lodge
- Owen-Cox House
- Owen-Primm House
- Nicholas Tate Perkins House
- Henry Pointer House
- George Pollard House
- Augustus Post House
- Red River Valley Brick Co.
- St. Luke's Methodist Church (Monticello, Iowa)
- St. Michael's Hospital and Nurses' Residence
- The Seaside (Waterford, Connecticut)
- Sharpe's Trout Hatchery Site
- Alexander Smith House (Brentwood, Tennessee)
- Southern Thames Historic District
- Town Farms Inn
- William Tully House
- Villa Bella Vista
- Warner House (East Haddam, Connecticut) Orlady edited the article to remove an incomplete date from a source (I had put in the authors' names but omitted to complete out the date of preparation), and to move one sentence, in this edit. I don't think that particularly helped. Why not just enter the date, from the linked source document? I have added the date, and otherwise edited the article slightly to remove some ambiguity. IMO, the article was fine before being identified here as some kind of problem, and it is now slightly improved. --doncram 20:56, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- Jonathan Warner House
- Washington Street Historic District (Middletown, Connecticut)
- Ambrose Whittlesey House
- James Wilhoite House
- R. C. Williams Warehouse Done - Station1 (talk) 22:52, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Wyatt Hall (Franklin, Tennessee)
Another new set
These are based on a search for "designed and/or" on June 13, 2011. I tried to avoid duplications and I did not include some articles that appeared otherwise to be in reasonably good shape.
- Ned Ashton House Done --Orlady (talk) 19:59, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- 1916 Buffalo High School
- Burlington Northern Depot (Amenia, North Dakota)
- Caldwell Odd Fellow Home for the Aged
- John F. Cance House
- Carver High School (Phoenix, Arizona)
- Chapman Creek Pratt Truss Bridge
- Congregation Knesseth Israel (Ellington, Connecticut) Done--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:55, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- ECS Bridge over Big Goose Creek
- Edwin Fitch
- Fremont Mill Bridge
- Kingfisher Post Office
- Massillon Bridge Company
- Niantic River Bridge - revised in this edit by Polaron to remove "and/or", so statement is now that bridge was designed and built by the named firm. This is not specifically supported by any reference. If you all prefer confident statements of possibly false information, then you should cross this off your list. I prefer the accurate "and/or" wording until specific sourcing is found for a more precise statement. --doncram 20:56, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- Shallcross (Anchorage, Kentucky)
- Stouts Mill Bridge
- Strathglass Park District -
I'd like to userfy this one. I can't see anything here that's worth keeping in article space. --Orlady (talk) 20:03, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Converted to redirect, pointing to Rumford, Maine, which had extensive info about this area as a key part of the history of the small town. --Orlady (talk) 20:17, 13 June 2011 (UTC) - University of Connecticut Historic District-Connecticut Agricultural School
- White House of the Chickasaws
- Williams and Stancliff Octagon Houses
- Wilson Pratt Truss Bridge
- Wisconsin Consistory Building
Excessive use of quotations
- George A. Berlinghof - I think the use of quotation was fine, but have edited it down anyhow. --doncram 21:03, 15 July 2011 (UTC) Done (checkmark annotation added Orlady (talk) 02:11, 16 July 2011 (UTC))
- Thomas L. Critz House
- Andrew Crockett House
- Ellington Center Historic District
- Fargo City Detention Hospital - The article, in this version as edited by me includes a quotation, which I think is fine. The article could be edited differently, but I see no problem with it as it is. --doncram 21:03, 15 July 2011 (UTC) I continue to see serious problems with that quotation. It's a 5-sentence quotation that makes up roughly half of the article. The quotation is a collection of factual statements; it does not convey someone's opinion or other "flavor" that would possibly justify use of a quotation. --Orlady (talk) 02:11, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Georgetown Historic District (Georgetown, Connecticut)
- Goshen Historic District (Goshen, Connecticut)
- Graniteville Historic District (Waterford, Connecticut)
- Sherwood Green House
- Hartwell B. Hyde House
- Jules Leffland
- Moolah Temple
- Northwood Bridge
- Mordecai Puryear House
- Quaker Hill Historic District (Waterford, Connecticut)
- Ridgefield Center Historic District
- Roper's Knob Fortifications
- John W. Ross (Iowa architect)
- Eleazer Williams House
- Charles L. Thompson