Progressive utilization theory: Difference between revisions
Trying to improve an article under construction. |
m fixed formatting error |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{undue|date=March 2013}} |
{{undue|date=March 2013}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
'''Progressive Utilization Theory''', also known by the acronym '''PROUT''', is a [[philosophical theory]] of [[socioeconomic]] and [[sociopolitical|political]] ideas propounded by Indian philosopher and spiritual leader [[Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar]].<ref name=Crovetto2008>{{cite journal|last=Crovetto|first=Helen|title=Ananda Marga and the Use of Force|journal=Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions|year=2008|month=August|volume=12|issue=1|pages=26-56|doi=10.1525/nr.2008.12.1.toc|url=http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.1525/nr.2008.12.1.26?uid=3739560&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21101697959937|accessdate=January 23, 2013|publisher=University of California Press}}</ref> <ref name=Crovetto2011>{{cite book|last=Crovetto|first=Helen|editor1-first=James R.|editor1-last=Lewis|editor1-link=James R. Lewis (scholar)|title=Violence and New Religious Movements|year=2011|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=New York|isbn=9780199735631|pages=9, 258-263|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=5CqS3ILwnmsC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false|accessdate=January 19, 2013|chapter=Ananda Marga, PROUT, and the Use of Force|chapterurl=http://books.google.com/books?id=5CqS3ILwnmsC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA249#v=onepage&q&f=false}}</ref> Considered<sup>[by whom]</sup> an integral part of [[Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar#Spiritual _philosophy|his spiritual philosophy]],<ref name=Crovetto2008/> Sarkar formulated the theory of his [[Ananda Marga]] movement |
'''Progressive Utilization Theory''', also known by the acronym '''PROUT''', is a [[philosophical theory]] of [[socioeconomic]] and [[sociopolitical|political]] ideas propounded by Indian philosopher and spiritual leader [[Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar]].<ref name=Crovetto2008>{{cite journal|last=Crovetto|first=Helen|title=Ananda Marga and the Use of Force|journal=Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions|year=2008|month=August|volume=12|issue=1|pages=26-56|doi=10.1525/nr.2008.12.1.toc|url=http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.1525/nr.2008.12.1.26?uid=3739560&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21101697959937|accessdate=January 23, 2013|publisher=University of California Press}}</ref> <ref name=Crovetto2011>{{cite book|last=Crovetto|first=Helen|editor1-first=James R.|editor1-last=Lewis|editor1-link=James R. Lewis (scholar)|title=Violence and New Religious Movements|year=2011|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=New York|isbn=9780199735631|pages=9, 258-263|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=5CqS3ILwnmsC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false|accessdate=January 19, 2013|chapter=Ananda Marga, PROUT, and the Use of Force|chapterurl=http://books.google.com/books?id=5CqS3ILwnmsC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA249#v=onepage&q&f=false}}</ref> Considered<sup>[by whom]</sup> an integral part of [[Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar#Spiritual _philosophy|his spiritual philosophy]],<ref name=Crovetto2008/> Sarkar formulated the theory of his [[Ananda Marga]] movement in 1959<ref name=Hayden>{{cite book|last1=Hayden|first1=Jeffrey K.|authorlink1=|last2=An|first2=Angela|authorlink2=|editor1-first=J. Gordon|editor1-last=Melton|editor1-link=J. Gordon Melton|editor2-first=Martin|editor2-last=Baumann|editor2-link=|title=Religions of the World, Second Edition: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Beliefs and Practices|year=2010|publisher=ABC-CLIO, Inc.|location=Santa Barbara, California|isbn=9781598842043|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=v2yiyLLOj88C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false|edition=2nd|accessdate=January 19, 2013|page=105|chapter=Ananda Marga Yoga Society|chapterurl=http://books.google.com/books?id=v2yiyLLOj88C&lpg=PP1&pg=PA105#v=onepage&q&f=false}}</ref><ref name=Irving>{{cite book|last1=Irving|first1=Terry|authorlink1=|last2=Cahill|first2=Rowan J.|authorlink2=Rowan Cahill|title=Radical Sydney: Places, Portraits and Unruly Episodes|year=2010|publisher=University of New South Wales Press Ltd|location=Sydney|isbn=9781742230931|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=fm1sh48vld0C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false|accessdate=January 19, 2013|page=316|chapter=The Conspiracy Against Ananda Marga|chapterurl=http://books.google.com/books?id=fm1sh48vld0C&lpg=PP1&pg=PA316#v=onepage&q&f=false}}</ref> and summarized<sup>[too early for a summary... more accurately, formalize]</sup> it in the fifth chapter of his influential work ''[[Ananda Sutram]]''.<ref name=Crovetto2011/> <ref name=Irving/> |
||
==Opinions of others== |
==Opinions of others== |
Revision as of 06:13, 20 March 2013
This article or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this article or section has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use.
This article was last edited by Abhidevananda (talk | contribs) 11 years ago. (Update timer) |
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Progressive Utilization Theory, also known by the acronym PROUT, is a philosophical theory of socioeconomic and political ideas propounded by Indian philosopher and spiritual leader Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar.[1] [2] Considered[by whom] an integral part of his spiritual philosophy,[1] Sarkar formulated the theory of his Ananda Marga movement in 1959[3][4] and summarized[too early for a summary... more accurately, formalize] it in the fifth chapter of his influential work Ananda Sutram.[2] [4]
Opinions of others
This section may need to be rewritten to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards. |
According to a description by Terry Irving and Rowan Cahill, PROUT "envisages a decentralized, community-based world economy of self-sufficiency for the poor; economic democracy; small business; and limits on the accumulation of wealth."[4] Sohail Inayatullah stated that the philosophy "attempts to balance the need for societies to create wealth and grow with the requirements for distribution."[5] David Skrbina characterized PROUT as a "model of social development... which advocates a 'small is beautiful' approach to society."[6] Economics instructor Mark Friedman places Sarkar's economic thought in the tradition of Monsignor John Ryan, E.F. Schumacher and Herman Daly in Sarkar's incorporation of spiritual values into economic goals.[7]
Sarkar positioned[positioned what?] as an alternative to communism and capitalism.[4] It has been characterized as a form of "progressive socialism"[8] as well as a "socialist theory".[1] PROUT recognizes all material goods[what about non-material goods?] as common property and seeks the rational and equitable distribution of that property to maximize the physical, mental, and spiritual development[how do material goods "maximize" spiritual development?] of all people[Is PROUT only concerned with people?].[1][9] It seeks to guarantee what it recognizes as the five minimum requirements of life for human beings: food, clothing, shelter, education, and medical care.[Does it not want to guarantee anything more than that?][1]
PROUT describes a social order consisting of four classes of people[This is not what Sarkar was talking about with his concept of "varna".] that cyclically dominate society: sudras (labourers), ksatriyas (military–minded individuals), vipra (intellectuals) and vaisyas (capitalists).[2] To prevent any social class[What is PROUT's concept of a social class?] from clinging to political power and exploiting the others, he proposed the concept of "spiritual elite" sadvipras (etymologically sad – true, vipra – intellectual) who would determine who held political leadership.[2] Sarkar thought that the first sadvipras would be created[Created how?] from disgruntled middle class intellectuals and military-minded people[Are the military-minded people also disgruntled?].[2] He called for[When and in which way did Sarkar call for this?] sadvipras to be organized into executive, legislative, and judicial boards which would be governed by a Supreme Board.[2] They, according to Sarkar, would be responsible for the application of force necessary to change the order of dominance[What does that mean?] within the social order, with large amounts of force[Did Sarkar not see any other way for social change?] akin to revolution.[2]
PROUT's economic model[Is there anything more to the economic model besides industrial structure?] advocates a three-tiered approach to industrial organization where key industries or public utilities are non–profit[Managed by whom?], a decentralized industry[What about farming?] run by sociolinguistic unions[Are these like trade unions?] provide people's bare minimum necessities, and most of the economic transactions are through producers' and consumers' cooperatives[vague - needs amplification].[2] It distinguishes itself from communism by proposing an incentive based economy[Are there no incentives under communism, and is this the only distinction?] where surplus in the society is distributed to people who serve the society.[2]
At the political level, PROUT rejects nationalism[does this mean that there would be no nations and no national governments under PROUT?] and seeks the formation of a world government.[2][5] Sarkar also supported the concept of a world army.[may need more context][2]
Cooperative communities have been established by Ananda Marga in an attempt to provide ideal models for the society outlined in PROUT.[8] A few intellectuals support the philosophy, but it has not achieved widespread implementation.[10]
Criticism
Professor Narasingha P. Sil describes Sarkar's ideas of the social cycles that underlie PROUT as having "little originality or historical validity", having been derived "with some feeble adjustments" from traditional Hindu caste structure.[11] Ravi Batra used the[all or some, accurately or inaccurately?] ideas in PROUT in his book The Great Depression of 1990. In reviewing the book for the Los Angeles Times, economist Paul Erdman described the work as "a strange mixture of voodoo historical theories and sound economic analysis"[Is this a criticism of PROUT or a criticism of Ravi Batra's book? And does it mean that a professional economist agreed with PROUT's economics but took exception with PROUT's theory of history?].[12]
See also
References
- ^ a b c d e Crovetto, Helen (2008). "Ananda Marga and the Use of Force". Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions. 12 (1). University of California Press: 26–56. doi:10.1525/nr.2008.12.1.toc. Retrieved January 23, 2013.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Crovetto, Helen (2011). "Ananda Marga, PROUT, and the Use of Force". In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Violence and New Religious Movements. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 9, 258–263. ISBN 9780199735631. Retrieved January 19, 2013.
{{cite book}}
: External link in
(help); Unknown parameter|chapterurl=
|chapterurl=
ignored (|chapter-url=
suggested) (help) - ^ Hayden, Jeffrey K.; An, Angela (2010). "Ananda Marga Yoga Society". In Melton, J. Gordon; Baumann, Martin (eds.). Religions of the World, Second Edition: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Beliefs and Practices (2nd ed.). Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, Inc. p. 105. ISBN 9781598842043. Retrieved January 19, 2013.
{{cite book}}
: External link in
(help); Unknown parameter|chapterurl=
|chapterurl=
ignored (|chapter-url=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b c d Irving, Terry; Cahill, Rowan J. (2010). "The Conspiracy Against Ananda Marga". Radical Sydney: Places, Portraits and Unruly Episodes. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press Ltd. p. 316. ISBN 9781742230931. Retrieved January 19, 2013.
{{cite book}}
: External link in
(help); Unknown parameter|chapterurl=
|chapterurl=
ignored (|chapter-url=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b Inayatullah, Sohail (2003). "Planetary Social and Spiritual Transformation: P. R. Sarkar's Eutopian Vision of the Futurechapter". In Shostak, Arthur B. (ed.). Viable Utopian Ideas: Shaping a Better World. New York: M. E. Sharpe, Inc. pp. 208–216. ISBN 9780765611055. Retrieved January 19, 2013.
{{cite book}}
: External link in
(help); Unknown parameter|chapterurl=
|chapterurl=
ignored (|chapter-url=
suggested) (help) - ^ Skrbina, David (1992). "NEO-HUMANIST ECOLOGY by Acarya Avadhuta". International Journal on World Peace. 9 (2): 96.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ Template:Cite article
- ^ a b Ellwood, Robert S. (1993). "Appendix 2: The 1960s and After". Islands of the Dawn: The Story of Alternative Spirituality in New Zealand. University of Hawaii Press. p. 230. ISBN 9780824814878. Retrieved January 12, 2013.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|chapterrul=
ignored (help) - ^ Onwuka, Ralph I. (1985). The OAU/ECA Lagos Plan of Action and Beyond. Lawrenceville, Virginia: Brunswick Publishing. p. 185. ISBN 9780931494581.
The main question however is not who owns the property (the individual or the state), since in PROUT the universe is our common patrimony, but how the property is rationally and equitably utilized.
{{cite book}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help)[This quote goes well beyond what is stated in the text.] - ^ Jones, Constance A.; Ryan, James D. (2007). "PROUT (est. 1959)". In Melton, J. Gordon (ed.). Encyclopedia of Hinduism. Encyclopedia of World Religions. New York: Infobase Publishing. p. 335. ISBN 9780816075645. Retrieved January 19, 2013.
{{cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|1=
(help); External link in
(help); Unknown parameter|chapterurl=
|chapterurl=
ignored (|chapter-url=
suggested) (help) - ^ Template:Cite article
- ^ Erdman, Paul (August 16, 1987). "(Review) The Great Depression of 1990". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved January 30, 2013.
This article needs additional or more specific categories. (March 2013) |