Reproducibility: Difference between revisions
reproducibility vs repeatability. Variations in measurements is 'repeatability' |
update cold fusion story |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Reproducibility''' is one of the main principles of the [[scientific method]], and refers to the ability of a test or [[experiment]] to be accurately reproduced, or ''replicated'', by someone else working |
'''Reproducibility''' is one of the main principles of the [[scientific method]], and refers to the ability of a test or [[experiment]] to be accurately reproduced, or ''replicated'', by someone else working independently. The term is very closely related to the concept of [[testability]] and, depending on the particular [[science|field]], may require the test or experiment to be [[falsifiable]]. |
||
Reproducibility is different from [[repeatability]], which measures the success rate in successive experiments, possibly conducted by the same experimenters. While repeatability of scientific experiments is desirable, it is not considered necessary to establish the scientific validity of a theory. For example, the [[cloning]] of animals is difficult to repeat, but has been reproduced by various teams, and is a well established research domain. One failed cloning does not mean that the theory is wrong. |
Reproducibility is different from [[repeatability]], which measures the success rate in successive experiments, possibly conducted by the same experimenters. While repeatability of scientific experiments is desirable, it is not considered necessary to establish the scientific validity of a theory. For example, the [[cloning]] of animals is difficult to repeat, but has been reproduced by various teams working independently, and is a well established research domain. One failed cloning does not mean that the theory is wrong or unscientific. Repeatability is often low in [[protoscience]]s. |
||
The results of an experiment performed by a particular [[research]]er or group of researchers are generally evaluated by other independent researchers by reproducing the original experiment. They repeat the same experiment themselves, based on the original experimental description, and see if their experiment gives similar results to those reported by the original group. The result values are said to be ''commensurate'' if they are obtained (in distinct experimental trials) according to the same reproducible experimental description and procedure. |
The results of an experiment performed by a particular [[research]]er or group of researchers are generally evaluated by other independent researchers by reproducing the original experiment. They repeat the same experiment themselves, based on the original experimental description, and see if their experiment gives similar results to those reported by the original group. The result values are said to be ''commensurate'' if they are obtained (in distinct experimental trials) according to the same reproducible experimental description and procedure. |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Famous problems== |
==Famous problems== |
||
: ''See main article at [[Cold Fusion]]'' |
: ''See main article at [[Cold Fusion]]'' |
||
In March 1989, [[University of Utah]] chemists Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann reported the production of excess heat that could only be explained by a nuclear process. The report was astounding given the simplicity of the equipment: it was essentially an [[electrolysis]] cell containing [[heavy water]] and a [[palladium]] [[cathode]] which rapidly absorbed the [[deuterium]] produced during electrolysis. The newsmedia reported on the experiments widely, and it was a front-page item on many newspapers around the world. Over the next several months others tried to replicate the experiment, but were unsuccessful. At the end of May the US Energy Research Advisory Board found the evidence to be unconvincing, and cold fusion was dismissed as [[pseudoscience]]. Later on, successful replications by independent teams were reported in peer reviewed scientific journals, and, although the effect is not considered fully repeatable, the field eventually gained some scientific recognition. |
|||
: ''See main article at [[Wilhelm Reich]]'' |
: ''See main article at [[Wilhelm Reich]]'' |
||
Revision as of 18:09, 25 November 2006
Reproducibility is one of the main principles of the scientific method, and refers to the ability of a test or experiment to be accurately reproduced, or replicated, by someone else working independently. The term is very closely related to the concept of testability and, depending on the particular field, may require the test or experiment to be falsifiable.
Reproducibility is different from repeatability, which measures the success rate in successive experiments, possibly conducted by the same experimenters. While repeatability of scientific experiments is desirable, it is not considered necessary to establish the scientific validity of a theory. For example, the cloning of animals is difficult to repeat, but has been reproduced by various teams working independently, and is a well established research domain. One failed cloning does not mean that the theory is wrong or unscientific. Repeatability is often low in protosciences.
The results of an experiment performed by a particular researcher or group of researchers are generally evaluated by other independent researchers by reproducing the original experiment. They repeat the same experiment themselves, based on the original experimental description, and see if their experiment gives similar results to those reported by the original group. The result values are said to be commensurate if they are obtained (in distinct experimental trials) according to the same reproducible experimental description and procedure.
The basic idea can be seen in Aristotle's dictum that there is no scientific knowledge of the individual, where the word used for individual in Greek had the connotation of the idiosyncratic, or wholly isolated occurrence. Thus all knowledge, all science, necessarily involves the formation of general concepts and the invocation of their corresponding symbols in language (cf. Turner).
Famous problems
- See main article at Cold Fusion
In March 1989, University of Utah chemists Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann reported the production of excess heat that could only be explained by a nuclear process. The report was astounding given the simplicity of the equipment: it was essentially an electrolysis cell containing heavy water and a palladium cathode which rapidly absorbed the deuterium produced during electrolysis. The newsmedia reported on the experiments widely, and it was a front-page item on many newspapers around the world. Over the next several months others tried to replicate the experiment, but were unsuccessful. At the end of May the US Energy Research Advisory Board found the evidence to be unconvincing, and cold fusion was dismissed as pseudoscience. Later on, successful replications by independent teams were reported in peer reviewed scientific journals, and, although the effect is not considered fully repeatable, the field eventually gained some scientific recognition.
- See main article at Wilhelm Reich
In the 1930's the German scientist Wilhelm Reich claimed to have discovered a physical energy he called "orgone," and which he said existed in the atmosphere and in all living matter. He developed instruments to detect and harness this energy that he said could be used to treat illness or control the weather. His views were not accepted by the mainstream scientific community; in fact, he was villified for his claims. In the early 1940's Reich encouraged Albert Einstein to test an orgone accumulator, which Einstein did, but he disagreed on the interpretation of the results. In 2001, Canadian researchers Paulo Correa and Alexandra Correa claimed to have successfully reproduced the experiment.
- See main article at Nikola Tesla
Nikola Tesla claimed as early as 1899 to have used a high frequency current to light gas-filled lamps from over 25 miles away without using wires. In 1904 he built Wardenclyffe Tower on Long Island to demonstrate means to send and receive power without connecting wires. The facility was never fully operational and was not completed, supposedly due to economic problems. Tesla's experiments have never been replicated.
See also
|
|
References
- Turner, William (1903), History of Philosophy, Ginn and Company, Boston, MA, Etext. See especially: "Aristotle".